• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

May 7th | UK General Election 2015 OT - Please go vote!

Status
Not open for further replies.

tomtom94

Member
I'll never understand why they went for that with what was clearly a one-shot attempt at change.

Straight PR would not only have been better but also have been a much easier sell to the public.

I'm pretty sure they offered PR to the Conservatives but they had to compromise to AV. I can't remember what it was in exchange for.
 

SmokyDave

Member
I genuinely feel the UK is turning into a far right country. The way we treat immigrants, and the vulnerable is absolutely disgusting. We are being taught it is okay to treat these people like sub human.
I genuinely feel that you're not on the right bus. The hyperbole is off the charts.
 

iMax

Member
Your post gave the impression that you didn't care about disabled people, which is why I asked.

I was charged with the allegation that I aligned my views with a party that don't care about the criminalisation of disabled people. I don't know how much more clear I could've made it.

Do I think disabled people should be criminalised? No.
 

Tak3n

Banned
Will the lib dems ever recover from this? Is such a thing even possible.

I personally don't think you can go down to 8 seats and ever be relevant again, many will disagree with me, but one thing we know, they can not command a presence at any debates etc anymore
 
move out of the shadow of new labour? Given what's happened overnight, they're almost certainly going to tac right because the centre ground of English politics now seems to be the centre-right. They'll be added the new back on as soon as they find some tape.

I think there's room for a real left wing party. Miliband didn't even try though - he wouldn't even go in for renationalisation of the rail network - which even tory voters support!
 
I genuinely feel that you're not on the right bus. The hyperbole is off the charts.

I think a better way to put it is that a lot of people feel they are moving more towards the left while simultaneously voting for parties and policies that are actually moving towards the right.
 
There are people with a wide variety of political positions in a party as large as the Tories and they disagree a fair amount. You get people who call themselves libertarians, cameron who has identified as a "compasionate conservative" and then you have outright closet facists who think that hitler was right all along. Paxman is a one nation Tory which is totally not like a national socialist.
 

Ashes

Banned
The conservatives are not far right. Both labour and conservatives are center left/right these days.

The welfare budget needs cutting. It is unsustainable. Parties previously have been skirting around the edges.

Party affiliations aside, you steer very close to moral bankruptcy with comments such as these.

How you target the poor ahead of so many other considerations in society with the veneer of legitimacy is contemptible.

I'd rather my tax pounds were invested in the poor than leave them hungry.

Long term strategies to get them out of the poverty trap is so much more socially responsible than this almost psychopathic - by that I mean totally lacking empathy - striking at the little money that most of the less well off in our society get.
 

twobear

sputum-flecked apoplexy
I'm not sure that's particularly reasonable. In 2010 all the major parties signed up to austerity as a solution and on 2015 they all basically did the same. If the Beeb have a representative from each party on, I'm not sure the unbiased approach is for their interviewers to go off in a Keynesian critique that literally none of the parties support - except the SNP (though that was largely just a rhetorical difference since their manifesto was similar to Labours) who did gangbusters. So maybe if this is the argument that should be put forward, Labour should have been doing it (and I'm sure you think they should), but that doesn't mean the BBC is somehow favouring the Tories when they themselves don't bring it up.

I think this BBC Bias thing has more or less been conjured up in the last 12 hours.

As I said, the Labour party failed to offer a compelling alternative.

But I mean, just because all parties sign up to austerity doesn't at all mean that the press (that is, if we are to maintain the delusion that they are unbiased and ought to report the truth) should just blindly report on it as though it's a sensible strategy; especially when, as I say, it had virtually no support from any genuine economists.

The BBC's failure to critique the strategy is particularly egregious, since they're hypothetically impartial and should be responsible for at least asking questions. But they don't: they just report that George Osborne said that austerity is working, and that Ed Balls thinks that it's not working hard enough.

