TheThreadsThatBindUs
Member
It's about harm to consumers not harm to Sony and that was rightly called out by the Judge.
Yes, and harming competitors in the market, harms the choice of which group?..... C'mon... you're almost there...
It's about harm to consumers not harm to Sony and that was rightly called out by the Judge.
That's a studio. CD Projekt is the publisher.CD Projekt Red
So it's good then?It is Bad but it is already allowed to Microsoft, so the competitors have to start buying before someone else does, otherwise they Will end up having no third party games for their platform
It isn't from the CMA. It is Microsoft seeing the CMA as the last remaining hurdle and rather than delaying that any longer it is saying OK CMA, let's not go down the long winded legal route get this done what do we need to do to make this happen.Absolutely wild ride this has been... did NOT expect anything from the CMA so soon, especially not IMMEDIATELY. Insane!
Mayor Pete, coming exclusively to Game Pass day-and-date!![]()
the time is near.
I bet if he thought it'd help him become President he'd do it in a heartbeatMayor Pete, coming exclusively to Game Pass day-and-date!![]()
They just need 20 more and then they will be able to compete.
We are dedicated to creating new, innovative, and immersive gameplay experiences. Committed to building exceptional games, EA Studios is made up of over 20 studios and more than 6,000 creators globally.
The judge made a wonderful and fair decision. That will impact gaming for the best imo. I think MS made a very impactful skilled and honest case. Going to be great having all those games on GP.
It's the new Pixar movie I think.More importantly, who the fuck is Mayor Pete??
very much so.tbf, the lawyers on both sides and the judge were too ill informed on the gaming industry to be involved in this at all
we are considering how the transaction might be modified in order to address those concerns in a way that is acceptable to the CMA
ready to consider any proposals from Microsoft to restructure the transaction in a way that would address the concerns set out in our Final Report.
It could actually just be a way of forcing them to obey the law, by negotiating all the way to the closure date, and then still blocking it, because Microsoft won't back down.Is it true that the CMA has released a statement saying they are open to revisions in the deal?
If so, this deal is done.
Love to see the losing side pay to win, and admit they cannot produce competitive games on their own.Love to see it.
Mom and dad aren't home step-Varteras.
And Activision is even more profitable. That's why it won't be exclusive. This is about revenue.Game Pass is profitable and they're already experimenting with ways to improve the profit margin with paid Early Access upgrades to the base game that comes included with Game Pass.
Game Pass is profitable.
We wont truly know if the gaming industry is finished until we pass Christmas. If they truly do decide to make exclusive Christmas skins, it's all over.at one point the FTC lawyer was saying this deal would result in "console specific character skins that may only be purchasable on one console type"
It's the biggest case of its type... that's literally how precedent is setYou think this case set that precedent?
This is true. I think people really just do not comprehend how massive a 2 trillion dollar corporation is. 2 trillion dollars is so much money, if you are a millionaire and make 1 million dollars every year, it would take you 2 MILLION YEARS to reach 2 trillion dollars. Let that sink in.What is even the point of regulators when they just bend over and take it up the ass by trillion-dollar corporations when the deal is big enough?
How can they claim to be protecting the public interest and consumers? Honestly, it's a joke.
This is essentially unregulated capitalism where multi-billion dollar corporations have more power than governments. We're not in for a good time.
LikeIt was more like hints, but what he said led me to believe that he thought the whole deal was coming to a head. Here's the main gist of the convo....
Heisenberg is usually very careful about his wording
I'll rephrase. You think any case set that precedent?It's the biggest case of its type... that's literally how precedent is set
bro is celebrating, popping champagne and jumping around like a maniac in his Halo Hoodie. give him 4 hoursRiky your thought on this?
There never was...Who cares, no legal ground, no rhetoric, nothing can block Playstation purchasing Capcom, or Kadokawa, or Konami, or whoever else now
Tomorrow is a Wednesday so Sega is on the table or something.So instead of console list wars...
Let's take bets on how long until we hear the next consolidation, no matter who it is.
I imagine all the big boys have been watching and waiting for this and drewling.
I think it won't even be longer than 2 months before we hear of the next retardation in gaming
So mark the date. Some time probably in October someone else is being consolidated, more 3rd party becoming exclusive
The Witcher 3 and Cyberpunk 2077 both had marketing deals with Xbox, and most recently the upcoming expansion for Cyberpunk was shown off at Xbox's Summer Event. I wouldn't be surprised at all.That's a studio. CD Projekt is the publisher.
And they are apparently the biggest publisher in Europe and own Witcher and Cyberpunk rights. They have the GOG Store. Loads of development studios.
Would be a good buy!
This isn't capitalism. In a true free market, Microsoft wouldn't have this amount of power. Don't get me wrong, they'd still be big, but they wouldn't be the monolith that they are.What is even the point of regulators when they just bend over and take it up the ass by trillion-dollar corporations when the deal is big enough?
How can they claim to be protecting the public interest and consumers? Honestly, it's a joke.
This is essentially unregulated capitalism where multi-billion dollar corporations have more power than governments. We're not in for a good time.
Sony must be put them as a different sector instead of being inside SIE itself.Who cares, no legal ground, no rhetoric, nothing can block Playstation purchasing Capcom, or Kadokawa, or Konami, or whoever else now
It's the biggest case of its type... of course it did, until MS are a monopoly you can always argue they aren't a monopoly.I'll rephrase. You think any case set that precedent?
I knew ESO would stay. The single player games tho? No shotDid you think MS would release Zenimax games on Playstation too?
A few more exclusive GAAS games in PlayStation's line-up should be enough to counter this huge Microsoft win today.A prime example where the rhetoric that justifies the existence of regulatory bodies and courts like this falls apart. Going by the standards set up by the FTC and by the court, this decision flies in the face of the facts of the evidence. That said, not surprising. Microsoft is a megacorp amongst megacorps.
I don't even think this changes the game in the long term. In fact, I think Microsoft pushed Xbox nearly entirely off the brink. But there's going to be a lot of stuff that could've been avoided in this industry before its all said and done.
PlayStation is going to have to be even more strategic and competitive though, so there's that to look forward to.
I'm sure Jim Ryan pulled people into rooms earlier this year to discuss who they buy and how else they mitigate this and those plans will start going into effect. He's a moron but he won't be *that* asleep at the wheel.So instead of console list wars...
Let's take bets on how long until we hear the next consolidation, no matter who it is.
I imagine all the big boys have been watching and waiting for this and drewling.
I think it won't even be longer than 2 months before we hear of the next retardation in gaming
So mark the date. Some time probably in October someone else is being consolidated, more 3rd party becoming exclusive
Look, all I want is to NOT see Master Chief armor in World of Warcraft. Or a fucking Brumak mount.
yep, people love to complain about capitalism but the actual problem is crony capitalism where these large corporations work with the government to either suppress or buy out competitionThis isn't capitalism. In a true free market, Microsoft wouldn't have this amount of power. Don't get me wrong, they'd still be big, but they wouldn't be the monolith that they are.
What you're describing is regulatory capture. And it must be said that Microsoft's lobbying arm made that into an art long before this deal was on the table.
That Thread will finally be vindicatedTomorrow is a Wednesday so Sega is on the table or something.