Mass Effect 3 SPOILER THREAD: LOTS OF SPECULATION FROM EVERYONE

Status
Not open for further replies.
These guys had no fucking clue what they were doing or even where to go with the end.

I hate reading these but I just keep doing it and rereading the same ones over and over.

Ending? What ending? 2 months away from the end? Ending, what ending?

Oh shit we need an ending?
How did we miss the ENDING?
I don't know I was too busy giving interviews about how many choices we will have in the....ending...oh fuck we are screwed! ABC, ABC!
No they will figure that out, colors. Colors are needed.
Sounds good.
*high five*

I really wish I could have been a fly on the wall during ME3's development. I love 99% of the game, so I appreciate the effort put into that, but how an ending (to a AAA triology none the less) can be rushed is beyond me. It seems like the main story arc would be the first thing completed and polished as other minor sidequests are added in. On the other hand, it was probably impossible to polish the turd that Mac Walters dropped on the rest of the team.
 
All according to keikaku.
iyR43WA9M6XN7.jpg

Translators note: keikaku means indoctrination.
 
It's easy to rip the argument to shreds, because at it's most basic level, it's effing hilarious.

But it makes sense. If synthetics believe that every organic civilization will reach a point of technological advancement where they create synthetic lifeforms that, inevitably, will wage warfare on their creator organics, win the war, and then subjugate the rest of the universe and end all organic life, then "pruning the tree" is a means of ensuring the survival of organic life in general. Sure, your civilization is going byebye, but there's still tons of other organic lifeforms out there.

Except the fact that the existence of this super-AI who doesn't want to kill all organics refutes his own point. If all synthetics inevitably devalue organics and destroy all of them, then it follows that the very AI telling us this would be devoted to killing all organics. The fact he does not do so proves his own point is wrong.
 
Like someone suggested, it would have been ideal for a "Reapers win" style ending. A brief post-credits sequence after the Reapers ruin everybody's shit of a new species landing on a planet and discovering the box, activating it to see a holographic image of Shepard.

Yeah, I keep repeating that as an ending because it's a neat, simple, ultra-dark "bad" ending that would logically flow from the narrative of the past two games.

That's all any of us wanted: something that made sense given the 100 hours prior.
 
Except the fact that the existence of this super-AI who doesn't want to kill all organics refutes his own point. If all synthetics inevitably devalue organics and destroy all of them, then it follows that the very AI telling us this would be devoted to killing all organics. The fact he does not do so proves his own point is wrong.
We basically get to talk to a wall at the end of ME3.
 
Except the fact that the existence of this super-AI who doesn't want to kill all organics refutes his own point. If all synthetics inevitably devalue organics and destroy all of them, then it follows that the very AI telling us this would be devoted to killing all organics.

Not necessarily. It's a super-AI. Maybe it's become obsessed with the logic of its plan and has abandoned the idea that it could, perhaps, interject in the inevitable organic-synthetic wars by having the Reapers wipe out the Geth (for example). You know, like an angel watching over organic life's shoulder. Maybe it's become corrupt over time. Maybe it's gone astray and just perpetuates the Reapers existence.

All of that would work as a counter, and it doesn't make the Godbaby's argument stupid as a plot point.

Godbaby's argument is stupid as a plot point precisely because none of the above ever gets said in-game :(
 
Okay, well that answers the A.I. question. And for the record I was super pissed to see it take the form of that kid. Every time that kid showed up in the game I raged. Such a sad attempt at building sympathy.

for a genocidal AI whose first notion of business should be to get rid of the filthy organics clogging up his body. There is no reason why Shepard being there at the crucible would change anything for mr. final solution.

Might as well have the kid be there, then stab Shepard in the chest. Hihihihihi.
*sticks out tongue*
roll credits.
 
I really wish I could have been a fly on the wall during ME3's development. I love 99% of the game, so I appreciate the effort put into that, but how an ending (to a AAA triology none the less) can be rushed is beyond me. It seems like the main story arc would be the first thing completed and polished as other minor sidequests are added in. On the other hand, it was probably impossible to polish the turd that Mac Walters dropped on the rest of the team.

Ya man. It would have been amazing to see what happened. I refuse to believe that someone didn't address the endings for sure.
 
