IFireflyl
Gold Member
Interesting, I didn't know about the "that no reasonable competition authority could have reached the same decision in the same situation" part.
The EU approval, regardless of whether they had the same concerns as CMA, reached a different verdict and is a viable case point for the CAT appeal.
The keywords were "could have reached the same decision". It doesn't state that another regulator had to have come to the same decision. Just because the EC accepted the remedies doesn't somehow mean that the CMA had to accept the remedies. The EC had the same cloud concerns, so the EC could have come to the same decision as the CMA. That shows there was no irrationality.