Mass Effect 3 SPOILER THREAD: LOTS OF SPECULATION FROM EVERYONE

Status
Not open for further replies.
So, if you guys are still upset about the ending, I would avoid listening to Weekend Confirmed. I considered myself pretty much over all this but listening to it gave me a little twitch.
Let me guess "something something entitlement something something get over it something something "

Am I close?
 
I know I'm probably the last proponent of the Indoctrination Theory left in the thread, but I thought this was a pretty interesting take on said theory -

http://uninhibitedandunrepentant.tumblr.com/post/19344938387/mind-holy-fuck

In addition, taking the points raised in the context that Bioware was experimenting with the concept of indoctrination in the final sequence, but dropped it because "taking control" away of shepard would be too weird for fans, this would be a perfect way to pull it off, but in an entirely different way.

Interesting note about the music if true. Does anyone have a video of that? I'm not going to play through Cerb base and London just to check.

I do think I'm ready to replay ME1. Keep remembering how awesome everything was at the start.
 
Also it's kinda weird how DARK and BROODY Shepard is on the cover of the game. In the game he's all...we can do this everyone!!! uguu~ ^__^

edit: Rewatching the ending, it's pretty clear the Mass Relays kinda explode. I mean it's not like they just lose energy and dry up and that's that...there is very clear fire and explosion and there is a red wave radiating outwards...maybe this is an argument of degrees.
Ya shepard on ME3 cover looked psycho
 
If you're not familiar with it, Tumblr is where all the janky myspace html layout shit went.
I try to keep the collection easy to read for everyone.

i wonder what happened to the conduit in the presidium was still linked with the one in ilos?damm speculations
Nothing because it was totally forgotten after ME1. :p

Man, the Indoc theory really needs to die.
Is it still going? Poor crazy people. It's sad just thinking about it.
 
DA:O Lead Designer Commented on ME3 Ending.



EDIT: I forgot to add, that he does't work at Bioware anymore.

Wow. did he just say movies that don't project "you are awesome" are a waste of time? As much as the ending is bad I'm not sure this guy could have his head more up his ass.
 
Also it's kinda weird how DARK and BROODY Shepard is on the cover of the game. In the game he's all...we can do this everyone!!! uguu~ ^__^

edit: Rewatching the ending, it's pretty clear the Mass Relays kinda explode. I mean it's not like they just lose energy and dry up and that's that...there is very clear fire and explosion and there is a red wave radiating outwards...maybe this is an argument of degrees.

He's dark and broody b/c he's being indoctrinated. Wouldn't you be dark and broody in that situation?
 
I know I'm probably the last proponent of the Indoctrination Theory left in the thread, but I thought this was a pretty interesting take on said theory -

http://uninhibitedandunrepentant.tumblr.com/post/19344938387/mind-holy-fuck

In addition, taking the points raised in the context that Bioware was experimenting with the concept of indoctrination in the final sequence, but dropped it because "taking control" away of shepard would be too weird for fans, this would be a perfect way to pull it off, but in an entirely different way.

I still believe in the indoctrination theory, I just don't believe bioware intended it and if by some chance the DLC follows up on it, it won't be because that was the original plan, but because they are doing damage control and they have an easy way out thanks to the fans. But so long as they don't do anything in the series to contradict the theory, we can still believe.


Man, the Indoc theory really needs to die.

Why?

Is it still going? Poor crazy people. It's sad just thinking about it.

It's the only interpretation that makes any sense.
 
Let me guess "something something entitlement something something get over it something something "

Am I close?

Pretty close. Which is expected but sad. Especially as that group has, in the past, rallied behind holding devs/pubs responsible for even lesser items. Then the fact that they laughed directly at anyone bothered by the endings...then spent almost half the show saying how much they hated it, or if they had not beat it yet, how much they thought they would hate it. Oy vey.

What blows my mind is they did the show in the last day or 2 which means if they wanted any kind of factual data they could have seen what was really going on and the examples of other media where feedback has changed things. Instead they basically make it clear that people should shut it and live with it.

Someone says the word "Entitlement" then *laughter* was the beginning of the end.
 
Wow, the dark energy plot doesn't sound like garbage. Wonder what happened.

Drew Karpyshyn briefly discussed the ending on twitter.

@DrewKarpyshyn - @danielhumgon @GambleMike From what I hear, the basic concept of the original ending is there, though some details may have been tweaked.

@DrewKarpyshyn - @LukGaming Dark Energy was on the table at one point, but the original idea for the ending was all about Reapers and Mass Relays.#ME3

@andb52 - @DrewKarpyshyn Could you provide any more detail on what you mean when you say the ending "was all about Reapers and Mass Relays?" Thanks!

‏@DrewKarpyshyn - @andb52 Nope. Already said more than I should. I don't like discussing things I wasn't involved with - too easy to say something stupid.

Looks to me like choices with the Reapers and destroying the Mass Relays was planned for a long time.
 
I think there always needs to be a way to get a happy ending though. It's a game, you're suppose to be able to win. That's what games do. If they want to make a movie, then put in whatever ending you want.

I agree for branching RPGs like ME (or at least what it should have been), but I think you can still "win" and have a bittersweet ending at the same time . Games like GoW3 and MGS3 both have fairly bittersweet endings, but they are done in such a way that you feel both a sense of accomplishment and closure. As long as the ending makes sense and is well written, I don't care if it is happy or apocalyptic.
 
I don't think that's what he said at all.

Maybe not projecting you are awesome, but having some happy ending in which things work out great. He specifically said

When you waste a couple hours of a person's life with an artsy/depressing movie or short story or even a novel, it is more forgivable because the time spent is less.

