Red Blaster
Member
courtney love?
has anyone checked in with ja rule for his thoughts on the matter
has anyone checked in with ja rule for his thoughts on the matter
Google doesn't, which could be the source of confusion.
To be quite honest over the past few days the only time this thread has been really serious have been around and after the press conferences.
"The Event"Wouldn't it be completely nuts if the plane ends up appearing in the same or near the same spot it disappeared? With everyone on board in good health and acting as if nothing happened. What would you guys think about that?
Ah, should have known to look up Inmarsat.
A little paraphrasing, but seems really clear to me, with multiple agencies from different countries agreeing.
But he specifically mentioned Wikipedia in his post, and he's been trolling for at least the last few pages. It's unfunny and tiresome.
Pilot suicide is not out of the question. There is a precedent for that.If you believe the pilot or co pilot was a part of this, it does not logically follow that its in the Indian ocean.
Pilot suicide is not out of the question. There is a precedent for that.
And it's easy to explain the motivation for it too. If the plane is never found, it looks like an accident. If it is an accident, life insurance still pays, the family name isn't marred by the homicide of passengers, etc.
They mentioned on CNN that Malaysia has only released the general location of the last ping. If they released the locations of all the prior pings, we might get a better sense of the plane's flight path and destination (if it even had one).
Pilot suicide is not out of the question. There is a precedent for that.
And it's easy to explain the motivation for it too. If the plane is never found, it looks like an accident. If it is an accident, life insurance still pays, the family name isn't marred by the homicide of passengers, etc.
New rule. Basic knowledge of Google or history required to post in thread.
Flying it 7 hours off course to just dump it in a different Ocean? Why not just continue into the one right off the coast of Malaysia?
My thought exactly. Why go to the trouble of turning off communications/track if you end-game is simply to crash the plane.Flying it 7 hours off course to just dump it in a different Ocean? Why not just continue into the one right off the coast of Malaysia?
But he specifically mentioned Wikipedia in his post, and he's been trolling for at least the last few pages. It's unfunny and tiresome.
What is clear? That this is what the satellite ping would mean if it had detected the plane as it did, or it's clear that the satellite did detect the actual plane? Cause so far I have read nothing indicating that anyone has had access to that data or that it confirmed it was the actual plane.
Like Pekin, Illinois. Where until 1980 the official high school team name was a certain racial epithet that rhymes with "sinks."The city is still called "Pekin" in french.
The coast of Malaysia is shallow water. Fly out to the Indian Ocean and the depth is 10,000+ ft.Flying it 7 hours off course to just dump it in a different Ocean? Why not just continue into the one right off the coast of Malaysia?
I grant that turning off the transponder is suspicious. However, the pilot really didn't want anybody to find the plane's blackbox which contains pilot audio but also the parameters for all the controls surfaces, air speed, etc. Other aircraft "accidents" turned out to be pilot suicides after investigators reviewed the blackbox and found the pilot angled the plane to nosedive.I think there's easier ways to make it look like an accident if that were the case. Turning off the transponder and programming a U-turn are suspicious as hell. If it were pilot suicide, I'm more inclined to think it would be as a political statement.
wait, what fire?I have a question, is it possible to fly the plane to 45000 ft to kill of the fire? And the high attitude happened to kill off the fire AND the all people on the plane. So the plane was on cruise control for the next 6 hours,flying essentially as a "ghost plane" and finally drop to sea peacefully.
The coast of Malaysia is shallow water. Fly out to the Indian Ocean and the depth is 10,000+ ft.
I grant that turning off the transponder is suspicious. However, the pilot really didn't want anybody to find the plane's blackbox which contains pilot audio but also the parameters for all the controls surfaces, air speed, etc. Other aircraft "accidents" turned out to be pilot suicides after investigators reviewed the blackbox and found the pilot angled the plane to nosedive.
I have a question, is it possible to fly the plane to 45000 ft to kill of the fire? And the high attitude happened to kill off the fire AND the all people on the plane. So the plane was on cruise control for the next 6 hours,flying essentially as a "ghost plane" and finally drop to sea peacefully.
This is a theory that has been discussed. Apparently flying up to put out a fire is not SOP - you are supposed to get down and land as quickly as possible. But some folks have theorized that if the pilot decided he couldn't land in time he could have attempted this. It would work, but like you say it would also incapacitate people pretty quickly.I have a question, is it possible to fly the plane to 45000 ft to kill of the fire? And the high attitude happened to kill off the fire AND the all people on the plane. So the plane was on cruise control for the next 6 hours,flying essentially as a "ghost plane" and finally drop to sea peacefully.
wait, what fire?
