H
hariseldon
Unconfirmed Member
Only when dealing with the terminally reeeeeeee.Is this how you resolve all your discussions? By presenting flawed premises and concluding with "fuck off" before the person can even reply?
Only when dealing with the terminally reeeeeeee.Is this how you resolve all your discussions? By presenting flawed premises and concluding with "fuck off" before the person can even reply?
Uh okay man.Only when dealing with the terminally reeeeeeee.
It's about reducing spread. People with immune responses rarely, and I mean rarely transmit viruses. Plus, this is something that escapes a lot of people, theres more to this than life and death. Thats a very overly simplistic binary way of seeing things. You wouldn't want to isolate alone for 14 days, thats boring as fuck. And I bet you like to taste and smell things. Do you workout? Do you like having 100% of your lung capacity? etc. etc.Serious question. Especially for those pushing the idea we all need the vaccine....
I am someone who is 50/50 on whether or not I want to get it. I think it was rushed, am not an anti-vaxxer and get my flu shot every year. But have concerns with this vaccine.
The argument I am seeing is that everyone needs to take it, even if you aren't part of a vulnerable population. My question is why? The point of a vaccine is to trigger a response in the body of the person taking the vaccine so that the immune system develops a response to the virus and can therefore fight it off if they contract it in day to day life.
If I have a .01% chance of dying from this, that tells me that my body is likely going to be naturally capable of fighting this virus off without a vaccine. The same cannot be said for the elderly and/or the immunocompromised. What good does it do for me to take the vaccine at that point if those who truly have a higher mortality risk have taken it? They are protected.
What am I missing here in this argument? This is a serious question and not an attempt to be dismissive because I simply don't follow the logic.
Serious question. Especially for those pushing the idea we all need the vaccine....
I am someone who is 50/50 on whether or not I want to get it. I think it was rushed, am not an anti-vaxxer and get my flu shot every year. But have concerns with this vaccine.
The argument I am seeing is that everyone needs to take it, even if you aren't part of a vulnerable population. My question is why? The point of a vaccine is to trigger a response in the body of the person taking the vaccine so that the immune system develops a response to the virus and can therefore fight it off if they contract it in day to day life.
If I have a .01% chance of dying from this, that tells me that my body is likely going to be naturally capable of fighting this virus off without a vaccine. The same cannot be said for the elderly and/or the immunocompromised. What good does it do for me to take the vaccine at that point if those who truly have a higher mortality risk have taken it? They are protected.
What am I missing here in this argument? This is a serious question and not an attempt to be dismissive because I simply don't follow the logic.
The general theory is that there will be people at risk who can't take the vaccine for various reasons, and people who can take it but don't increase the likelihood that the people who can't take it will catch the disease.Serious question. Especially for those pushing the idea we all need the vaccine....
I am someone who is 50/50 on whether or not I want to get it. I think it was rushed, am not an anti-vaxxer and get my flu shot every year. But have concerns with this vaccine.
The argument I am seeing is that everyone needs to take it, even if you aren't part of a vulnerable population. My question is why? The point of a vaccine is to trigger a response in the body of the person taking the vaccine so that the immune system develops a response to the virus and can therefore fight it off if they contract it in day to day life.
If I have a .01% chance of dying from this, that tells me that my body is likely going to be naturally capable of fighting this virus off without a vaccine. The same cannot be said for the elderly and/or the immunocompromised. What good does it do for me to take the vaccine at that point if those who truly have a higher mortality risk have taken it? They are protected.
What am I missing here in this argument? This is a serious question and not an attempt to be dismissive because I simply don't follow the logic.
Because we accept that this is a chaotic situation,
A virus is not responsible for that chaos. The people who accepted a terrible diagnostic tool and then failed to question the massive statistical fraud, propaganda and outright fake stories are responsible for that. You're in that very large crowd.
There's been a carpet bombing in this thread today by the truth averse and there are no solid arguments to be found anywhere in the posts. No one is challenging the fact that this piss poor "gold standard" of testing has deceived the world. This pandemic is based on a mountain of lies and exaggerations. Change my mind.
Something tells me that won't happen and is irrespective of how sound ones argument is.Change my mind.
I can’t change the mind of someone so terrified to take a vaccine.
Not everyone can have a vaccine. Vaccines are not 100% effective. A very small minority will not be protected.
