Who has said it's not covered by the treaty? The Philippines certainly believe that it's covered. The US has only been equivocal as always, but has not denied that it's not covered by the treaty.
http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2014/04/29/1317422/obama-us-committed-defend-philippines
Your statements only give further support to China's playbook of using civilian vessels to assert their claims in the region. I don't think Japan would make a case to the UN, by the way. I think someone would veto it.
I'm pretty sure US would discourage Japan from using force against weaponless civilian vessels. The US has not stated that they would back Japan in a war instigated by Japan. They say they will defend Japan against the use of force against it, and they have not called these non-military acts anywhere, even in non-treaty situations like Vietnam, as the use of force. I am pretty confident that the US would not be bombing these civilian vessels just because Japan told the US to do so.
Look at the statements about defending the Philippines--"we will defend you against armed attack." No action against non-military unarmed Chinese vessels that just spray water and occupy with numbers. And it is clear that Philippines has been requesting US help in this area.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Japan does not have a military still, right?
*edit*
Nope, I'm wrong -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Self-Defense_Forces
I think your out of your mind if you think Japan would not do anything.The U.S. never made an assurence about that shoal. The Chinese have made claims about it since AT LEAST the 1930's. This is not the same thing. Why you can't seem to comprehend that I don't know. The U.S. was actually given control of those Japanese islands after WWII and then gave them back to Japan. China did not become interested until oil and gas reserves were found.
Well obviously they wouldn't do that first, they would send in their Coast Guard vessels to either impound the Chinese vessels or escort them out of the area. If the Chinese are escorting the fishing boats with military ships, Japan would deliver an ultimatum. If the Chinese do not comply Japan can very much claim that they are indeed being invaded and act accordingly - with full US support. As for the Philippines, they never responded with force and they never asked the US to join them in a war with China. They accepted that it wasn't worth it and preferred to negotiate while they built a stronger navy, in case China decided to try it again.
I just don't get why you bring up the whole "civilian fishing vessels" ruse as some kind of ultimate move that would leave Japan unable to respond. It really isn't - it's effective against weaker countries that don't actually want a war with you or are unable to conduct one. It's a bully tactic. It doesn't work against Japan because they can back up their outrage with a credible military force.
It's similar to what Russia is up to in Ukraine. They send in "volunteers" with "donated supplies" because they can get away with it, due to the Ukrainian Military not being strong enough to respond. Do you think they could do the same in say Alaska? Of course not.
Are you using Wikipedia history now? The Chinese claim dates back to the Treaty of Shimonoseki of 1895, which was nullified by the Treaty of San Francisco in 1951. It's claimed as part of Taiwan, which is why Taiwan claims it itself.
The Chinese have never used military ships in these encounters, so your scenario doesn't ever happen. The US has never called these types of actions the use of force, even when against countries that aren't protected by treaties. I fail to see how they would suddenly agree to bomb civilian vessels because Japan told them to.
"Senior Chinese military officials have admitted for the first time that a frigate locked its radar on a Japanese destroyer during the two nations spat over disputed islands"
The Chinese have never used military ships in these encounters, so your scenario doesn't ever happen. The US has never called these types of actions the use of force, even when against countries that aren't protected by treaties. I fail to see how they would suddenly agree to bomb civilian vessels because Japan told them to.
Finally, regarding the UN: I'm not talking about Japan appealing to the UNSC for an intervention (which would obviously be blocked by both China and Russia, no argument there) I'm talking about just addressing the General Assembly as a matter of principle and getting the international consensus on their side. It's really a matter of form anyway, they already have all the support they need to enforce whatever military response they prefer. .
The UN has been useless for quite some time. It's sad how over the years my opinion has had to change about them but after France went unilateral to deal with the crisis in Mali was the point I had to admit they are toothless.
The UN easily would've been the best force to undercut Russia's "peacekeeping" efforts even with them on the security counsel.
Godzilla?Problem with that is that there's a certain giant standing right behind Japan.![]()
Godzilla?
Care to guess what would happen if the UN was granted power to forcefully go after Russia over Ukraine? .
Japan doesn't even need that Giant, Japan can win (For the foreseeable future atleast) any naval fight against China. Infact it doesn't matter how big the Chinese Military gets today they will have to engage Japan in the sea and Japan is the one country that can pump out High-Tech Aircraft Carriers/naval assets should the need Arise. So China will be highly stupid to go to war with Japan anytime in the first half of this century.
China has territorial disputes Japan, India, Vietnam and the Phillipines.
Basically a lot of the neighbors.
Who? The US won´t go to war with China for Japan.
Except that's not what the UN needed to do. The UN needed to just send in a force to stabilize the country while the protests ran their coarse. Russia would still have troops in the Ukraine but this time they would be forced to leave after everything settled down because the other countries are also present.
Considering that the UN still provides other benefits such as a forum to hash out the expansion into the arctic territories Russia wouldn't be leaving.
It wouldn't be the first time China has done something stupid that ended up sending them back to the stone age.
I wish people could just get along. I'm so tired of people being against each other because of meaningless things like race or nationality or ethnicity.
We are all one people. We are all one race. We are all one nation. We are all one ethnicity.
And war is so terrible. We need love, not war. Peace and love are so beautiful.
I wish for love between Japan and China, and everyone.
I hope so much that love wins out and that people don't hurt each other again. People should let go of the past.
And I don't care who owns what land. I wish there weren't any countries. :<
Your move China and/or Japan.
![]()
What is this from? At first I was thinking Ghostbusters 2 but it never got that big.
China has territorial disputes Japan, India, Vietnam and the Phillipines.
Basically a lot of the neighbors.
So is Korea with all her neighbors.
So is Japn with all her neighbors.
So is Russia with most of her neighbors.
Doesn't preclude China from acting aggressively though. Chinese seem to have a lot of wounded pride and almost desperation to prove they are not the puny kid who can be pushed around anymore. I think a lot of Chinese are itching to give Japan and the West a little payback for the humiliation they've endured. All it takes is one little incident and things escalate. If a Japanese vessel accidentally hit a Chinese boat and someone went overboard and drowned, something like that. Chinese would be baying for blood.
How large is this poll?
Seems state controlled media leads to rational reactions while the experience with China leads to irrational reaction?In China, the survey included 1,539 Chinese residents in the major cities of Beijing, Shanghai, Chengdu, Shenyang and Xi'an, 201 international relations scholars from around the country and 813 university students and faculty members at five top Beijing universities. In Japan, respondents included 1,000 members of the public and 628 intellectuals, mostly with experience of China...When asked about the largest stumbling block for the relationship, both the Chinese and Japanese public named the islands dispute as their top concern, yet the portion in both sides shrank this year - 64.8 and 58.6 percent, respectively, from 77.5 and 72.1 percent last year. ....
Japan's image in the eyes of the Chinese public has "slightly improved" in the past year because the portion of Chinese people having a "bad" or "relatively bad" impression about Japan dropped by about 6 percentage points from the previous year to 86.8 percent of those polled.
But in Japan, the corresponding figure hit a record 93 percent this year.
Kevin Jiang, vice-general manager of market research consultancy Horizonkey Information and Data Co Ltd, said: "Compared with the large number of Japanese people who harbor ill-will toward China, Chinese people are relatively more rational."
This is kinda coolAmong the Japanese public who supported public diplomacy, 70.7 percent of them believed that "mutual understanding between the two peoples will be deepened through exchanges", compared with 66.2 percent last year.
Similarly, 56.7 percent of those in China who supported public diplomacy believed that people-to-people interactions "expand the foundation for the shared interests of both nations".
http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2014-09/10/content_18571095_2.htmLast year, 14.3 percent of Chinese respondents obtained information regarding Japan directly from Japanese media last year. The figure this year rose to 23.7 percent.
When it came to Chinese intellectuals, including university faculty and students, 21.4 percent of them accessed Japan-related information directly from Japanese media.
About 53% of Chinese respondents and 29% of Japanese respondents expected a war to break out by the year 2020, according to a joint survey conducted by newspaper China Daily and Genron, a Japanese NGO.
Come on guys, they just want the Olympics to be held to in Osaka!
This is what happens when China has a rebirth and Japan turns to nationalism in a decline. Both populations have their reasons to bring about petty conflict, whether over a few isles or whatever.
Not happening. This is one the few times where I believe we would honor our military treaties.
Yes, definitely. The majority. About 2,352 Chinese citizens who voted in a poll represent what the 1.4 billion living in China think.
Sensationalist post at its best.
http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2014-09/10/content_18571095.htm
Who? The US won´t go to war with China for Japan.
Problem with that is that there's a certain giant standing right behind Japan.![]()
Who? The US won´t go to war with China for Japan.
What is this from? At first I was thinking Ghostbusters 2 but it never got that big.
came to post thislucky it isn't a democracy
Isn't the Chinese govt provoking anti Japanese sentiment among their citizens?
I'd wager the expectations are distorted by China's state narrative about Japan's so-called militarism. Based on my interactions, more than a few Chinese actually believe Japan is going back to the days of imperialism and is gearing up to fight a war of aggression. Since that is complete nonsense, the real possibility of a war is virtually nil.
Dunno about the us but the weeaboos will fly or swim over to defend Japan for sure.
While I doubt there's going to be a major war, the tensions produced by sentiments like these could (and likely will) continue to fuel the current arms race, diverting investments from more generally beneficial areas of the economy. Unfortunate.
Dunno about the us but the weeaboos will fly or swim over to defend Japan for sure.
Protoss vs Zergs?
This needs to be stated again. The Chinese media has been pushing looming Japanese aggression hard. They are not doing this to ramp up for a war, it is for for economic and domestic interests.
Sanae Takaichi, the internal affairs minister, was among a record-equalling five women selected by Abe as he attempts to make his cabinet more female voter-friendly and to increase womens presence in the workplace.
Takaichi, an Abe ally on the right of the governing Liberal Democratic party (LDP), was pictured posing alongside Kazunari Yamada, the 52-year-old leader of the National Socialist Japanese Workers party, on the neo-Nazi partys website.
A smiling Takaichi and Yamada appear together standing in front of a Japanese flag.
Yamada has voiced praise for Adolf Hitler and the September 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre. In a YouTube video Yamadas supporters are seen wearing swastika armbands, while he denies the Holocaust took place and criticises postwar Germanys ban on the Nazi salute, accusing the country of being no different from North Korea.