pretty much. That and she had a more cohesive dinner.Christine deserves it. Josh made the single biggest mistake with the lobster. Christine showed better flavors and techniques and made no huge errors.
they said it was even in taste, but 1 dish helped them all decide. It's clear it was the uncooked lobster. The only unforced big error of the night.Based off this performance alone, Josh should have won. Lobster sunk or not, I call foul
Show is so damn rigged...
ALL ABOUT DAT MARKETABILITY SON.
$$$
Show is so damn rigged...
Show is so damn rigged...
That's not fair. Josh got kicked off once, and came back. Christina has made solid food every single week. Yeah her being blind made the marketability contest a no-braininer, but unlike previous seasons, the talent went with the marketability.
I actually thought it was refreshing to see a clear frontrunner win. They didn't try to diminish her, or build up others to throw us off. She was just a brilliant mind they had.
Frank was better and more consistent than Christine, so Christine wasn't the frontrunner.
Frank was alright but the dude folded under pressure. Same could be said for Becky. She was probably the big front runner for the majority of the season too. But just like Frank she couldn't preform under the pressure.
Frank got fucked over by Josh and Josh never deserved to be in the top 2.
That's not fair. Josh got kicked off once, and came back. Christina has made solid food every single week. Yeah her being blind made the marketability contest a no-braininer, but unlike previous seasons, the talent went with the marketability.
I should have explained myself better.
I wasn't really rooting for either really, thought Becky was the best, but I can't taste the food so who knows. Josh got sent home, and then was brought back under questionable circumstances vs Stacey/Mike. Christine was exposed as a fraud when all season she was touted as having an amazing palette then when they unbiased judges come in they say she can't even make a decent broth.
No, what pisses me off was Christine's simplicity being able to win her the title, while Adrien last year apparently lost because he braised his meat.
Same thing happened in Season 1. The girl who won made simpler dishes. I think one of her dishes was breaded fried chicken over some kale compared to the guy who made a beef wellington.
That was a case of marketability over talent though. Wasn't the girl only 19 years old or something?
Same thing happened in Season 1. The girl who won made simpler dishes. I think one of her dishes was breaded fried chicken over some kale compared to the guy who made a beef wellington.
Show is so damn rigged...
Unfortunate outcome. Good for Christine, but I think Josh deserved to win. This entire season has seemed awfully predictable, though. I was hoping for Josh to pull it out, but Christine was definitely more marketable. To those crying foul over Josh coming back... everyone had a shot and it could've been anyone in that position. The fact is that he came back by cooking stuff extremely well and ended up showing that he didn't deserve to go home and deserved his spot in the final. Christine absolutely deserved to be in the final two, but I just think Josh did a better job in the end.
Josh came out with complex, sound dishes that not only apparently tasted good, but looked fucking incredible. All of his dishes looked amazing, but his lamb dish? That looked better than most things I've seen on any MasterChef season or MasterChef: The Professionals.. and those were professional chefs. I appreciate his focus on something different and unique for the finale of a MasterChef competition, not simple and back to basics like the Christine dishes. Christine kept it too simple... shame.
Shouldn't be no surprise after last season. Christine deserves all the success coming her way but based on those dishes it should've been Josh hands down.
.