Disease cannot spread if a vast majority are successfully vaccinated, preventing the virus from spreading, and hurting those who are not protected by the vaccine.
We want to stop covid as much as we can. This requires mass vaccination the same way smallpox and polio did.
Ultimately, it’s not just about you, it’s about everyone.
I'm not taking a vaccine to fix a lie. The truth can do that just fine.
Well hold on. Obviously he knows it's not as deadly. Just that it's a disease that is spreading badly. I've compared it to the Spanish flu cause its quite analogous but I'm aware its not as bad as the Spanish flu. Just drawing a comparison to illustrate a point.Are you seriously equating covid to smallpox and polio?
Please stop, it makes you sound ridiculous.
It's about reducing spread. People with immune responses rarely, and I mean rarely transmit viruses. Plus, this is something that escapes a lot of people, theres more to this than life and death. Thats a very overly simplistic binary way of seeing things. You wouldn't want to isolate alone for 14 days, thats boring as fuck. And I bet you like to taste and smell things. Do you workout? Do you like having 100% of your lung capacity? etc. etc.
Well hold on. Obviously he knows it's not as deadly. Just that it's a disease that is spreading badly. I've compared it to the Spanish flu cause its quite analogous but I'm aware its not as bad as the Spanish flu. Just drawing a comparison to illustrate a point.
A virus is not responsible for that chaos. The people who accepted a terrible diagnostic tool and then failed to question the massive statistical fraud, propaganda and outright fake stories are responsible for that. You're in that very large crowd.
There's been a carpet bombing in this thread today by the truth averse and there are no solid arguments to be found anywhere in the posts. No one is challenging the fact that this piss poor "gold standard" of testing has deceived the world. This pandemic is based on a mountain of lies and exaggerations. Change my mind.
Dude... I literally said in my post I'm aware its not as bad as the Spanish flu. Its comparable as the last big global pandemic and its trends and peaks track with covid so far. Thats all I meant. I know you have your talking points man I really do but its important to read and understand a post before replying.The vast - vast vast vast - majority of people recover from COVID just fine. These symptoms are blasted in the media but for a virus that has probably infected close to 1 billion people, if this stuff was common, then trust me, we would know. A lot of people, upwards of 20-50%, don't even know they have it. 95% of the rest get a fever and a cough and get over it. And the vast majority of the rest who end up in the hospital recover.
It's perfectly reasonable to look at the risk and say, you know what, I'd rather just get COVID than take this untested beta vaccine. hell, a lot of people who would be saying that already got COVID.
It's not analogous to the Spanish Flu at all actually. The Spanish Flu killed healthy 20 and 30 year olds regularly. This thing kills 80 year olds with COPD.
A lot of us have looked at the data and know the risks of this virus, based on what has actually happened. Using CNN normie fear mongering is not going to change our minds.
A virus is not responsible for that chaos. The people who accepted a terrible diagnostic tool and then failed to question the massive statistical fraud, propaganda and outright fake stories are responsible for that. You're in that very large crowd.
Dude... I literally said in my post I'm aware its not as bad as the Spanish flu. Its comparable as the last big global pandemic and its trends and peaks track with covid so far. Thats all I meant. I know you have your talking points man I really do but its important to read and understand a post before replying.
Hopefully not this
Trust me bro
I can’t change the mind of someone so terrified of a virus and having to take a vaccine.
Whats your source and evidence for this claim ?
There's been a carpet bombing in this thread today by the truth averse and there are no solid arguments to be found anywhere in the posts. No one is challenging the fact that this piss poor "gold standard" of testing has deceived the world. This pandemic is based on a mountain of lies and exaggerations. Change my mind.
Covid is an amalgamation of other diseases like rhinovirus, flu, heart conditions and even cancers
There's been a carpet bombing in this thread today by the truth averse and there are no solid arguments to be found anywhere in the posts. No one is challenging the fact that this piss poor "gold standard" of testing has deceived the world. This pandemic is based on a mountain of lies and exaggerations. Change my mind.
You sounds like really big conspiracy theorist there buddy
Newsflash for you, actual people died from Covid-19
This virus is real and not a fake news
CDC can confirm with certainty 6% of the deaths attributed to COVID were definitely from COVID, that's a mortality rate that in no way justifies lockdowns and mask mandates and other things that WHO and CDC guidelines found were NOT RECCOMENDED measures in even severe pandemics. The H1N1 virus was real as well, we didn't lock down, put stupid masks on, etc.
