They weren't released this week?spidye said:wat? a fps higher charted than a dating sim and monster hunter? what happened?
They weren't released this week?spidye said:wat? a fps higher charted than a dating sim and monster hunter? what happened?
cw_sasuke said:Piracy i would guess.
Oh noes.DMeisterJ said:MH3 gone (from top 10) and MHP2G still charting.
I read there is one point at the beginning where you need to sync/connect the pedometer to the game to keep on playing...jcm said:That makes sense. Do the pokewalkers make or break the game? It's a clever strategy.
donny2112 said:Thanks for the research, bttb.
I think eventually going sub-20K this year is a definite. Not so sure about sub-10K, though.
1. NDS Pokemon Heart Gold/Soul Silver (Nintendo/Pokemon Co.) - 1,408,980 / NEW
2. NDS Tomodachi Collection (Friend Collection) (Nintendo)
3. NDS Dragon Quest IX: Defenders of the Starry Sky (Square Enix)
spidye said:wat? a fps higher charted than a dating sim and monster hunter? what happened?
slaughterking said:Looks like DQIX had another ~50k week. Outstanding.
Hahaha.Jonnyram said:Oh noes.
Maybe we can start calling it Million Hunter (Try!)
Jonnyram said:Oh noes.
Maybe we can start calling it Million Hunter (Try!)
jcm said:What's the point of the pokewalkers from Nintendo's point of view? Do they add margin? Suppress used game sales? Sell Pokemon games to people who wouldn't otherwise buy them?
There must be a good reason to include them, especially if they are slowing game production. Otherwise Nintendo is leaving money on the table.
Also why do a remake if you can't add anything new?cw_sasuke said:Piracy i would guess.
That's a pretty poor 2nd week...Road said:5. [PS3] Kidou Senshi Gundam Senki: Lost War Chronicles (Namco Bandai) - 32,000 / 191,000
[Nintex] said:Crazy to see Square-Enix on the charts in the west and Activision charting in Japan.
onken said:Doesn't SE publish CoD in Japan?
"What its" are pointless if they have no reasonably probable basis. See examples in mine and Meier's posts.test_account said:Ye, that might be what he ment indeed. But i didnt see what was so wrong to say the 57k PS3 consoles sold each week in average for 1 year. What Clear wrote on the next line showed (at least this is how i understood it) that he didnt belive that it was likely for the PS3 to sell this amount, so i understood his 57k a week comment to be more as a "what if" comment if you know what i mean? I dont see what is so stupid about saying this, but that is just my opinion It wasnt like he said that it was possible that it would happend or so.
We're talking ~0.01% chance vs. ~0.001% chance here. One is ten times more likely than the other, but both are too small to be meaningful.test_account said:I know that you most likely mentioned the 250k for 3 years example to show that 250k and 57k are both unlikely to happend, but i am not sure that i would say that 57k in average each week for about 1 year is basicly the same as saying 250k each week for 3 years. 250k each week for 3 years is pretty much impossible, i dont think anyone disagree with that, but is it impossible for the PS3 to sell 57k systems each week in average for about 1 year?
Not what we were talking about, but in the same irrelevant factor of probability in my eyes. There's a huge difference between increasing significantly in popularity after one year and doing so after 5-6 years. PS2 averaged about half of 57k in it's fifth year (outside of the holidays) and even less in it's sixth.test_account said:i dont know how realisticly it is for the PS3 to sell 57k a week in average in about 1 year from this date, i agree to that, but what about in about 2-3 years or so? It is impossible to know for sure what the PS3's pricetag is in 2-3 years though, but what i PS3's popularity rises? Is it possible? Didnt the DS see a big rise in popularity after that it had been 1 year or so on the market? I am not saying that this will happend to the PS3, or that it is likely to happend, but i just wanted to ask if it is possible
Well alright then. We agree.test_account said:But to be honest, i think it is near impossible for the PS3 to sell 57k each week in average for about 1 year
In this case regarding hardware sales, what decides what is probable or not?Jokeropia said:"What its" are pointless if they have no reasonably probable basis. See examples in mine and Meier's posts.
We're talking ~0.01% chance vs. ~0.001% chance here. One is ten times more likely than the other, but both are too small to be meaningful.
Ye, that is true, it is difference between 1 year into the console life cycle and 5-6 years into the the console life cycle as you say, i agree, but can we rule it 100% out? In afterthought, maybe not as much as 57k, but something not very far away from 57k? ("very far" can be relative though). No one knows what the future brings for sureJokeropia said:Not what we were talking about, but in the same irrelevant factor of probability in my eyes. There's a huge difference between increasing significantly in popularity after one year and doing so after 5-6 years. PS2 averaged about half of 57k in it's fifth year (outside of the holidays) and even less in it's sixth.
Ye, i agree to that it is unlikely, but honestly i dont know if i would rule it out 100% (but maybe 95%-99% or something hehe). Maybe not exactly 57k though, since that seems pretty high i think, i agree, but something not very far away from 57k, maybe 45k or so? I am not exaclty holding my breath that it will happend and i certainly wouldnt bet any money on that it will happend, but i think it shall be interesting to see what happends at leastJokeropia said:Well alright then. We agree.
The 57k discussion mostly started when i asked what was wrong about saying a "what if" comment regarding if the PS3 sold 57k a week in average for about 1 year, and at the same time say that ~30k would be fantastic for Sony. I understood this comment that 57k wasnt likely, but that it was more of a "what if" comment. I was just wondering what was "wrong" (or what i shall say) about saying something like this. I didnt mean any disrespect or anything like that to anyone, i was just wonderingBishopLamont said:Why are you guys talking about the PS3 doing 57k? There's no chance in hell that's gonna happen. It was doing 10k per week, it'll be lucky to do twice that on average next year.
test_account said:I was just wondering what was "wrong" (or what i shall say) about saying something like this.
test_account said:I just wanted to ask if it was 100% impossible because unexpected things have happend before, like how many thought that the PS3 would sell about 150k consoles when it recently got a pricedrop and when the PS3 Slim was released? Only one guy thought so, at least from what i saw.
donny2112 said:Famitsu Sep 7-13
1. NDS Pokemon Heart Gold/Soul Silver (Nintendo/Pokemon Co.) - 1,408,980 / NEW
2. NDS Tomodachi Collection (Friend Collection) (Nintendo)
3. NDS Dragon Quest IX: Defenders of the Starry Sky (Square Enix)
4. WII Wii Sports Resort (Nintendo)
5. PS3 Kidou Senshi Gundam Senki: Lost War Chronicles (Namco Bandai)
6. PS3 Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (Legendary Edition) (Activision)
7. NDS Love Plus (Konami)
8. NDS Sloane and MacHale's Mysterious Story 2 (Level 5)
9. PSP Monster Hunter Portable 2 G (BEST) (Capcom)
10. PSP MAPLUS Portable Navigator 3 (Edia Co.)
http://www.famitsu.com/game/rank/sokuho/1227629_1796.html
Ye, if it is treated like an actual possibility, then i wont say too much about it, i agree to that, but did he (the user "Clear") mean to treat it as an actualy possibilty when he said that ~30k would be fantastic for Sony on the next line though? I understood this comment more something like: "if the PS3 sells 57k a week, that would be like 3 million PS3 consoles sold in 1 year, but realisticly ~30k would be fantastic for Sony, and that ~30k is more of a best-case senario rather than 57k". That is why i was wondering what was "wrong" about saying the 57k comment before saying the "~30k would be fantastic for Sony". Is 57k unlikely to happend? Sure, but what is "wrong" about saying a comment like this when it is mentioned on the next line that ~30k would be fantastic for Sony and that ~30k is more realistic rather than 57k?donny2112 said:Treating it like an actual possibility.