So yeah, he literally called it a waste of time. He didn't limit it to just depressing but expanded to include 'artsy' which I can only assume from context means any ending that isn't unambiguously positive.

To carry that into games wherein players of determinate of success or failure then it does become "you are awesome" ending.
 
Though there's no equivalent to The Boss in ME, I think the Illusive man could have filled her roll a bit. If we could have had a boss fight similar to its, I think it would have worked very well.

Maybe not projecting you are awesome, but having some happy ending in which things work out great. He specifically said

So yeah, he literally called it a waste of time. He didn't limit it to just depressing but expanded to include 'artsy' which I can only assume from context means any ending that isn't unambiguously positive.
I guess he was being a bit of a jerk by using the word waste, but I think he only meant in relation to movies that end up being bad.

Your emotional attachment varies depending on how long you are around the characters portrayed. It's not something where you've spent 50 hours / a few years to get a crummy ending. You'll get over something that was a few hours sooner than that.
 
I still believe in the indoctrination theory, I just don't believe bioware intended it and if by some chance the DLC follows up on it, it won't be because that was the original plan, but because they are doing damage control and they have an easy way out thanks to the fans. But so long as they don't do anything in the series to contradict the theory, we can still believe.




Why?



It's the only interpretation that makes any sense.

Because Bioware would never be competent enough to pull something like that.
 
The only line I remember TO THIS day is: "You exsist because we allow it, You'll end...because we demand it". To me that made the reapers a object of... I can't even describe it.

"I am the vanguard of your destruction - this exchange is over."

"Soverign...it's moving....that thing has turned a move that would shear our ships in half"


Cue Virmire music.....bliss. Still the best reaper exchange by a country mile.
 
What if the Shepard breath scene happened as a result of him/her falling off the Citadel and landing back in London? Could happen. He's Space Jesus.
 
Umm...but...

Whut?

Because Bioware would never be competent enough to pull something like that.

So? Death of the Author.

The theory still applies until there in the story that overturns it. Bioware's intentions have nothing to do with it. I had hoped they intended the theory so that the DLC would build off it. Now that I know they didn't, it probably won't. Which sucks. But that doesn't invalidate the theory. What the STORY says is what matters, not what the author says.
 
I'm sitting here skimming through the weekend confirmed podcast, and just like every other game journalist, they are fabricating the complaints of the gamer's. At this point this type of false deflection has to be intentional. It's almost sickening how they just gloss over the situation like "oh those silly gamer's wanting the end to be just perfect". At least know what's being argued before you criticize a fairly large group of disgruntled fans.

I just got to their ending discussion and had to stop. I'll finish tomorrow, but man is that going to irk me if they sit and rag on us. My podcast was honest about it and I admitted that I thought people were over-reacting until I finished the game and saw the end for myself. At that point I was like "Where can I send my money for this Retake Mass Effect 3 thing?"
 
I just got to their ending discussion and had to stop. I'll finish tomorrow, but man is that going to irk me if they sit and rag on us. My podcast was honest about it and I admitted that I thought people were over-reacting until I finished the game and saw the end for myself. At that point I was like "Where can I send my money for this Retake Mass Effect 3 thing?"
So you are GAF! Nice can't wait to hear you guys talk about the ending more in depth.
 
I think there always needs to be a way to get a happy ending though. It's a game, you're suppose to be able to win. That's what games do. If they want to make a movie, then put in whatever ending you want.

And as I keep saying, It isn't even a happy ending if Shep lives.
Billions fucking died. People need to understand what the fucking term HAPPY even means.
 
Who freaking cares what they think? The only people that listen to that show now are the people who can't find the unsubscribe button in iTunes.
 
I just got to their ending discussion and had to stop. I'll finish tomorrow, but man is that going to irk me if they sit and rag on us. My podcast was honest about it and I admitted that I thought people were over-reacting until I finished the game and saw the end for myself. At that point I was like "Where can I send my money for this Retake Mass Effect 3 thing?"

I just couldn't understand how they could be so mocking of complaints about the ending and then later get so indignant about the day 1 DLC. I would have thought at the very least they would have been equally worthy of getting annoyed about.
 
So? Death of the Author.

The theory still applies until there in the story that overturns it. Bioware's intentions have nothing to do with it. I had hoped they intended the theory so that the DLC would build off it. Now that I know they didn't, it probably won't. Which sucks. But that doesn't invalidate the theory. What the STORY says is what matters, not what the author says.

You link that like it's some kind of scientific law of the universe and not an abstract literary theory with its own supporters and detractors. Many people, myself included, believe the context of a work, both the personal motives of the author and the cultural and historical period in which they lived, are vital to analysis. That doesn't mean there can't be any other interpretations aside from the authors', but we need to take what they intended into consideration.
 
Sovereign basically makes no sense at all when you factor in the Catalyst. Sovereign had to do all this stuff - indoctrinate Saren, discover the plans for the Conduit, manipulate countless people, when Kid Citadel was just hanging out apparently knowing about everything and not particularly caring. And what does he do in those intervening 50,000 years, anyway?

It would have been understandable for Sovereign to go through all that if he really was the only Reaper around to be able to communicate back to the rest of his peeps in dark space, but we now know he wasn't. Making it even funnier is that the Conduit sent people inside the Citadel itself, so you'd think the Catalyst would be quite well-aware of it.

Of course the actual answer is the Bioware writers probably had completely different plans for the Reapers back then, but it's still amusing. The Catalyst seems to invalidate a lot of what happened in ME1.
 
Even in the completely implausible best case scenario of BioWare retconning the ending (including space Casper) with a sizable, free expansion pack, nothing will change the fact the first playthrough will always be soured by BioWare's incompetence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom