How does that take a month to fix?
It could be a case of just not having the man-hours to do it. I'd imagine they're focused on Amonkhet at this point.How does that take a month to fix?
I like to imagine Wizards being so daft that they think they can build a software program using physical objects. Like trying to photoshop by using a bag of rice and glue.Pretty sure it's built by unpaid interns using popsicle sticks and glue.
It could be a case of just not having the man-hours to do it. I'd imagine they're focused on Amonkhet at this point.
I'm more interested about what in the underlying systems makes it require any work at all. I'd think pauper legality (or legality in any format, for that matter, but especially rarity-based ones), would be exclusive rather than inclusive. Commons should be legal in the format by default unless specifically banned or excluded.
I like to imagine Wizards being so daft that they think they can build a software program using physical objects. Like trying to photoshop by using a bag of rice and glue.
The whole of MTGO is a pile of spaghetti code, as evidenced by their implementation of the Theros Archetypes and how they were coded into the game. I haven't done much coding in a long time, but their solution of hard coding it makes no sense.
During one of the betas there were 3 evolving wilds available and only 1 of them didn't work. Each art is its card on MODOThe thing that's stuck out to me, more than anything, was the foil version of a card was bugged (functionallythe card didn't work as intended), but the non-foil version worked just fine. Instead of foiling being a boolean that toggles a graphical affect on a player's specific card, it seems like foil/non-foil cards are treated as separate entities entirely.
This makes absolutely no sense from a databasing/coding perspective, and hints and how twirly and twisted the spaghetti code really is.
I mean, even if they have to flag them as pauper legal one by one it shouldn't take more than an hour for a single person to do that.
The thing that's stuck out to me, more than anything, was the foil version of a card was bugged (functionallythe card didn't work as intended), but the non-foil version worked just fine. Instead of foiling being a boolean that toggles a graphical affect on a player's specific card, it seems like foil/non-foil cards are treated as separate entities entirely.
This makes absolutely no sense from a databasing/coding perspective, and hints and how twirly and twisted the spaghetti code really is.
During one of the betas there were 3 evolving wilds available and only 1 of them didn't work. Each art is its card on MODO
Apparently, people seem to think it has something to do with leagues. I don't use MTGO, so I don't know all the specifics on how they handle leagues, but I thought that leagues were starting and stopping all the time. If leagues run for specific dates, then it does make some sense; you don't want to make new cards legal in the middle of the league.I mean, even if they have to flag them as pauper legal one by one it shouldn't take more than an hour for a single person to do that.
Yeah, let's be a little bit fair to the current MTGO team: they're working on a backend codebase that's fifteen years old, which they've never been given the opportunity to rebuild top-to-bottom for modern purposes despite the length of time involved. Anyone who's ever worked on a legacy codebase like that knows the kind of horrible bullshit you have to do just to keep the lights on after a certain point, and how little individual developers (even working together) can really do to fix it.
Ultimately the problem is that the backend is not designed to do what it needs to do in 2017, and the only functional solution is to build something new -- which is exactly why they're building something like this from scratch now.
Apparently, people seem to think it has something to do with leagues. I don't use MTGO, so I don't know all the specifics on how they handle leagues, but I thought that leagues were starting and stopping all the time. If leagues run for specific dates, then it does make some sense; you don't want to make new cards legal in the middle of the league.
Oh my god even when I login to my account there's literally no way to contact them.This probably doesn't apply to most of you, but WotC is updating their online systems (lol) and merging DCI and Wizards stuff. I assume most everyone here has DCI numbers. But if you want to check your planeswalker points in the future but currently don't, it would be good idea to set that up.
http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/news/keep-your-dciwizards-account-date-2017-03-21
For Pauper players
MTGO be more complex than NASA mission control...
Oh my god even when I login to my account there's literally no way to contact them.
For Pauper players
MTGO be more complex than NASA mission control...
I...I really want to know how MTGO is programmed
Apparently, people seem to think it has something to do with leagues.
dammit I want to make a Triskaidecaphobia modern deck
but it's going to be a Decaphobia deck too (Hidetsugu's Second Rite). Basically watch ya neck when you at 13 or 10.
In the world of fetches and Death's Shadow, where people purposefully drain their own life in a variety of ways?
For Pauper players
MTGO be more complex than NASA mission control...
Snap gets new art after so many years
Great article by John Dale Beety summing up all of Nicol Bolas' story so far, ready in time for Amonkhet.
http://www.starcitygames.com/article/34779_ReintroducingNicol-Bolas.html
Good recap.
They are gonna get fucked up.
Do you think it's worth buying 2 or 3 playsets of Ajani Unyielding as a spec? It's down to $3, and I remember people being hyped on him at reveal. He's obviously not playable in the current standard, but i'd be buying him as a post-rotation spec, or a long term casual spec if that doesn't work out
If Chandra could defeat the Eldrazi titans by lighting them on fire, I'm sure WotC will find some way to jump the shark and have the Gatewatch overcome Bolas. Liliana will probably absorb the power of the Chain Veil and become a mega-Planeswalker or Urza-reborn or something and everything will be hunky dory after that.
We have Ajani/Obi-Wan warning them not to take Bolas lightly and urging that them to recruit more allies before heading in, they're on Bolas' home turf and don't even have the slightest idea what his grand schemes are, and the second set is literally titled Hour of Devastation.
They're losing this fight.
Besides Nissa dyingWith no real consequences of course.
Please.If Chandra could defeat the Eldrazi titans by lighting them on fire, I'm sure WotC will find some way to jump the shark and have the Gatewatch overcome Bolas. Liliana will probably absorb the power of the Chain Veil and become a mega-Planeswalker or Urza-reborn or something and everything will be hunky dory after that.
Please.
The Eldrazi are just dumb kaiju. Bolas is going to outsmart them all.
Besides Nissa dying
Maybe the planeswalker in question is named Wit. Did you ever think about that?So smart, with that typo on the card.
Yes I blame Bolas for it. You should too.
Maybe the planeswalker in question is named Wit. Did you ever think about that?
Maybe the planeswalker in question is named Wit. Did you ever think about that?
Besides Nissa dying
Besides Nissa dying
Then they'll have to go back to Zendikar to revive her.
I thought Urza is green now.With the game's struggles to attract women, there's no way they're killing off a female Planeswalker who they've spent several years retconning into a new personality. (Especially with no Green Planeswalker waiting to fill the voidassuming Garruk is G/B now, and not really Gatewatch material.)
I thought Urza is green now.