Iguanas on a Planethe fire that the magical iguanas started in the cargo bay
anticitizen one plsSomething strange is going on:
According to that map the plane was supposed to go to PEK which i'm assuming is Peking, China but when I try to look up Peking on the internet/wikipedia there is no information. Did an entire city disappear?
This is a theory that has been discussed. Apparently flying up to put out a fire is not SOP - you are supposed to get down and land as quickly as possible. But some folks have theorized that if the pilot decided he couldn't land in time he could have attempted this. It would work, but like you say it would also incapacitate people pretty quickly.
The only thing that makes the theory hard to swallow is that the plane changed directions a couple times after the ascent/descent (if the altitude readings were even correct in the first place , which some people doubt).
courtney love?
has anyone checked in with ja rule for his thoughts on the matter
There's apparently massive tension between Shias and Sunnis in Malaysia too, to the point that aspects of Shia are criminalized. This could very well turn out to be an internal religious conflict too. I imagine they're going to dig extensively into the pilot and copilot's backgrounds...
Well they have doubled back on things they released before, so it wouldn't shock me if we heard another "whoops, actually we got the path all wrong..."I think I will pin the rest of the "direction changes" to the incompetence of the Malaysia military radar. Unless Malaysia let Americans audit their data, I don't have confidence in this supposedly route change.
I think I will pin the rest of the "direction changes" to the incompetence of the Malaysia military radar. Unless Malaysia let Americans audit their data, I don't have confidence in this supposedly route change.
One of the questions in 3/17's press conference was if it was a national threat to have shared military radar data with foreign agencies. The answer was along the lines of "yes technically it would be but that's something we are going to look at going forward, right now we are trying to find the plane"
I think I will pin the rest of the "direction changes" to the incompetence of the Malaysia military radar. Unless Malaysia let Americans audit their data, I don't have confidence in this supposedly route change.
The guy was so sure of himself he turned off all communications, managed to do "something" that prevented everyone on board from phoning anywhere, avoids all radars, satellites, etc., and goes to hide under the ocean the other way around?
Even if all that is true and the plane eventually crashed they would have more than likely found the wreckage by now
I see your point in the impossible mission, but I disagree on this point.Doesn't make any sense. Plus, that's only "justifiable" because it has worked so far. It would be nonsensical as soon as the black boxes would be found. That a pilot could have bet everything on such an impossible mission is really far fetched.
There is no earth.There was no plane. There is no such thing as "Malaysia".
So how can they know that the turn was done by the automatic pilot?
The only ways I could see that are:
1-They saw the turn and decided it was too smooth and "perfect" to be done manually. Problem with that is that I really doubt that have precise enough information to see that kind of stuff.
2-They saw that the new heading was directly toward a specific waypoint in the system which sound like the moste plausible way but even then, in theory, it could have been done manually.
Also, depending on how the turn was actually done, it doesn't necessarly require that much aviation knowledge. If we're talking about changing the flightplan in the computer then yes you need some knowledge but that's not that complicated (I could most probably do it myself after playing with PMDG 777 in FSX for a while). On the other hand, if it was simply a heading change on the autopilot then it really doesn't require that much knowledge.All you need to know is where the HDG knob is on the center panel in the cockpit.
this doesnt sound like malaysia air's fault at all, i hope they surive this incident as an airline.
Serious question: Have you ever been on a plane?
Because if so, you'd know that you don't get any cellphone signal whatsoever whenever you go above ~3000ft.
Many aircraft carry air phones using radio or satellite technology, and the Malaysia Airlines jet was equipped with them in business class. The plane continued to send satellite pings for nearly seven hours after it was apparently diverted.
But air phones these days tend to be part of an aircraft’s in-flight entertainment system. If someone deliberately diverted a plane and turned off its transponder and other communications equipment, that person is likely to have disabled the in-flight entertainment system so that passengers could not figure out from the map that they were flying in the wrong direction, said a telecommunications expert who insisted on anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to the news media.
If the entertainment system was turned off, the air phones also would not work, the expert said.
The coast of Malaysia is shallow water. Fly out to the Indian Ocean and the depth is 10,000+ ft.
I grant that turning off the transponder is suspicious. However, the pilot really didn't want anybody to find the plane's blackbox which contains pilot audio but also the parameters for all the controls surfaces, air speed, etc. Other aircraft "accidents" turned out to be pilot suicides after investigators reviewed the blackbox and found the pilot angled the plane to nosedive.
Wait until people stop looking for it. Give it a quick & dirty paint job just to hide the obvious stuff. Change or remove the transponder. Fly it into the White House.
Making the assumption that the plane was in fact "stolen", that's my theory as to why.