It's easy to rip the argument to shreds, because at it's most basic level, it's effing hilarious.

But it makes sense. If synthetics believe that every organic civilization will reach a point of technological advancement where they create synthetic lifeforms that, inevitably, will wage warfare on their creator organics, win the war, and then subjugate the rest of the universe and end all organic life, then "pruning the tree" is a means of ensuring the survival of organic life in general. Sure, your civilization is going byebye, but there's still tons of other organic lifeforms out there.

If you think of the civilization as an individual and organic life as the group, the Reapers are basically killing the individual to save the group. The individual will say "wait that makes no sense, you kill me so synthetics won't kill me?", but the synthetic responds by saying "we're killing you to save the group, sucks for you."

Still doesn't make sense to me. Because as humans, we never knowingly cull another species to save another species. At the most, we'd minimize them, like putting a genophage or trimming the amount of wild rabbits. But we'd never completely wipe them out. In fact, we preserve some species by creating wildlife habitant and protect them from extinction. Also, they are thinking from the POV that ALL organics are the same but they are not. Each organic have their own individuality so by wiping out certain organics, they basically destroying a unique species. Not to mention, if they are so hell bent on protecting organics, why don't the Reapers kill the offending synthetics who try to kill other organics instead? What a fail logic these Reapers have.

Yeah. Would have been nice if that was used somehow. Hell, even in the Winter Space scene. Have Grandpa Buzz play something from it, have that be where the stories of the Shepard are from.

I'd shed some manly tears if that somehow appear in the ending. I'd be happy to see Shepard dead if the ending actually makes sense and shows that all of his sacrifices wasn't for naught. But not like this.
 
Sounds like a sound bug in your system, actually. It happens.
(but is obviously not supposed to)

Yeah, but what perfect timing. Right near the reaper core, with all the indoctrination talk, you couldn't have planned it better. lol

Now me and Javik have to try to kill Kai Leng without EDI.
it's not going well. RAGE!
 
I couldn't believe how hot EDI looked in the mission you infiltrate Cerberus' base at the end of the game. Her model is just so ridiculously perfect... the huge firm ass, enormous tits, legs, thighs. I know that sounds creepy but good lord.
 
Man, this thread is moving fast.

Can't keep up!

We need someone to recap every 10 pages or so.


I couldn't believe how hot EDI looked in the mission you infiltrate Cerberus' base at the end of the game. Her model is just so ridiculously perfect... the huge firm ass, enormous tits, legs, thighs. I know that sounds creepy but good lord.
What do you except from a TIM design?
 
I still can't wrap my head around the "more speculation from everyone".

The Matrix ended in such a way because it was the first movie in a trilogy.

Mass Effect 3 is the ending. You are supposed to get closure. Not this.
 
Maybe it's become corrupt over time. Maybe it's gone astray and just perpetuates the Reapers existence.
I think it's a simple program. For some reason it needed the Crucible to update to firmware 2.0, where there's a Stop-killing option.

That to me seems like the real question to ask. Why the Crucible? Why does it add these options?
 
Like someone suggested, it would have been ideal for a "Reapers win" style ending. A brief post-credits sequence after the Reapers ruin everybody's shit of a new species landing on a planet and discovering the box, activating it to see a holographic image of Shepard.

Damn, it is so depressing thinking about the possible endings for this game because it is the brainstorming session that Bioware should have had on their own. In a little more than a week, the community has crafted at least 5 solid endings that range from Shepard living, Shepard dying, and the Reapers winning. Why could Bioware (specially Walters) not do this on their own?
 
Like someone suggested, it would have been ideal for a "Reapers win" style ending. A brief post-credits sequence after the Reapers ruin everybody's shit of a new species landing on a planet and discovering the box, activating it to see a holographic image of Shepard.

That would have been perfect.

Taking the events of the ending as we see them, what's everyone's thoughts of what would come after the ending? Do all the races in the combined armada just stay at Earth? Try to go home without the relays? Does the galactic civilization rebuild itself or stay isolated? What ultimately happens to the Normandy's crew. Thoughts? Theories?
 
for a genocidal AI whose first notion of business should be to get rid of the filthy organics clogging up his body. There is no reason why Shepard being there at the crucible would change anything for mr. final solution.

