No, thanksAvatar bet if......wait.....no....nevermind.
![]()
you can be in denial...but if the merger is passed everywhere but the UK. Why would Microsoft stop it just for the UK. Here is an article claiming such...and they list where it comes from Bloomberg. So this is no random youtuber. https://www.xfire.com/microsoft-could-pull-out-of-the-uk-after-cma-disapproval/Well, yeah you did say he was a source.
"comes from many sources i have heard on youtube, Here is one..."
And they all know exactly we know. Microsoft was rumored to have been looking into ways to get around the CMA block. That came out of MLex via Idas. If you want to believe anything beyond that then it is up to you, but no one else here has to put any stock into it.
Bro he's just a cool ex-industry guy who still chats with some Xbox employees lol, he's not Phil Spencer's personal fluffer.I do believe HeisenbergFX4 has had confirmation the deal is closing, and that it is as good as fact.
I do appreciate the cool part but I have never been a part of the industryBro he's just a cool ex-industry guy who still chats with some Xbox employees lol, he's not Phil Spencer's personal fluffer.
I remember you from the infamous ABANDONED thread though, good stuff.
Based on everything I've seen so far: On Monday, either Kotick is walking away from the deal with $3B or a merger extension is happening, I'm leaning towards the extension agreement happening. I don't think they're closing the deal on Monday, that's my prediction.
I agree, but to think Activision won't be taking the opportunity to get even more money is ludicrous IMO.Based on everything I've seen so far: On Monday, either Kotick is walking away from the deal with $3B or a merger extension is happening, I'm leaning towards the extension agreement happening. I don't think they're closing the deal on Monday, that's my prediction.
Here is a gif for you to use in the appropriate time my friendI see the paint sniffers have returned with their 'ignore the uk' rhetoric.
you can be in denial...but if the merger is passed everywhere but the UK. Why would Microsoft stop it just for the UK. Here is an article claiming such...and they list where it comes from Bloomberg. So this is no random youtuber. https://www.xfire.com/microsoft-could-pull-out-of-the-uk-after-cma-disapproval/
Posted ?
Posted ?
from the article i listed.I'm not in denial of anything. I simply don't believe every single thing I'm told as you do. For example, you should read the actual article. It is speculation. The same rumor that I referenced previously.
"One extreme option could be to bypass the UK order and press ahead with the deal, or withdraw Activision from the UK market, one of the people said, confirming earlier reports by regulatory news outfit Mlex."
![]()
Microsoft’s Smith Set for Talks With UK Chancellor Over Activision Deal Ban
Microsoft Corp. President Brad Smith will meet with UK Chancellor Jeremy Hunt next week to voice his frustration over the shock decision by Britain’s competition regulator to block its $69 billion takeover of Activision Blizzard Inc.www.bloomberg.com
Keywords: "could be". The article said nothing of removing Activision games from the UK.
Because MS, both as a commercial enterprise and gaming enterprise, does not want to completely withdraw from the UK. It is that simple. Just because an outlet reports what some blowhard says does not mean the blowhard was saying something plausible.you can be in denial...but if the merger is passed everywhere but the UK. Why would Microsoft stop it just for the UK. Here is an article claiming such...and they list where it comes from Bloomberg. So this is no random youtuber. https://www.xfire.com/microsoft-could-pull-out-of-the-uk-after-cma-disapproval/
It's not realistic because it's all of Microsoft that has to pull out of the UK, not just Xbox or gaming.It did mention they could pull out of the UK. Will they, who knows. But realisticly if the uk was the ONLY one stopping the merger, I bet Microsoft would. I don't believe everything i am told. But this would make be realistic in a buisness stand point.
Apple would stand to make a fortune though.IMO of course, but it would be such a massive money loss for MS to do that.
Posted ?
from the article i listed.
"According to a report by Bloomberg, Microsoft could opt to pull Activision games from the UK market as a last resort to the disapproval of its proposed acquisition of the Call of Duty and Diablo 4 publisher. The verdict is still under appeal with a decision set to be announced late in July after additional evidence is heard in court. Microsoft may be looking at its options should it not get a favorable decision.
Microsoft president Brad Smith is reportedly personally visiting the UK and hopes to meet the UK Chancellor Jeremy Hunt to discuss potential remedies to the CMA ruling. Smith will be in the country to conduct a talk about Artificial Intelligence and strengthened regulations around the technology. He will also be holding a number of private functions in the country."
It did mention they could pull out of the UK. Will they, who knows. But realisticly if the uk was the ONLY one stopping the merger, I bet Microsoft would. I don't believe everything i am told. But this would make be realistic in a buisness stand point.
Microsoft Corp. President Brad Smith will meet with UK Chancellor Jeremy Hunt next week to voice his frustration over the shock decision by Britain's competition regulator to block its $69 billion takeover of Activision Blizzard Inc.
Smith is set to hold talks with Hunt as well as officials from the Competition and Markets Authority, the agency that wielded the April 26 veto, according to people familiar with the discussions, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Microsoft confirmed that Smith will be in London, where he's giving a "scheduled talk about the potential of AI and the need for thoughtful regulation of it." He'll also hold private discussions on other issues, "including the proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard as we remain committed to finding creative and constructive ways to address remaining regulatory concerns," a Microsoft representative said.
Smith is expected to point to the benefits of the acquisition for gamers and push back against the move to block the industry's largest merger — a decision that will soon play out in a special UK antitrust court. Hunt previously criticized the CMA's veto, telling a business conference recently that competition watchdogs must "understand their wider responsibilities."
Despite Hunt's comments, one of the people said government ministers were "unhappy" with some of Smith's criticism of the CMA in interviews in which he claimed that the European Union — which approved the takeover — was a better place to do business than the UK. The government holds no formal role in the enforcement of the country's competition rules, but members of the CMA board are appointed by the UK's business department.
Smith will also sit down with Microsoft's legal representatives to discuss the firm's strategy to counter the CMA decision, laying out a series of options that the company could take to save the deal.
One extreme option could be to bypass the UK order and press ahead with the deal, or withdraw Activision from the UK market, one of the people said, confirming earlier reports by regulatory news outfit Mlex.
The company is also likely to draw on the EU's findings in its legal arguments against the CMA, after EU merger officials conditionally approved the record-breaking gaming merger last month.
The Chancellor's office declined to comment. Activision didn't respond to a request for comment. The confidential discussions will take place as Smith takes part in London Tech Week, an event aimed at boosting the UK's technology industry.
While the CMA said the merger would reinforce Microsoft's advantage in the cloud gaming market, EU competition chief Margrethe Vestager called it "pro-competitive" and said that it could "kick-start" the cloud streaming market.
Following the regulator's block, Microsoft appealed to the UK's Competition Appeal Tribunal. An opening hearing into the substance of Microsoft's appeal is slated for the week beginning July 24.
Does it really say that? I can't see it because I don't have an account. Who exactly is saying it?from the article i listed.
"According to a report by Bloomberg, Microsoft could opt to pull Activision games from the UK market as a last resort to the disapproval of its proposed acquisition of the Call of Duty and Diablo 4 publisher. The verdict is still under appeal with a decision set to be announced late in July after additional evidence is heard in court. Microsoft may be looking at its options should it not get a favorable decision.
Microsoft president Brad Smith is reportedly personally visiting the UK and hopes to meet the UK Chancellor Jeremy Hunt to discuss potential remedies to the CMA ruling. Smith will be in the country to conduct a talk about Artificial Intelligence and strengthened regulations around the technology. He will also be holding a number of private functions in the country."
It did mention they could pull out of the UK. Will they, who knows. But realisticly if the uk was the ONLY one stopping the merger, I bet Microsoft would. I don't believe everything i am told. But this would make be realistic in a buisness stand point.
Microsoft Corp. President Brad Smith will meet with UK Chancellor Jeremy Hunt next week to voice his frustration over the shock decision by Britain's competition regulator to block its $69 billion takeover of Activision Blizzard Inc.
Smith is set to hold talks with Hunt as well as officials from the Competition and Markets Authority, the agency that wielded the April 26 veto, according to people familiar with the discussions, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
CMA will probably accept the same remedies as the EC (which in fact are quite good for the consumer and more sensible than CMA's decision)
The what?
*Googles*
Is that a pork pie in a bread bun? And what the fuck is a barm cake?
![]()
But to have an extension they need to go back to shareholders right?Based on everything I've seen so far: On Monday, either Kotick is walking away from the deal with $3B or a merger extension is happening, I'm leaning towards the extension agreement happening. I don't think they're closing the deal on Monday, that's my prediction.
lol yeah good point, and google for that matter and all of their competitorsApple would stand to make a fortune though.
Does it really say that? I can't see it because I don't have an account. Who exactly is saying it?
All I can see is:
They rejected that remedies on April.CMA will probably accept the same remedies as the EC (which in fact are quite good for the consumer and more sensible than CMA's decision)
GAF > Kotik > GAFOh so that's where the "waste of taxpayers money" line comes from.
Interesting that we heard it from Bobby after hearing it from a few people here first. Never fails.
/sWelp....
Round 3? I lost count.....
not to be confused with a wigan slapper, which would be the second best thing you've ever eaten in your life (behind the pie butty)Join the bet, if the cma blocks you get to eat the demented british delicacy called the wigan slappy and pretend it's the best thing you've eaten in your life.
Posted ?
GAF > Kotik > GAF
He gets his talking points from here![]()
![]()
I'm actually surprised they've appealed. No chance the appeal is successful though.