Not at all, he is cold as ice:
Its funny that he's obviously reading this forum yet he hasn't the balls to post anything or even defend himself.
Not at all, he is cold as ice:
I wish he would just overtly reference GAF (we all know who he's talking about).Apparently this thread full of concerned gamers is actually full of "vomit and diarrhea." Charming. But hey, there might be "one good post" amongst it all.
Thanks for omitting the tweets surrounding those two that provide proper context. That's not manipulative at all.
Apparently this thread full of concerned gamers is actually full of "vomit and diarrhea." Charming. But hey, there might be "one good post" amongst it all.
something tells me microsoft won't be upfront about the fact in their advertising. Trying to sneak it by is as anti-consumerist as it gets.You normally are playing a game on the pubs terms. Hence the license agreements on the box or linked to on the products.
This is not an issue for one main reason.
It will be a business decision that they made whose terms are disclosed upfront.
If you do not have access to internet, if you have any fears of servers being shut down or launch errors, simply do not purchase the product.
It is up to MS to put whatever feature they feel is necessary. Your response is to either support them or avoid them like the plague. I have not and do not have any plans for purchasing Diablo 3 or Sim City. That is my way of sowing displeasure at the choices made releasing those products.
Why are they always ignored?
Apparently this thread full of concerned gamers is actually full of "vomit and diarrhea." Charming. But hey, there might be "one good post" amongst it all.
Do you also boycott Steam? If valve were to hit some financial problems and were forced to shut down steam how many games would you lose?
FYI Microsoft Game Studios apparently has 3 Creative Directors:
FYI Microsoft Game Studios apparently has 3 Creative Directors who are on LinkedIn:
Anthony Gallegos' friendwho is this Gies guy even??
Why are we even wasting our time on this guy? He's already been thoroughly discredited here on GAF.
If it doesn't make money it will be labeled a bad decision. That is entirely separate from whether it is good for consumers. And while it's not on you to come up with a 20-minute PowerPoint presentation by tomorrow afternoon, it seems like there should be some reasonably evident benefit for consumers that someone could hypothetically come up with. The only thing I can imagine is an OnLive-type game buffet service that actually works--and that is VERY arguable and up to personal preference as to whether that is better than individual game ownership, even assuming the technology worked perfectly, which it surely doesn't at the moment.
Gies has a Gaf account. He should come here and find out for himself.
...this thread contains homophobic slurs directed specifically at Arthur Gies and features an animated .gif using sexual slurs against Microsoft as a punchline. (edit: see immediately above.)
"Vomit and diarrhea" sounds about accurate to me.
Interesting..he lists his company as Microsoft Studios instead of Game Studios...lends credence that he may be a plant..
in which case, bravo Sony!
who is this Gies guy even??
http://www.psu.com/a018980/How-Micr...-put-Sony-in-first-place-for-next-gen-success
This kind of headline isn't far fetched at this point...
How long are they going to be silent for?
Maybe they should invade a city.
There's a guy who works two minimum wage jobs. He just saved up enough money to buy the new 720 because he loves Madden. It's the only game he buys every year.
The problem is that he just moved out of his mother's house, so bills are tight. He doesn't have broadband because
1) It's expensive
2) Where he lives, the internet service providers don't have plans he can afford.
You just kept him from playing video games with your always-on connection.
Another guy just started college. He loved Xbox when he was in high school, but the college doesn't allow you to hook your Xbox up to the internet.
You just kept him from playing video games with your always-on connection.
There's a child who got a new Xbox for Christmas. His parents can't be bothered to set up the console so he can get on Xbox Live.
You just kept him from playing video games with your always-on connection.
There's a place out in the country that doesn't have any means of reliable broadband access. A family has scraped together enough money to buy a new Xbox.
You just kept them from playing games with your always-on connection.
Thunderstorm? No video games.
Poor people? No video games.
Not allowed? No video games.
Not tech savvy? No video games.
I don't know if Microsoft realizes this, but their brand was built on college-age males who aren't rich.
You're punishing them.
something tells me microsoft won't be upfront about the fact in their advertising. Trying to sneak it by is as anti-consumerist as it gets.
Come on, Gies. You're here reading all this "verbal diarrhea".
At least have the guts to respond to your inane statements.
Fixed.
Anthony Gallegos' friend
He's the Reviews Editor. #DealWithItHey, here's an idea:
He is the "journalist". Isn't it HIS job to inform potential readers as to what the pros, cons and caveats of always online are and provide valid reasons for his obvious support for it?
Come on, Gies. You're here reading all this "verbal diarrhea".
At least have the guts to respond to your inane statements.
Sure, there's more context but he seems to be only saying that defensively "I'm totally not defending Microsoft or always-online here, but..."Thanks for omitting the tweets surrounding those two that provide proper context. That's not manipulative at all.
Can we call him a clown yet?
Dude is a troll and a bad one at that. He won't respond. He'll just hide behind his twitter account like he always does. Atleast JSchirer from Kotaku has the guts to post and defend the website and does a great job at it. Jaffe posts and defends things he says. Aegies? Ha.