Microsoft / Activision Deal Approval Watch |OT| (MS/ABK close)

Do you believe the deal will be approved?


  • Total voters
    886
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
LOL. Why recognizing that you are going to be third in the console war is not incompatible with wanting to sell as many consoles as possible and achieve the maximum possible benefits?

Lol?

You are either in it or you aren't. Being third at the moment doesn't mean you lost, it means you are losing.

That's not the point tho.
They have put the games on GFN and they'll add more and more in the coming months. Also, CoD is guaranteed to be there because of the binding contract they signed.

It's not a binding contract, and they only did what they did after regulatory scrutiny.

I do not expect you to understand.
 
Don't.
You will be mentally scared.
awkward-boner.gif
 
Lol?

You are either in it or you aren't. Being third at the moment doesn't mean you lost, it means you are losing.
What stupidity. According to you if you are third in sales you should no longer worry about having exclusives and launching your games in the competition ? ..... It is clear that your animosity towards MS leads you to really crazy arguments LOL
 
What remedies were those? The EU has never released the report.

So, list them, you seem well informed.
"Microsoft offered the following comprehensive licensing commitments, with a 10-year duration:

- A free license to consumers in the EEA that would allow them to stream, via any cloud game streaming services of their choice, all current and future Activision Blizzard PC and console games for which they have a license.
- A corresponding free license to cloud game streaming service providers to allow EEA-based gamers to stream any Activision Blizzard's PC and console games."
 
What stupidity. According to you if you are third in sales you should no longer worry about having exclusives and launching your games in the competition ? ..... It is clear that your animosity towards MS leads you to really crazy arguments LOL

Man go read a book, I don't have to explain to you what every sentence means.
 
Last edited:
It is relevant, they were acting on grey zone.
It's irrelevant to the now, because they no longer do this.

What is relevant, are BS contracts that are not worth the paper they are written on, and only done to be sly and get the deal approved.

nVidia has nothing to lose. They would love consolidation, they tried with ARM and were denied.
 
Last edited:
"Microsoft offered the following comprehensive licensing commitments, with a 10-year duration:

- A free license to consumers in the EEA that would allow them to stream, via any cloud game streaming services of their choice, all current and future Activision Blizzard PC and console games for which they have a license.
- A corresponding free license to cloud game streaming service providers to allow EEA-based gamers to stream any Activision Blizzard's PC and console games."

Now find the post from earlier describing Microsoft's option to get out of it.
 
According to you if you are third in sales you should no longer worry about having exclusives and launching your games in the competition ? ..... It is clear that your animosity towards MS leads you to really crazy arguments LOL
It's been this way for 20 years. If they weren't funded by microsoft they'd be out of business a decade ago. That's the whole point and why they're trying to buy the industry. because they can't compete otherwise
 
lol what did he say? To get Halo running on switch, would present a technical challenge and lower frame rate and resolution?
He was asked if he thought the Switch was significantly less powerful than the XSX and PS5. His answer,

"I don't believe that to be the case." or something to that effect.
 
So, who is winning currently ?

Far too early to tell, FTC is doing a good job with what should have been the weakest part of their case with consoles, Booty was drilled, the fun will be when they start leveraging CMA on cloud.
Also you can make the best argumentations but you need to sway the judge.
 
He was asked if he thought the Switch was significantly less powerful than the XSX and PS5. His answer,

"I don't believe that to be the case." or something to that effect.

Weren't we saying weeks ago that the Nintendo argument was a really stupid one to make?

Will Smith Reaction GIF
 
lol what did he say? To get Halo running on switch, would present a technical challenge and lower frame rate and resolution?


Halo already runs well on the weak ass Xbox One, getting it running on Switch sounds like it should be an easy enough thing in thery.


Yes, it is a theory. Because in 2022 MS began its efforts to acquire ABK and being the good guy and doing shit like this fits perfectly with that strategy.

And yes, my take is a theory too. Neither are proof. You are the only one claiming it is and it simply isn't.

Honest question, do you believe or have an inkling that if the deal goes through, MS will yank all those games from PS+ within a matter of weeks ?

I say weeks not years because games tend to rotate from those services annually or bi-annually anyway so they *will* eventually go off anyway.
 
Honest question, do you believe or have an inkling that if the deal goes through, MS will yank all those games from PS+ within a matter of weeks ?

I say weeks not years because games tend to rotate from those services annually or bi-annually anyway so they *will* eventually go off anyway.

There is no way for me to know, but it certainly would not surprise me if they did.
 
Booty got destroyed live LMAO

Dude wasn't ready, these guys live in Court houses, the Xbox heads are just regular people ffs.

Absolute bloodbath bootyBath 🤣
Maybe the play is to do so bad and still win thus proving to the FTC that all judges in 'Merica can be brought. Land of the free, home of the corrupt.
2019 "No f-ing way we'll put games on rival services"
2022 : nearly 10 or more games are on rival services

it's not really a theory when there is demonstrable change in effect, but I understand if you don't want to see it that way.
New content, or shit that already existed on the platform before MS brought them, that cost them absolutely nothing, and they get nothing but pure unadulterated profit for for allowing on ps+?

Is this your argument?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom