This post is so full of strawmen it's like you're writing the script to a Wizard of Oz sequel.
Genitalia ≠ muscular body composition. Nobody is debating the genital differences between men and women.
Facial hair ≠ muscular body composition. There may be some tangential links between testosterone levels and increases in facial hair + ease of growing muscle mass, but they aren't what is being discussed here.
Nobody is debating that men and women aren't fundamentally different. I think anyone with a middle school education understands that. Nobody is arguing otherwise, but it sure is easy to win an argument against a made up opponent.
Nobody is being overly sensitive about anything here, nor are they acting like a targeted minority. That was brought up by exactly zero people in this thread. Strawman.
The only thing ridiculous here is the belief/opinion that a woman with visible ab muscles is somehow less feminine than one without. It has zero to do with physiological differences, the ease of growing muscles in men versus women, or anything. It's merely a poorly formed opinion that you are confusing with fact.
Is it harder for women to gain muscle than men? Sure. Natural testosterone levels dictate that. But you are acting like it's difficult for women to have a visible six-pack. It isn't appreciatively more difficult than it is for a guy. A six-pack is 95% being skinny from diet, and 5% working out your abs. I should know, I've had one off and on my entire life. I've worked with women with visible abs, and it all comes down to having a very low bodyfat level.
Here is the latest Crossfit women's champion. She has a six pack and is every bit as muscular as Rogue is in that costume. She is no more or less feminine than any other woman. Don't confuse your taste with facts.
You can definitely say whatever you want, bro. You're always free to be wrong.
