And these issues aren't minor, I'm willing to bet that they're a huge factor with the public not accepting the Surface (certainly can't say people don't know about the Surface with the way MS spammed all those ads for months straight).
Just like with the word "lapability" and people literally being fixated on laps, you're so fixated on the one picture I posted of how I lounge on the couch with my laptop that you're completely ignoring the grander point I was making with it: the Surface, with its keyboard, just doesn't provide the same flexibility and easy-of-use as other devices with keyboards, in any number of ways. And for MS the excuse seems to be, "well, in those cases you can use it as a tablet!" but at that price hardly anybody is thinking about using it as a tablet. At that price people are going to expect a true laptop replacement.
Sounds like I need to bring more stuffs for Shog to write off.
So here's the question. Do I go with a 10inch Surface Pro 2 or a 12inch Pro 3? I really liked the mobility of my Surface RT, that I could hold it as a tablet in one hand. Is this still going to be possible with the Pro 3?
So here's the question. Do I go with a 10inch Surface Pro 2 or a 12inch Pro 3? I really liked the mobility of my Surface RT, that I could hold it as a tablet in one hand. Is this still going to be possible with the Pro 3?
To be fair, the rest of his comparo was pretty much right on. It's just that one troll logic popped out and smacked me in the face as wacky.
Weight wise, SP3 is closer to RT than SP2. So IMO SP3 is more one hand hold friendly.
Surface RT / 2 / Pro 3 / Pro 2 weigh ~ 680 / 640 / 800 / 900 grams respectively. Pro 3 is about as thin as RT and doesn't weigh that much more. Holding it should work about as well as holding the RT.
Thinking about the issue... technically, you'd only need more levels of pressure than 256... if the saturation/luminance value was in excess of 256 discrete steps OR... the brush was larger than 256 pixels - because at a single step of pressure it'd equate to 1 pixel, and two steps, it'd equate to 2 pixels... and at 256 pixels, it'd equate to 256 pixels.
If you have a 2000 pixel brush, then each step would have to be something like 10 pixel difference in size.
That's assuming that there was a linear scaling between pressure based brush size and pressure steps - but even if there isn't, that just means the nature of the scaling changes - that some stepping points produce a far larger degree of change then other stepping points (e.g. the step between 0 pressure and 1 step of pressure changes the brush size from 0 to 1000 for a 2000 pixel brush or some such).
Unless I'm simply misinterpreting how these things work - which I could be, I'm only figuring this stuff out on the fly based on the principles of what I already know.
His conclusion of 256 levels being good enough was fine. It's just how he got to it was wacky. You have to remember that you can use pressure for more than brush size expression. I'd say opacity change is just as important, if not more. And you can also use it for angle change, jitter or whatever the brush has parameter for.
Thinking about the issue... technically, you'd only need more levels of pressure than 256... if the saturation/luminance value was in excess of 256 discrete steps OR... the brush was larger than 256 pixels - because at a single step of pressure it'd equate to 1 pixel, and two steps, it'd equate to 2 pixels... and at 256 pixels, it'd equate to 256 pixels.
If you have a 2000 pixel brush, then each step would have to be something like 10 pixel difference in size.
That's assuming that there was a linear scaling between pressure based brush size and pressure steps - but even if there isn't, that just means the nature of the scaling changes - that some stepping points produce a far larger degree of change then other stepping points (e.g. the step between 0 pressure and 1 step of pressure changes the brush size from 0 to 1000 for a 2000 pixel brush or some such).
Unless I'm simply misinterpreting how these things work - which I could be, I'm only figuring this stuff out on the fly based on the principles of what I already know.
Stylus are used for more than just 2D painting programs. Here's the problem that is not being addressed with this. There are a batch of programs where pressure sensitivity is everything, 256 pressure points is nowhere near enough in inking programs and 3D sculpting programs like Zbrush. For example Zbrush uses the pressure sensitivity of the tablet to control how much your stroke will actually pull out vertices. Have more steps is very important to creating nuances needed in digital sculpting. I'm my experience my old x61t tablet with wacom tech and 256 pressure levels doesn't hold a candle to my intuos with 2048 levels. Many times I have to move my work to my desktop to get the subtle differences needed in digital sculpting. Now this is by no means a common use case but for a professional like me this is a deal killer. I was looking forward to this being the ultimate artist device many of us artists have been looking for. For years many companies have come close but there is always one thing off, and sadly this time not having wacom is a big omission. I will wait till I can try it myself, but at the moment ntrig isn't really supported by zbrush to begin with. This was supposed to be a pro device not something just for execs to take notes. While the artist market is small they are loyal
Okay bro
Okay bro
I've only ever used the Pro 2 in-store on a perfectly flat surface where it was plenty stable.
