Little Old Man
Member
When are we likely to get more elf cards? Dominaria? I wouldn't mind a GB or GBW commander tbh.
And I just want Jund to be great again.
WotC rotates the Modern format via BnR. It's possible our pet decks could be viable again. Maybe.
At least with Fish, Merfolk could get some new cards in Ixalan. It's possible. I'm not sure how Ixalan will fall on the power level scale, but probably weak?
the last elfball commander ended up banned. Do you mean tribal elves? The ones in origins where from lorwyn where we're unlikely to return to, another coreset would be the best bet.When are we likely to get more elf cards? Dominaria? I wouldn't mind a GB or GBW commander tbh.
I can't decide which Commander 2017 deck to get. Vampire and the Arcane one seem to completely break the game. (Beginner here, so my opinion could be way off base.)
Are you planning on playing the deck as-is or do you have some cards around to tool them up with?
As-is at first, with modifications as I learn the game. What I am noticing at my local card store, though, is that everyone has older cards in their decks.
Yo, so apparently there's a ban announcement tomorrow? What's up with that? I was totally out of the loop on the news.
Smh, it's probably Death's Shadow.
It's a weird announcement date.
Everyone who isn't having to deal with endless hordes of Grixis Shadow and Eldrazi at their PPTQs.
I just want fish to be good again.
I can't decide which Commander 2017 deck to get. Vampire and the Arcane one seem to completely break the game. (Beginner here, so my opinion could be way off base.)
Vampires is probably the most consistent with the most win conditions, but Dragons is more fun than being the Timmy Lord has any right to be.
I got to play and play against both last night.
There's always going to be some deck that is the best/most popular. If they ban something from DS or Eldrazi, Valakut and Storm decks become the best ones, then they ban something from those and Affinity and CoCo become the best ones, then they ban something from those...
Modern is in a really good place, there's really no need to touch anything at all right now.
Strangely, it's like a really powered down version of the current Vintage meta that everyone is scrambling for restrictions over, Shops vs Mentor.
The real risk here is the 'ban pod but not twin' leading to the remaining thing taking over the format.
It wouldn't bother me to see Eldrazi Temple go. I think the deck would still be strong enough without the occasional turn 2 TKS blowout.
while there might not be anything oppressive that needs to be deleted there are a couple decks that should be taken down a notch. Delve continues to be a terrible mechanic in execution.
the decks are old enough to realize the playerbase couldn't come up with an answer either. And GDS is pretty format warping.Absolutely nothing good can ever come from WotC micromanaging deck performance in non-degenerate environments via an activist ban list. People hated this about Modern when it started out and that point (where it was a brand-new format that people didn't understand well yet) was the single time it was the most justified.
the decks are old enough to realize the playerbase couldn't come up with an answer either.
1 to 3 sounds about right for modern, when there isn't a new archetype born in the process and/or some power creep going on, ever since Origins. Maybe closer to 2 to 4.This is silly. Modern isn't Vintage where the ability of new cards to impact the meta is limited enough that each set only has maybe 1-3 potential playables, and the current Modern meta has been evolving most of the time from January when the last bans hit. It's not like Standard where you can exhaust every potential in one rotation window.
I think a big reason people hated that was a belief that Modern should have began wild-west style with no ban-list and all and sculpted the initial banlist from those results. It was clear from the get-go that they intended to heavily curate Modern via the banlist.Absolutely nothing good can ever come from WotC micromanaging deck performance in non-degenerate environments via an activist ban list. People hated this about Modern when it started out and that point (where it was a brand-new format that people didn't understand well yet) was the single time it was the most justified.
And I just want Jund to be great again.
I can't decide which Commander 2017 deck to get. Vampire and the Arcane one seem to completely break the game. (Beginner here, so my opinion could be way off base.)
Yeah, there are some very good cards that they couldn't really put in these decks because of their price, most of which are older.
I would sort of recommend against trying to run Wizards as-is. It doesn't come with any real win condition, so without pretty significant retooling it's mostly just a chore to play.
The other three decks are all pretty good straight out of the box, though. Vampires is probably the most consistent with the most win conditions, but Dragons is more fun than being the Timmy Lord has any right to be. Cats is a bit lower on the totem pole than either, and would take the most expenditure to bring up to speed since it honestly wants for some pricier cards, but it's still fun to play.
Dammit, you really had me, scrolling down on mobile and saw SFM.Standard
No changes
Modern
Stoneforge Mystic is unbanned.
Legacy
No Changes
Commander
Ramos is banned, too fucking good
jk
But SFM being unbanned would be GLORIOUS
Ramos is banned, too fucking good
@blakepr
*braces self*
This is just the start of a day you'll want to pay attention to #WOTCstaff
Hell of a top-down design
And hey, they managed to not have DFC get spoiled in the sheet leak!
Also, that really doesn't look like a MTG card. Looks likeThe early idea for Masterpiece series cards this block before they decided they weren't doing them this set
Also https://twitter.com/blakepr/status/902169249338101760
We either getting something banned/unbanned or more spoilers today
Unban Smuggler's Copter.
And hey, they managed to not have DFC get spoiled in the sheet leak!
Also, that really doesn't look like a MTG card. Looks likeThe early idea for Masterpiece series cards this block before they decided they weren't doing them this set
The back looks like a Dominion card
Vintage:
Thorn of Amethyst is restricted.
Monastery Mentor is restricted.
Yawgmoth's Bargain is unrestricted.
All other formats:
No changes
Starting with this set, all planeswalkers past, present, and future will have the supertype legendary. They will also be subject to the "legend rule." The "planeswalker uniqueness rule" is going away. What does this mean? In short, everything that's true about legendary creatures will now be true about legendary planeswalkers.
Under the new rules, if a player controls more than one legendary planeswalker with the same name, that player chooses one and puts the other into their owner's graveyard. This means that if you control Jace, Unraveler of Secrets and cast Jace, Cunning Castaway, both Jaces can exist under your control.
Planeswalkers will continue to have planeswalker types (Jace, Nissa, Bolas, and so on). However, those subtypes won't be used by any rule to determine what a player can retain control of. Cards like Jace's Defeat will continue to be able to refer to those subtypes.
Not sure Sphere was the right call. It'd be a bummer if budget-ish Eldrazi decks got taken out in the crossfire.
Now that it's confirmed, not sure I see the point of the Legendary change on PWs either.
Now that it's confirmed, not sure I see the point of the Legendary change on PWs either.
First thing that came to mind.The back looks like a Dominion card but yeah that's cool! A new take on Double-Faced cards, instead of the Innistrad "transformation" theme is exciting.
They couldn't make him any more naked? At least give him a shirt to wear on a frickin boat. Now he just looks stupid.