• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

May warns future of EU citizens in the UK is uncertain, deportations could happen

Status
Not open for further replies.

Trojita

Rapid Response Threadmaker
This shit is so fucked. Have the people that believed they referendum was not binding and might not happen finally realized shit has really hit the fan at this point?
 

Breakage

Member
What a fucking mess. I can't believe they are actually going to see this vote thru. It's regressive in every single way.
Why aren't there any prominent figures from the big 2 parties coming out and saying Brexit is a disaster in the making? Surely they know it's going to be bad so why are they keeping quiet? Almost feels like there's an element of censorship at play.
 

danowat

Banned
What a fucking mess. I can't believe they are actually going to see this vote thru. It's regressive in every single way.
Why aren't there any prominent figures from the big 2 parties coming out and saying Brexit is a disaster in the making? Surely they know it's going to be bad so why are they keeping quiet? Almost feels like there's an element of censorship at play.

Because a large percentage of the population think it's a good idea.
 

Setsu00

Member
Because a large percentage of the population think it's a good idea.

I want to believe that more people didn't know what they were voting for, but I'm starting to think that this is actually what 52% of the UK want. It's horrible.
 
Congratulations on fucking up the lives of so many people Leave voters. This is the hideous right wing future you voted for.
 

Breakage

Member
Because a large percentage of the population think it's a good idea.

I get that, but everything post-Brexit suggests that leaving the EU is going to be an utter disaster for everyone including the people that voted leave. There are just so many areas of life that will be profoundly affected by us leaving. Yet the folks in politics seem to be obsessed with respecting the vote and "uniting" people. How can they call for unity when 52% voted to go backwards? Are people supposed be united in the destroying the UK or something? These calls for solidarity and unity are pointless. We are literally walking into a disaster.
 
This is so silly. Ignoring the obvious humantian issues, being public about this is such a stupid gambit. The type of person who would feel impressed by this kind of "tough talk" is not the type of person to join the conservative party to vote in a leadership election. Likewise, the more centrish MPs in the party, will think twice about voting for her.

When there are so many more British expats than EU migrants, this is like punching a wall to show how angry you are, with your face.
 

danowat

Banned
I get that, but everything post-Brexit suggests that leaving the EU is going to be an utter disaster for everyone including the people that voted leave. There are just so many areas of life that will be profoundly affected by us leaving. Yet the folks in politics seem to be obsessed with respecting the vote and "uniting" people. How can they call for unity when 52% voted to go backwards? Are people supposed be united in the destroying the UK or something? These calls for solidarity and unity are pointless. We are literally walking into a disaster.

I don't know whether it's pure disillusion, or they are seeing something that I can't, but a lot of people I talk to, STILL, say that leaving the EU is a good idea.

I don't get it.
 

Nikodemos

Member
This sort of plain idiocy only serves as fuel for Sturgeon and Adams. All they need to do for political gains is point at the Tories and say: "Do you really want those arseholes telling us what to do? After all they've said and done?".
 
This is so silly. Ignoring the obvious humantian issues, being public about this is such a stupid gambit. The type of person who would feel impressed by this kind of "tough talk" is not the type of person to join the conservative party to vote in a leadership election. Likewise, the more centrish MPs in the party, will think twice about voting for her.

When there are so many more British expats than EU migrants, this is like punching a wall to show how angry you are, with your face.

It's not about sending a message to the members, it's about putting things on the table for A50 negotiations.
 

Nikodemos

Member
It's not about sending a message to the members, it's about putting things on the table for A50 negotiations.
But it's cretinous. They'll say "we intend to expel all EU citizens"; the other members will counter "well, that's unfortunate; we'll offer dual citizenship to British residents, because we like the taxes they pay". Guess who will (figuratively) end up looking like a bunch of drunkards who pissed themselves?

It's painfully stupid. As ThoughtsOfSpeaking very accurately put it, it's like punching a wall in anger with your face.
 
I suspect it's all posturing for domestic support.

Lots of people voted leave, (and lots of Tory members voted leave) in order to get rid of the immigrants.
If May argues for an amnesty, she potentially loses the leadership election. She has to hope that her uncompromising tough-justice "Thatcher Mk2" persona is enough for Leave-voting Tories to vote for her despite her former backing of Remain.

We can't evict the immigrants anyway. Who would do all their jobs?
Merkel's not an idiot and can clearly see it as an unenforceable threat.

At worst, I expect a fudge, whereby we use a points-based-system for giving out visas to existing immigrants (a fair and tough system for leave voters to support), but the points-system is rigged so that everyone qualifies except for a few unskilled fruit pickers who only came over this summer and were going home anyway.

Forced deportations would mean riots on the streets and cause Europe to utterly destroy us in any trade negotiations.

The EU won't retaliate in kind. They'll do the opposite, and welcome the British retirees, students and scientists into their economy. Why would they want to stop young healthy educated people from paying German taxes? Why would they want to stop baby boomers from spending their pensions in Spain?
 
