I'm a conservative and I'd agree with Moore on all those points. Even conservatives would want a lot of that, if couched in the right message and with accompanying financials to show that your taxes wouldn't rise much.
The electoral college is set up the way it is to give an extra layer of voting between the people and elected office. It is a bit archaic at this point, but it also gives smaller states more power. For example california and NYC ALWAYS go democratic in presidential elections, so there is no point in wasting time campaigning there. By contrast Florida, Ohio, etc can swing between the two parties so a lot of time is spent there.
Gerrymandering is what some of you are thinking here, where district lines are drawn such that the population is homogeneous and will re-elect the same party, year after year. Excluding minorities from white areas, as well as creating voting districts that are mostly hispanic or black to elect democratic candidates - both parties have gerrymandered, although republicans tend to do it a lot more. Some states have already outlawed the practice and require districts be drawn by simple geography, but it needs to be a national rule really.
Voting occurs on tuesdays because sunday was the sabbath (rest), monday was travel day, so people would vote on tuesdays back in the old days of horse and buggy.