latinlikeaviolin said:
With loafers,
they look great. In my experience, they're the best looking colour sock with a loafer by a mile. When the Ivy League kids were doing it, they usually wore it with chinos, thereby following the rule that their socks should be lighter than their pants (y'know to extend the length of the leg and all that stuff). However, there are some pictured that wore their socks with shorts, and they still looked great.
This is your example for wearing white socks with loafers?
Really? Nearly all of those looks look absolutely ridiculous and remind me of someone tucking a t-shirt into their jeans without a belt. It's basically Mother-isn't-around-I'll-wear-what-I-like
couture. And the cases where the outfit works? They're wearing a light-colored khaki with white socks, which is close to keeping with the matching socks rule.
The black pants, white socks, black loafers look I'm on the fence about, but I think that's because it looks like they were going for a specific style, and the white sock with the high hem on the pant makes the ankle area pop (edit: in an otherwise conservative look).
Why am I bringing this up? Because the rules aren't as steadfast as some perceive them to be. Though to never button the bottom button of your jacket?
JFK didn't do it. Or how about wear your watch on your wrist?
The late Gianni Agnelli, the head of Fiat, said screw that. You see, the rules are not arbitrary, they were never meant to be; they should be a guideline for developing your own sense of how to dress yourself.
JFK was the president so he could do what he damn-well pleased--that being said he probably would have looked better in that suit jacket with the bottom button un-done. Gianni Agnelli though, holy shit the watch over the shirt thing looks absolutely retarded. That's a clear "I have to wear a suit, but how can I still cry out 'Look at me! Look at me!'" look and it's just stupid, come on now.
The guy with the "jarring" socks looks great and he sure knows how to dress himself. The colour palette of his jacket and shirt work well with his skin tone while his pants, pocket square, socks, and shoes provide enough contrast so as to keep the outfit lively. A lighter colour sock would not work so well because it disregards the deep brown patina of the shoe and it would take away from the earthy tones of his jacket. He probably opted out of the matching sock (matching with his pants) because it could make his bottom half seem too safe. He knows how to break the rules when needed in order for his own personal sense of style to come forth. Would his picture have been circulated around the internet (or even taken) if he wore a longer sports coat, trousers instead of jeans, navy socks, and a leather briefcase? Probably not. Like him, develop your own sense of style. Don't dress for rule's sake; dress for you own sake. After all, the second you start dressing with the rules is the second you decide to put a costume on.
The
only part I don't like about the guy's outfit are the socks. They are, without a doubt, the wrong color for the outfit. He has a good look but the socks draw too much attention away from the rest of his outfit. It throws off the balance and I feel like I'd end up staring at the guy's socks instead of paying attention to anything he were saying if we had a conversation.
I will give you that the jacket
does lend some balance to the outfit, but what if he had to take the jacket off for a minute? Now he's just a weirdo in a white shirt, dark jeans and tan socks--how dumb would that look?