• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Mask Efficacy |OT| Wuhan!! Got You All In Check

Status
Not open for further replies.

diffusionx

Gold Member
Anyone who thinks those places are "back to normal" because they don't have COVID cases just is living in a different reality at this point. It's literally impossible to believe that this virus is both extremely virulent and contagious and there are these massive cities along the same latitudes that don't have it. They're back to normal because they chose to go back to normal. They'll test people who show up to the doctor sick and treat those who need treating but for everyone else, go live if your life.

Remember the WHO said recently COVID is endemic. We are choosing, or it is being chosen for us, to live like scared babies instead of accepting reality of what this virus is and moving on from this idiotic nonsense that is a waste of time, money, and energy.
 
Last edited:

prag16

Banned
Gona need some real evidence for this statement
Sorry. As the person pushing mandated draconian intervention, the burden of proof is on you. And you have this far failed miserably to deliver.
The number will be much worse right now if people dont wear mask around
Prove it.
Wearing mask is useless then how are you going to explain this one

Meaningless anecdote.

You are quickly becoming a cartoon character here.
 

Liljagare

Member
Ouch, the flu belivers do not want to look at the new OECD predictional stats for spring.

Hold on to your butts everyone, 2021 is not going to start well.
 
This isn't a good.
"Days after." It needs like two weeks to do anything. This is a non issue. Thats like "man doesn't put foot on the gas, car doesn't move. Cars ineffective?"
 

Joe T.

Member
Ouch, the flu belivers do <snip>

Found a flu nonbeliever. 👆

Hold on to your butts everyone, 2021 is not going to start well.

Started well for me:





"Isn't it obvious that there is an extremely serious problem here that should actually shake the entire "pandemic"?"

69229782.jpg
 

Lister

Banned
Yeah, freedom is pretty important to most Americans. If you don't value it, it's probably not the country for you. It would be like going to Japan and making a fuss about how group harmony is prioritized over individual liberty.

You sound like the idiots back in the 80's/90's refusing to wear seatbelts cause of their FREEEDOHM!!!

You live in a society, not in a fucking vacuum. Your actions have consequences for others. In the case of the seatbelt laws, for the most part it was a thing where you ended up a statistic, no biggie (except for you, but play stupid games win stupid prizes). But even then there were other issues other people had to deal with. Starting with passengers in the car for which you were now a fast moving projectile endangering them. For the first responders who would have to pick up your torn carcass from the pavement. For the tax payers who would have to pay for the much more expensive care you would need should you survive, possibly including supporting your handicapped ass.

In this case you just end up as a vector, infecting other people around you, helping the disease reach our most vulnerable people. Maybe you won't end up a statistic, or another cautionary tale among the many we have from nurses that watch as covid patient's eyes go wide in fear as they struggle for breath, or of the deniers who's literal last words were: It's NOT COVID!!! ::dies of covid::

But you are still causing harm to others.

Wearing a mask and social distancing. Quarantining if you're sick or travel, and avoiding crowded places/only going out when you need to (or to a park where you can distance for some needed fresh air/sun light), and testing if you need to, is not asking the world of you, you fucking snowflake. You're not storming the beaches at Normandy.
 
Last edited:
You sound like the idiots back in the 80's/90's refusing to wear seatbelts cause of their FREEEDOHM!!!

You live in a society, not in a fucking vacuum. Your actions have consequences for others. In the case of the seatbelt laws, for the most part it was a thing where you ended up a statistic, no biggie (except for you, but play stupid games win stupid prizes). But even then there were other issues other people had to deal with. Starting with passengers in the car for which you were now a fast moving projectile endangering them. For the first responders who would have to pick up your torn carcass from the pavement. For the tax payers who would have to pay for the much more expensive care you would need should you survive, possibly including supporting your handicapped ass.