That is true, everyone knew that there was going to be a large spike in the PS3 sales as you say, but there were like 2 people who guessed over 100k. I think that the lowest prediction i saw was around 50k, but even 50k could have been concidered as a large spike (going from 1k-2k to 50k is a big spike, at least in my opinion). Didnt most people predict a lower number because they looked at how the PS3 had sold previously? When looking at how the PS3 had sold previously and then to guess that the PS3 would sell about 150k is in my opinion something that was rather unlikely to happend. I surely didnt expect the PS3 to sell over 100k at least, because i looked at how the PS3 had sold previously in general.donny2112 said:Everyone knew the PS3 was going to have a large spike. Kurosaki Ichigo was just the only one that got the size of the spike correct. That's a much different circumstance then saying that the PS3 will buck every spike-driven trend we've seen and not continue to drop past its second week. Yes, it is for all intents and purposes "impossible."
test_account said:Did he (the user "Clear") mean to treat it as an actualy possibilty
donny2112 said:Why give the amount of consoles that 57/week for a year would result in if he wasn't treating it like an actual possibility?
I understood it more as an "what if" comment, or as a "fun fact" (or what i shall say). In afterthought, maybe he ment that it was possible, but that it was very unlikely? But i cant quite see why he mentioned that ~30k would fantastic and more realistic on the next line if he treated the 57k as an actuall possibilty that was likely to happend at least. But this is just how i understood it, i might have missunderstood what he ment.donny2112 said:Why give the amount of consoles that 57/week for a year would result in if he wasn't treating it like an actual possibility?
spwolf said:dont you post stats like that every week? "if wii sold like this every week it will overtake PS2....", etc?
test_account said:But i cant quite see why he mentioned that ~30k would fantastic and more realistic on the next line if he treated the 57k as an actuall possibilty that was likely to happend at least. But this is just how i understood it, i might have missunderstood what he ment.
donny2112 said:That would be JJS. I always took the reasoning to be "if this ridiculous thing were to occur, here's how long it would take <x> to catch up to <y>" in order to give a sense of scale for the lead of one console over another and not to put forward an actual possible scenario.
spwolf said:it is still ridicilous thought because you are taking one week and trying to make sense of it... like when PS3 sold 1k everyone was OMG it will take 15 years to catch up to Wii.
:lolRoad said:95 years.
Isn't that the kind of thing we do in here? I see it as mostly a measure of how important a week is. When I first started doing it with DS and PSP, it was to show how the minor PSP weekly leads were going to take forever for it to actually amount to anything in the LTD race.spwolf said:it is still ridicilous thought because you are taking one week and trying to make sense of it...
spwolf said:it is still ridicilous thought because you are taking one week and trying to make sense of it... like when PS3 sold 1k everyone was OMG it will take 15 years to catch up to Wii.
personally, i think steady 20k would be great improvement over 8k that happened lately.
JoshuaJSlone said:Isn't that the kind of thing we do in here? I see it as mostly a measure of how important a week is. When I first started doing it with DS and PSP, it was to show how the minor PSP weekly leads were going to take forever for it to actually amount to anything in the LTD race.
Sure. But the magnitude of that drop isn't preordained. Everything that you (and others) are saying about 57k every week being totally impossible is very true. However, I think test_account is not concentrating on the number, but on the kind of scenario it describes: a truly massive (percentage) bump in hardware sustained over a very long run.donny2112 said:That's a much different circumstance then saying that the PS3 will buck every spike-driven trend we've seen and not continue to drop past its second week. Yes, it is for all intents and purposes "impossible."
donny2112 said:Famitsu Software Pie for Aug 31-Sep 6:
DS - 42.0%
PS3 - 27.1%
WII - 13.1%
PSP - 10.3%
PS2 - 5.5%
360 - 1.7%
Other - 0.2%
Edit:
If you were to combine that with MC's total software for the week to get a rough approximation, you'd get PS3 with 253K in software with 189K of that shown above.
markatisu said:Do we have any idea what it was the week before?
schuelma said:Looks like Tri will exit the charts in a few weeks just over 900K or so.
Probably won't make it to a million by the end of the year, but I think it will get there sometime in 2010.
markatisu said:Or it could settle in at 7-10k for a really long time, never know since MH2PG still remains at a constant level.