I don't know why if they knew it turned back, as indicated on the search areas image, why they were still searching around the initial disappearance spot. Are they not 100% on that?
These aren't 3rd world countries...
Actually according to that they are not defined by the 3rd world term but once were.Actually... Indonesia and Malaysia are defined as 3rd world countries.
Actually... Indonesia and Malaysia are defined as 3rd world countries.
Actually... Indonesia and Malaysia are defined as 3rd world countries.
In real life? Who knows. I can't think of any instances (at least of airliners).Wouldn't the enormous turnaround rule out pilot suicide too? If a pilot wanted to kill himself and take the plane with him (sidebar: how often does this ever happen?) there was plenty of ocean for it on the way there.
If they were on the ground the carriers would be able to trace them easily. As noone has found the plane yet we can assume that they do not have signal and are not ringing.I don't think anyone is suggesting the phones were ringing at 35000ft. The phones were ringing well after it disappeared from tracking, so presumably the phones were on the ground at that point. We also don't know where the plane is, so it might have crashed somewhere that gets signal? We just don't know anything. Anyway many people are saying that you get false rings sometimes when the operator is searching networks.
Well, what do you speculate at this point? Nothing makes sense to me outside the catastrophic power-outage angle, especially if they've ruled out the two Iranians being connected to terrorism.
In real life? Who knows. I can't think of any instances (at least of airliners).
In fiction -- see: Tom Clancy's Debt of Honor. And yes, he wrote that book way before 9-11. Clancy was a bit prophetic about Russian ultra-nationalism as well I suppose.
Seems like an awfully convoluted way of going out, if all you're interested in is committing suicide, vs loftier objectives. Just walk into a spinning engine and it'll be over instantly. Why bother going to all that trouble (unless someone had a major grievance I guess, but we probably would have heard about something like that by now).
Apparently somewhere in the Breaking News app there were allegations that the copilot had a reputation to let people into the cockpit. Can anyone confirm the story or find a link?
Apparently somewhere in the Breaking News app there were allegations that the copilot had a reputation to let people into the cockpit. Can anyone confirm the story or find a link?
Wait, this flyover the peninsula is confirmed now? Where did this start, how is it confirmed and how did they not figure this out until now?
Another possibility.
It seems like som Malaysian newspaper made a story quoting some rmaf dude. Reuters then confirmed it with other sources i guess, and later the guy cited to start with (along with the rest of the af) denied saying it.Wait, this flyover the peninsula is confirmed now? Where did this start, how is it confirmed and how did they not figure this out until now?
I was being a jackass and I shouldn't have been (it's been Jackass Day at work). This is where I was going. "Third World" is an archaic and loaded term and is meaningless when it comes to measuring development.Going back to the cold war are we!?!
I think you mean developing countries:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developing_country
There’s considerable confusion around the theory that flight MH370 veered back towards Malaysia after it stopped communicating with ground controllers. The Malaysian air force chief, General Rodzali Daud, has been quoted as saying that the flight made a sharp left turn, and headed back across Malaysia and out over the Malacca strait.
The New York Times quotes Tengku Sariffuddin Tengku Ahmad, spokesman for the prime minister’s office, as contradicting that account. He said that senior military officials, with whom he had checked, said there was no no evidence that the plane had crossed back over the Malaysian peninsula, only that it may have attempted to do so.
“As far as they know, except for the air turn-back, there is no new development,” Mr Tengku Sariffuddin is quoted as saying. The Times says he described the earlier remarks by the air force chief as “not true.”
I'd like to think the US has spy satellites on any potential air field.Another possibility.
Could it have been decompression?
Most cases of planes just going silent and flying around aimlessly is a result of a loss in cabin pressure.
Yes, the crew has masks but if they can't get to them within a few seconds they are in trouble.
There was this Greek flight that did just that some years ago.
Edit: I had a brain fart. It would of course not account for the loss of transponder signal. never mind.
Another possibility. http://i.imgur.com/KtDYQf4.jpg
We don't know what was wrong with the communication systems when we still don't know what happened to them. I don't think there has been many/any accidents where the transponder and radio went dead at 35000 feet in a plane that otherwise functioned.I hope as a result of this incident, some major overhauls are made to improve communication and navigation in commercial aircraft. NextGen needs to be widely rolled out ASAP.
