The thing about Sasuke is that his motivations and character never really made any sense or have any real impact.
Griffith is a well-written and complicated character. His betrayal makes people foam at the mouth because goddamn. Nobody ever feels like that about Sasuke or any other Naruto character.
The thing about Sasuke is that his motivations and character never really made any sense or have any real impact.
Griffith is a well-written and complicated character. His betrayal makes people foam at the mouth because goddamn. Nobody ever feels like that about Sasuke or any other Naruto character.
Sasuke was just a bad loser, the moment he saw Naruto as a rival he wanted anything to gain more power and beat him but he was never a nice guy
DTL feels that way about Sasuke
Sasuke was just a bad loser, the moment he saw Naruto as a rival he wanted anything to gain more power and beat him but he was never a nice guy
Gintama major announcement in next issue (43rd) of Weekly Shounen Jump.
"More surprising than live-action film."
I mean yeah that's intentional, this contradiction is super creepy and really sells the atmosphere that the manga is going forThere's nothing complicated about Griffith. He uses people and things to get what he wants. He's a complete and utter monster. The manga keeps portraying him like he's some sort of sacred entity even though he's a monster. That's what I don't get about Berserk. Nobody is hoping that Griffith turns his life around. He's unforgivable!!!!
There's nothing complicated about Griffith. He uses people and things to get what he wants. He's a complete and utter monster. The manga keeps portraying him like he's some sort of sacred entity even though he's a monster. That's what I don't get about Berserk. Nobody is hoping that Griffith turns his life around. He's unforgivable!!!!
Griffith was not always a monster, he actually had a very strong human connection with Guts and (to a lesser degree) the Band of Hawks. He didn't just sacrifice the Band of Hawks on a whim, he did so after his entire world collapsed around him, and the reason his world collapse was due to a rash reaction to losing Guts.
As for the reason the manga portraits him as a sacred entity, it's that despite all his actions, people perceived their lives as improved when close to Griffith.
As far everyone in the world is concerned, Griffith is their personal savior. Why would they look at him as anything other than that?
Can we stop comparing everything and anything to Naruto before I burst a fucking blood vessel?
Chio-chan no Tsuugakuro 8
This is officially up there in "Newest series to be fucking hilarious" with Grand Blue and...uh...something else I'm sure.
What was that at the cover? Someone passed away?
I mean yeah that's intentional, this contradiction is super creepy and really sells the atmosphere that the manga is going for
Griffith was not always a monster, he actually had a very strong human connection with Guts and (to a lesser degree) the Band of Hawks. He didn't just sacrifice the Band of Hawks on a whim, he did so after his entire world collapsed around him, and the reason his world collapse was due to a rash reaction to losing Guts.
As for the reason the manga portraits him as a sacred entity, it's that despite all his actions, people perceived their lives as improved when close to Griffith.
As far everyone in the world is concerned, Griffith is their personal savior. Why would they look at him as anything other than that?
You have a very...I don't know any polite way to say this, child-like view of storytelling. I guess basic or naive are better words. That how something is presented is the truth of what that thing is, that there is no deceit or nuance to something. Yes, Griffith is drawn beautifully and shining and beautiful. And you're like "But he isn't any of those things so why does he get drawn that way?!?!?!" which is...the point. He is very specifically drawn as a savior, built up as a wonderful beautiful man and loved by tons of people in direct contrast to the awful things that he had to do to achieve that beautiful form. And it makes the situation so much more tense and dark because we the readers are keenly aware of things that the characters in the manga are not; the people flocking to Griffith and loving him do not know he is a demon, that he colludes with the Godhand and that he inflicted a massacre and betrayal to get there. They just see him as the only safe point of reference in a world that has gone to complete shit. They don't know everything we know. Which is why it's such a messed up situation; we know he's garbage, they do not. Him being drawn beautiful isn't supposed to make us think he's so awesome and good. It's actually being used for the direct opposite effect.
The manga is not a cartoon for children. It's villains aren't ugly caricatures, who rub their hands together and go "Evil evil evil, all day erry day, evil for evil's sake!" and then sandblast an orphan. They are presented as one thing, even visually within the manga, when they are in fact another. It's a very common form of dramatic irony.
Do you see what I'm saying?
The Naruto comparisons make it worse because when your point of reference is something "easy" or common, it removes any nuance from your understanding of the more complicated or better written thing. Like, honestly. There is nothing in common between Sasuke or Griffith on almost a base and fundamental level except for the vague idea of "betrayal" which is so nebulous and unhelpful that by it's very comparison point you are poisoning the well of the conversation.
That's why all the frequent Naruto comparisons drive me nuts because when you compare two things based entirely on surface features that are so vague and generic that it can apply to any number of things that are distinctly dissimilar you are already starting with a false premise and flawed understanding of what you are trying to understand. It does not help anyone, especially not yourself, in understanding.
Also Naruto fucking sucks.
Everyone should read Tsugumomo instead.
