• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Marvel Cinematic Universe |OT2| Discussion on released and future projects (spoilers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
N

Neoxon

Junior Member
J10 said:
Official announcement on the Russos directing Avengers 3 & 4.

As anticipation and excitement build to a fever pitch for Marvel’s “Avengers: Age of Ultron,” the blockbuster sequel to the third-largest movie of all time, Marvel is proud to announce Joe and Anthony Russo will join the franchise as the directors of Marvel’s “Avengers: Infinity War – Part 1” and “Avengers: Infinity War – Part 2.”​
Click to expand...
At least it's official now.
 
E

E the Shaggy

Junior Member
Hot Coldman said:
Marvel's
Avengers:
Infinity War
Part 1 -
Captain America Dies In This One
Click to expand...

Just gimme this scene, that's all I ask:

infinity-gauntlet-caps-walk.jpg
 
Q

Quick

Banned
danielcw said:
Do you guys think the movies will be called "Part 1" and "Part 2", or are the parts going to get specific subtitles?
Click to expand...

Marvel Presents, in association with Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures: Marvel's Avengers: Infinity War - Part 1: Split Infinitives.

Marvel Presents, in association with Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures: Marvel's Avengers: Infinity War - Part 2: Thanos Is In This Movie, Too.
 
B

Busaiku

Member
Do Sony only have the film rights for Spider-Man?
Like if Daredevil does really well, is it too much to hope for a similar treatment for street level Spider-Man?
 
N

Neoxon

Junior Member
Busaiku said:
Do Sony only have the film rights for Spider-Man?
Like if Daredevil does really well, is it too much to hope for a similar treatment for street level Spider-Man?
Click to expand...
Put it this way, Spider-Man is like a car. Sony still owns the car, but they're too drunk to drive it. Marvel Studios is their designated driver while Sony rides shotgun.
 
TDLink

TDLink

Member
Busaiku said:
Do Sony only have the film rights for Spider-Man?
Like if Daredevil does really well, is it too much to hope for a similar treatment for street level Spider-Man?
Click to expand...

Marvel has TV rights to Spider-Man, but they will never use them. Spidey is too big for TV.

They are doing characters on TV that they don't think can carry a film on their own. Daredevil is probably the one exception (especially sine he had a film), but I am sure they just feel the TV format works better for him.
 
Q

Quick

Banned
In an ideal MCU, a major star appearances would happen at random on the TV shows. The closest we have is Nick Fury in Agents of SHIELD. Imagine Spidey popping in and helping Daredevil take down Stilt Man or something.

Neoxon said:
Put it this way, Spider-Man is like a car. Sony still owns the car, but they're too drunk to drive it. Marvel Studios is their designated driver while Sony rides shotgun.
Click to expand...

post-27633-Troy-Abed-good-point-Community-8k1e.gif


This is a pretty good analogy. lol
 
B

BLACKLAC

Member
TDLink said:
Marvel has TV rights to Spider-Man, but they will never use them. Spidey is too big for TV.

They are doing characters on TV that they don't think can carry a film on their own. Daredevil is probably the one exception (especially sine he had a film), but I am sure they just feel the TV format works better for him.
Click to expand...

Not necessarily, they don't really have the time and resources in their film division.
 
N

Neoxon

Junior Member
TDLink said:
Marvel has the animated TV rights to Spider-Man.

They are doing characters on TV that they don't think can carry a film on their own. Daredevil is probably the one exception (especially sine he had a film), but I am sure they just feel the TV format works better for him.
Click to expand...
FTFY
 
TDLink

TDLink

Member
BLACKLAC said:
Not necessarily, they don't really have the time and resources in their film division.
Click to expand...

Essentially it is how it is. They have plenty of resources, they are going up to 3 films a year and planning to have 5 (for now) concurrent television shows. They are simply reserving TV for the street level heroes rather than doing them in the films. They are smaller scale and don't require the CG bonanza that the films indulge in. So yes, it very much is about the "scale" of the hero they are looking at in terms of if they get a film or a tv show.

As an added benefit the shows get a longer time to tell their stories and thus have the potential to be much better than the films in the long term since there is more opportunity to better develop the characters and narrative, but it's not like Marvel is thinking Daredevil or Jessica Jones are better characters and more deserving of that treatment than Spider-Man or Iron Man. It has everything to do with the scale of the hero.

It just is how it is.
 
D

duckroll

Member
Neoxon said:
The deal they made with Sony before the MCU one gave Marvel the animated & merchandising rights to Spider-Man, not live-action.
Click to expand...

Nah, I'm pretty sure Sony gave up all television and merchandising rights to Spider-man because they only wanted to focus on making the most money out of the films. They were really dumb.
 
F

fallengorn

Bitches love smiley faces
Neoxon said:
The deal they made with Sony before the MCU one gave Marvel the animated & merchandising rights to Spider-Man, not live-action.
Click to expand...

Do you have a source that makes that distinction? All I've seen is the ign article where Greg Weisman says they "relinquished all television rights to Spider-man, including animation."
 
N

Neoxon

Junior Member
duckroll said:
Nah, I'm pretty sure Sony gave up all television and merchandising rights to Spider-man because they only wanted to focus on making the most money out of the films. They were really dumb.
Click to expand...

fallengorn said:
Do you have a source that makes that distinction? All I've seen is the ign article where Greg Weisman says they "relinquished all television rights to Spider-man, including animation."
Click to expand...
I double-checked & live-action TV was also relinquished. My mistake.
 
P

Pachimari

Member
Weren't they also planning a Runaways show?

I hope it's Inhumans though. I love them. And let them have seasons all the way up to the movie in 2019.

Man, we don't need 2 Shield shows, so please no to the "Real Shield".
 
J

J10

Banned
They do have the money, but they probably don't have the time and they just wouldn't get a return on it. You're gonna have to wait for him to appear in a movie if you want something better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Kraven the Hunter - Review Thread
News Cringe
30
2K
AJUMP23 replied
Tom Holland’s Spider-Man Is Returning To The MCU &
News
15
2K
Kacho replied
Deadpool & Wolverine: 30 Spoiler-Filled Details From the First 35 Minutes
Spoilers
19
5K
Toots replied
Report: A Marvel 6v6 Overwatch-Style Shooter Is Coming
News
22
2K
Kurakasis replied
Disney Getting Nervous About Brie Larson(The Marvels), May Push Movie Back
2
95
9K
Grildon Tundy replied
Top Bottom