You're the tenth person to mention this.Or OR aliens took them
Think about that
We received a report of cracking and corrosion in the fuselage skin underneath the SATCOM antenna adapter. During a maintenance planning data inspection, one operator reported a 16-inch crack under the 3-bay SATCOM antenna adapter plate in the crown skin of the fuselage on an airplane that was 14 years old with approximately 14,000 total flight cycles. Subsequent to this crack finding, the same operator inspected 42 other airplanes that are between 6 and 16 years old and found some local corrosion, but no other cracking. Cracking and corrosion in the fuselage skin, if not corrected, could lead to rapid decompression and loss of structural integrity of the airplane.
While we are swapping stories here. You should look into this crash.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_South_Dakota_Learjet_crash
Was crazy. Just a plane flying on autopilot with everyone dead inside. This flew through my center and I know some of the people who worked the fighters in to intercept. They never fired on it, just crashed into the ground.
I'd like to think the US has spy satellites on any potential air field.
While we are swapping stories here. You should look into this crash.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_South_Dakota_Learjet_crash
Was crazy. Just a plane flying on autopilot with everyone dead inside. This flew through my center and I know some of the people who worked the fighters in to intercept. They never fired on it, just crashed into the ground.
Satellites are on an orbital pattern. We can't just choose to hover it over a particular spot. Which is precisely why spy planes aren't going away anytime soon.I'd like to think the US has spy satellites on any potential air field.
While we are swapping stories here. You should look into this crash.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_South_Dakota_Learjet_crash
Was crazy. Just a plane flying on autopilot with everyone dead inside. This flew through my center and I know some of the people who worked the fighters in to intercept. They never fired on it, just crashed into the ground.
At approximately 1033 the aircraft ascended through FL256 (25,600 feet (7,800 m)) and ATC requested the pilot to confirm the altitude of the aircraft. “Sierra Kilo Charlie–um–standby," the pilot said.[13] This was the final spoken transmission from the aircraft, and the altitude of the aircraft continued to increase. According to the accident report, transmissions from the aircraft thereafter were only open-microphone transmissions, sounds of what is believed to be standard background noise produced by the engines, a person breathing, "one unintelligible syllable", and "two chime-like tones, similar to those generated by electronic devices."[13] ATC attempted to regain contact with the aircraft as the transmissions occurred. "Sierra Kilo Charlie Sierra Kilo Charlie Melbourne Centre if receiving this transmission squawk ident" the controller in contact with the aircraft said at 1040.[15] At 1041, the controller asked again, "Sierra Kilo Charlie only receiving open mike from you. Would you contact me on one two five decimal two."[16]
I'm assuming the plane went down somewhere in the middle of the indian ocean. That is a huge body of water. Who knows if/when we will find it.
I thought there were plenty of geostationary satellites?Satellites are on an orbital pattern. We can't just choose to hover it over a particular spot. Which is precisely why spy planes aren't going away anytime soon.
Not spy satellites.I thought there were plenty of geostationary satellites?
Not spy satellites.
Is there a list of spy satellites out and about then?
kinda defeats the purpose of spy satellites if you know the location of each and every one of them...
I figured that they weren't confident with the information.. back to square one? at this point the chinese should take over all search efforts. The Malaysian government is totally incompetent
http://www.theguardian.com/world/blog/2014/mar/11/malaysia-airlines-mh370-search-refocused-on-malacca-straits-live-updates
Well, no...and I suppose it's not impossible that they have a satellite dedicated to each and every airfield on the planet. They'd be pretty easy to spot and counter, though.Is there a list of spy satellites out and about then?
The way they keep the location of spy satellites unknown is by continually varying the orbital pattern via thrusters. There's little point in having a geostationary spy satellite.My point exactly so unless crozier works for the government how would he know if there is or is not any geostationary spy satellites?
The way they keep the location of spy satellites unknown is by continually varying the orbital pattern via thrusters. There's little point in having a geostationary spy satellite.