I agree theres not enough people died out there from covid 19
More Americans have now died from COVID-19 than the number of US troops killed during World War II
The death toll from 12 months of COVID-19 in the US has now surpassed that of four years of one of the bloodiest conflicts in US history.www.businessinsider.com
Another person who doesn't read people's posts. If we counted World War II deaths the way we did COVID deaths every trooper who was in World War II died of World War II, even if they died decades later.
Youre damn right this guy is quoting from Twitter..see his post above...hahaha..
probably have no relatives or loved ones in the high risk category (and even if you did, you wouldn’t be worried about them), and have read enough stuff on social media from people just like you, to convince yourself covid’s not really that much of an issue.
I mean, most people have grandparents and many people have older parents so that was a smart way of injecting everybody full of fear. I know it semi worked on me for about a week or two til my senses kicked in and realized it was all bullshit and me and my family have a better chance of getting struck by lightning than getting covid/dying of it.
Here in Vancouver BC the fear mongering isn't quite as bad as it is in say the US but it still exists.
My parents are old enough to be "at risk" and even they don't really give two fucks about COVID. We OBEY the shitty idiotic rules they have in place here when we have to but other than that we live life pretty normally here. They're not afraid and neither am I. Same with most people I talk to over here. Most people I talk to over here think something is up and we're being jerked around and lied to in some fashion but I suppose that makes all these random people of different races, ages, and beliefs "flat earthers" right?
I've said before you can have your little pandemic if you want to, but you're seriously stupid if you think that everything is copacetic with all the ridiculous nonsensical guidelines, the narrative they're pushing, the fear mongering, the advertisements, and the NON STOP sensationalism attached to this thing.
If you think this is all completely normal then you are simply gullible and have way, way too much faith in the powers that be. Y'know, the very same powers that don't even obey their own fucking guidelines a lot of the time.
The approval of several Covid-19 vaccines is an impressive technological development that should rapidly end the lockdowns and allow normal life to resume. But authorities like Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates argue that lockdown restrictions may have to continue through the fall and even into 2022, notwithstanding the catastrophic harms the lockdowns have caused, especially to young people, the poor and the working classes.
The imminent dissemination of vaccines can help end lockdowns by the end of January. The Great Barrington Declaration, which we wrote with Martin Kulldorff of Harvard Medical School, provides the key idea: focused protection of people who face a high risk of mortality should they become infected.
The risk of mortality from Covid-19 infection is now well established by seroprevalence studies conducted world-wide. Seroprevalence studies measure a lower bound on the number of people who have been infected. There is a sharp age gradient in the survival rate after infection. At least 99.95% of people under 70 survive infection; that figure is only 95% for 70 and older.
Covid-19 is thus especially deadly for the old and others with chronic conditions. But the lockdowns are deadly as well. The harms include plummeting childhood vaccination, worse cardiovascular disease outcomes, and less cancer screening, to name a few. It’s impossible to quantify the total deaths they have caused and will cause, but it’s safe to conclude that for people under 70 without chronic conditions—especially children and young adults—Covid-19 is far less deadly than a lockdown. For children, the cessation of in-person schooling has led to severe learning losses, which are predicted to shorten the lifespans of affected students. Among 25- to 44-year-olds, the CDC reports a 26% increase in excess all-cause mortality relative to past years, though less than 5% of 2020 deaths have been due to Covid-19.
Given these facts, the Great Barrington Declaration calls for focused protection for the vulnerable. That means directing limited resources, now including vaccines, to shield these people from infection. For the rest of the population, it calls for an end to lockdown. Tens of thousands of epidemiologists, public health scholars, and physicians have signed on to this plan. But it has been dismissed by others who argue that perfect protection of the vulnerable is impossible.
Some 50 million people in the U.S. are over 65. The number of vaccine doses expected to be available over the next two months will be enough to vaccinate every elderly person who wants to be inoculated, as well as health-care workers and other vulnerable people. With a 90%-plus efficacy rate in protecting against Covid-19 symptoms, we will achieve near-perfect focused protection.
At that point, the lockdown should end immediately and forever. For healthy young and middle-aged people, especially for minorities and the poor, the lockdown’s harm far outstrips the harms from infection.
