• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Majority in China expect war with Japan by 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kallor

Member
It wouldn't be the first time China has done something stupid that ended up sending them back to the stone age.
 

slit

Member
Who has said it's not covered by the treaty? The Philippines certainly believe that it's covered. The US has only been equivocal as always, but has not denied that it's not covered by the treaty.

http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2014/04/29/1317422/obama-us-committed-defend-philippines




Your statements only give further support to China's playbook of using civilian vessels to assert their claims in the region. I don't think Japan would make a case to the UN, by the way. I think someone would veto it.

I think your out of your mind if you think Japan would not do anything.The U.S. never made an assurance about that shoal. The Chinese have made claims about it since AT LEAST the 1930's. This is not the same thing. Why you can't seem to comprehend that I don't know. The U.S. was actually given control of those Japanese islands after WWII and then gave them back to Japan. China did not become interested until oil and gas reserves were found.
 

Nivash

Member
I'm pretty sure US would discourage Japan from using force against weaponless civilian vessels. The US has not stated that they would back Japan in a war instigated by Japan. They say they will defend Japan against the use of force against it, and they have not called these non-military acts anywhere, even in non-treaty situations like Vietnam, as the use of force. I am pretty confident that the US would not be bombing these civilian vessels just because Japan told the US to do so.

Look at the statements about defending the Philippines--"we will defend you against armed attack." No action against non-military unarmed Chinese vessels that just spray water and occupy with numbers. And it is clear that Philippines has been requesting US help in this area.

Well obviously they wouldn't do that first, they would send in their Coast Guard vessels to either impound the Chinese vessels or escort them out of the area. If the Chinese are escorting the fishing boats with military ships, Japan would deliver an ultimatum. If the Chinese do not comply Japan can very much claim that they are indeed being invaded and act accordingly - with full US support. As for the Philippines, they never responded with force and they never asked the US to join them in a war with China. They accepted that it wasn't worth it and preferred to negotiate while they built a stronger navy, in case China decided to try it again.

I just don't get why you bring up the whole "civilian fishing vessels" ruse as some kind of ultimate move that would leave Japan unable to respond. It really isn't - it's effective against weaker countries that don't actually want a war with you or are unable to conduct one. It's a bully tactic. It doesn't work against Japan because they can back up their outrage with a credible military force.

It's similar to what Russia is up to in Ukraine. They send in "volunteers" with "donated supplies" because they can get away with it, due to the Ukrainian Military not being strong enough to respond. Do you think they could do the same in say Alaska? Of course not.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Japan does not have a military still, right?

*edit*

Nope, I'm wrong -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Self-Defense_Forces

Yup, despite technically almost being pacifistic according to its constitution, Japan has a military with a budget equal to Germany - they're ranked 8th worldwide. As far as their navy goes there is an argument to be made that it could easily be the second most powerful in the world after the US Navy. (Well, to be fair Russia is technically second, it's just that their assets are split over several fleets spread halfway across the world due the size of the country, so Japan can bring more to bear in a single conflict than the Russians can. I'm also aware that China has more tonnage, but a lot of it is obsolete and they lack naval experience.)
 
Not worried. You could have asked 1000 people in the US if they expect a war with Russia by 2015, last year, and probably a majority or more would have said yes. Even people strongly against conflict always just assume that those who are in power -- or those who they don't like in power -- are secretly trying to create a war.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Japan does not have a military still, right?

*edit*

Nope, I'm wrong -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Self-Defense_Forces
 

numble

Member
I think your out of your mind if you think Japan would not do anything.The U.S. never made an assurence about that shoal. The Chinese have made claims about it since AT LEAST the 1930's. This is not the same thing. Why you can't seem to comprehend that I don't know. The U.S. was actually given control of those Japanese islands after WWII and then gave them back to Japan. China did not become interested until oil and gas reserves were found.

Are you using Wikipedia history now? The Chinese claim dates back to the Treaty of Shimonoseki of 1895, which was nullified by the Treaty of San Francisco in 1951. It's claimed as part of Taiwan, which is why Taiwan claims it itself.

Well obviously they wouldn't do that first, they would send in their Coast Guard vessels to either impound the Chinese vessels or escort them out of the area. If the Chinese are escorting the fishing boats with military ships, Japan would deliver an ultimatum. If the Chinese do not comply Japan can very much claim that they are indeed being invaded and act accordingly - with full US support. As for the Philippines, they never responded with force and they never asked the US to join them in a war with China. They accepted that it wasn't worth it and preferred to negotiate while they built a stronger navy, in case China decided to try it again.

I just don't get why you bring up the whole "civilian fishing vessels" ruse as some kind of ultimate move that would leave Japan unable to respond. It really isn't - it's effective against weaker countries that don't actually want a war with you or are unable to conduct one. It's a bully tactic. It doesn't work against Japan because they can back up their outrage with a credible military force.