This has to be posturing, they can't seriously be thinking about uprooting EU nationals that have lived here for years or even decades.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permanent_residency

All European Union countries have a facility for someone to become a permanent resident, as EU legislation allows an EU national who moves to another EU country to attain permanent resident status after residing there for five years.

I'd be Hitler-level surprised if she's talking about kicking out anyone out who has "permanent residency", "indefinite leave to remain" etc. after the fact.
 
I voted for Leave, but I've got to say I'm not at all happy with this approach. The right thing to do is to reassure everyone here now that they won't be forced out. I assumed that would be the case before the referendum, as the alternative just seemed unthinkable.
 
I voted for Leave, but I've got to say I'm not at all happy with this approach. The right thing to do is to reassure everyone here now that they won't be forced out. I assumed that would be the case before the referendum, as the alternative just seemed unthinkable.

Not to be rude, but the campaign for the option you voted for literally used a poster that could be directly compared to Third Reich propaganda. It made constant use of dog-whistle phrases like "ordinary, common people" and "hard working British people" . I really don't understand how this is in any way surprising.
 

LewieP

Member
I voted for Leave, but I've got to say I'm not at all happy with this approach. The right thing to do is to reassure everyone here now that they won't be forced out. I assumed that would be the case before the referendum, as the alternative just seemed unthinkable.

Why on earth would you make such an assumption?!? Did you not know what you were voting for?
 
Not to be rude, but the campaign for the option you voted for literally used a poster that could be directly compared to Third Reich propaganda. It made constant use of dog-whistle phrases like "ordinary, common people" and "hard working British people" . I really don't understand how this is in any way surprising.

You're not being rude, don't worry about that!

There's a huge difference between changing the UK's immigration system and forcing people already here onto planes and boats. I thought I was voting for the former. This was never on the table!
 
I voted for Leave, but I've got to say I'm not at all happy with this approach. The right thing to do is to reassure everyone here now that they won't be forced out. I assumed that would be the case before the referendum, as the alternative just seemed unthinkable.
You voted to end free movement, but didn't think that would mean people that made use of that now could lose their right to it? How....
 
England is a toilet full of racists and I feel sickened to be associated with it.

Whoa!!!! Mister Generalisation. Maybe take a second to consider that this politician that is running to replace the PM until a general election, is not the be all and end all of all English opinion.

Idiots will often get more press in times like this. Hell the news studios search them out. May won't win, because she doesn't have the support of her population and even if she were, she won't last the next general election.
 
This was never on the table! In no debate, or press release, or piece of campaign literature was "forced repatriation" mentioned!
I believe you on that. But seeing as the Leave movement had a lot to do with immigration and people taking British jobs, it was kind of clear to me that at least some in the campaign wanted those people to leave if possible.

Still doubt it would go through however. Too much trouble doing that and it would create a serious mess in a lot of workplaces if people are just forced out, making it a large hit on the economy also.
 

kmag

Member
This was never on the table! In no debate, or press release, or piece of campaign literature was "forced repatriation" mentioned!

Not getting at you, but I think a lot of people were looking at this like a GE where you have manifesto commitments which while aren't binding represent a desired path forward. In this you had two sides (one side in particular) throwing out "nice to haves" and "wouldn't it be greats" without any notion, concept or seeming expectation of delivery.

Without any framework we're left with a kludge of a mess with no clear way forward.
 

iceatcs

Junior Member
I could see it won't happen to everyone, but possible for the unemployment deportations or welfare limitation. i.e. No work for 3 months, you got to leave or can't apply for EU welfare anymore.

If you are rich or perm-work, "welcome and stay!"
 

kmag

Member
I believe you on that. But seeing as the Leave movement had a lot to do with immigration and people taking British jobs, it was kind of clear to me that at least some in the campaign wanted those people to leave if possible.

Still doubt it would go through however. Too much trouble doing that and it would create a serious mess in a lot of workplaces if people are just forced out, making it a large hit on the economy also.

The UK would also be a net loser if it came to pass. It can't be said enough as a group EU migrants are net contributors (they're normally working, normally young and healthy and most of them don't have UK dependents). While say Spain probably benefits from UK immigrant pensioners (mainly due to reciprocal healthcare arrangements), the UK would be a loser if you took out those working migrants and replaced them with retirees.
 
Whoa!!!! Mister Generalisation. Maybe take a second to consider that this politician that is running to replace the PM until a general election, is not the be all and end all of all English opinion.

Idiots will often get more press in times like this. Hell the news studios search them out. May won't win, because she doesn't have the support of her population and even if she were, she won't last the next general election.

Nah I'm sorry, there's no excuse. Despite being one of the wealthiest and most literate countries in the world, England's dark heart elected this government and voted to isolate itself and ostracise those who have come to live here.
 

LewieP

Member
This was never on the table! In no debate, or press release, or piece of campaign literature was "forced repatriation" mentioned!

Feel free to show me where forced repatriation was ruled out during any of the Leave campaigns vague statements about reducing immigration.
 

Englebert3rd

Unconfirmed Member
This was never on the table! In no debate, or press release, or piece of campaign literature was "forced repatriation" mentioned!

Heh, it was heavily implied. While it wasn't in the arguments, it was a massive elephant in the room.
I'm Italian and I live in London, this stuff scares me because anything can happen.
 
Feel free to show me where forced repatriation was ruled out during any of the Leave campaigns vague statements about reducing immigration.

You know I can't do that.

But regarding the "reducing immigration" bit I really don't think it was unreasonable to think the people already here would be allowed to stay. Reducing immigration doesn't imply deportation. That's like me saying I'm going to go on a diet, but really I was talking about throwing up all my meals.

Anyway, maybe I look like kind of a naive idiot right now, I dunno. As one of the few (admitted) Leavers on Gaf I feel the need to make it clear that this kind of talk really shocks and angers me, and it was not what I wanted at all.
 
You know I can't do that.

But regarding the "reducing immigration" bit I really don't think it was unreasonable to think the people already here would be allowed to stay. Reducing immigration doesn't imply deportation. That's like me saying I'm going to go on a diet, but really I was talking about throwing up all my meals.

Anyway, maybe I look like kind of a naive idiot right now, I dunno. As one of the few (admitted) Leavers on Gaf I feel the need to make it clear that this kind of talk really shocks and angers me, and it was not what I wanted at all.

You've always looked like a naive idiot about this issue, sorry.
 
You're not being rude, don't worry about that!

There's a huge difference between changing the UK's immigration system and forcing people already here onto planes and boats. I thought I was voting for the former. This was never on the table!

The problems with voting for a campaign that is heavily based on xenophobia, regardless of your own reasons for supporting that side, are that it:

1. Normalises such language in the public space and gives racists the impression that they have a democratic mandate to attack the "other"

2. Gives politicians an incentive to continue using such tactics and even escalate their rhetoric to outdo others, since they don't get punished by decent people refusing to vote for them and automatically pick up a bunch of votes from the racist minority

3. Scares the shit out of the people who are targeted by their rhetoric, even if they never intend to do anything beyond just using it to win votes

(And I'm sure you can come up with more...)

In this case I suspect TM is saying this to pick up votes from the right wing of the party and has no intention to actually follow through, but note how she's nevertheless already escalated the rhetoric from the Leave campaign, as you point out yourself.
 

SteveWD40

Member
Nah I'm sorry, there's no excuse. Despite being one of the wealthiest and most literate countries in the world, England's dark heart elected this government and voted to isolate itself and ostracise those who have come to live here.

Actually about 30% of the electorate did.
 

LewieP

Member
You know I can't do that.

But regarding the "reducing immigration" bit I really don't think it was unreasonable to think the people already here would be allowed to stay. Reducing immigration doesn't imply deportation. That's like me saying I'm going to go on a diet, but really I was talking about throwing up all my meals.

Anyway, maybe I look like kind of a naive idiot right now, I dunno. As one of the few (admitted) Leavers on Gaf I feel the need to make it clear that this kind of talk really shocks and angers me, and it was not what I wanted at all.

So you voted for a vague anti immigrant sentiment without any concrete plan?

Sounds like you got exactly what you asked for.
 
Heh, it was heavily implied. While it wasn't in the arguments, it was a massive elephant in the room.
I'm Italian and I live in London, this stuff scares me because anything can happen.

It's fucking outrageous and disgusting that it's even up for discussion. It very likely won't happen but the fact it's being used to play politics I find absolutely vile.
 

Maledict

Member
I absolutely believe you Quiche - but at the same time am also doing the 'told you so' dance. This is what I meant when arguing that if you have to stand by racists and bigots to win an election, you can't pretend that has consequences.

Leave won off the back of immigration and 'taking back control'. Whilst they might not have explicitly said it, I certainly got the impression they would be looking at people already here - and we know from the racist and hate crime attacks that have occurred since that a lot of Leave supporters think that deportation is on the table.

Had Leave come out and said 'no-one here today will be deported' I suspect the result would have been different.
 

Zaph

Member
You're not being rude, don't worry about that!

There's a huge difference between changing the UK's immigration system and forcing people already here onto planes and boats. I thought I was voting for the former. This was never on the table!

I think we're going to see a lot of "I thought I was voting for..." excuses over the next few years.

Pro-tip - throughout history, whenever leaders have used (or been associated with) populist, xenophobic campaign rhetoric with vague promises of making things "better", they're nutters who will, at best, have no effect, or at worst, will do some very nasty damage to real people.
 

BibiMaghoo

Member
Anyway, maybe I look like kind of a naive idiot right now, I dunno. As one of the few (admitted) Leavers on Gaf I feel the need to make it clear that this kind of talk really shocks and angers me, and it was not what I wanted at all.

Sadly, you went and stood by the people that wanted exactly this, though obviously for different reasons.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom