The Technomancer
card-carrying scientician
Flashback effects are always playable. Split cards are usually playable. Flashback split cards were definitely going to be playable
So gearhulk was the card dominating standard. Not Gideon who has been in every pro tour final since his release. Nor the 13 power minslaver or the artifact that lets you play it turn 4. Or the vehicle that was in every deck. Or the insta win combo.Before any of the current bannings I felt gearhulk should have been banned. But...6 mana, you would think that people shouldn't be able to get there fast enough. I'm not actually sure anymore.
I've said from the beginning that people were really underestimating them. Cut // Ribbons specially, that cards will be very frustrating to play against. Having that inevitability in the graveyard for free is going to make stalemates go away fast.
I asked this before did anyone in this thread actually underrate aftermath? All I remember is complaining about the design.
I asked this before did anyone in this thread actually underrate aftermath?
I don't actually think anyone in here really did, I was more thinking of the broader community (and especially a notably bad post by SaffronOlive.)
Well, yeah, it's not unbeatable. Even Eldrazi in the Eldrazi Winter was beatable, but the deck is definitely warping the format around it (People are maindecking relics and condemn for example) and it's far and away the best deck. I think it would be probably fine in the long run but going by previous behaviours I think it'll eat a ban before the end of the summer (probably street wraith or shadow itself).
There's also a truly terrible article about Cut // Ribbons by Frank Lepore where he calls the card so bad that's insulting.
Cut/Ribbons at uncommon would NOT BE OK.One of the weird common threads of this and the SaffronOlive article is offense that these cards are rare, which I suspect is another factor driving people to subconsciously underrate them.
Frank Lepore doesn't impress me with his insight. I don't like that he replaced Cheon on magic tv.There's also a truly terrible article about Cut // Ribbons by Frank Lepore where he calls the card so bad that's insulting.
https://www.channelfireball.com/articles/cut-ribbons-and-gideon-of-the-trials/
I asked this before did anyone in this thread actually underrate aftermath? All I remember is complaining about the design.
Frank Lepore doesn't impress me with his insight. I don't like that he replaced Cheon on magic tv.
We just haven't had instant/sorcery splits before.
The split card rules are still really broken and dumb.
Believe! Good luck getting that 1 last win!Eyyyy Projared is here!
Efro, Sutcliffe, Ken W, Shuhei Nakamura, BDM, bbd....
I'm (5-3)!
One more!
But he wears a suit when he plays Magic! A suit!
Cut to Ribbons is an insultingly good Limited card.
The latest LR cast was actually really negative about this limited format, which surprised me. Usually the guys are more forgiving up front, but neither of them seem to like it very much at the moment.
Frank Lepore doesn't impress me with his insight. I don't like that he replaced Cheon on magic tv.
Wait what?Had a pretty decent time at GO Richmond yesterday.
Played in the Sealed pool in the morning, did really shitty. Played in two Modern Showdowns and went 2-2 both times.
Traded in a bunch of cards and got a Mox Ruby and some deck boxes along with some stuff to work on foiling out Affinity and some cards to build Elves.
Wish I could have stayed the weekend like I intended to last month, but my dad decided he wanted to come visit.
And good luck Ashodin.
One of the weird common threads of this and the SaffronOlive article is offense that these cards are rare, which I suspect is another factor driving people to subconsciously underrate them.
The meta already adjusted. We have the most diverse tier 1 in modern than we have had in ages. There is control (UW control), combo (dredge, storm), midrange (shadow decks) ramp (valakut, 50 shades of tron), aggro (burn, affinity). Why would you want a ban based on how healthy this is....It's strong but I don't consider it too dominant or format warping. At the top of their popularity both infect and affinity had a bigger meta share but Wizards didn't take action against them. The deck can also be easily interacted with. I foresee more problems with Eldrazi and Ballista since they are all bullshit cards that hard to interact with. Easiest thing to do is to counter them but Cavern blocks that.
I'm trying to get a full set of power. That puts me at 4 moxes. Just had a bunch of random cards that I'm not playing or doing anything with and just was able to find someone that would take them all and with trade in bonus got me there.Wait what?
Shit that's... not a bad idea.I'm trying to get a full set of power. That puts me at 4 moxes. Just had a bunch of random cards that I'm not playing or doing anything with and just was able to find someone that would take them all and with trade in bonus got me there.
And all the nissas are garbage but one.I think it's just wrong to not play Last Hope in the 75. There are marches that Last Hope can win on its own.
There are four Nissas in Standard and 1 Jace. What a time to be alive.
Where have I heard this before?We have the most diverse tier 1 in modern than we have had in ages.
Cut/Ribbons at uncommon would NOT BE OK.
Where have I heard this before?
That's not diverse though.The meta already adjusted. We have the most diverse tier 1 in modern than we have had in ages. There is control (UW control), combo (dredge, storm), midrange (shadow decks) ramp (valakut, 50 shades of tron), aggro (burn, affinity). Why would you want a ban based on how healthy this is....
Based on this post I can tell that you haven't played competitive magic that frequently. At the highest level there is normall LESS than this that's viable. For the past few years the format has had like 3-5 decks that are tier 1 with NO control deck being tier one for a consistent basis. (Grixis isn't consistent) This is as good as it gets since wizards doesn't print powerful answers often anymore. No use in complaining about it when that's how they print cards these days. Plus there is nothing that's on the ban list that helps. Jace homogenizes fair decks, stoneforge slides into abzan and makes it better, and preordain makes storm better. The only argument for a card to help blue is dig through time and that card carries more baggage than Jace does. The format is fine how it is right now and bans to death shadow just make the format worse. If shadow is banned then all the tron decks/unfair decks get way better and push the other fair decks minus abzan out. UW control is there to prey on shadow. Also what are you talking about? UW is tier 1 because of ancestral being legal. Hell there are two builds floating around right now: the as foretold build and the Gideon of the trails build. The powerful control decks are good in different metas. Jeskai is good when small creatures are good, UW is good when ramp/big creatures/midrange is good and grixis is good when control needs a slightly faster way to close out. The format is fine just not for you.That's not diverse though.
The fact that you listed 1 Control deck that's still somewhat fringe and are saying it somehow balances out the overexcess of Ramp/Aggro/Midrange is bonkers. We have 1 Control Deck floating around tier 1 (that according to basically all info I can find is 4-5% of the field, aka the same amount as Non-Eldrazi Tron) vs all the Combo(Ad Nasaeum/Dredge/Storm), Ramp(Valakut/Tron), Midrange(Eldrazi/Death's Shadow), and Aggro(Burn/Affinity).
I don't even like Control that much, but it says something that Blue and White get continuously fucked over in Modern(What's the most recent cards in these colors to see play in the vein of Fatal Push/Swiftspear/The Eldrazi that wasn't banned in under 6 Months?) In fact, of the unbans we've had both the ones aimed at helping UW landed with a wet fart while the Green one has to be rebanned.
My thoughts exactly. This is as good as it gets with the current pool of cards. Be happy that there is a tier 1 control deck since there isn't most of the time.Modern is pretty diverse. Certainly much closer to the positive end of the spectrum than the negative. Yes, control and reactive strategies need a boost, but I don't think bannings or unbannings will help that- they need printings. New cards in the format to help address how slow reactive strategies are compared to the proactive ones. Taking out one strategy- be it death's shadow or anything else- isn't going to help control in the face of all the other incredibly fast strategies. Unbanning Jace or any other option won't help either- those only solidify control's grip on the game where it's strongest already; there are no unban options that will help control's early game.
That said, UW's success IS promising, even if it's only one archetype doing well atm.
DAY TWO ACHIEVED
MY FIRST GP EVER
Congrats! Hope you get Top 8, or at least top 64 and get some money!DAY TWO ACHIEVED
MY FIRST GP EVER
DAY TWO ACHIEVED
MY FIRST GP EVER
Traded in a bunch of cards and got a Mox Ruby and some deck boxes along with some stuff to work on foiling out Affinity and some cards to build Elves.
DAY TWO ACHIEVED
MY FIRST GP EVER
The format still only has 1-4 decks at tier 1(Death's Shadow, Eldrazi Tron, and Tron, with Burn/Affinity floating around at the bottom). I play plenty of Competitive Modern, trust me, and when every spiky player at my LGS is on either Tron or Eldrazi that's not healthy to me. This is putting Tier 1 as 5% or above according to MTGTop8 because Salvation's current tiers are off and Nexus doesn't update at a reasonable pace and even then Eldrazi+Death's Shadow are at 23-24% of the meta.Based on this post I can tell that you haven't played competitive magic that frequently. At the highest level there is normall LESS than this that's viable. For the past few years the format has had like 3-5 decks that are tier 1 with NO control deck being tier one for a consistent basis. (Grixis isn't consistent) This is as good as it gets since wizards doesn't print powerful answers often anymore. No use in complaining about it when that's how they print cards these days. Plus there is nothing that's on the ban list that helps. Jace homogenizes fair decks, stoneforge slides into abzan and makes it better, and preordain makes storm better. The only argument for a card to help blue is dig through time and that card carries more baggage than Jace does. The format is fine how it is right now and bans to death shadow just make the format worse. If shadow is banned then all the tron decks/unfair decks get way better and push the other fair decks minus abzan out. UW control is there to prey on shadow. Also what are you talking about? UW is tier 1 because of ancestral being legal. Hell there are two builds floating around right now: the as foretold build and the Gideon of the trails build. The powerful control decks are good in different metas. Jeskai is good when small creatures are good, UW is good when ramp/big creatures/midrange is good and grixis is good when control needs a slightly faster way to close out. The format is fine just not for you.
I'm not on the "Ban Death Shadow Train" by any means. I'd rather we kill Eldrazi Tron for violating the color pie by being able to run no colors and still be 11% of the meta then kill a deck that is actually pretty sweet.Modern is pretty diverse. Certainly much closer to the positive end of the spectrum than the negative. Yes, control and reactive strategies need a boost, but I don't think bannings or unbannings will help that- they need printings. New cards in the format to help address how slow reactive strategies are compared to the proactive ones. Taking out one strategy- be it death's shadow or anything else- isn't going to help control in the face of all the other incredibly fast strategies. Unbanning Jace or any other option won't help either- those only solidify control's grip on the game where it's strongest already; there are no unban options that will help control's early game.
That said, UW's success IS promising, even if it's only one archetype doing well atm.
Yeah, I think modern is in a good place for brewers and those who thrive on getting edges through careful deck choice and sideboard selection. I do think the actual play of the format is pretty weak- with lots of strategies playing their own game of solitaire, shutting out certain decks with a single card, (blood moon, chalice on 1, rest in peace, stony silence, etc.) natural tron just ending games, etc. I find even standard to be a more interesting and skill testing from a play perspective.
I don't know how they address that problem, though, and at least the format does offer something different with its diversity so players that enjoy the deck choosing or building aspect of the game more than the minutia of navigating careful battlefield oriented games have a good option in the game.
Of course, the natural solution for everyone is just to play legacy, which has the best balance of both deck diversity and skill testing gameplay.
DAY TWO ACHIEVED
MY FIRST GP EVER
DAY TWO ACHIEVED
MY FIRST GP EVER