Microsoft / Activision Deal Approval Watch |OT| (MS/ABK close)

Do you believe the deal will be approved?


  • Total voters
    886
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is the most bullshit saga ever.
How the hell am I going to enjoy my freedom if this shit keeps going nonstop.

Fk this shit. Hope it burns to the ground.
we've missed you you loveable rogue. never forget:

(console) war is peace
freedom (from GAF) is slavery
ignorance is strength (xbois)
 
Season 2 Nbc GIF by Manifest


I'm actually surprised they've appealed. No chance the appeal is successful though.
Corley did leave the door open by saying she may have some errors in there that need a day 1 patch for rushing it out hot.
 
I'm actually surprised they've appealed.
They had to imo.

Corley's interpretation of their burden cannot be allowed to become a precedent as this will fuck up their future cases.

*looks at replies*

"something something taxpayers dollars"
It's genuinely weird how downright scripted these interactions get.

You would expect a transaction that supposedly has a lot of benefits from consumers to get varying accounts of said benefits. There shouldn't be any need to have a hymn sheet out like this.
 
can someone make an argument that could make the FTC win?
Yesterday there were people saying the judge applied an incorrect standard of review. IF (Big IF) that was accurate, it should open the door to a stay of the judge's ruling until the Court of Appeal's either decides the case on merits or remands back to the District Court for reconsideration under the correct standard. Would not be a win on the merits if that happened, but would push things back way past the 18th.
 
FTC appeal AND an FTC congressional hearing tomorrow on mismanagement.

FTC took one L. Looking forward for the appeal taking the second L real soon. However, icing on the cake is the big L it's going to take in front of Congress. Triple L is the jackpot.

This week has been a treat.
 
serious 'how it started vs how it's going' vibes ITT since yesterday. you gotta laugh. got to admire the CMA and FTC who seem to enjoy making the green rats suffer. a waste of tax payer money? I can't think of anything better for it to go towards.
 
Waste them tax dollars we just print embezzle and launder all over the world anyhow!
🤷‍♀️

They sure weren't concerned about their taxpayer dollars when this happened:


I'm sure this will cost next to nothing compared to that, not sure why they're worried.
 
Last edited:
Bad news I have to buy Diablo 4 now because of this shitshow.

Good news the stock will drop again tommorrow and I will make way more than $70 I spend on Diablo when MS lawyers destroy the FTC in court again.
 
Bad news I have to buy Diablo 4 now because of this shitshow.

Good news the stock will drop again tommorrow and I will make way more than $70 I spend on Diablo when MS lawyers destroy the FTC in court again.
Don't buy it.

It's shit. And boring.

Dropped it before finishing the campaign, and I have thousands of hours in D2 and D3.
 
Based on my calcs, $0.25 of my monthly federal taxes is going to the FTC's entire budget. I'm okay with this as long as this thread/saga keep delivering
Shit, way more goes to free medical, room and board to criminals and non-citizens taking those MS laid off jobs via H1-B than this appeal process.

Will Somebody Think of the Taxes!

Let tax evading (through loopholes and lobbying) big tech go unfettered, because tAxEs.

So painfully transparent.
 
Last edited:
Honestly, what else have they got brewing that's more pressing than this (at this moment in time)?

Might as well fuck around and find out.

Well, Khan's reputation is already in the trash; might as well take dive in the dumpster. Sunken cost fallacy, etc, etc.

 
Last edited:
Bad news I have to buy Diablo 4 now because of this shitshow.

Well you can't want to play it that much. It's not going on sale any time soon and you could have been playing and enjoying it with everyone else since it launched.

So much faux begging it's unreal.

Well, Khan's reputation is already in the trash; might as well not take dive in the dumpster.


Well exactly, she has nothing to lose.
 
Last edited:
Yesterday there were people saying the judge applied an incorrect standard of review. IF (Big IF) that was accurate, it should open the door to a stay of the judge's ruling until the Court of Appeal's either decides the case on merits or remands back to the District Court for reconsideration under the correct standard. Would not be a win on the merits if that happened, but would push things back way past the 18th.
And I assume if the wrong standard was applied, then her stating the deal could be bad for Sony, is the required bullet in the chamber to confirm the probability of a probability has passed each threshold?
 
Honestly, what else have they got brewing that's more pressing than this (at this moment in time)?

Might as well fuck around and find out.
I dunno as I don't pay enough attention but they just keep making their reputation worse and worse with this shit.

Find a win, any win lol
 
Well you can't want to play it that much. It's not going on sale any time soon and you could have been playing and enjoying it with everyone else since it launched.

So much faux begging it's unreal.



Well exactly, she has nothing to lose.

Bah, you caught my grammatical mistake. My stealth edit skills are faaaaaillling!
 
How it started;

I don't think its a done deal because MS will close over CMA. I think its a done deal because CMA is going to get wrecked at the CAT hearing starting July 28th just like the FTC did.

I get to play Diablo 4 possibly on Monday. This is amazing. I am going to hold off on Yakuza and Persona games if MS announces Sega acquisition tommorow.

How it's going;

Bad news I have to buy Diablo 4 now because of this shitshow.

Good news the stock will drop again tommorrow and I will make way more than $70 I spend on Diablo when MS lawyers destroy the FTC in court again.
 
And I assume if the wrong standard was applied, then her stating the deal could be bad for Sony, is the required bullet in the chamber to confirm the probability of a probability has passed each threshold?
No clue what you are asking.

By wrong standard I am referring to the legal standard for a judge to decide how they should rule. Some "experts" claim she misinterpreted the applicable one. If true, that would be something an appeal's court looks at seriously. In many cases where that is the appellate decision, their order is for a remand. That means for the original judge to issue a new opinion with the correct standard being applied.
 
It's not realistic because it's all of Microsoft that has to pull out of the UK, not just Xbox or gaming.

It'd be like the biggest business news in the history of big business.

It's click-bait speculation for the most part. Or stuff floated by MS to make regulators feel antsy.

IMO of course, but it would be such a massive money loss for MS to do that.
There's also a potential domino effect of other countries that work with UK businesses moving to the same new platform.
 
I stopped following this shit show a while ago. Is it gonna happen or not? Still no fucking idea?

More likely than not at this point but still not a done deal.

I personally don't think the FTC has even a puncher's chance and the CMA is a big LOL, but hey...maybe there's another plot twist or two (like Microsoft and their new bride pulling out of the UK :messenger_grinning_sweat:).
 
How it started;





How it's going;

These jokers are doing a really poor job of convincing anyone that they actually play games and that they even want to play games.

The yakuza and persona games have already been on gamepass for eons now.
 
Last edited:
can someone make an argument that could make the FTC win?

Appeal will most likely challenge the judge's application and interpretation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act and resulting improper, elevated threshold imposed on FTC by the judge.

"Reasonable probability that it might" (FTC) vs. Reasonable probability that it will" (Judge)..... substantially lessen competition.

Two very different statements that determine burden of proof threshold. Let's call it what it is, the judge got sloppy and fumbled her citings in order to appease Microsoft/Activision and their merger deadline. She basically admitted this possibility in her write-up.

The term "substantial" isn't the contention, it's the "may be". "Reasonable probability that it might" (FTC) vs. Reasonable probability that it will" (Judge)

See an whitepaper written by Georgetown Law professor which discusses the inherent conundrum surrounding Section 7 of the Clayton Act. It's 20+ pages but surprisingly decent read from layman's perspective (kudos to the author). Copied key portion below but link to full paper is available to those who wish to understand FTC likely position on potential appeal.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom