TheKaeptain
Banned
I don't see why people were doubting Marty. Even his weaker films are better than 90% of shit released.
Read it now, sounds much better than the trailers are showing. Just one question. If watched in 2d will it still be as good visually do you think?Expendable. said:Have you read my impressions? I've seen the actual film and that bit is not representative of it.
Dead Man said:Read it now, sounds much better than the trailers are showing. Just one question. If watched in 2d will it still be as good visually do you think?
Hmm... might be worth the headache then. Thanks.Expendable. said:Definitely not. There is a specific moment in the 3rd act that uses 3D as a storytelling device, not just technically. It is magnificent and gave me chills.
Aside from a brief mention that at some point it supposedly switches gears and stops sucking, all you really say is if you are a student of film you'll appreciate the nods. Oh yeah, and the 3D doesn't suck. Of course as many times as I've heard the latter it really means nothing to me. 3D, even done well, does nothing as far as building interest for a movie. I'm no student of film either, so really the only thing I've got to hold onto this movie doesn't suck as much as those trailers lead me to believe is your assurance it does a 180 midway through.Expendable. said:Have you read my impressions? I've seen the actual film and that bit is not representative of it.
It's fine even before the turning point. It doesn't "stop sucking" because it's all good. The original trailer doesn't representative the movie well in any fashion.Dali said:Aside from a brief mention that at some point it supposedly switches gears and stops sucking, all you really say is if you are a student of film you'll appreciate the nods. Oh yeah, and the 3D doesn't suck. Of course as many times as I've heard the latter it really means nothing to me. 3D, even done well, does nothing as far as building interest for a movie. I'm no student of film either, so really the only thing I've got to hold onto this movie doesn't suck as much as those trailers lead me to believe is your assurance it does a 180 midway through.
You shot a lot of the movie at Shepperton Studios outside London. In creating these sets, what aspects of the real Paris were you aiming for?
We built a train station, which is kind of an impression of Parisian train stations the Gare du Nord, the Gare de Lyon, the old Gare Montparnasse, which no longer exists. We took that and aspects of French visual culture around the late 20s, early 30s, the Dadaists, the short films they made, Man Ray and Léger and René Clairs comedies, Under the Roofs of Paris and À Nous la Liberté and created a Paris that wasnt really Paris. It was an Americans impression of Paris. As a joke, I kept asking, How are we going to know its Paris? Whatever the angle was, Id say, Put the Eiffel Tower in there!
In the past, youve gone to great lengths to achieve a desired texture. In Raging Bull, someone held a hot bar of iron beneath the lens to make Jake LaMotta look particularly weary. In The Age of Innocence, when Archer first sees Ellen, you overcranked the camera and then dissolved each frame into the next to make things flutter and slow down. In what ways did you experiment on Hugo?
My instinct was if something wasnt normally done with 3-D cameras, lets see if we could do it. And that actually was almost every other shot. But the most enjoyable time was building an approximation of Georges Mélièss glass studio. We started replicating scenes from Méliès films as best we could. We recreated the underwater set for Kingdom of the Fairies. With Mélièss films, especially the hand-colored ones, its like illuminated manuscripts come alive. We shot Méliès shooting his films for five or six days. It was one of the best times Ive had shooting a picture.
polyh3dron said:I saw this at a screening in downtown LA last Saturday and Scorsese did a Q&A afterwards (the one moderated by PTA). I honestly had low expectations going into it and didn't know much about it other than that 1st trailer but holy shit I was blown away at how good it was. Some of the shots they pulled off in this movie are amazing, the story was great and I can tell why it grabbed Marty's interest. Going into it I thought it was just Marty selling out, doing a 3D kids' fantasy flick for a paycheck but this movie felt like it his heart was in it just as much as it was in Raging Bull and Taxi Driver. Ben Kingsley was fuckawesome in his role, as were the kids and Sacha Baron Cohen. This is also a GREAT use of 3D technology having been shot in 3D as opposed to being "converted" after the fact and Scorsese went on record at the Q&A as saying that he feels this new addition to movie technology is just as important as color and sound before it.
THIS THIS THISIt goes without saying that the craftsmanship is as good as it gets, and for those who cant stand 3D this could be a game-changer. Critic Leonard Maltin (who loved it) commented after the Regal screening that one extraordinary use of 3D in a scene involving co-star Sacha Baron Cohens face moving progressively closer into the audience could be the one that finally makes the 3D sale to those who just think its a fad.
Rob Legato says Jim Cameron called #Hugo "the best #3D film ever made."
Ignatz Mouse said:I'm trying to suss out what would be a contender. Coraline, maybe.
It's not that high a bar, but coming from Cameron it means a lot
overcast said:Wow, surprised this is getting good reviews to be honest. I really didn't like the trailer. Love Scorsese, but didn't impress me. I'll watch this for sure though.
Ignatz Mouse said:I didn't see Transformers 3, but Avatar isn't even in teh running since the story and acting are so bad.
I didn't mean "the best" to mean best use of 3D, but the best movie that happens to be 3D.
Which I guess means one of the Toy Story movies, now that I think about it. I liked Coraline but the Toy Stories were better.
Still nothing close to Hugo though.
this.Ignatz Mouse said:A couple of us sawa previewthe whole movie, and believe me, the trailer is a horrible representation of the film.
Expendable. said:- James Cameron and Scorsese Talk Hugo and 3D
- the film will only get a 1200 theater release next weekend, instead of the 3k+ for Muppets and Arthur Christmas.
Expendable. said:On my phone, but Deadline just reported Hugo's Asa got cast as the lead in ENDER'S GAME!
How to explain the feeling I have for Martin Scorsese’s HUGO.
Transcendent Joy. Tear-producing Awe & Wonder.
But that doesn’t really do it for me. What we have here is our greatest domestic filmmaker, a man that made his name as a director that told stories of criminals and a stunning grip of violent imagery, unleashed telling a story about a little boy – a thief – an orphan – a curious boy named Hugo Cabret. What amazes me about Scorsese and this film is the simple fact that this movie is completely, 100%, not like a single other film in his career.
....
If you’ve seen Walt Disney’s classic cartoon CLOCK CLEANERS, where Mickey, Donald and Goofy have to clean a giant tower clock, not unlike BIG BEN, and well… hijinks occur… but when I was a kid, I had the old Fisher Price Hand Held Movie Viewer, which had cartridges with whole cartoons (it seemed to me) – and one of my faves was CLOCK CLEANERS – the brilliant thing about that cartoon was the constantly moving environment of the interior of the clock. We’ve also seen it in THE GREAT MOUSE DETECTIVE or even in Orson Welles’ superb film, THE STRANGER. There are other great Clockwork films, but Scorsese – holy shit. It’s just wondrous. It isn’t overdone, it feels right, but absolutely magic for a child to live in and within.
....
This is why the film is just so beautiful. So important for film loving folks to take their children to. The movie captures the magic of film. The magic of the makers of film. The wonder of the moving image.
If I had to pick some films to compare the MAGIC of this film to, it’d be Bill Condon’s GODS & MONSTERS, Giuseppe Tornatore’s CINEMA PARADISO and even something like Buster Keaton’s SHERLOCK JR. This is Scorsese’s love letter to film. The love that he gives Hugo and Chloe Moretz’s Isabelle’s discovery of every new bit of information – it’s stunning. Watching them discover the history of cinema, which Scorsese gives us a MASTER CLASS IN 3D of, literally taking images that I’ve had embedded in my noggin from the earliest age from my parents – and bringing them to life in an entirely new way. Once the kids are further along on their discovery of who George Melies is – the imagery becomes… well, naturally unbelievably amazing. Forget the work Scorsese did trying to recapture the magic from AVIATOR – here – it’s all 100% perfect. Here, he takes us on a 3D ride of discovery through the original magician of cinema. George Melies. Before there was Willis O’Brien, before there was Ray Harryhausen, before Jim Henson, before all the names of wizards of cinema, there was George Melies – and this film is Scorsese’s love letter to him… but more so – to the notion of film preservation, history, exhibition and the power it has to change lives.
even something like Buster Keatons SHERLOCK JR.