Is that keypad solid and non-flexible or bendy and thin?Okay bro
Is that keypad solid and non-flexible or bendy and thin?
Okay bro
Both posts kind of miss the point that it can be used as a tablet (as i am doing now shitting on the toilet)
Okay bro
There are an awful lot of people in this thread that claim that the surface isn't for them because it isn't a laptop. That's fine though, if you are a heavy content creator then a laptop or even a desktop would suit your needs. For most people though all they do is consume content, and maybe some light creation. That would imply that the surface would meet their needs nicely. In a bigger picture sense, there is a large audience for this judging by normal computer usage patterns; personally I think the issue is the price.
...but it doesnt only work on a desk or table. Have you even read the thread. There's like, real life, actual, people in here saying how they use a surface everyday in those ways.The problem is, sometimes when you improve an aspect of a product you draw more attention to it. If you don't 100% fix the issue, it can work against you.
Personally, I don't really like the Type Cover as a solution at all and wouldn't buy one. The way I see it if it only really works on a desk or table, then I might as well use a small bluetooth keyboard which has way more flexibility to be placed ergonomically than a thing that has to be attached to the device. If ever need to use it in my lap, the new kickstand angle seems really good for the software keyboard.
My ideal use would be at my desk with the Surface kicked back in the drawing angle, pen in my right hand and my left hand on a bluetooth keyboard off to the side for shortcuts. I have always wanted a "desk computer" like the Apple "Knowledge Navigator" concept or what the original Surface tables kinda were. The Surface Pro 3 is the closest thing I have seen to that really, at least out of the things I could conceivably afford. Hell, I would love a 15" or 17" Surface.
Okay bro
What about sitting Indian style say while you're holding onto the controller playing games, you've got a laptop in your lap. Can you do that with the surface pro 3?
not to be dismissive of your use case, but I'd love to know what situation brings this about.
not to be dismissive of your use case, but I'd love to know what situation brings this about.
Yo I'm sitting on my couch playing PS4 wolfTNO cross legged with my heavy 4.5 lbs rMBP on my lap. When I die I glance down to refresh GAF or whatever.
Please take an awkward selfie.
Im sold on it. Going to upgrade from an aging late-09 Macbook.
The more I look at it, the more I realize the SP3 is a technological marvel.
It's weird whenever I see the things people do defined like this.For most people though all they do is consume content, and maybe some light creation.
...but it doesnt only work on a desk or table. Have you even read the thread. There's like, real life, actual, people in here saying how they use a surface everyday in those ways.
That's the audience it matters to the least. I've literally never seen anyone actually put a laptop on their lap in a conference room, because that's what conference room tables are for.
They discontinued that! why?!I think somebody at Microsoft agrees with me somewhat because, for a hot second, they sold this wireless keyboard adapter.
Interesting analysis.... They need to sell the Surface as a new category
Apparently the wireless keyboard thingy doesn't work very well. Reddit's reviews by those that own it make me understand a little bit why it was discontinued, and put me off buying one:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Surface/comments/25ckzq/anyone_have_the_wireless_adapter_for_type_covers/
They discontinued that! why?!
wait... it's a $60 adapter that you attach to your existing Surface keyboard accessory?
i wonder why it didn't sell...
I actually slam this thing for work all day every day and it keeps up. It's quite an amazing little machine Running Creative Suite most days and it doesn't skip a beat (though 8Gb RAM would definitely help...). Regularly cranking out large format posters on it and it's fine. Obviously a desktop would be more suited from a raw power POV but being able to unhook this tiny computer, chuck it in a bag and be completely portable and be able to do illustrations on the screen while out and about is a godsend. I'ts untethered me from my desk in a way no other machine has.There are an awful lot of people in this thread that claim that the surface isn't for them because it isn't a laptop. That's fine though, if you are a heavy content creator then a laptop or even a desktop would suit your needs. For most people though all they do is consume content, and maybe some light creation. That would imply that the surface would meet their needs nicely. In a bigger picture sense, there is a large audience for this judging by normal computer usage patterns; personally I think the issue is the price.