Focused protection is the best strategy for using the vaccine. A combination of vaccine-induced immunity among the vulnerable and natural immunity among the less vulnerable will provide a solid wall of protection against a recurrence of the epidemic in 2021. For the vulnerable, the vaccine will protect against Covid. For the less vulnerable, the vaccine will protect against lockdown torture.
Although the lockdowns should have been abandoned much earlier, the end is finally at hand with the advent of the vaccines. Then the work of repairing the damage can begin.
because of those shitty idiotic rules
I mean, most people have grandparents and many people have older parents so that was a smart way of injecting everybody full of fear. I know it semi worked on me for about a week or two til my senses kicked in and realized it was all bullshit and me and my family have a better chance of getting struck by lightning than getting covid/dying of it.
Here in Vancouver BC the fear mongering isn't quite as bad as it is in say the US but it still exists.
My parents are old enough to be "at risk" and even they don't really give two fucks about COVID. We OBEY the shitty idiotic rules they have in place here when we have to but other than that we live life pretty normally here. They're not afraid and neither am I. Same with most people I talk to over here. Most people I talk to over here think something is up and we're being jerked around and lied to in some fashion but I suppose that makes all these random people of different races, ages, and beliefs "flat earthers" right?
I've said before you can have your little pandemic if you want to, but you're seriously stupid if you think that everything is copacetic with all the ridiculous nonsensical guidelines, the narrative they're pushing, the fear mongering, the advertisements, and the NON STOP sensationalism attached to this thing.
If you think this is all completely normal then you are simply gullible and have way, way too much faith in the powers that be. Y'know, the very same powers that don't even obey their own fucking guidelines a lot of the time.
All though I am sure your PM is blaming all the bad little boys and girls who didn't listen.
Yup, aLL tHe HOusE pArtieS and "conspiracy theorists". Cuz somehow even IF there were a bunch of house parties that automatically means everyone AT these parties HAD covid and SPAT in everybody's face/sucked their fuckin' dicks off. Get real. Buncha bullshit.
We had a buncha virtue signalling protests here when people pretended to care about George Floyd for a few weeks and they outright said not a one person got COVID during all the protests. But NOW people start getting it, just mere days before they made masks mandatory! How romantic! Cool STORY.
And if you don't suck COVID dick that automatically means you HAVE COVID.
COVID only seems to works on people who don't believe! But wait, I'm also supposed to believe it's EVERYWHERE!!!!
If you disobey guidelines that must mean you automatically HAVE COVID duhhhhhhhhhh.
People who get together automatically have COVID. People against the tarded restrictions automatically have COVID! Nevermind if they actually have it, just fine em anyways cuz...cuz...they....have it? Or they...don't? Who cares just fine em anyways and paint em all with the same brush: Trump supporting science denying flat earthers duhhhh
Rogan: They're idiots. They're MONSTERS. They never even tell you how to keep your immune system strong.
All of them cunts older than that are welcome to get it.Yeah, fuck all of them cunts older than that!
Recommending Vitamin D doesn't make big pharma billions. Recommending Vitamin D doesn't help petty tyrants to go on totalitarian power trips.This, in retrospect, is going to be the great missed opportunity in governments' response to the virus. The heavy focus on masks which appears to be a weak mitigation, at best, while ignoring vitamin D supplementation which looks like it provides similar protections as the vaccines will--this was a catastrophic error.
Recommending Vitamin D doesn't make big pharma billions. Recommending Vitamin D doesn't help petty tyrants to go on totalitarian power trips.
Someone watches Dr John LOL.
Never watched him but I'll look into his content. Usually, listening to doctors on youtube is an excellent idea. They're much more intelligent than the doctors I have seen, trying to get updated with COVID-19 lessonsSomeone watches Dr John LOL.
Saw this on his video about Ivecermetin. Which is looking like a real winner.
But were all in on the vax train now
Never watched him but I'll look into his content. Usually, listening to doctors on youtube is an excellent idea. They're much more intelligent than the doctors I have seen, trying to get updated with COVID-19 lessons
I listen to the MedCram videos to get briefed on all the current information, and then from there I usually venture out to other videos to understand more, or glance over the studies being published
I'm hoping for the best, if it can be used to dramatically fight this virus and the disease it causes like it has been showing so far, then that would be about as good as we can ask for I would think. That, and maybe years from now, a safer vaccine
probably have no relatives or loved ones in the high risk category (and even if you did, you wouldn’t be worried about them)
As the kids these days say, imagine letting the government tell you you can't kill your family.