Alligatorjandro
Banned
The terrorists have conquered us
it's a universal swear word
well, here you go:
http://www.scriptonitedaily.com/2013/03/19/police-state-uk-the-rights-you-didnt-know-youd-lost/
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...labours-curbs-on-civil-liberties-1627054.html
and two previous "terrorist laws"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-terrorism,_Crime_and_Security_Act_2001
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_Act_2006
Still haven't figured out why the US and the UK have been trying to out-awful each other this last year or so. Is there some sort of contest going on that I wasn't aware of?
Looking at this post and what is happening right now...what exactly would be Mays incentive to stop attacks? More attacks and less police pretty much is a winning recipe for her if people are willing to give up their rights.May cut MI5 and Police.
At the time she was told by both "This will leave us exposed. Vulnerable to attack. Very real chance of requiring militarisation of police force in near future".
May called it scare mongering.
3 attacks this year she is directly responsible for. The reason you can view those films is because those in a position to do something had their support cut to the point they could not.
Now these things are coming to light and her once huge majority is down to a fraction, and she's calling for this human rights change not because it's what we need to fight terrorism effectively, but because it could score her last minute votes to increase her win to a majority again.
She /is/ an evil cunt.
Viewing extremist material can have benefit when trying to understand how to educate again it and counter it with educated responses.
Viewing child porn has no value.
Don't be absurd.
She is nothing, nothing compared to May and Boris and their ilk. Yes, she may not be ideal, but its not even in the same league as the shit the Tory's have been pulling.
If you like you can list every thing wrong you can think of about Abbot, I'll retort with May and Boris. Each point raised requires citation to back it up.
Go whenever your'e ready.
For what it's worth, cunt isn't considered as severe as it is in the UK.
I totally understand that. I just think that given the context of this thread and the way it's being said, the word "cunt" comes off as incredibly sexist––regardless of how other cultures might use that word.
Is this the best you can come up with, wow my human rights have been well and truly been stripped.
You're first link babbling about 800 years of history and links essentially links back to the wiki links you posted.
The worse you can come up with is the 14 day detention for terrorism linked activity. How often have British citizens been held in captivity for 14 days for something not related to terrorism?
If you can find the police regularly abusing this then you may have a point.
It's a horrible word but she is horrible enough to justify the use.
If it makes you feel any better Boris is a huge cunt too.
PS - they're also both huge dicks. I'm happy to call them huge dicks if that is more palatable.
fair enough.
also:
American English > British English. Please don't kill me
Looking at this post and what is happening right now...what exactly would be Mays incentive to stop attacks? More attacks and less police pretty much is a winning recipe for her if people are willing to give up their rights.
I can only assume she has some Russian state run banks holding her money.
Good thing that election is coming up soon
Here's our dear leader in action talking about the human rights act in her Home Secretary days... before Andrew Neil points out she's lying
https://twitter.com/Ali_8k/status/872196515279904769
this is called moving goalposts
I showed you a list of human rights being stripped (for example rights to protest, rights to a fair trial) and you're dismissing them for no reason other than your own stubborness
you can also look at the liberties we lost after two other major terror attacks and ask yourself if you feel any safer
It isn't called moving the goal posts.
I said show me a history of the tory's doing this since that is who was being discussed.
You show me a bunch of actions being taken by the labour government to combat terrorism.
By the nature of this thread it is clearly being implied the worst is going to happen, but so far we've got no evidence the worst is going to happen. If you consider up to 14 days without charge relating to terrorism, which has no signs of showing it being abused the worst? Then yes the sky is falling.
Oh ok show me the history of the last 50 years of the British losing human rights.
I said show me a history of the tory's doing this since that is who was being discussed.
It isn't called moving the goal posts.
It isn't called moving the goal posts.
I said show me a history of the tory's doing this since that is who was being discussed.
You show me a bunch of actions being taken by the labour government to combat terrorism.
By the nature of this thread it is clearly being implied the worst is going to happen, but so far we've got no evidence the worst is going to happen. If you consider up to 14 days without charge relating to terrorism, which has no signs of showing it being abused the worst? Then yes the sky is falling.
come on mate, sort yourself out
and then
and then the audacity to say
if it's not moving the goalposts, it's a chronic case of amnesia
Her supporters probably view it as beautifully poetic.On the anniversary of D-Day.
Does she have no shame ? Doesn't matter I guess, her papers will lap it up.
Well we were talking about the torys and instead of refuting me, you're focusing on something completely irrelevant.
Confirmed 14 days without charge that isn't being abused, end of the world. Uk governments can not be trusted with human rights, you've sure shown me.
We're talking about the same Japan that has about 1% of non-asian population, nevermind muslim population, right ? Really weird.Isn't it funny how Japan never really invaded the Middle East and subsequently doesn't have to real with radical Islamic terror it created/perpetuated?
I posted this in the GE thread, so why not here?
A video has been leaked of May talking to her party after telling the press she'd abolish human rights.
I don't follow British politics closely, but this feels like a really stupid thing to say with elections coming up. I mean, it's one thing to do that stuff while saying you're not, but does saying it outright actually win you points?
Yes. Unfortunately.
Hey guys, remember when the UK was proud of the rule of law?"I mean doing more to restrict the freedom and movements of terrorist suspects - when we have enough evidence to know they are a threat, but not enough evidence to prosecute them in full in court."
What are the polls looking like for the election? I seem to remember reading that May and the Tories were pretty down, but that's been a week or so ago.
What are the polls looking like for the election? I seem to remember reading that May and the Tories were pretty down, but that's been a week or so ago.