Everyone should read Tsugumomo instead.
You have a very...I don't know any polite way to say this, child-like view of storytelling. I guess basic or naive are better words. That how something is presented is the truth of what that thing is, that there is no deceit or nuance to something. Yes, Griffith is drawn beautifully and shining and beautiful. And you're like "But he isn't any of those things so why does he get drawn that way?!?!?!" which is...the point. He is very specifically drawn as a savior, built up as a wonderful beautiful man and loved by tons of people in direct contrast to the awful things that he had to do to achieve that beautiful form. And it makes the situation so much more tense and dark because we the readers are keenly aware of things that the characters in the manga are not; the people flocking to Griffith and loving him do not know he is a demon, that he colludes with the Godhand and that he inflicted a massacre and betrayal to get there. They just see him as the only safe point of reference in a world that has gone to complete shit. They don't know everything we know. Which is why it's such a messed up situation; we know he's garbage, they do not. Him being drawn beautiful isn't supposed to make us think he's so awesome and good. It's actually being used for the direct opposite effect.
The manga is not a cartoon for children. It's villains aren't ugly caricatures, who rub their hands together and go "Evil evil evil, all day erry day, evil for evil's sake!" and then sandblast an orphan. They are presented as one thing, even visually within the manga, when they are in fact another. It's a very common form of dramatic irony.
Do you see what I'm saying?
The Naruto comparisons make it worse because when your point of reference is something "easy" or common, it removes any nuance from your understanding of the more complicated or better written thing. Like, honestly. There is nothing in common between Sasuke or Griffith on almost a base and fundamental level except for the vague idea of "betrayal" which is so nebulous and unhelpful that by it's very comparison point you are poisoning the well of the conversation.
That's why all the frequent Naruto comparisons drive me nuts because when you compare two things based entirely on surface features that are so vague and generic that it can apply to any number of things that are distinctly dissimilar you are already starting with a false premise and flawed understanding of what you are trying to understand. It does not help anyone, especially not yourself, in understanding.
Also Naruto fucking sucks.
Everyone should read Tsugumomo instead.
Nice Kochikame tribute in Shokugeki no Soma
It seems every WSJ manga has a Kochikame tribute in it this week, as well as some SQ ones. The Soma one is really nice.
Better placed that others, like Toriko.
I was thinking that FMA actually had a surprisingly diverse cast for a shounen series in a 'fantasy' world compared to other shounen.
Where was the tribute in Toriko? I must have missed it.
The important question here is that the (I think) first ever ancient Chinese gay drama is airing, and I'm wondering if it's a good idea to watch it
Chinese characters are going to have the stereotypical "Chinese look" in JP entertainment forever. Although from the beginning it was pretty obvious a place called Xing would cough up the Chinese-types.well, that's probably because the mangaka gave a shit about other cultures.
I was still a bit iffy on the blatently chinese characters who wander in about halfway through but they work out mostly alright.
Love is More Than A WordHuh, what's its name?
Where was the tribute in Toriko? I must have missed it.
a lot of the best manga are written by western influenced authors tbh
Fullmetal Alchmest, Jojo's Bizarre Adventure, My Hero Academia...
Chinese characters are going to have the stereotypical "Chinese look" in JP entertainment forever. Although from the beginning it was pretty obvious a place called Xing would cough up the Chinese-types.
But I think what ended up interesting I guess is that it's everybody from different cultures/countries/places that came together to defeat the big bad.
I mean, yeah they get their influence from everywhere like good authors do, but I wouldn't say Araki and Arakawa aren't western-influenced too.
Like look at Diamond is Unbreakable -- Morioh is a small Japanese city, but it looks like a 50s Americana suburb because that's what Araki picked up from horror movies.
Araki has always been straight up in love with Europe and western bands and that shows everywhere in his works very clearly from locations, character names, his art style, etc, etc etc.
Love is More Than A Word
There's vast difference between Kishimoto's Sasuke and Miura's Griffith. Honestly I never find any similarities between the character besides them being "good lookers with awful personality". There haven't a single instance where I thought Griffith horrible doing portrayed as something good unironically as compared to Sasuke to the eyes of the reader.
OniBarubary have said it that Griffith is something that would you like to call irony. But the irony isn't placed on the character itself but the world surrounding it. Miura does it to provoke anger and draw ire not only towards Griffith, but to show how it is easy to deceive the ignorant masses with half-perceived good deeds.
Miura knows what he writes and the kind of story he want to tell to his reader. Kishimoto doesn't or at least lost his vision midway. I couldn't think anyone with normal moral compass would like Griffith as a character unironically or as he was perceived in the world of the story. Meanwhile Sasuke have a lot of fans who like him as he is, not knowing how horrible his personality in reality.
In my observation, MediKing made the comparison because he doesn't know things better, yet. It's understandable and not something worth to get really upset for. Everybody have their moment of comparing everything to Dragonball or discussing which character that Saitama can't beat.