Might as well have the kid be there, then stab Shepard in the chest. Hihihihihi.
*sticks out tongue*
roll credits.
I pretty much took his acceptance of Shepard in stride given that Shepard is essentially galactic Jesus. The legend of Shepard at the end only strengthens that, however stupid it is.

Shepard.
 
I couldn't believe how hot EDI looked in the mission you infiltrate Cerberus' base at the end of the game. Her model is just so ridiculously perfect... the huge firm ass, enormous tits, legs, thighs. I know that sounds creepy but good lord.

I don't think you know just how creepy that sounded you robosexual.

At least my bromance with Garrus is with another organic!
 
Not necessarily. It's a super-AI.

How does I throw switch? I'm a super AI, I can't be expected to know these things!

JUST JUMP INTO THE BEAM ALREADY HUMAN! OR I KILL YOU! which I'm going to anyway, but I like to play with people, as my child form should indicate.

I also feature in the walking dead, where I fuck up shit.
 
Honestly, I both love and despise Bioware for this ending. The ending was so mind fuckingly stupid that it was actually ingenious.

And yes, we have all been indoctrinated so badly that we'll discuss theories and shit until we're able to throw more money at our overlords.

Bioware are the Geth, EA are the Old Machines, and we are the Walking Meat Wallets.

EA Child: We created a solution to save you from spending your money on useful things, it's called DLC. You will accept it.
 
That would have been perfect.

Taking the events of the ending as we see them, what's everyone's thoughts of what would come after the ending? Do all the races in the combined armada just stay at Earth? Try to go home without the relays? Does the galactic civilization rebuild itself or stay isolated? What ultimately happens to the Normandy's crew. Thoughts? Theories?

Earth hosts an intergalactic kegger.
 
Well, I mean the Reapers were pretty obviously well shackled in that they never decided to revolt and say fuck you starchild we are going to eat ALL organic life. And the ending could still technically make sense in that they don't exactly have baby monitors. They just stick their heads in every 50,000 years, scope the place out. I guess they think it is possible that synthetics might wipe out all the organics if they wait any longer than that.

You would think the whole Geth thing would have brought them in 300 years ago, though, which kind of indicates that their plan sucked. What was Sovereign doing? Just chilling? With Geth efficiency it seems like the Geth could have destroyed life in that time if they had really tried. The fact that they didn't kind of negates the conclusions that starchild makes.

Especially since you ally with them, and then fuck them just after you have given them true consciousness.
 
Not necessarily. It's a super-AI. Maybe it's become obsessed with the logic of its plan and has abandoned the idea that it could, perhaps, interject in the inevitable organic-synthetic wars by having the Reapers wipe out the Geth (for example). You know, like an angel watching over organic life's shoulder. Maybe it's become corrupt over time. Maybe it's gone astray and just perpetuates the Reapers existence.

All of that would work as a counter, and it doesn't make the Godbaby's argument stupid as a plot point.

Godbaby's argument is stupid as a plot point precisely because none of the above ever gets said in-game :(

The argument is still logically flawed. All you've said in his defense is he doesn't count as a synthetic, with no real evidence why that's true. If he's not a synthetic, but some kind of mystical god, then yeah okay whatever. But if he's synthetic, then his argument does not make logical sense unless he has somehow ascended past synthetic form which in turn invalidates his argument that all synthetics ultimately decide to kill all life, since it proves they can ascend past such conclusions.
 
I love witnessing the birth of new memes from the ashes of a screw up. We already have "Lots of speculation", rainbow endings, Marauder Shields, starchild, and Buzz Aldrin. Even when something fails, good can still come of it.
 
So now that everyone is part synthetic, can Joker and EDI bang? I bet they did. That father/grandfather and kid are probably the offspring off a Joker EDI Traynor orgy.
 
You would think the whole Geth thing would have brought them in 300 years ago, though, which kind of indicates that their plan sucked.
The 50,000-year cycle is so arbitrary. What if there's a civilization that advances in only 4,000 years and creates sentient AIs in 100? If they get wiped by the robots they build then the Reaper's purpose is completely flawed. Not to mention that they don't mention what they do to the synthetics created.
 
Damn, it is so depressing thinking about the possible endings for this game because it is the brainstorming session that Bioware should have had on their own. In a little more than a week, the community has crafted at least 5 solid endings that range from Shepard living, Shepard dying, and the Reapers winning. Why could Bioware (specially Walters) not do this on their own?

Why do I get the feeling that maybe the other writers crafted that beautiful box scene with Shep and Liara, thinking it'd be incorporated in the ending by the head writer. But the head writer went "Oh hell no, I'm going to be artsy fartsy and 'original' about the ending. No need to incorporate your writing thanks!".
 
The argument is still logically flawed. All you've said in his defense is he doesn't count as a synthetic, with no real evidence why that's true. If he's not a synthetic, but some kind of mystical god, then yeah okay whatever. But if he's synthetic, then his argument does not make logical sense unless he has somehow ascended past synthetic form which in turn invalidates his argument that all synthetics ultimately decide to kill all life, since it proves they can ascend past such conclusions.

You misunderstand my point in a number of ways.

1) I never said he wasn't a synthetic. I emphasized he was still AI, not some demi-god.

2) It still has a cold, but not infallible, logic to it. We synthetics realize that we must protect organics from lesser synthetics. It's akin to playing God.

3) It doesn't have to be airtight perfect and sensible! The problem is the game never actually acknowledges the holes, and instead just has Shepard chug along saying 'lol k ur right'.
 
Why do I get the feeling that maybe the other writers crafted that beautiful box scene with Shep and Liara, thinking it'd be incorporated in the ending by the head writer. But the head writer went "Oh hell no, I'm going to be artsy fartsy and 'original' about the ending. No need to incorporate your writing thanks!".

Mac Walters wasn't going to let some underling writer undercut his artistic vision.
 
It's easy to rip the argument to shreds, because at it's most basic level, it's effing hilarious.

But it makes sense. If synthetics believe that every organic civilization will reach a point of technological advancement where they create synthetic lifeforms that, inevitably, will wage warfare on their creator organics, win the war, and then subjugate the rest of the universe and end all organic life, then "pruning the tree" is a means of ensuring the survival of organic life in general. Sure, your civilization is going byebye, but there's still tons of other organic lifeforms out there.

If you think of the civilization as an individual and organic life as the group, the Reapers are basically killing the individual to save the group. The individual will say "wait that makes no sense, you kill me so synthetics won't kill me?", but the synthetic responds by saying "we're killing you to save the group, sucks for you."

It's a very sci-fi evil machine type answer: cold, hard, logical.

But then the existence of the Catalyst himself would seem to disprove the notion. Here's a synthetic who, while certainly very advanced, can apparently control himself from wiping out everything in the galaxy even though he easily could (though it's likely he wiped out his own creators), so why wouldn't he confer the possibility for that on other synthetics?

Better yet, why wouldn't he quite simply take steps to intervene and reprogram synthetics that seemed to be getting out-of-hand and murderous? He's built up as incredibly powerful - with godlike technological abilities - so his method of purging the galaxy of all advanced organics in order to save the more primitive ones just seems backwards. It's throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
 
Translators note: keikaku means indoctrination.
You lying sack of lies!

Finished it and I'm just shocked at the ending. After gathering all the war assets, I really expected something more, not just a "Enjoy your 3 terrible endings".

Give me control over where and how to deploy all the assets I gathered or show them in action or force me to make choices like I did during the final mission of ME2. Do something. Instead, it was just another mission with a terrible ending.

Hurray Space Jesus. Or something.
 
Except the fact that the existence of this super-AI who doesn't want to kill all organics refutes his own point. If all synthetics inevitably devalue organics and destroy all of them, then it follows that the very AI telling us this would be devoted to killing all organics. The fact he does not do so proves his own point is wrong.

Not necessarily. It's a super-AI. Maybe it's become obsessed with the logic of its plan and has abandoned the idea that it could, perhaps, interject in the inevitable organic-synthetic wars by having the Reapers wipe out the Geth (for example). You know, like an angel watching over organic life's shoulder. Maybe it's become corrupt over time. Maybe it's gone astray and just perpetuates the Reapers existence.

The argument is still logically flawed. All you've said in his defense is he doesn't count as a synthetic, with no real evidence why that's true. If he's not a synthetic, but some kind of mystical god, then yeah okay whatever. But if he's synthetic, then his argument does not make logical sense unless he has somehow ascended past synthetic form which in turn invalidates his argument that all synthetics ultimately decide to kill all life, since it proves they can ascend past such conclusions.

Looking over our argument I just realized how vital it is to know what the child-ghost thing was. Did he ever state he was an AI or was that part of LOTS OF SPECULATION. Essentially there's only two options, AI/Synthetic (logically flawed) or Organic/Mystical Being (logically consistent, but stupid). I don't feel like watching the end again, does anyone know what the child says about his own state?
 
But then the existence of the Catalyst himself would seem to disprove the notion. Here's a synthetic who, while certainly very advanced, can apparently control himself from wiping out everything in the galaxy even though he easily could (though it's likely he wiped out his own creators), so why wouldn't he confer the possibility for that on other synthetics?

Better yet, why wouldn't he quite simply take steps to intervene and reprogram synthetics that seemed to be getting out-of-hand and murderous? He's built up as incredibly powerful - with godlike technological abilities - so his method of purging the galaxy of all advanced organics in order to save the more primitive ones just seems backwards. It's throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

Why didn't he just NOT wipe out his creators?
 
You lying sack of lies!

Finished it and I'm just shocked at the ending. After gathering all the war assets, I really expected something more, not just a "Enjoy your 3 terrible endings".

Give me control over where and how to deploy all the assets I gathered or show them in action or force me to make choices like I did during the final mission of ME2. Do something. Instead, it was just another mission with a terrible ending.

Hurray Space Jesus. Or something.

There were 2 endings. Reapers win or Reapers destroyed.
 
Well, I mean the Reapers were pretty obviously well shackled in that they never decided to revolt and say fuck you starchild we are going to eat ALL organic life. And the ending could still technically make sense in that they don't exactly have baby monitors. They just stick their heads in every 50,000 years, scope the place out. I guess they think it is possible that synthetics might wipe out all the organics if they wait any longer than that.

You would think the whole Geth thing would have brought them in 300 years ago, though, which kind of indicates that their plan sucked. What was Sovereign doing? Just chilling? With Geth efficiency it seems like the Geth could have destroyed life in that time if they had really tried. The fact that they didn't kind of negates the conclusions that starchild makes.

Especially since you ally with them, and then fuck them just after you have given them true consciousness.

Sovereign tried to exterminate the races before the geth, but failed because the keepers wouldn't react.
 
But then the existence of the Catalyst himself would seem to disprove the notion. Here's a synthetic who, while certainly very advanced, can apparently control himself from wiping out everything in the galaxy even though he easily could (though it's likely he wiped out his own creators), so why wouldn't he confer the possibility for that on other synthetics?

Better yet, why wouldn't he quite simply take steps to intervene and reprogram synthetics that seemed to be getting out-of-hand and murderous? He's built up as incredibly powerful - with godlike technological abilities - so his method of purging the galaxy of all advanced organics in order to save the more primitive ones just seems backwards. It's throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

Again, that's what makes it a good motivation. It's not perfect. It has holes. You can get the epic "YOU'RE WRONG!" dialogue confrontation from it.

The problem is that it's revealed in the last 5 mins of a 100+ hour series, and, in a series where the main char will argue when shit is stupid, the main char just nods and says "ohhhhh... that makes sense."

EDIT: I should add I still prefer the Lovecraftian-horror "you can't comprehend our motivations, insect" storyline instead of the above.
 
Because he's an asshole, but that doesn't mean all synthetics are. :> He assumed that synthetics are inherently evil no matter what because he's a prick who killed his creators.

I'm also pissed off that Shep just went "Oh okay then, I choose one of those options" instead of "Die you dumbass POS synthetic/god!"

Y'know, in a Final Fantasy game, we would have fight that space Casper as a final boss and it'd eventually morph into a monstrous form. I can't believe I'm saying this but that'd have been preferable. Anything but going quietly with the dumb RGB explosions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom