The Technomancer
card-carrying scientician
If meld is real, I'm curious to see how they'll handle rarity. In draft, getting two rares (or mythics) that meld would be fairly uncommon.
I'm guessing Bruna/Gisela are the only rare ones
If meld is real, I'm curious to see how they'll handle rarity. In draft, getting two rares (or mythics) that meld would be fairly uncommon.
I'm guessing Bruna/Gisela are the only rare ones
That assumes Hanweir isn't a meld card.
Looking at the wording on Graf Rats, if only one card was brought back to the battlefield, I don't think "meld" would be necessary, and Midnight Scavengers wouldn't have a frame that indicates it can transform. The former would just say to exile both cards then return Graf Rats transformed. There probably is something weird going on with the back of the cards, which we don't see with Hanweir.
This is a cool card. I'm actually kind of surprised that they've never done a one-shot Pod type effect like this before.
That assumes Hanweir isn't a meld card.
Like I said, I'd have to see the back before I could say. There's not really enough to go on with the front to know how it actually works.
Tutor effects are problematic and they probably just don't want to throw too many around.
THATS WHY IT HAS HASTEa) The fact that these cards use a new keyword action meld that refers to both, not just one, pretty much establishes that the result can't just be the isolated backside of one of the two cards, buuuut
b) It could actually still be possible that Hanweir is the resulting giant-size card of two other cards melded?
Yeah but a one-shot one is safer than a repeatable one!
Yeah, but then it looses it's oomph. I can't imagine Brusela not being a meld card, but I'd also be surprised if they hadn't found a way to make that work in limited. Perhaps the printing tech has gotten to the point where they can guarantee two cards showing up in the same pack (though that has its own problems).The nice thing about meld as an execution (instead of the pure BFM style) is that the individual cards you get can still be played, and maybe even worthwhile, even if you can't meld them. Graf Rats is a 2/1 for 2 which can be playable in black; Midnight Scavengers is a 3/3 with Raise Dead which you might want anyway. The rares and mythics could easily be designed to be playable even if you don't meld them.
THATS WHY IT HAS HASTE
THATS WHY IT HAS HASTE
Yeah, but then it looses it's oomph. I can't imagine Brusela not being a meld card, but I'd also be surprised if they hadn't found a way to make that work in limited.
Perhaps the printing tech has gotten to the point where they can guarantee two cards showing up in the same pack (though that has its own problems).
Okay, so i will say the one issue with Hanweir being a melded card is that it's got card info printed on it that looks like it would on a single card -- I don't know how it would look on a melded card, but presumably different.
Isn't there this Yu-gi-Oh card that can be folded out three times or so?
Maybe they don't make a difference for webshots of the card for easier handling on the internet?
There were several denialists. They sort of... faded away, but early on some did not believe in Electric Boogaloo 2: The Eldrazening.
EDIT: Also, lol Reddit.
i hoped that it wouldn't actually just be emrakul because i'm kind of over the eldrazi.
but it's just emrakul, big silly card and all. oh well.
By "that" I mean, getting the cool story/moment of fusing Gisela and Bruna fusing to actually happen, not simply making the cards playable in limited.I mean, they did find a way to make it work in limited
this is that way
By "that" I mean, getting the cool story/moment of fusing Gisela and Bruna fusing to actually happen, not simply making the cards playable in limited.
It's City of Brass being destroyed.Normally I'd pick up the EMA WL and Force, but I just won't remember the new art, especially on Wasteland.
That's the problem, I look at the art and see City of Brass.It's City of Brass being destroyed.
I'm skeptical about this giant sized card. I'm not sure why it wouldn't just be one regular sized card.ho shits
I mean, they did find a way to make it work in limited
this is that way
100% guarantee this hasn't happened.
Because that's less awesome.I'm skeptical about this giant sized card. I'm not sure why it wouldn't just be one regular sized card.
I'm skeptical about this giant sized card. I'm not sure why it wouldn't just be one regular sized card.
It'll be difficult getting both halves of the meld cards in limited, won't it?
If it's anything like the test cards, having it split over two cards would look hideous. I think sticking to a normal single back will be easier to play with and it will look better.Because that's aesthetically hideous? I mean... if you're going to make things that require two different cards to transform, why wouldn't you use the backs of both? It's cooler, it makes it easier to tell these cards from other DFCs, it has better symmetry and aesthetics, and it explains why these cards require two different fronts to flip -- plus, in this case, the flavor is literally that two different creatures merge together, so having their two cards become one supports that better.
I really liked Assemble the Legion as a win condition. The slow ticking up of tokens was entertaining. Especially against the Supreme Verdict decks of that period.
I just felt like getting that out there.
If it's anything like the test cards, having it split over two cards would look hideous. I think sticking to a normal single back will be easier to play with and it will look better.
It's not only not cooler it's gimmicky as hell. I won't believe that until I see it.Because that's aesthetically hideous? I mean... if you're going to make things that require two different cards to transform, why wouldn't you use the backs of both? It's cooler, it makes it easier to tell these cards from other DFCs, it has better symmetry and aesthetics, and it explains why these cards require two different fronts to flip -- plus, in this case, the flavor is literally that two different creatures merge together, so having their two cards become one supports that better. Doing it the way you're saying is like such a "just use kicker for everything" pitch.
That's exactly why the mechanic works this way. If it were classic BFM style, if you only have one card it's a blank. This way, each card has a front side that you can play on its own even if you can't meld them. In this case, it's a 2/1 for 2 in black (not unplayable) and a 3/3 with a raise dead (definitely something you'd run in some cases) so you can just treat them as single-faced cards if you can't draft or open both.
It's not only not cooler it's gimmicky as hell.
It's not only not cooler it's gimmicky as hell. I won't believe that until I see it.
What's the gameplay benefit of a giant cardYou are posting in the OT for a game with 20+ years of history of using gimmicks to distinguish sets and cards from each other and sell packs. "Gimmicky" is a meaningless criticism of a Magic mechanic.
The problem with that design is that for convenience I'm only going to use the bottom half stopping the awesomeness of it
What's the gameplay benefit of a giant card