In this case you just end up as a vector, infecting other people around you, helping the disease reach our most vulnerable people. Maybe you won't end up a statistic, or another cautionary tale among the many we have from nurses that watch as covid patient's eyes go wide in fear as they struggle for breath, or of the deniers who's literal last words were: It's NOT COVID!!! ::dies of covid::

But you are still causing harm to others.

Wearing a mask and social distancing. Quarantining if you're sick or travel, and avoiding crowded places/only going out when you need to (or to a park where you can distance for some needed fresh air/sun light), and testing if you need to, is not asking the world of you, you fucking snowflake. You're not storming the beaches at Normandy.
*begins to lose faith in humanity as board transmogrifies into a conspiracy nut job covid denying tour de force*
*rational people enter and counter with common sense like this post*
*faith in humanity slowly restores as does hope for 2021*
 
You sound like the idiots back in the 80's/90's refusing to wear seatbelts cause of their FREEEDOHM!!!

You live in a society, not in a fucking vacuum. Your actions have consequences for others. In the case of the seatbelt laws, for the most part it was a thing where you ended up a statistic, no biggie (except for you, but play stupid games win stupid prizes). But even then there were other issues other people had to deal with. Starting with passengers in the car for which you were now a fast moving projectile endangering them. For the first responders who would have to pick up your torn carcass from the pavement. For the tax payers who would have to pay for the much more expensive care you would need should you survive, possibly including supporting your handicapped ass.

In this case you just end up as a vector, infecting other people around you, helping the disease reach our most vulnerable people. Maybe you won't end up a statistic, or another cautionary tale among the many we have from nurses that watch as covid patient's eyes go wide in fear as they struggle for breath, or of the deniers who's literal last words were: It's NOT COVID!!! ::dies of covid::

But you are still causing harm to others.

Wearing a mask and social distancing. Quarantining if you're sick or travel, and avoiding crowded places/only going out when you need to (or to a park where you can distance for some needed fresh air/sun light), and testing if you need to, is not asking the world of you, you fucking snowflake. You're not storming the beaches at Normandy.
You want to control other people. Ostensibly for their own good, only you can fuck off. I don’t care what you think is good. That is actually the beauty of being free. I don’t give a shit what you want me to do. You don’t have to like it. You can bitch and complain. But I’m going to do it anyway. I’ll take the precautions I feel are appropriate, which I’ve been doing the whole time. But I’m also going to go the gym, go the stores, visit my family when I’m not sick. We all have our eyes open. We are aware of the risks. But my grandfather has dementia. He probably won’t know my name in six months. So I think we’ll take our chances.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
You sound like the idiots back in the 80's/90's refusing to wear seatbelts cause of their FREEEDOHM!!!

You live in a society, not in a fucking vacuum. Your actions have consequences for others. In the case of the seatbelt laws, for the most part it was a thing where you ended up a statistic, no biggie (except for you, but play stupid games win stupid prizes). But even then there were other issues other people had to deal with. Starting with passengers in the car for which you were now a fast moving projectile endangering them. For the first responders who would have to pick up your torn carcass from the pavement. For the tax payers who would have to pay for the much more expensive care you would need should you survive, possibly including supporting your handicapped ass.

In this case you just end up as a vector, infecting other people around you, helping the disease reach our most vulnerable people. Maybe you won't end up a statistic, or another cautionary tale among the many we have from nurses that watch as covid patient's eyes go wide in fear as they struggle for breath, or of the deniers who's literal last words were: It's NOT COVID!!! ::dies of covid::

But you are still causing harm to others.

Wearing a mask and social distancing. Quarantining if you're sick or travel, and avoiding crowded places/only going out when you need to (or to a park where you can distance for some needed fresh air/sun light), and testing if you need to, is not asking the world of you, you fucking snowflake. You're not storming the beaches at Normandy.

Not reading all that, but I do wear a mask where required by stores and such, but I would never be in favor of handing over more control to the government to micromanage people's lives. The downside of that is more division in society and less "group cohesion," but that's the flipside of prioritizing individual liberties.

*begins to lose faith in humanity as board transmogrifies into a conspiracy nut job covid denying tour de force*
*rational people enter and counter with common sense like this post*
*faith in humanity slowly restores as does hope for 2021*

You joined well into the pandemic, though? Either way, there have been people arguing both sides of the freedom vs. control coin throughout this thread. It's almost as if it's OK to not have 100% enforced agreement.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not reading all that, but I do wear a mask where required by stores and such, but I would never be in favor of handing over more control to the government to micromanage people's lives. The downside of that is more division in society and less "group cohesion," but that's the flipside of prioritizing individual liberties.



You joined well into the pandemic, though? Either way, there have been people arguing both sides of the freedom vs. control coin throughout this thread. It's almost as if it's OK to not have 100% enforced agreement.
I'm just gonna pretend this response to me made any sense.
 

Joe T.

Member
You sound like the idiots back in the 80's/90's refusing to wear seatbelts cause of their FREEEDOHM!!!

You can discern a lot about what a person does or doesn't know about the coronavirus and the measures being applied simply by the manner in which he responds to those that disagree. The majority of the blame always rests with the individual for not digging deeper or having an open mind, but I have a great deal of resentment for the corporate media, governments and "experts" that have treated us all like animals. You've been conditioned into believing the opposite of what is true.

Here's a nice montage, a timeline of governments and their experts telling everyone about the ineffectiveness of masks right through the first half of the year... until they all abandon it completely as if instructed by someone from above. Try to tell me you don't see what's happening here after watching it and take special note of the WHO's U-turn mentioned in the video's title:

 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
I'm just gonna pretend this response to me made any sense.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but your post said you had begun to lose faith in humanity as this board "transmogrified into a conspiracy nut job covid denying tour de force," but you just joined at the end of July, well into the pandemic.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but your post said you had begun to lose faith in humanity as this board "transmogrified into a conspiracy nut job covid denying tour de force," but you just joined at the end of July, well into the pandemic.
.... Since I've joined.... It's been almost half a year dude.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
You can discern a lot about what a person does or doesn't know about the coronavirus and the measures being applied simply by the manner in which he responds to those that disagree. The majority of the blame always rests with the individual for not digging deeper or having an open mind, but I have a great deal of resentment for the corporate media, governments and "experts" that have treated us all like animals. You've been conditioned into believing the opposite of what is true.

Here's a nice montage, a timeline of governments and their experts telling everyone about the ineffectiveness of masks right through the first half of the year... until they all abandon it completely as if instructed by someone from above. Try to tell me you don't see what's happening here after watching it and take special note of the WHO's U-turn mentioned in the video's title:



Nevermind that it's pretty clear now that, as we knew before this pandemic, masks actually have no effect (or not enough of one to really even register) on the spread of COVID-19.

Mask use over 90% in the US now and yet the spread has never been faster.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
.... Since I've joined.... It's been almost half a year dude.

Yes, and your post implied that something has changed over time since you joined, but the exact same debates were raging in July and even before in this very thread.
 
Yes, and your post implied that something has changed over time since you joined, but the exact same debates were raging in July and even before in this very thread.
Agree to disagree. In my opinion it's gotten worse. Maybe my memory is failing because I don't recall every conversation about covid from a video game board but I don't remember being to the level it is now back then. Perhaps I just checked it less than I do now from being less busy.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
Agree to disagree. In my opinion it's gotten worse. Maybe my memory is failing because I don't recall every conversation about covid from a video game board but I don't remember being to the level it is now back then. Perhaps I just checked it less than I do now from being less busy.

Well, if you're so inclined, you're actually in the very thread where those conversations took place and it's very easy to jump back to previous pages to see for yourself. I'd recommend starting around late May when the BLM riots really started kicking off and politicians and health experts around the world were forced to show their asses bare for all to see.
 

Outrunner

Member
You sound like the idiots back in the 80's/90's refusing to wear seatbelts cause of their FREEEDOHM!!!

You live in a society, not in a fucking vacuum. Your actions have consequences for others. In the case of the seatbelt laws, for the most part it was a thing where you ended up a statistic, no biggie (except for you, but play stupid games win stupid prizes). But even then there were other issues other people had to deal with. Starting with passengers in the car for which you were now a fast moving projectile endangering them. For the first responders who would have to pick up your torn carcass from the pavement. For the tax payers who would have to pay for the much more expensive care you would need should you survive, possibly including supporting your handicapped ass.

In this case you just end up as a vector, infecting other people around you, helping the disease reach our most vulnerable people. Maybe you won't end up a statistic, or another cautionary tale among the many we have from nurses that watch as covid patient's eyes go wide in fear as they struggle for breath, or of the deniers who's literal last words were: It's NOT COVID!!! ::dies of covid::

But you are still causing harm to others.

Wearing a mask and social distancing. Quarantining if you're sick or travel, and avoiding crowded places/only going out when you need to (or to a park where you can distance for some needed fresh air/sun light), and testing if you need to, is not asking the world of you, you fucking snowflake. You're not storming the beaches at Normandy.
Thank you
 
Well, if you're so inclined, you're actually in the very thread where those conversations took place and it's very easy to jump back to previous pages to see for yourself. I'd recommend starting around late May when the BLM riots really started kicking off and politicians and health experts around the world were forced to show their asses bare for all to see.
Late may? I thought I joined in July? Gotta get this stuff straight while you're apparently sifting through ones post history from like 6 months ago. BLM protest would incite that kind of discourse. Now it seems just... ridiculous. Covid was relatively subsided in the summer. Now its exploding and its the same shit from that unique time in summer with the protest.
 

Leyasu

Banned
You can discern a lot about what a person does or doesn't know about the coronavirus and the measures being applied simply by the manner in which he responds to those that disagree. The majority of the blame always rests with the individual for not digging deeper or having an open mind, but I have a great deal of resentment for the corporate media, governments and "experts" that have treated us all like animals. You've been conditioned into believing the opposite of what is true.

Here's a nice montage, a timeline of governments and their experts telling everyone about the ineffectiveness of masks right through the first half of the year... until they all abandon it completely as if instructed by someone from above. Try to tell me you don't see what's happening here after watching it and take special note of the WHO's U-turn mentioned in the video's title:


It wasn't an instruction from above that prompted the about face. It was the fact that they now had enough in stock for the general population. All the bullshit stemmed from the simple fact of having barely enough for the health care workers that needed them, let alone the general public.

Once the channels were full, and people could buy them without jeopardizing health care workers supplies, the message changed.

In France, mask wearing was so useless and not needed, they even banned their sale to the general public until the 10th of May. People buying them from abroad had their parcels intercepted and the contents confiscated. Amazon in the EU would not sell certain types as they were reserved for people that needed them, and everything else had delivery dates of months after purchase.

In short, there were no higher ups giving the nod, and the WHO followed the script being used by most of the western world due to the dire shortages of PPE.
 

Outrunner

Member
You can discern a lot about what a person does or doesn't know about the coronavirus and the measures being applied simply by the manner in which he responds to those that disagree. The majority of the blame always rests with the individual for not digging deeper or having an open mind, but I have a great deal of resentment for the corporate media, governments and "experts" that have treated us all like animals. You've been conditioned into believing the opposite of what is true.

Here's a nice montage, a timeline of governments and their experts telling everyone about the ineffectiveness of masks right through the first half of the year... until they all abandon it completely as if instructed by someone from above. Try to tell me you don't see what's happening here after watching it and take special note of the WHO's U-turn mentioned in the video's title:


> don't trust the media
> here this YouTube video with 0 credibility, trust it
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
Late may? I thought I joined in July? Gotta get this stuff straight while you're apparently sifting through ones post history from like 6 months ago. BLM protest would incite that kind of discourse. Now it seems just... ridiculous. Covid was relatively subsided in the summer. Now its exploding and its the same shit from that unique time in summer with the protest.

Not sure why wires are getting crossed, but to put it simply: my point is that nothing has changed since you joined. COVID deniers and COVID doom sayers and everything in between have been right here in this very thread since the beginning.

> don't trust the media
> here this YouTube video with 0 credibility, trust it

Not to defend the channel it's posted on it, but you're really showing that you must not have even clicked on the link. It's a timeline compilation of clips and such from news media and press conferences, etc. It's almost 100% original sources that have been edited together to tell a story. What does the channel's credibility have to do with anything? Are you saying all of the videos are doctored?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not sure why wires are getting crossed, but to put it simply: my point is that nothing has changed since you joined. COVID deniers and COVID doom sayers and everything in between have been right here in this very thread since the beginning.
Agreed. And I'm saying, it has gotten worse. Deniers seem to be becoming more prevalent and brazen.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
Agreed. And I'm saying, it has gotten worse. Deniers seem to be becoming more prevalent and brazen.

Deniers that COVID exists or deniers of the effectiveness of the policies and restrictions that have been imposed?

If the latter, it only makes sense, because the policies have been complete disasters that have quite obviously not been effective and yet many policy makers can't seem to consider anything else but to double down on their failures, all else be damned.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Agreed. And I'm saying, it has gotten worse. Deniers seem to be becoming more prevalent and brazen.
I think that's probably a result of watching so many of our public health experts and political leaders either breaking their own rules or watching as the measures they implement fail to do what they are supposed to do. Masks were supposed to work. Remember this:
Well compliance has been over 90% for months. Didn't work, did it? This is just one example. Things like this erode trust and lead to people, rightly, questioning what they are being told.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
I think that's probably a result of watching so many of our public health experts and political leaders either breaking their own rules or watching as the measures they implement fail to do what they are supposed to do. Masks were supposed to work. Remember this:
Well compliance has been over 90% for months. Didn't work, did it? This is just one example. Things like this erode trust and lead to people, rightly, questioning what they are being told.

Gotta say, though, the whole mask thing was such a brilliant play at shifting responsibility.
 

Joe T.

Member
> don't trust the media
> here this YouTube video with 0 credibility, trust it

You're being presented with the deceptiveness of the media, government and their experts, not being told to trust it. This stupid game you're playing is what I expect from trolls. People get paid to do what you're doing here, to "flood the zone" with garbage in order to cover up the truth, so I'm hoping there's something in it for you because it's not reflecting well on your character.

We already knew before this started that masks were pointless in the general public. Some of us stood by that scientific understanding and were smeared for it because the masses ate up what they were being told without question. The WHO has abandoned you on PCR tests, lock downs and even masks, yet you're incapable of admitting they aren't helping.

If I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here it would be in thinking that it's self-preservation of ego driving you to continue defending masks.

Edit: spelling
 
Last edited:

Outrunner

Member
You're being presented with the deceptiveness of the media, government and their experts, not being told to trust it. This stupid game you're playing is what I expect from trolls. People get paid to do what you're doing here, to "flood the zone" with garbage in order to cover up the truth, so I'm hoping there's something in it for you because it's not reflecting well on your character.

We already knew before this started that masks were pointless in the general public. Some of us stood by that scientific understanding and were smeared for it because the masses ate up what they were being told without question. The WHO has abandoned you on PCR tests, lock downs and even masks, yet you're incapable of admitting they aren't helping.

If I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here it would be in thinking that it's self-preservation of ego driving you to continue defending masks.

Edit: spelling

Flooding the zone with garbage is what you have been doing the entire time on this thread, but you are not alone.
 
Last edited:
Gotta say, though, the whole mask thing was such a brilliant play at shifting responsibility.
I said it at the beginning. It was a politician's wet dream. They get to pretend they are doing what it takes while simultaneously creating a whole subset of people to blame for the problem. It couldn't be that the masks didn't work... You people just aren't doing it right. It was a stroke of genius. It is an infallible proposition. If cases go down, the masks are working. If they don't, its just because people aren't masking hard enough. Suddenly they can't lose, because people will never admit the masks didn't work like we were told they would.
 

Belgorim

Member
Here they have had to explain that masks do not work every single press conference. At least now most press has stopped asking avout it, except about how it is going to work in public transport when recommendation starts to use it during rush hours.
 

Outrunner

Member

Community Use Of Face Masks And COVID-19: Evidence From A Natural Experiment Of State Mandates In The US

The study provides evidence that US states mandating the use of face masks in public had a greater decline in daily COVID-19 growth rates after issuing these mandates compared with states that did not issue mandates. These effects were observed conditional on other existing social distancing measures and were independent of the CDC recommendation to wear face covers issued April 3, 2020. As international and state governments begin to relax social distancing restrictions, and considering the high likelihood of a second COVID-19 wave in the fall and winter of 2020,30 requiring the use of face masks in public could help in reducing COVID-19 spread.


Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe

We estimate large reductions in Rt in response to the combined non-pharmaceutical interventions. Our results—which are driven more by countries with advanced epidemics and larger numbers of deaths—suggest that these interventions have together had a substantial effect on transmission, as measured by changes in the estimated Rt. At the time of this study, we find current estimates of Rt to range from a posterior mean of 0.44 (0.26–0.61) for Norway to a posterior mean of 0.82 (0.73–0.93) for Belgium, with an average of 0.66 across the 11 countries—an 82% reduction compared to the pre-intervention values. For all countries, we find that current interventions have been sufficient to drive Rt below 1 (probability Rt < 1.0 is greater than 99% across all countries we consider) and achieve control of the epidemic. These conclusions are corroborated by studies from individual countries—France12, Spain13, Germany14 and the UK15—over a similar period, which arrive at very similar estimates despite different methodologies and data.

Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions

Using a comprehensive, hierarchically coded dataset of 6,068 NPIs implemented in March–April 2020 (when most European countries and US states experienced their first infection waves) in 79 territories23, here we analyse the impact of government interventions on Rt using harmonized results from a multi-method approach consisting of (1) a case-control analysis (CC), (2) a step function approach to LASSO time-series regression (LASSO), (3) random forests (RF) and (4) transformers (TF). We contend that the combination of four different methods, combining statistical, inference and artificial intelligence classes of tools, also allows assessment of the structural uncertainty of individual methods24. We also investigate country-specific control strategies as well as the impact of selected country-specific metrics.

All the above approaches (1–4) yield comparable rankings of the effectiveness of different categories of NPIs across their hierarchical levels. This remarkable agreement allows us to identify a consensus set of NPIs that lead to a significant reduction in Rt. We validate this consensus set using two external datasets covering 42,151 measures in 226 countries. Furthermore, we evaluate the heterogeneity of the effectiveness of individual NPIs in different territories. We find that the time of implementation, previously implemented measures, different governance indicators25, as well as human and social development affect the effectiveness of NPIs in countries to varying degrees.

Fig. 1: Change in Rt (ΔRt) for 46 NPIs at L2, as quantified by CC analysis, LASSO and TF regression.

41562_2020_1009_Fig1_HTML.png

The left-hand panel shows the combined 95% confidence intervals of ΔRt for the most effective interventions across all included territories. The heatmap in the right-hand panel shows the corresponding Z-scores of measure effectiveness as determined by the four different methods. Grey indicates no significantly positive effect. NPIs are ranked according to the number of methods agreeing on their impacts, from top (significant in all methods) to bottom (ineffective in all analyses). L1 themes are colour-coded as in Supplementary Fig. 1.
 

Joe T.

Member
Here they have had to explain that masks do not work every single press conference. At least now most press has stopped asking avout it, except about how it is going to work in public transport when recommendation starts to use it during rush hours.