The BBC bias tends to favour whoever's in power. That's been true since forever. And it was reinforced during Blair's years when they were punished for daring to question the government re: WMDs and the sexed up dossier. Nevermind that the BBC were in the right and it was an important piece of investigative journalism--they were punished for questioning the government's line.
 

driver116

Member
Bad result for Labour. The LibDem's result was based on a gamble, and it didn't pay off. The SNP have done well to secure Scotland, but I really don't think it will do much for them in the long run except give cause for yet another referendum.
 
Wow, it's a bloodbath for Labour and Lib Dems this morning. The Tories must be french kissing each other in joy.

I can't help but feel now without the Lib Dems whining over their shoulder the Tories are going to take their gloves off. :/
 

mocoworm

Member
How you target the poor ahead of so many other considerations in society with the veneer of legitimacy is contemptible.

I'd rather my tax pounds were invested in the poor than leave them hungry.

Long term strategies to get them out of the poverty trap is so much more socially responsible than this almost psychopathic - by that I mean totally lacking empathy - striking at the little money that most of the less well off in our society get.

.
 
what I did find amusing was how the various MPs we saw across the night conformed to stereotypes.

Tories - largely RP speaking members of the upper, upper middle and upper classes. Slick hair, elitism personified.

Labour - Normal, everyday type people from the middle and working classes. The sort of people most of us are, whatever our allegiances.

Lib dems - As above, but more middle class and with slightly less gravitas/

SNP - A load of jakey nutters who wouldn't look out of place in the dole queue or swearing at their kids in a harvester. Not all of them but there were definitely a few .
 

iMax

Member
Party affiliations aside, you steer very close to moral bankruptcy with comments such as these.

How you target the poor ahead of so many other considerations in society with the veneer of legitimacy is contemptible.

I'd rather my tax pounds were invested in the poor than leave them hungry.

Long term strategies to get them out of the poverty trap is so much more socially responsible than this almost psychopathic - by that I mean totally lacking empathy - striking at the little money that most of the less well off in our society get.

The welfare budget does need cutting. Last year it was £734bn. We have the challenge of optimising it. Getting more out of it. Stopping abuse and exploitation. It's unsustainable. We can't afford it.

If we can't optimise it, then we can't cut it. And if we can't afford it, we need more internal revenue. Closing tax avoidance loopholes would be a good start.
 

Cindres

Vied for a tag related to cocks, so here it is.
Will the lib dems ever recover from this? Is such a thing even possible.

I doubt it, my predictions for my constituency and surrounding were pretty much on. Newcastle's a pretty studenty City and it's the North East so very safe Labour seats. Last time there was a good amount of LD voting, unsurprisingly numbers for Green and Labour went up this time. I don't see how the Lib Dems could come back from this, it'll need a real shake up in leadership.
 

Tak3n

Banned
I think there's room for a real left wing party. Miliband didn't even try though - he wouldn't even go in for renationalisation of the rail network - which even tory voters support!

he was never going to, he always believed a Tory-Light/centre left party was the way to go

he needed to be a real choice
 

Renegade Yeti

Neo Member
As an Irishman looking in one thing I have noticed is that the UK's electoral system is broken. When the greens and ukip get 5 million votes but only a handful of seats then there is something fundamentally wrong.

Couldn't agree more, although I can't see it changing anytime soon, the curren system favours Tory and labour and neither is going to change that whilst either are in parliament
 

kmag

Member
The welfare budget does need cutting. Last year it was £734bn. We have the challenge of optimising it. Getting more out of it. Stopping abuse and exploitation. It's unsustainable. We can't afford it.

o-DWP-570.jpg
 

Hasney

Member
Cameron will campaign to stay in, but the times, sun, mail, express, ukip and half the tory party want out

tough call

That's the biggest issue, big Dave can't campaign to stay in too hard so it will depend a lot on Labour and Lib Dems (assuming on the latter) new leaders.
 

tomtom94

Member
So gaf - do you reckon we're out of Europe?

No. I think the Conservatives will be forced to allow a free vote on the issue and the front-bench of the party will side with the IN campaign on the grounds that while it's not particularly exciting, it is really important that we stay in.
 
Party affiliations aside, you steer very close to moral bankruptcy with comments such as these.

How you target the poor ahead of so many other considerations in society with the veneer of legitimacy is contemptible.

I'd rather my tax pounds were invested in the poor than leave them hungry.

Long term strategies to get them out of the poverty trap is so much more socially responsible than this almost psychopathic - by that I mean totally lacking empathy - striking at the little money that most of the less well off in our society get.

Quite. The 'welfare is unsustainable' idea is only remotely accurate in any kind of just society if you look at the vast majority of said budget: pensions.

What is more, most of the housing benefit subsidises landlords. Sort the housing crisis out and perhaps it may drop. Fraud is miniscule, and yes, of course must be punished - nobody disagrees on this. The fact the argument revolves around fraud and exploitation is absurd: NOBODY wants that to happen.
 

Madchad

Member
So gaf - do you reckon we're out of Europe?

He wont even hold a referendum trust me.

On another note i believe Labour shot themselves in the foot by having Ed as leader over his brother. My dad has been saying that was a massive mistake from day one thanks to the unions power over the party. Hes been a Labour member all his life.
 

DECK'ARD

The Amiga Brotherhood
I'm pretty sure they offered PR to the Conservatives but they had to compromise to AV. I can't remember what it was in exchange for.

They held the balance of power yet still let themselves get fucked on the issues that really mattered.

The Tories played them like a fiddle.
 

twobear

sputum-flecked apoplexy
The Tory party talk about optimising spending while introducing NHS privatisation measures that totally undermine optimisation of spending.

It's just double-think. Completely bonkers.
 

Tak3n

Banned
Cameron will campaign to stay in, but the times, sun, mail, express, ukip and half the tory party want out

tough call

Only if he gets the changes he want, Cameron has been giving a gun by the british people

pro EU people should now be worried, as he is about to ride into Brussels with a full mandate to say, meet these demands or we are off...he said on the record he would only say 'stay in' if he got all the changes he wanted, which includes restricting free movement....

to coin a phrase from braveheart

"We've come to pick a fight"
 
The welfare budget does need cutting. Last year it was £734bn. We have the challenge of optimising it. Getting more out of it. Stopping abuse and exploitation. It's unsustainable. We can't afford it.

'abuse and exploitation' is a tiny tiny proportion of the welfare budget. More is lost through admin errors and it's absolutely insignificant compared to tax fraud / avoidance / evasion.

Edit: http://www.cas.org.uk/features/myth-busting-real-figures-benefit-fraud

There are scores of other sites with much more detail - but I'm off to bed now!
 
That's the biggest issue, big Dave can't campaign to stay in too hard so it will depend a lot on Labour and Lib Dems (assuming on the latter) new leaders.

He can, he's not fighting another election. He should also work with people like ken clarke, charlie kennedy, alan johnson and others who people actually like, and try to make sure that people like blair, brown and clegg keep quiet.

Just woke up, have yet to check the news. How bad is it?

Tory majority
 

Mindwipe

Member
Will the lib dems ever recover from this? Is such a thing even possible.

I wonder if there's some route to radically rework the party to be a more economically right wing but heavily libertarian route. That plays well with younger Conservative voters - small state types.

But it's going to be at a level of essentially starting again. And there's every chance their base won't go for it, so the party will be dead.

It took a long time to beat the party into something electable in a way the Greens are fifteen years away from, so the anti-authoritarian left in England is completely fucked - and to be very clear, that's Nick Clegg's fault and he will be hated for it for a very long time.
 
Couldn't agree more, although I can't see it changing anytime soon, the curren system favours Tory and labour and neither is going to change that whilst either are in parliament

The system isn't designed for the current political landscape. SNP have absolutely battered it because the opposition was divided. Do we know what their share of the vote in Scotland actually was?

If we went towards PR you can expect SNP to lose out but UKIP would absolutely smash it.
 
I'm not massive on politics, but I'd have definitely preferred Labour to win this. Hopefully it won't affect those of us on lower incomes too much.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
The Liberal Democrats are also dead, so electoral reform died with them. Worst night for the British left in decades.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom