The skyboxes really were amazing in ME1. I liked, but didn't love the exploration aspect, but the visuals were nice.
There was only one planet that was really a bitch with the mountains. I think maybe the one where it is a binary planet. I think it opens after Virmire, regardless. Everything else was easily navigable with a little bit of Mako experience under your belt.
No she didnt. She's much more interesting to talk to in 1. Everything in 3 is just talking about stuff established in 1 or the dumb Horizon mission and working with Cerberus. And you barely talk with her after she gets out of the hospital.
It is nothing personal, just something I found off a site
http://www.gameranx.com/updates/id/...-writer-allegedly-slams-controversial-ending/
Patrick Weekes said:The endgame doesn't have that. I wanted to see banshees attacking you, and then have asari gunships zoom in and blow them away. I wanted to see a wave of rachni ravagers come around a corner only to be met by a wall of krogan roaring a battle cry. Here's the horror the Reapers inflicted upon each race, and here's the army that you, Commander Shepard, made out of every race in the galaxy to fight them...
For me, Anderson's goodbye is where it ended. The stuff with the Catalyst just... You have to understand. Casey is really smart and really analytical. And the problem is that when he's not checked, he will assume that other people are like him, and will really appreciate an almost completely unemotional intellectual ending. I didn't hate it, but I didn't love it...
I have NO IDEA why these different cutscenes aren't in there. As far as I know, they were never cut. Maybe they were cut for budget reasons at the last minute. I don't know. But holy crap, yeah, I can see how incredibly disappointing it'd be to hear of all the different ending possibilities and have it break down to "which color is stuff glowing?" Or maybe they ARE in, but they're too subtle to really see obvious differences, and again, that's... yeah.
If he really did wrote that, seems Weekes the only one that understands what's so great about the ME Saga.
If he really did wrote that, seems Weekes the only one that understands what's so great about the ME Saga.
Thanks for the link.
Weekes hits the nail on the head:
He is pretty much the only writer other than Walters that has remained on the writing team throughout the ME franchise. It's apparent he should have been promoted to lead instead of Walters but alas.
If he really did wrote that, seems Weekes the only one that understands what's so great about the ME Saga.
Patrick Weekes said:No other writer did, either, except for our lead. This was entirely the work of our lead and Casey himself, sitting in a room and going through draft after draft.
And honestly, it kind of shows.
Every other mission in the game had to be held up to the rest of the writing team, and the writing team then picked it apart and made suggestions and pointed out the parts that made no sense. This mission? Casey and our lead deciding that they didn't need to be peer-reviewe.d
And again, it shows.
He's as easy to romance as the characters in the game.Anyone going to PAX East should give him a hug.
It is hard not to get mad when Bioware nailed 99% of the game and then the egos of Hudson and Walters made them do an about face and go it alone.
I'm really curious how much this is diving Bioware as a staff. Surely some of the staff must be really upset at what Casey and Walters did, to me it's almost like they didn't trust their own staff with proofing the ending.
What a fucking shame.
I'm really curious how much this is diving Bioware as a staff. Surely some of the staff must be really upset at what Casey and Walters did, to me it's almost like they didn't trust their own staff with proofing the ending.
What a fucking shame.
No one cares that Hale/Meer voices the kid? I thought this was pretty major.
If anything it heavily leans towards the indoc theory.
Have an expansive and wonderful looking sci-fi universe? Make it a corridor shooter.
Have very interesting characters from variety of alien races? Fill the game with humans.
Such a waste.
No one cares that Hale/Meer voices the kid? I thought this was pretty major.
If anything it heavily leans towards the indoc theory.
No one cares that Hale/Meer voices the kid? I thought this was pretty major.
If anything it heavily leans towards the indoc theory.
It doesn't lean towards anything. They were going to be the easiest voice actors to get, and the symbolism of "space kid totally represents everyone Shepard has let down as well as him/her" could have been there in any ending. Why would the fact that the other gender of Shepard speaks there point in any way through an in-universe fourth wall being broken?
I think that's an over-simplistic way of looking at it. They could have used any random voice to voice the kid, but they chose both Shepards.
Personally to me it seems they're going for the old "your conscience is speaking to you", and that would make sense if Shepard is indoctrinated.
I think that's an over-simplistic way of looking at it. They could have used any random voice to voice the kid, but they chose both Shepards.
Personally to me it seems they're going for the old "your conscience is speaking to you", and that would make sense if Shepard is indoctrinated.
The indoctrination theory is the religious debate of gaming; everybody is set in their ways and you're not likely to convince anyone to reconsider.
I'm on the indoctrination side of the fence though.
No one cares that Hale/Meer voices the kid? I thought this was pretty major.
If anything it heavily leans towards the indoc theory.
Weekes said:The endgame doesn't have that. I wanted to see banshees attacking you, and then have asari gunships zoom in and blow them away. I wanted to see a wave of rachni ravagers come around a corner only to be met by a wall of krogan roaring a battle cry. Here's the horror the Reapers inflicted upon each race, and here's the army that you, Commander Shepard, made out of every race in the galaxy to fight them.
No one cares that Hale/Meer voices the kid? I thought this was pretty major.
If anything it heavily leans towards the indoc theory.
I'm on the Indoc side because it's the only way to fix this mess lol.
I'm on the Indoc side because it's the only way to fix this mess lol.
It is really interesting and something I missed the first time through until someone pointed it out. I would LOVE to think that Bioware was planning the indoctrination theory from the get go, but based on Walters' "Lots of speculation", the Dr's "clarification", and Hudson's artistic integrity remarks, I think it is safe to say what we got is it. With that said, I think indoc theory allows Bioware to pursue different endings with ease. It allows them to keep everything in the game without further explanation and create multiple endings tailored to the fans requests while still keeping with the themes of the series.
I don't know why these would be considered evidence against indoctrination. Leaving evidence of indoctrination but not confirming it would obviously provide a lot of speculation.
And the "clarification" DLC is going to clarify how much ass Shepard kicks after overcoming indoctrination.
I don't know why these would be considered evidence against indoctrination. Leaving evidence of indoctrination but not confirming it would obviously provide a lot of speculation.
And the "clarification" DLC is going to clarify how much ass Shepard kicks after overcoming indoctrination.
There is not a single fucking piece of evidence for the indoctrination theory. Nothing. They have said that they scrapped an ending where you struggled with the controls against Reaper indoctrination. The rest of the game was already written when they wrote the ending. There's no way the evidence some are saying points towards the indoctrination ending could ever possibly point towards it.
*wakes up*
GET OUT OF MY HEADDDDDDD
*turns blue*
*Biotic Charges through Harbinger*
SHEPARD STRIKEEEEEEEEEEEE
*Harbinger blows up*
Liara: I think I'm wet.
*Shepard flies through the citadel, punches vent kid in the face*
*destroys the reapers with a single blast of the catalyst but saves the geth and EDI because that's what shep does, man*
*end:
http://i.imgur.com/AND1g.jpg
Except shopped with Shep's face.
He is literally writing it on a page where he details the ending without a mention of indoctrination.
Highlights: "Shepard's death". "Ends conflict".
Garrus looks sexy in that dress.
The hell? Why so much aggression?
Anyways, I don't see how it couldn't be indoctrination since if the ending actually happened, then that would mean Shepard re-entered orbit from fucking space and survived.
He is literally writing it on a page where he details the ending without a mention of indoctrination.
http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/2723/33611897.jpg[IMG]
Highlights: "Shepard's death". "Ends conflict".[/QUOTE]
And the text dump of production notes or whatever don't mention indoctrination at all either. In fact, when TIM starts to control Shepard and those black tendrils come up, it's not called indoctrination, it's called "control mojo"
No agression at you personally, just at the notion that it's as viable a theory as the literal ending.
Re-entering orbit and staying intact happened in ME2 as your body is still whole while landing on the icy planet (near the Normandy for whatever reason). Most likely they forgot about that part though.
And the text dump of production notes or whatever don't mention indoctrination at all either. In fact, when TIM starts to control Shepard and those black tendrils come up, it's not called indoctrination, it's called "control mojo"
But there was originally a section where Shepard was getting indoctrinated which they cut because they couldn't get the controls right (which to me seems fucking stupid as I'd think fighting indoctrination would be more a test of your will rather than of shooting stuff).
But there was originally a section where Shepard was getting indoctrinated which they cut because they couldn't get the controls right (which to me seems fucking stupid as I'd think fighting indoctrination would be more a test of your will rather than of shooting stuff).