Glad you brought this up because it's been on my mind. How much pressure has the press put on the government there to impose mask mandates? I suspect that if they've avoided recommending them until now they either haven't faced too much pressure in their briefings or they've done a decent enough job defending their position.

The mask issue is a cascading effect. It usually starts with a recommendation on public transit before the press hammers the government for a mandate. Then that moves to indoor areas and finally outdoors if the press is successful. They spent weeks hammering the Quebec government for each, it was ridiculous watching it unfold because they have precious little time (1 question, 1 follow up and no exceptions) - behave more like activists than reporters.

Quebec's government eventually buckled on all of them except outdoors, that one only applies to protesters which gave them the authority to crack down on the resistance. They let slip in one briefing that none of the measures in place are backed by scientific evidence and that's the upside to spending so much time watching the daily briefings: the most important statements sometimes get completely ignored by the press.
 

Ma-Yuan

Member
No it doesn't. There could be a million other reasons why they didn't get the virus.

I can also show you a doctor who claims to have treated 3K covid patients with HCQ and not one died.

I guess that proves that HCQ is a cure for COVID so everyone start popping HCQ.

The actual science of masks, actual studies, RCTs etc all show that N95s do a good job but everything else doesn't do much and without proper education, hygiene, and disposal+use of the mask they will most likely help to spread the virus rather than reduce transmission.



So 90% of Americans wear masks. Science said if 80% wore masks the virus would plummet. US has more cases than ever.

Same thing in Canada where I live. We don't have Trumpers up here. Mask mandate since July. Yet cases are surging.

If masks worked so well then why are old people in nursing homes still dying in Canada? I mean slap a mask on them, slap a mask on everyone who works there and voila problem solved no more old people dying.

Why are prisoners being freed if Masks work? Just slap a mask on them and voila problem solved no prisoners will get infected.

The issue is that no cares for the rest of hygiene... Mask don't help because sick people stay home. I think I never encountered even one coughing person with a mask since this shit started. And well asymptomatic people don't spread it so yes I assume also masks are completely useless. In the beginning of the first lockdown they cleared all shopping carts in super markets before giving them to you. Barely was a parking lot full in front of a super market and people waited in lines. This is a thing of the past in Germany super markets are crammed and the parking lots are full of cars and no one cares how or if his cart was cleaned. Since this virus can stay days infectios on a surface people most likely transmitted it via their hands when they touched a tainted ground or object. I suspect healthy people driving this by not enacting things we did before like washing hands using alcohol when we go shopping or out in general. It almost feels like by ignoring this they wanna get the numbers high because this is so dumb... Also most of the scared people seem to give rats ass about it when they it comes to free time activities. I was on a mountain using a sled for my two boys today and hell that mountain was so crowded I have never seen this before and not a single mask 🤣
 

12Goblins

Lil’ Gobbie
The mask wearing debate is so dishonest IMO . Of course controlling how much germs you spread is helpful to mitigate the spread, bu none of this will ever be 100%. An analogy I like personally is the stacking layers of Swiss cheese, where every layer or measure we put in place (mask wearing being one slice of swiss cheese, another can be 6 ft distancing, another can be closing bars at night or whatever, virtually useless temperature checkpoints, etc, etc) to where eventually if you stack enough layers, there are no holes for the virus to pass through. that is the idea anyway
 
Last edited:

Belgorim

Member
Glad you brought this up because it's been on my mind. How much pressure has the press put on the government there to impose mask mandates? I suspect that if they've avoided recommending them until now they either haven't faced too much pressure in their briefings or they've done a decent enough job defending their position.

The mask issue is a cascading effect. It usually starts with a recommendation on public transit before the press hammers the government for a mandate. Then that moves to indoor areas and finally outdoors if the press is successful. They spent weeks hammering the Quebec government for each, it was ridiculous watching it unfold because they have precious little time (1 question, 1 follow up and no exceptions) - behave more like activists than reporters.

Quebec's government eventually buckled on all of them except outdoors, that one only applies to protesters which gave them the authority to crack down on the resistance. They let slip in one briefing that none of the measures in place are backed by scientific evidence and that's the upside to spending so much time watching the daily briefings: the most important statements sometimes get completely ignored by the press.
It is hard for me to compare pressure compared to other countries. The pressure has however been very high, it has been brought up every single time another country increases their mandates. The press also spends a lot of time claiming experts and WHO and others recommend general mask usage (which they do not).

The public health agency (fhm) has been pretty good in explaining their position and the lack of evidence to suggest masks work and the prodding has stopped somewhat now when it is becoming obvious to the press that most countries with mandates have an even worse situation compared to Sweden.
The trust towards the public health agency is still extremely high here, and many people still watch the press conferences in person twice a week (the rest presumably read the cliff-notes from the press).

They have to defend their position a lot when it comes to how other countries can come to such a different conclusion compared to us. The agency responsible is responsible for the overall health though, they are not only a disease control agency and as such they feel they have to weigh their restrictions towards doing as little harm as possible (i.e. Sweden kept schools open all spring).

They have always been in favour of masks in health care and have explained that proper use is required for effect.

We will see what happens in the spring with the public transport recommendation, it could be as you say, a slippery slope.
 

Joe T.

Member
It is hard for me to compare pressure compared to other countries. The pressure has however been very high, it has been brought up every single time another country increases their mandates. The press also spends a lot of time claiming experts and WHO and others recommend general mask usage (which they do not).

The public health agency (fhm) has been pretty good in explaining their position and the lack of evidence to suggest masks work and the prodding has stopped somewhat now when it is becoming obvious to the press that most countries with mandates have an even worse situation compared to Sweden.
The trust towards the public health agency is still extremely high here, and many people still watch the press conferences in person twice a week (the rest presumably read the cliff-notes from the press).

They have to defend their position a lot when it comes to how other countries can come to such a different conclusion compared to us. The agency responsible is responsible for the overall health though, they are not only a disease control agency and as such they feel they have to weigh their restrictions towards doing as little harm as possible (i.e. Sweden kept schools open all spring).

They have always been in favour of masks in health care and have explained that proper use is required for effect.

We will see what happens in the spring with the public transport recommendation, it could be as you say, a slippery slope.

That gives me a fairly good idea of the situation between press and government regarding masks there, thanks for that. Gives me a greater appreciation for Tegnell's work and the population of Sweden, too. Most people here don't watch the briefings which of course makes it much easier for them to be misled.

I hope they can continue resisting the pressure there because I firmly believe they've had it right up until now. Ramping up the mass testing hopefully won't be their undoing.
 
The mask wearing debate is so dishonest IMO . Of course controlling how much germs you spread is helpful to mitigate the spread, bu none of this will ever be 100%. An analogy I like personally is the stacking layers of Swiss cheese, where every layer or measure we put in place (mask wearing being one slice of swiss cheese, another can be 6 ft distancing, another can be closing bars at night or whatever, virtually useless temperature checkpoints, etc, etc) to where eventually if you stack enough layers, there are no holes for the virus to pass through. that is the idea anyway
I get the idea. But a couple of things.

1. That's not how maskes were sold to the public. The CDC director said in the early fall that we could get the pandemic under control if enough people wore masks. Masks were treated as the silver bullet to covid. Its obvious that was bullshit. Because masks were completely oversold, they ended up undermining public trust. You have lunatics screaming at strangers to wear their masks from a foot away. Then you have other people who say "masks do nothing". I'm sure they do something. While whatever they do is debatable, its obvious they are not even close to enough. And they were sold as being the thing we needed to do to get this under control.

2. Because they were over sold, people have rightly begun to question the validity of other things we have been told. So things like outdoor dining bans, gym bans, church service bans. Maybe some of these things are very effective. But when public trust is eroded by public officials either overselling their policies or by them completely disregarding their own rules, it damages the public's willingness to go along.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom