These aren't journalists. Gaming writers are disguising op-eds as news, and then failing to actually reach out and seek quotes from the gaming community. It's not that this couldn't be an interesting read. How did we come to this point? Why did this ending in particular yield such a thorough negative response? I didn't even really hate the ending that much, but I'd sure like to know from a more objective, outsider stand point how this looks.
But no, instead we'll just continue to drive a wedge between videogame critics and gamers/real video game journalism.
But no, instead we'll just continue to drive a wedge between videogame critics and gamers/real video game journalism.