"Reported by Derek Strickland on Saturday, April 6 2013 2:24 am"
um...
He has a time machine, GET HIM!
Time zones. It's probably not in the States.
"Reported by Derek Strickland on Saturday, April 6 2013 2:24 am"
um...
He has a time machine, GET HIM!
Via Vire - "If we were working a new console, it would not have always online requirements"
Thanks. The Sweet Billy and Aaron Greenburg stuff is new to me.summary is on the 1st page. Lately though Gies has been riling up the gaf hate with his unadulterated love for everything MS/a cool 750,000 dollars
Anybody else wish they could be a fly on the wall at Sony's executive meetings next week?
Kaz probably took the whole gang out for drinks tonight!
A direct link to a post only shows you that post, so I don't see how that's relevant
Microsoft's lack of attempt at damage control is hilarious.
They must REALLY live in a fucking bubble if they think this is gonna go well for them.
Apparently this thread full of concerned gamers is actually full of "vomit and diarrhea." Charming. But hey, there might be "one good post" amongst it all.
At the same time, it's not entirely surprising nor revelatory that they are silent on an as-yet-unannounced product.Not necessarily. Microsoft could have said something like
"We would never implement something so anti-consumer that alienates our fans and customers."
It's happening. MS would have flatout denied it if nothing was happening.
A majority have seen it. The fact that he WOULD post about an always-online DRM scheme in the wake of the leaks already mentioned is why this is blowing up.
I don't understand how people can't grasp this.
It wouldn't matter if he was director of keyboard layouts on the Surface tablets ... he obviously knows/knew/seen/saw something that prompted him to post what he did. Which feeds even more fuel to the fire that is brewing surrounding speculation.
Most big corporate decisions and secrets usually aren't leaked by the board of directors. It's somebody down the chain that doesn't realize the gravity of what they may be commenting on.
"Reported by Derek Strickland on Saturday, April 6 2013 2:24 am"
um...
He has a time machine, GET HIM!
Damn, didn't know you were a GAFer too.I received an official statement from Microsoft a few minutes ago, via their PR agency Edelman:
http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/...ll-require-always-on-internet-connection.aspx
Could someone with screenshot capabilities capture the fantastic bit between Gies and myself on Twitter? I would, but my phone (oddly) has no such function.
My handle is @GiantBreadbug. I think our short exchange is interesting.
Here it is paraphrased until someone can screencap it:
Me: Hundreds of thousands of people everywhere do not have access to a stable connection. They would not be able to play games.
Gies: yep. i know.
US = the worldTime zones, how do they work... ?
When someone like Gies says something dumb I wish more members would post respectful criticism of his opinion without resorting to personal insults. It makes it a whole lot easier for people to dismiss neogaf when we spend pages and pages piling on one guy with post like 'this guy is an idiot, how does this guy have a job' etc. Yes he takes some very questionable stances but the response here is disproportionate.
Arthur Gies is a fucking idiot.
Anybody else wish they could be a fly on the wall at Sony's executive meetings next week?
Kaz probably took the whole gang out for drinks tonight!
"Not my problem, not a valid argument." (Which is, rather coincidentally, the same response to SimCity, IIRC?)Could someone with screenshot capabilities capture the fantastic bit between Gies and myself on Twitter? I would, but my phone (oddly) has no such function.
My handle is @GiantBreadbug. I think our short exchange is interesting.
Here it is paraphrased until someone can screencap it:
Me: Hundreds of thousands of people everywhere do not have access to a stable connection. They would not be able to play games.
Gies: yep. i know.
Time zones. It's probably not in the States.
US = the world
get with the times. its awesome
Could someone with screenshot capabilities capture the fantastic bit between Gies and myself on Twitter? I would, but my phone (oddly) has no such function.
My handle is @GiantBreadbug. I think our short exchange is interesting.
Here it is paraphrased until someone can screencap it:
Me: Hundreds of thousands of people everywhere do not have access to a stable connection. They would not be able to play games.
Gies: yeah i know.
Why wouldn't Microsoft just come outright and say it then?
"If we were working a new console, it would not have always online requirements"
Damn, didn't know you were a GAFer too.
As for the statement, a little more personalized than their "we don't comment on rumors or speculation" tripe but still pretty much the same thing. I found it interesting that they're saying Orth is not reflective of Microsoft but isn't he at a pretty high position there?
If I were Sony I would release a statement today saying that the system will not have always online requirements just to pile onto the shitstorm.
Nope. They can't confirm or deny anything because the next Xbox doesn't even officially exist.
Expect your denial of always online when they actually announce/unveil the console and not a tweet earlier.
man if this is the same Adam Orth that played bass for Weezer briefly, I don't give a fuck this guy rules
Is Polygon seriously like the only site that didn't report on this?
They can't comment on a console/system that hasn't been announced yet. What'd you think they would say?
"
really ? why do i find that very fucking hard to believe MS?
Apparently this thread full of concerned gamers is actually full of "vomit and diarrhea." Charming. But hey, there might be "one good post" amongst it all.
Has Sony debunked always online for their console?
So someone from MS finally responds but they only distance themselves from Sweet Billy.
If always online is a feature they needed to issue an apology now for his behavior (they didn't need to confirm the rumors about their feature set). By not apologizing for it people could hold a grudge against them for not acknowledging the severity of his behavior towards them. As a result when MS does announce always online they'll remember this incident and see it is MS temporarily distancing themselves because they do agree with Sweet Billy's underlying sentiments that anyone with a spotty connection should just roll over and get kicked.
If always online isn't a feature a direct apology isn't as necessary.
Microsoft made an official statement
He is an employee of your company you dumb fucks, he represents you.
It's almost like he agrees with the general sentiment on NeoGAF that an always-online console would suck for consumers, thus people who don't have a stable internet connection (or who object to the business practice) should simply refuse to buy one and get a PS4 instead.
I wonder why he hasn't said that.
But I thought everybody forgot about PS4. It came and went.I don't really think how bad Microsoft realizes this is for their public image.
IGN posted the news story less than a couple hours ago and this comment already has 6000 upvotes.
Damn, didn't know you were a GAFer too.
As for the statement, a little more personalized than their "we don't comment on rumors or speculation" tripe but still pretty much the same thing. I found it interesting that they're saying Orth is not reflective of Microsoft but isn't he at a pretty high position there?
Microsoft realizes that there's a lot of negative sentiment about the possibility of an always-online Durango.
Everyone and their mother knows that Durango is coming. Major Nelson even put up a giant countdown to E3 with a Durango hint on his website.
It WOULD NOT have hurt Microsoft's PR to make a simple statement defining that Microsoft's policy is fundamentally pro-consumer.
What I think is Microsoft hasn't made a final decision yet.