Empty Space
Member
This is far funnier then it should be.
Every single relay blowing up like a supernova and destroying galactic civilization isn't franchise suicide?
The alliance SR2 has a fucking terrible paint job. I'm not sure if the Cerberus one is any better, but if you're going to buy one do not get the alliance version.Does anyone else prefer the Normandy's Cerberus paint scheme? I'm deciding which Normandy model to get, and honestly the ME2 version looks way better.
The alliance SR2 has a fucking terrible paint job. I'm not sure if the Cerberus one is any better, but if you're going to buy one do not get the alliance version.
This is the most accurate post I've seen in the thread.
Exactly what is wrong with an all out balls to the wall fight at the end? The intensity was getting pretty high already and "war weariness" seemed to be the ending theme. And it was working. Everyone reaching the end of how far they could push themselves to win. Seeing squadmates fall around you as you are making the final push. I didn't need a happy ending, but what we got was lame and worst of all plodding.
Clean slate for Mass Effect 4,5,and 6. It's not suicide. There will be more games.
I think that the Catalyst being behind the Reapers motivations lives up to Sovereigns promise that their purpose was incomprehensible to us. Sure we can get the gist of it, they are here to harvest all advanced organic life to preserve it as the ultimate end of evolution every 50,000 years. To save it from otherwise being simpley destroyed by synthetics eventually. But their ultimate motivations and the thought process behind them are still not clear.(Give that ME is a story created and written by humans, the Catalyst and its ambiguity was necessary to keep the concept of motivations we can't understand)
You are speculating (SPECULATION) based on no evidence whatsoever. Besides, like I said above, we are told what the Reaper's motivations are.Then I started thinking of the motivations of the race that is whatever the catalyst beings are, what are their motivations for wanting to save us? What if it is because ultimately they know (from experience) that evolution will allow another species to "catch up" to them, to be their equal, or otherwise, a competitor. What better way to stop that from happening than the Reaper cycle? Preventing both synthetics and organics from achieving this. Of course in order for this to be the motivation of the catalyst that assumes that there is some lying going on on its end, (Synergy would likely in the end entail some sort of control by the Catalyst, as would the Control option, which is why they are presented as Paragon by the Catalyst) but would that really be suprising?
So these synthetics turn organics into a fine paste in order to protect organics from synthetics that would probably turn organics into a fine paste.Or it could be that a species that far advanced had really come to appreciate life, and thought that preserving it via the Reapers was better than all remnants and history of the species being erased from the Universe inevitably by some other force, likely synthetics of their own creation .
It quite does disprove the Catalyst. Never mind the fact that the Reapers helped out the geth by upgrading them.This is where the Rannoch mission comes into play, people that got the best outcome for this mission,(as I did) may think that this disproves what the Catalyst says.
However after seeing my friend play the same mission, something became clear. From the point of view of the Catalyst war with the synthetics is inevitable. They are right, or at least right enough to be skeptical of any peace that Shepard may have secured for now.
I'm sorry, but I don't accept that. Throughout the games, we are shown that we should give life, whether organic or synthetic, a chance. We can cure the genophage or save the rachni or achieve peace with the geth. Plus, most of the geth are content with hanging out in space just crunching numbers. They only rebelled because the quarians tried to kill them.The simple fact that all it took was for Shepard to make a couple wrong decisions and the Geth wiped out the Quarians (or visa versa) shows that peace would likely not last forever.
The Catalyst is gone.Yet still gave you the choice, because in the end the Catalyst is likely powerful enough to rectify it if need be.
SPECULATIONAre the Catalysts from the Milky way? Or are they capable of traveling with ease between the vastness of dark space, placing Reapers on the rim of every galaxy, and relays throughout each? Harvesting or "preserving" life on a scale that humans cannot begin to comprehend?
Where Bioware went wrong, is execution of these grand ideas. The cutscene with the Normandy did not make any sense, but it could of if they had just filled that little plothole with a small cutscene or line of dialogue, just given Joker and crew a reason to be leaving through the relays.
How is ending a trilogy with contradictions and confusing ambiguity brave? Or providing endings that are virtually identical? How is having Shepard act out of character brave?All in all, great and brave move for the ending Bioware, half assed execution though.
No matter how you try to justify it, the ending is shit.
Can't you just let other people have their opinion? Every single time someone has come into this thread to say they didn't mind the ending they are asked to try the other endings and flat out told their opinion is wrong. Get used to the fact that not everyone agrees with you and you don't have to refute their opinion just because you didn't agree. It's stifling any discussion and it's just downright annoying to anyone who wants to hear the counter arguments
Mushed up paste is the ultimate form of evolution? We know what their ultimate motivation is: to keep synthetics from destroying organics. That is what the Catalyst says outright. TOo bad that we have 3 examples of synthetic life not trying to destroy all organic life: EDI, the geth, and the Reapers themselves since while they do destroy a lot of organic life, they don't destroy all of it.
So synthetics destroy organics to protect organics in order to keep organics from creating synthetics that would destroy organics. It's circular logic and people have already figured out other solutions to the Reaper's "problem"
You are speculating (SPECULATION) based on no evidence whatsoever. Besides, like I said above, we are told what the Reaper's motivations are.
So these synthetics turn organics into a fine paste in order to protect organics from synthetics that would probably turn organics into a fine paste.
It quite does disprove the Catalyst. Never mind the fact that the Reapers helped out the geth by upgrading them.
We have no proof of that since we can't present EDI or the geth as refuations of the Catalysts assertion. From our perspective, it sounds like a lot of bullshit
I'm sorry, but I don't accept that. Throughout the games, we are shown that we should give life, whether organic or synthetic, a chance. We can cure the genophage or save the rachni or achieve peace with the geth. Plus, most of the geth are content with hanging out in space just crunching numbers. They only rebelled because the quarians tried to kill them.
The Catalyst is gone.
SPECULATION
There are recorded lines from Joker saying that he was coming in to the rescue, but they didn't add it in, mostly because SPECULATION
How is ending a trilogy with contradictions and confusing ambiguity brave? Or providing endings that are virtually identical? How is having Shepard act out of character brave?
No matter how you try to justify it, the ending is shit.
Can't you just let other people have their opinion? Every single time someone has come into this thread to say they didn't mind the ending they are asked to try the other endings and flat out told their opinion is wrong. Get used to the fact that not everyone agrees with you and you don't have to refute their opinion just because you didn't agree. It's stifling any discussion and it's just downright annoying to anyone who wants to hear the counter arguments
Even if you like or feel indifferent to the ending, stuff like it negating player choice and creating plotholes aren't really arguable.
I haven't finished the game yet. But I had to post this. I couldn't wait.
At the climax of the Cerberus attack on the Citadel I wanted to kill Ashley so badly. I was praying for a Renegade interrupt. "OMG SHEPRUZ R U STILL CERBERUZ OR NOT I JUST DONT KNOW PUT UR GUN DOWN"
Holy flaming fucking shit. If that is a sign of how bad the writing is going to get for the ending then I am going to explode.
The whole game has been this up and down ride of "good" and "poop". The Ashley showdown was steaming poop. Thane and Mordin's deaths were kind of touching.
The whole game has been this up and down ride of "good" and "poop". The Ashley showdown was steaming poop. Thane and Mordin's deaths were kind of touching.
The negating player choice in my opinion was not a problem as far as the 3 endings go. Those are seperate choices themselves, not a culmination of your choices. Leading up to those 3 choices I would have liked to see more raction to my choices however, much like ME2 did.
The Citadel is destroyed in two of the endings.What proof do you have that the Catalyst is gone?
No, that is not true in any way, shape, form, or paste. If you took a person and put them into a blender, are they still human?and yes, that fine past and genitic material is the essence of what makes us us.
The species that is the Catalyst
They have likley seen what shepard accomplished with the Geth/Quarians thousands of times over, peace was made, but it obviously did not last. Who are we to say? Just because a bunch of primitive organics and primitive synthetics were able to get along for the past 2 weeks means that all of the sudden a race who has seen life evolve from nothing, to space fairing species, to extinction, thousands of times over, we now know better than them? No, we dont.
I haven't finished the game yet. But I had to post this. I couldn't wait.
At the climax of the Cerberus attack on the Citadel I wanted to kill Ashley so badly. I was praying for a Renegade interrupt. "OMG SHEPRUZ R U STILL CERBERUZ OR NOT I JUST DONT KNOW PUT UR GUN DOWN"
Holy flaming fucking shit. If that is a sign of how bad the writing is going to get for the ending then I am going to explode.
The whole game has been this up and down ride of "good" and "poop". The Ashley showdown was steaming poop. Thane and Mordin's deaths were kind of touching.
The Citadel is destroyed in two of the endings.
It's an AI
Most of the least-important characters are. :/I was hoping for the same thing too when I reached that part. I wanted to blow Kaidan's brains out if given the option. They act all emo throughout the whole game because they're salty about that. It was extremely annoying. What sucks is that you only have about 4 (5 with a romance scene)full fledged conversations with them give or take. They're horribly written in this game.
I was hoping for the same thing too when I reached that part. I wanted to blow Kaidan's brains out if given the option. They act all emo throughout the whole game because they're salty about that. It was extremely annoying. What sucks is that you only have about 4 (5 with a romance scene)full fledged conversations with them give or take. They're horribly written in this game.
Could not disagree more. Who told you the creators of the Reapers are an AI? Or are you assuming that just because its appearance is similar to that of a hologram?
Speculation.
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it's a duck.Could not disagree more. Who told you the creators of the Reapers are an AI? Or are you assuming that just because its appearance is similar to that of a hologram?
Speculation.
It's a computerised being that lives inside the Citadel, how the hell would it be non-synthetic? It can draw its own conclusions, therefore it's not a VI.
It's a computerised being that lives inside the Citadel, how the hell would it be non-synthetic? It can draw its own conclusions, therefore it's not a VI.
Could not disagree more. Who told you the creators of the Reapers are an AI? Or are you assuming that just because its appearance is similar to that of a hologram?
Speculation.
If we ever manage to transplant human conciousness into a computer is it still human conciousness or is it just AI? It seems like the best way of a race extending it's lifespan infinitely is to leave their physical bodies behind.
Hadn't read that but that is really cool. I was just trying to prove that it seems a logical step for an organic race to shed it's body in order to overcome the limits of organic beings.
You should've taken more time with it, but oh well.Well, all I kept hearing for a while was how terrible the ending was, and I decided to barrel through to the ending after being caught up in multi, just to see for myself; I didn't think it could be that bad. Well, I just finished the game, and holy shit,not only was it underwhelming, it was terribly written and totally didn't give me any closure!
I'm totally disappointed in the lack of choice you're offered in the last scene of the game, I mean why was I not given an option to not jump in the fucking thing? I'm angry that a new protagonist( some god/ai/I'mnotsurewhatthefuckheis kid ) is just thrown into last few seconds of the game, only to tell us he's behind the reaper attacks and then spew his horrible logic as to why he's doing it. Most of all, I'm upset I don't get to see how the relationships I established with all of the characters develop after the war ended, because they're all fucking dead apparently.......except for Joker, EDI, and LIARA( Even though she was with me during the last mission, wtf! )
In fact, the more I think about the ending, the more I find to take fault with ( you mean synthesis is the only way to peace? getting rid of diversity being the only way? that seems to totally contradict the theme of the whole theme of the game, and makes my in game attempts at brokering peace with the other races seem pointless! ), and the more questions I come up with. But I'm not gonna sit here and bother you guys with my questions. I'm sure the answers to what I'm asking are already out there ( or in this thread already ). Right now though, I just feel like sitting here and wallowing in my disappointment until I fall asleep.
It's partly why the ending is so jarring.This is all a shame too, this was a FANTASTIC game up until the end.
Well, all I kept hearing for a while was how terrible the ending was, and I decided to barrel through to the ending after being caught up in multi, just to see for myself; I didn't think it could be that bad. Well, I just finished the game, and holy shit,not only was it underwhelming, it was terribly written and totally didn't give me any closure!
I'm totally disappointed in the lack of choice you're offered in the last scene of the game, I mean why was I not given an option to not jump in the fucking thing? I'm angry that a new protagonist( some god/ai/I'mnotsurewhatthefuckheis kid ) is just thrown into last few seconds of the game, only to tell us he's behind the reaper attacks and then spew his horrible logic as to why he's doing it. Most of all, I'm upset I don't get to see how the relationships I established with all of the characters develop after the war ended, because they're all fucking dead apparently.......except for Joker, EDI, and LIARA( Even though she was with me during the last mission, wtf! )
In fact, the more I think about the ending, the more I find to take fault with ( you mean synthesis is the only way to peace? getting rid of diversity being the only way? that seems to totally contradict the theme of the whole theme of the game, and makes my in game attempts at brokering peace with the other races seem pointless! ), and the more questions I come up with. But I'm not gonna sit here and bother you guys with my questions. I'm sure the answers to what I'm asking are already out there ( or in this thread already ). Right now though, I just feel like sitting here and wallowing in my disappointment until I fall asleep.
This is all a shame too, this was a FANTASTIC game up until the end.
Does no one in this thread actually understand the ending?
Re-play it. There's a lot of hints that point you in the right direction.
Holy shit! How did you know.I swear, if he says indoctrination theory...
Edited my previous post. There's no assumptions there, just observations. It's pretty clear.Do you not understand the thread?
Re-read it. There's a lot of hints that point you in the right direction.
Honestly, though, there's been a lot of great discussion in this thread. I don't think you can come in here and assume.
Does no one in this thread actually understand the ending?
Re-play it. There's a lot of hints that point you in the right direction. he biggest pieces of evidence here are...
- Anderson entering the final area before him (even though there's only one path, and they weren't in the same corridor prior).
- Shepard fucking breathing in space.
- The "paragon" and "neutral" endings actually being NEGATIVE (what the Reapers want).
- The "renegade" ending showing Shepard still being alive.
- The kid appearing. The kid was never seen by anyone else, and appeared only in his dreams (except at the beginning).
- Shepard having a bullet wound when he wasn't shot. Anderson was shot.
tl;dr
Shepard entering the beam was all in his head. None of it occurred. Destroying the Reapers is the true ending. It's a clever setup for DLC that will explain exactly what happened post-dream (when he wakes up at the end of the renegade ending).
Holy shit! How did you know.
Stealth edits. :lol
So you didn't read the thread(s). It's cool.Edited my previous post. There's no assumptions there, just observations. It's pretty clear.
"Indoctrination theory" is a theory that tries to tie up the loose ends. I just find it ridiculous that there are still people who see what's presented and take it at face value. The game makes it very clear that it's not to be taken at face value.PRO-TIP
Indoctrination theory has been discussed a bit in this thread.
Go ahead and ask away. Any question can be answered by any of these four concepts: space magic, speculation, artistic integrity, and lolBioware.
We all know that feeling man. It gets better in a few days.
Except it doesn't
"Indoctrination theory" is a theory that tries to tie up the loose ends. I just find it ridiculous that there are still people who see what's presented and take it at face value. The game makes it very clear that it's not to be taken at face value.
It also makes it clear that the events are happening. The only section that's debatable is the meeting with the Catalyst, but even then the events are simply presented in an hyper-state of being. It doesn't lead to a dream.The game makes it very clear that it's not to be taken at face value.
lolBioware. Bioware recorded lines for Joker where he says he's coming in to save the day, but for some reason, it was cut.the fuck did joker break away from the whole fleet and when did my squadmates link up with him?
Speculation. We have no idea.Or where did the garden planet that joker crashed on come from ( just how far away from the main fleet was the Normandy )?
Y'know, shit like that. I dunno, it almost feels like I missed something somewhere and I feel compelled to watch the ending again, just to see if I can find something I missed. But right now I'm sleepy and I can barely put organize my thoughts lol.