EMP?None of this makes any sense. Aliens?
I wonder if it was a total power failure and the pilots decided to glide the plane in? The course change and continual descent would make sense in that context...no navigational or communications equipment...
So now it's pretty obvious that the plane is indeed at the other side of Malaysia... to the west/northwest. Last contact from radar made there, and from the same place, 8 villagers heard a 'jet' noise by 01:30am.
I just don't understand why the military didn't release this info before... they wasted 3 days worth of search in the wrong place.
EMP?
This seems like the only mechanical failure option that makes sense. Plane loses all electric power for some reason, the pilots immediately turn around and try to land but can't navigate without the help of electronics.
I'm not big on assuming conspiracies, but given the parameters of this accident it's hard to imagine a scenario that doesn't involve some foul play such as:
1) Pilot suicide
2) Hijacking attempt
3) The plane was accidentally shot down by some military force and there is a cover-up
The revelations that the plane flew hundreds of miles off course would appear to rule out sudden catastrophic mechanical failure.
It would mean the plane flew around 500 km (350miles) at least after its last contact with air traffic control, although its transponder and other tracking systems were off.
A non-military source familiar with the investigations said the report was one of several theories and was being checked.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/missing-malaysia-airlines-flight-live-3219331#ixzz2vgZhufeY
Follow us: @DailyMirror on Twitter | DailyMirror on Facebook
CNN is still going for the terrorist angle.
I imagine a well-placed fire could lead to a similar result.Avionics are designed to withstand EMI.
I imagine a well-placed fire could lead to a similar result.
Well, what do you speculate at this point? Nothing makes sense to me outside the catastrophic power-outage angle, especially if they've ruled out the two Iranians being connected to terrorism.Honestly any fire large enough to kill that many systems probably causes the plane to crash quickly.
This seems like the only mechanical failure option that makes sense. Plane loses all electric power for some reason, the pilots immediately turn around and try to land but can't navigate without the help of electronics.
I'm not big on assuming conspiracies, but given the parameters of this accident it's hard to imagine a scenario that doesn't involve some foul play such as:
1) Pilot suicide
2) Hijacking attempt
3) The plane was accidentally shot down by some military force and there is a cover-up
It's the distance between the old last known transponder position and the alleged last known military radar sighting near the island of Pulau Perak (Strait of Malacca)How are they arriving at the 350-400m number? Six hours of fuel sounds like it could go farther than that.
Well, damn
tried to turn around but got the course wrong by 20 degrees
CNN is still going for the terrorist angle.
tried to turn around but got the course wrong by 20 degrees
tried to turn around but got the course wrong by 20 degrees
quick, someone ask Indonesian military whether they had some rogue planes cruising there too
Can you lose your sense of directions if you don't have a Transponder and radio
Yes. Even with a radio you can. There was a famous case in Florida with air force pilots confusing the Bahamas with the florida keys. And they were talking to others the whole timeCan you lose your sense of directions if you don't have a Transponder and radio
They should have, but with the story so far I wouldn't trust them with tracking anything.Did Indonesia not see the plane? I mean with the above map the plane is heading directly to indonesia.
tried to turn around but got the course wrong by 20 degrees
quick, someone ask Indonesian military whether they had some rogue planes cruising there too
Now I wonder if en route from 1 to 2 if it was constantly seen on radar, or only appeared briefly on radar when it arrived at point 2? If it was on radar all the time why weren't fighter jets scrambled to go and see what's happening? Surely a commercial plane making a turn around without having any communication with air traffic means the airplane is having problems or something suspicious is going on?
All very suspicious.
How so? a large number of air disasters occur because of aircraft malfunction or pilot error. From what little we know the terrorism/pilot suicide/missile strike doesn't even make sense in this situation. Lets not forget how quick we are to jump to conclusions, TWA 800/Air France 447 was initially thought to be an act of terrorism and look how that turned up.
The info that they're putting out is very inconsistent. It looks like a cover-up or something.How so? a large number of air disasters occur because of aircraft malfunction or pilot error. From what little we know the terrorism/pilot suicide/missile strike doesn't even make sense in this situation. Lets not forget how quick we are to jump to conclusions, TWA 800/Air France 447 was initially thought to be an act of terrorism and look how that turned up.
The Malaysian governments inconsistencies in the handling of the crisis were further highlighted Tuesday when the countrys chief of police said there had been no baggage removed from the aircraft before take-off early Saturday, contradicting what officials had said for the past three days.
Khalid Abu Bakar, the inspector general of the Malaysian police, said previous reports by Malaysian officials that five passengers had failed to board the flight and that their baggage had been removed were false. Everybody that booked the flight boarded the plane, he said.
But Malaysia Airlines later issued a clarification, saying that there were four passengers who booked tickets on the flight but failed to check in at the airport or check any bags for the flight.
On top of that, it appears they knew this and still kept the search efforts in an area where the plane couldn't possibly be.The fact they flew for so long after losing communication, off course, just seems odd. Terrorism is the least likely possibility, in my opinion, I think there's something they're not telling people yet, or don't want people to know though.
The info that they're putting out is very inconsistent. It looks like a cover-up or something.
You shouldn't expect Indonesian radar to have picked anything up. I'm not going to say much more on it, but I have family in the Indonesian government and intelligence service and the source of my statement is based on that.
Could a direct lightning strike destroy all the electronics on board?
They could not have made it across the Indian ocean in 6 hours.Welp.
With the possibility of the plane having flown over Indonesia without anybody batting an eye, next on the trajectory are Maldives, Seychelles and Somalia. Not sure whether the 6h of remaining fuel would have got it all the way across to Somalia. Not at the low altitude at least.
Welp.
With the possibility of the plane having flown over Indonesia without anybody batting an eye, next on the trajectory are Maldives, Seychelles and Somalia. Not sure whether the 6h of remaining fuel would have got it all the way across to Somalia. Not at the low altitude at least.
I don't think anyone is suggesting the phones were ringing at 35000ft. The phones were ringing well after it disappeared from tracking, so presumably the phones were on the ground at that point. We also don't know where the plane is, so it might have crashed somewhere that gets signal? We just don't know anything. Anyway many people are saying that you get false rings sometimes when the operator is searching networks.Also can we please stop asking about the phones ringing? There is NO way that the phones would work at 35,000ft above the ocean. This 777 did not have wifi or personal phones in it as well. That whole theory is just wrong. It would not happen.
This seems like the only mechanical failure option that makes sense. Plane loses all electric power for some reason, the pilots immediately turn around and try to land but can't navigate without the help of electronics.
I'm not big on assuming conspiracies, but given the parameters of this accident it's hard to imagine a scenario that doesn't involve some foul play such as:
1) Pilot suicide
2) Hijacking attempt
3) The plane was accidentally shot down by some military force and there is a cover-up
well damn...You shouldn't expect Indonesian radar to have picked anything up. I'm not going to say much more on it, but I have family in the Indonesian government and intelligence service and the source of my statement is based on that.
I don't know why if they knew it turned back, as indicated on the search areas image, why they were still searching around the initial disappearance spot. Are they not 100% on that?
I'm not sure on number 3 but I'm sure that they definitely do for 1 and 2.that would assume Malaysian and Indonesian military would
- have people paying attention to who flies in their aerospace
- have an agreed response to unidentified / unresponsive craft
- have the air craft required to intercept, ready and fuelled
I am not sure of whether these assumptions are entirely accurate.
that would assume Malaysian and Indonesian military would
- have people paying attention to who flies in their aerospace
- have an agreed response to unidentified / unresponsive craft
- have the air craft required to intercept, ready and fuelled
I am not sure of whether these assumptions are entirely accurate.