It's similar to what Russia is up to in Ukraine. They send in "volunteers" with "donated supplies" because they can get away with it, due to the Ukrainian Military not being strong enough to respond. Do you think they could do the same in say Alaska? Of course not.

The Chinese have never used military ships in these encounters, so your scenario doesn't ever happen. The US has never called these types of actions the use of force, even when against countries that aren't protected by treaties. I fail to see how they would suddenly agree to bomb civilian vessels because Japan told them to.
 

slit

Member
Are you using Wikipedia history now? The Chinese claim dates back to the Treaty of Shimonoseki of 1895, which was nullified by the Treaty of San Francisco in 1951. It's claimed as part of Taiwan, which is why Taiwan claims it itself.

Oh right make up things because you can't admit you're wrong and then sidestep the issue. I just looked on wikipedia and that treaty is mentioned so why would I say the 30's? I would have said 1895.
 
The Chinese have never used military ships in these encounters, so your scenario doesn't ever happen. The US has never called these types of actions the use of force, even when against countries that aren't protected by treaties. I fail to see how they would suddenly agree to bomb civilian vessels because Japan told them to.

Huh?

China military officials admit radar lock on Japanese ship

"Senior Chinese military officials have admitted for the first time that a frigate locked its radar on a Japanese destroyer during the two nations’ spat over disputed islands"
 

Nivash

Member
The Chinese have never used military ships in these encounters, so your scenario doesn't ever happen. The US has never called these types of actions the use of force, even when against countries that aren't protected by treaties. I fail to see how they would suddenly agree to bomb civilian vessels because Japan told them to.

Then what's the problem? The Japanese Coast Guard can deal with that. That what it's for, and they've been doing just that for close to a decade, dealing with both Chinese and Taiwanese intruders. Of course the US doesn't need to be roped in to "bomb civilian vessels", that's crazy talk. I swear it's as if you're assuming that Japan is completely defenseless and needs to run to the US for everything.

Japan is perfectly competent enough to deal with an armada of Chinese "fishing boats" if they need to. They would only need the US Navy if the Chinese decide to do an impromptu reenactment of the Falklands (only with less sheep and more boats).
 

wildfire

Banned
Finally, regarding the UN: I'm not talking about Japan appealing to the UNSC for an intervention (which would obviously be blocked by both China and Russia, no argument there) I'm talking about just addressing the General Assembly as a matter of principle and getting the international consensus on their side. It's really a matter of form anyway, they already have all the support they need to enforce whatever military response they prefer. .

The UN has been useless for quite some time. It's sad how over the years my opinion has had to change about them but after France went unilateral to deal with the crisis in Mali was the point I had to admit they are toothless.

The UN easily would've been the best force to undercut Russia's "peacekeeping" efforts even with them on the security counsel.
 

Nivash

Member
The UN has been useless for quite some time. It's sad how over the years my opinion has had to change about them but after France went unilateral to deal with the crisis in Mali was the point I had to admit they are toothless.

The UN easily would've been the best force to undercut Russia's "peacekeeping" efforts even with them on the security counsel.

The UN is designed to be toothless. That's the only way that the major powers would stay members. The League of Nations failed because it had too much power - it required nations to involve themselves somehow in military conflicts even if it meant going against their allies. This also kept some nations out - like the isolationist United States - and most of the more aggressive major powers, like Japan and Nazi Germany, simply left.

The UN is supposed to act as a forum where the nations of the world can gather peacefully to discuss current issues in a diplomatic setting. That's it. I must say that it does at least perform that task quite well and has probably helped in averting some conflicts, especially during the Cold War.

Care to guess what would happen if the UN was granted power to forcefully go after Russia over Ukraine? Russia would leave, followed by China and a pretty significant number of smaller states aligned with them. The only nations left would be NATO and other Western-aligned nations and the entire point of the UN would be undone. Let's not even begin to imagine what would have happened if those powers had been in place during the rather illegal US invasion of Iraq.
 

wildfire

Banned
Care to guess what would happen if the UN was granted power to forcefully go after Russia over Ukraine? .

Except that's not what the UN needed to do. The UN needed to just send in a force to stabilize the country while the protests ran their coarse. Russia would still have troops in the Ukraine but this time they would be forced to leave after everything settled down because the other countries are also present.

Considering that the UN still provides other benefits such as a forum to hash out the expansion into the arctic territories Russia wouldn't be leaving.
 
34155.jpg


godzilla-2014-09c.gif
 

WARP10CK

Banned
Japan doesn't even need that Giant, Japan can win (For the foreseeable future atleast) any naval fight against China. Infact it doesn't matter how big the Chinese Military gets today they will have to engage Japan in the sea and Japan is the one country that can pump out High-Tech Aircraft Carriers/naval assets should the need Arise. So China will be highly stupid to go to war with Japan anytime in the first half of this century.

The size of the Chinese navy is really small which is strange considering how big the rest of their armed forces is.

Does not matter if your army is huge invading Japan means crossing the sea and cleared airspace without that, they can't touch Japan soil.
 
China has territorial disputes Japan, India, Vietnam and the Phillipines.
Basically a lot of the neighbors.

Vietnam and the Philippines have already announced closer economic and military ties, basically an alliance, and there are rumblings that Japan wants in as well, with US backing.
 
Guys calm down.

First of all, China won't invade Japan's islands, lets get that out of the way. It's totally inpractical Secondly China won't nuke Japan. China has no first use policy.

So it comes down to it, in worst case scenario, a conventional nava warfarel. Now lets look at China and Japan weapons. China has about equal sea power with Japan, while Japan is specialize in anti submarine vassels and China has better hands here and there. China OTOH has much better land based fighter planes and mid range missiles.

Now look at China vs US naval. The entire China new weapon development roadmap is base upon the sea denial capability against the US carrier groups. So its going to be a lot of cheap missiles try to scare the expensive carrier groups from entering the east sea and yellow sea.

Will US carrier group risk the chance of getting sunk to enter China's front yard? No I do not think so. Even during the great war, Germany didn't chance taking her mega dreadnoughts to fight against the Brits head to head. So my conclusion is that it will never come to war in the first place. Worst case it will be cuba crisis type of chicken game. Eventually one side will back down before a hot war break out.

And why would China start a war with Japan in 10 years anyway. China has a hell lot of pie to cut in South China Sea. Picking the ASEAN counties apart is a million times easier than face off again Japan so soon. Any ASEAN that's not Vietnam is basically cake walk to China.
 
Pure sensationalist nonsense. Also, it should come as little surprise that there's a big disconnect between what the Chinese people think and what the government thinks. Heck even in the US that disconnect is pretty big.
 

Nivash

Member
Except that's not what the UN needed to do. The UN needed to just send in a force to stabilize the country while the protests ran their coarse. Russia would still have troops in the Ukraine but this time they would be forced to leave after everything settled down because the other countries are also present.

Considering that the UN still provides other benefits such as a forum to hash out the expansion into the arctic territories Russia wouldn't be leaving.

Which protests - Maidan or the insurrection in the East? And under what pretense? The UN can only send peacekeepers as an invitation unless they need to act due to blatant aggression - like the Gulf War - or rampant abuse of human rights - like Serbia. And for what goal? Would they be there to defend Yanukovich or to watch while he gets overthrown?

It would be completely impossible to get to a point where Russia and NATO could agree on the course of action because they have completely opposed interests. Hell, China could even oppose it out of principle no matter what objective they arrive at because they are categorically opposed to international involvement in domestic issues.
 
I used to work with a lot of chinese people (chinese car importing) and they all think this(even if its not historically accurated, they all have the same mentality) :

-Japan used to belong to China
-Korea used to belong to China
-They hate japanese A LOT (they all remember the dates of the japanese invasion)
-China is getting a lot of weapons to invade china and korea soon, the same for taiwan
-They consider Taiwan a part of china
-They want to destroy the US

They also are nice people :D
 
I wish people could just get along. I'm so tired of people being against each other because of meaningless things like race or nationality or ethnicity.

We are all one people. We are all one race. We are all one nation. We are all one ethnicity.

And war is so terrible. We need love, not war. Peace and love are so beautiful.
I wish for love between Japan and China, and everyone.

I hope so much that love wins out and that people don't hurt each other again. People should let go of the past.

And I don't care who owns what land. I wish there weren't any countries. :<
 
I wish people could just get along. I'm so tired of people being against each other because of meaningless things like race or nationality or ethnicity.

We are all one people. We are all one race. We are all one nation. We are all one ethnicity.

And war is so terrible. We need love, not war. Peace and love are so beautiful.
I wish for love between Japan and China, and everyone.

I hope so much that love wins out and that people don't hurt each other again. People should let go of the past.

And I don't care who owns what land. I wish there weren't any countries. :<

The whole idea of Westphalian nation state is separate people in half of the time arbitary geographical areas and they compete with each other.
 

Timbuktu

Member
How large is this poll? not sure if we get accurate polling data for something like this in China. In any case,the leadership has gotten a lot more aggressive in the last year, but I still don't them actually wanting to get into a conflict. And in another five years? Who knows, a China is changing too fast and we don't really know what goes on within the party.
 
Doesn't preclude China from acting aggressively though. Chinese seem to have a lot of wounded pride and almost desperation to prove they are not the puny kid who can be pushed around anymore. I think a lot of Chinese are itching to give Japan and the West a little payback for the humiliation they've endured. All it takes is one little incident and things escalate. If a Japanese vessel accidentally hit a Chinese boat and someone went overboard and drowned, something like that. Chinese would be baying for blood.

This reads like a bad Tom Clancy fanfic
 
How large is this poll?

http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2014-09/10/content_18571095.htm
In China, the survey included 1,539 Chinese residents in the major cities of Beijing, Shanghai, Chengdu, Shenyang and Xi'an, 201 international relations scholars from around the country and 813 university students and faculty members at five top Beijing universities. In Japan, respondents included 1,000 members of the public and 628 intellectuals, mostly with experience of China...When asked about the largest stumbling block for the relationship, both the Chinese and Japanese public named the islands dispute as their top concern, yet the portion in both sides shrank this year - 64.8 and 58.6 percent, respectively, from 77.5 and 72.1 percent last year. ....
Japan's image in the eyes of the Chinese public has "slightly improved" in the past year because the portion of Chinese people having a "bad" or "relatively bad" impression about Japan dropped by about 6 percentage points from the previous year to 86.8 percent of those polled.

But in Japan, the corresponding figure hit a record 93 percent this year.

Kevin Jiang, vice-general manager of market research consultancy Horizonkey Information and Data Co Ltd, said: "Compared with the large number of Japanese people who harbor ill-will toward China, Chinese people are relatively more rational."
Seems state controlled media leads to rational reactions while the experience with China leads to irrational reaction?
Edit: Weird the source for OP article didn't mention the Japanese side that expected war to break out.
Edit2: My bad, didn't realize there were 2 pages to the article.
Among the Japanese public who supported public diplomacy, 70.7 percent of them believed that "mutual understanding between the two peoples will be deepened through exchanges", compared with 66.2 percent last year.
Similarly, 56.7 percent of those in China who supported public diplomacy believed that people-to-people interactions "expand the foundation for the shared interests of both nations".
This is kinda cool
Last year, 14.3 percent of Chinese respondents obtained information regarding Japan directly from Japanese media last year. The figure this year rose to 23.7 percent.
When it came to Chinese intellectuals, including university faculty and students, 21.4 percent of them accessed Japan-related information directly from Japanese media.
http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2014-09/10/content_18571095_2.htm

http://time.com/3318650/china-war-japan-2020-poll/
About 53% of Chinese respondents and 29% of Japanese respondents expected a war to break out by the year 2020, according to a joint survey conducted by newspaper China Daily and Genron, a Japanese NGO.
 
Come on guys, they just want the Olympics to be held to in Osaka! :D

This is what happens when China has a rebirth and Japan turns to nationalism in a decline. Both populations have their reasons to bring about petty conflict, whether over a few isles or whatever.

In China's view those islands are restricting Their flow by water, and that's cramping them. Look at the US, it has free access to both of the biggest Oceans while China has to find a way around diplomatic bombs.
 
Isn't the Chinese govt provoking anti Japanese sentiment among their citizens?

I'd wager the expectations are distorted by China's state narrative about Japan's so-called militarism. Based on my interactions, more than a few Chinese actually believe Japan is going back to the days of imperialism and is gearing up to fight a war of aggression. Since that is complete nonsense, the real possibility of a war is virtually nil.

This needs to be stated again. The Chinese media has been pushing looming Japanese aggression hard. They are not doing this to ramp up for a war, it is for for economic and domestic interests.
 

linsivvi

Member
While I doubt there's going to be a major war, the tensions produced by sentiments like these could (and likely will) continue to fuel the current arms race, diverting investments from more generally beneficial areas of the economy. Unfortunate.

Yep, and I bet the people who drive up these sentiments are those who have the most to gain from it.
 
This needs to be stated again. The Chinese media has been pushing looming Japanese aggression hard. They are not doing this to ramp up for a war, it is for for economic and domestic interests.

It doesn't help when Japanese politicians do dumb things like this.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/09/neo-nazi-photos-pose-headache-for-shinzo-abe
Sanae Takaichi, the internal affairs minister, was among a record-equalling five women selected by Abe as he attempts to make his cabinet more female voter-friendly and to increase women’s presence in the workplace.

Takaichi, an Abe ally on the right of the governing Liberal Democratic party (LDP), was pictured posing alongside Kazunari Yamada, the 52-year-old leader of the National Socialist Japanese Workers party, on the neo-Nazi party’s website.

A smiling Takaichi and Yamada appear together standing in front of a Japanese flag.

Yamada has voiced praise for Adolf Hitler and the September 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre. In a YouTube video Yamada’s supporters are seen wearing swastika armbands, while he denies the Holocaust took place and criticises postwar Germany’s ban on the Nazi salute, accusing the country of being “no different from North Korea”.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom