Why not announce it then? Wasn't that how 3DS or Wii U was first announced? As a direct response to major Japanese news networks spilling the beans?
They can't comment on a console/system that hasn't been announced yet. What'd you think they would say?
Nope. They can't confirm or deny anything because the next Xbox doesn't even officially exist.
Expect your denial of always online when they actually announce/unveil the console and not a tweet earlier.
also, i haven't said anything about GAF this morning.
Is Polygon seriously like the only site that didn't report on this?
Yes, on an interview. I cant find the link now though.
This is his best tweet guys:
Michael Pachter 2: Electric Boogaloo?The sad thing is that this is actually building his reputation. Next thing you know he's that "controversial" dude with "challenging" opinions that get gamers talking and more people start listening to what he says. We're helping build that future
GiantBomb hasn't, but they usually don't wade into stuff like this on their front page. They're more interested in entertainment and actual news (as bad as this thing is, I don't necessarily think it's "news" - it's one dumbass employee saying something stupid).
All they needed to say was some bullshit about how Microsoft always has consumer's interests at heart and they can't wait to talk more about their plans moving forward.
By flatly refusing to even hint at a denial of always-online they have pretty much confirmed it.
'So Microsoft thinks saying NOTHING they'll stop the ball... right...
This train is still rollin'
Is Polygon seriously like the only site that didn't report on this?
I thought I saw something too that went "we have no current plans/announcements for always-online requirements."
There was a thread on that a few days ago
And let the shitstorm, potentially (read: will) get WORSE?!
Anyone who's not a fucking moron knows that the 720 exists and one of their guys just potentially killed any interest from a LOT of users based on a)always online being so anti-consumer and b)the guy who confirmed it acting like a jackass causing the perception that the entire company is this way.
This is PR 101 type shit.
Because they probably dug deep down their pockets to fund a huge reveal sometime soon.
Is Polygon seriously like the only site that didn't report on this?
man if this is the same Adam Orth that played bass for Weezer briefly, I don't give a fuck this guy rules
If I was a retailer I'd refuse to stock the next box.
grudges? really now?
I have no idea what Microsoft will do with their console, but internet grudges will have zero influence on whether it succeeds or fails.
It is
No it was something like "yes, you will be able to enjoy your PS4 old shcool style with offline play". Its in this thread but I cant find it.
honestly I don't know what the furor is about. .
And let the shitstorm, potentially (read: will) get WORSE?!
Anyone who's not a fucking moron knows that the 720 exists and one of their guys just potentially killed any interest from a LOT of users based on a)always online being so anti-consumer and b)the guy who confirmed it acting like a jackass causing the perception that the entire company is this way.
This is PR 101 type shit.
when you really get down to it arthur gies is probably the worst person in the worldl
Again, couldn't they do what Nintendo did? Confirm the successor, give a basic idea of what it'll be, but leave the system reveal and various other facets to the reveal. Playing it as if all news about this new system simply doesn't exist until they actually show it off is currently doing more harm than good.
I see nothing alarming about confirming Durango, making a comment on this stuff, and then talking about an event they have in the works for it unless they really don't want to make a comment on this matter. They're not fooling anyone for a reveal. Not wanting to deny this right now really points to them hoping they have something to show to counterbalance this element.
That really limits the amount of useable venues and pushes the price up for organisers. The PS4 is just a smarter option.I don't know of a single large hotel, especially one that would accommodate a tournament, that doesn't have WiFi.
If you're at a venue and setting everything up in a couple of hours, you're not going to run a cable to every box just so that the games will work. Chances are you won't even have access to the router.How are they connected together if there is no "wifi"?
Did you mean "internet"?
You can have wifi without internet and you can have internet without wifi.
It's just a matter of whether or not there's a cable running from the box to the router.
"We're not releasing an always online console."to answer that is to confirm that the next xbox exist
The Verge can be trusted. The same can not be said for Polygon.
They say this exact same robot PR thing for everything.
We're still on the same path we were yesterday, except as things have been pointed out and elaborated on, the always online requirement for the Durango is still probable but there's a small chance always online isn't a requirement. Or the always online design is something completely different than what we think it is.
Microsoft's PR statement doesn't add weight to always online being a requirement or it not being a requirement.
Nothing stops this train until MS shoots it down and fires Arthur and this dude.
You can't expect him or Adam to enter a dog pile.Come on, Gies. You're here reading all this "verbal diarrhea".
At least have the guts to back up your inane statements.
Well Microsoft IS one of Vox's premium advertisers so..
I think you are significantly underestimating what public opinion and word of mouth can do. This isn't just something relegated to NeoGAF and Twitter. Normal people read sites like IGN and Yahoo.