mdsfx
Member
I doubt many people care at this point.
nope. don't care.
I doubt many people care at this point.
Jesus Christ IGN
Really can't decide whether or not to grab this on PC or PS4. All depends on how the PC version performs and how easy the PS4 Platinum is
Like is way too late man, lol we already passed that but we can go back!
"I will say it straight up, this game is worse than Wolfenstein The New Order"
WTF IGN some people here will get mad as hell!!
Don't you drag Wolfenstein into this.
Poor BJ has been through enough, already
Okay jokes aside, where is this stuff about PS4 being 60 fps coming from?
I'm contemplating playing this on 360 controller or mouse and keyboard.
#firstworldproblems
I'm not a fan of Tomb Raider's frame rate on the PS4. I picked it up last week because it was pretty cheap on PSN ($17), even though I already played it maxed out on PC at launch.
I found the wildly dynamic framerate of anywhere from 40 to 60 to be extremely distracting. It was definitely hitting 60 in the claustrophobic "tombs", but in any outdoor environment I was really wishing that the game had a 30fps lock option, such as Titanfall 360 or Second Son. It was really all over the place.
Some poor guy at IGN is sitting at his desk, face down, wondering what in the world he did to deserve this.
I'll take the PS4's lowest frame rate dip of 40 compared to every other version, all of which can drop down into the 20's. It feels pretty damn smooth to me and mostly holds in the 50's, so you're nitpicking really. The sequence in particular that stands out is when all those dudes are zip lining over to kick your ass while bombs are being thrown at you and the responsiveness of the gun play and camera control was amazing and made taking out those bastards more fun than infuriating, which is what it felt like on PS3 and the little bit I played on the ONE.
So are the reviews 12 am Eastern or pacific?
If you're someone used to solid, smooth 60 fps all the time, a variable 40-50s framerate can be more jarring than 30 fps. With 30 fps the control isn't as responsive but the visuals are steady. With a variable framerate it's all over the place and you notice immediately that it's not steady at all. Whether it's worth going to 30 fps depends on the person.
Edmond Dantès;131670503 said:To indulge in the realm of speculation for a moment; one wonders how easy it would have been for Oromë or Tulkas to simply approach Mordor sweeping aside all resistance, entering Barad-dûr and doing to Sauron what Eönwë did to Melkor. Of course the non-interference policy was in place (with exceptions) so Manwë would have prevented such action. But then much of the strife of the First Age was due to Manwë's irresolute nature.
Once I saw this I opened Wiki lol.Edmond Dantès;131670503 said:To indulge in the realm of speculation for a moment; one wonders how easy it would have been for Oromë or Tulkas to simply approach Mordor sweeping aside all resistance, entering Barad-dûr and doing to Sauron what Eönwë did to Melkor. Of course the non-interference policy was in place (with exceptions) so Manwë would have prevented such action. But then much of the strife of the First Age was due to Manwë's irresolute nature.
I'll be here to lend my expertise on such things. It's not always that a Tolkien related videogame is released and especially one that shows promise.I fucking love these posts popping up amongst all the 60fps and review score talk.
Eastern.
If you're someone used to solid, smooth 60 fps all the time, a variable 40-50s framerate can be more jarring than 30 fps. With 30 fps the control isn't as responsive but the visuals are steady. With a variable framerate it's all over the place and you notice immediately that it's not steady at all. Whether it's worth going to 30 fps depends on the person.
If this is like Second Son "Unlocked 60fps" then it will be amazing IMO.
I never needed the 30fps lock in that game, felt perfect, maybe is because Im not that used to 60fps? who knows!
Edmond Dantès;131671067 said:I'll be here to lend my expertise on such things. It's not always that a Tolkien related videogame is released and especially one that shows promise.
No one here is paying any attention to this topic.
(Besides me, obviously).
If this is like Second Son "Unlocked 60fps" then it will be amazing IMO.
I never needed the 30fps lock in that game, felt perfect, maybe is because Im not that used to 60fps? who knows!
5 hours.In how many hrs is that?
Looking at the 3 hour PS4 footafe on youtube .
Edmond Dantès;131671067 said:I'll be here to lend my expertise on such things. It's not always that a Tolkien related videogame is released and especially one that shows promise.
Dev interview, see Shinobi's post.
Oh good you're back. Some questions:
The Black Gate - Talion is a ranger stationed at the Black Gate, how common is that and for how long was that happening? I imagine it would be similar to Ice and Fire's wall in the North with mostly a skeleton crew guarding it. Is the Black Gate set directly on the border or is it within the bounds of Mordor itself?
Orcs - There's lots of talk about Uruks vs Uruk-hai but it seems a bit confusing. Did Tolkien use the terms interchangeably or is there an actual breed or race difference between the two?
Thanks.
Dev interview, see Shinobi's post.
it'd be hilarious if the score did turn out to be 3/10.
It won't!
Green Man Gaming
$37.50
25% off of $49 - SEPTEM-BEROFF-ER25XX
This is why you buy a PC system. This is why! Pre-Bought!
In terms of the Black Gate, two towers (Narchost and Carchost) were built by Gondorians after the War of the Last Alliance at the end of the Second Age. The towers were built and maintained from that point on to watch for the return of Sauron. This watch persisted well into the Third Age, but finally declined and ended approximately 1000 years before the events of The Hobbit. Sauron returned to Mordor during that time period. As far as Rangers are concerned, Tolkien didn't really expound upon what took place during the 1000 year desertion of the area. One of the facets of the mythos that Tolkien left open to elaboration. The Gate essentially provides protection for a gap in a range of mountains that surround Mordor.Oh good you're back. Some questions:
The Black Gate - Talion is a ranger stationed at the Black Gate, how common is that and for how long was that happening? I imagine it would be similar to Ice and Fire's wall in the North with mostly a skeleton crew guarding it. Is the Black Gate set directly on the border or is it within the bounds of Mordor itself?
Orcs - There's lots of talk about Uruks vs Uruk-hai but it seems a bit confusing. Did Tolkien use the terms interchangeably or is there an actual breed or race difference between the two?Thanks.
No one here is paying any attention to this topic.
(Besides me, obviously).
U forgot Nuuvem for 29.99 !
Edmond Dantès;131675546 said:In terms of the Black Gate, two towers (Narchost and Carchost) were built by Gondorians after the War of the Last Alliance at the end of the Second Age. The towers were built and maintained from that point on to watch for the return of Sauron. This watch persisted well into the Third Age, but finally declined and ended approximately 1000 years before the events of The Hobbit. Sauron returned to Mordor during that time period. As far as Rangers are concerned, Tolkien didn't really expound upon what took place during the 1000 year desertion of the area. One of the facets of the mythos that Tolkien left open to elaboration. The Gate essentially provides protection for a gap in a range of mountains that surround Mordor.
As far as Uruks and Uruk-hai are concerned; Tolkien used the terms interchangeably. In terms of meaning, hai translates to 'folk', Uruk-hai translates to 'Orc-folk'.
1. After that battle of Dagorlad in Second Age 3434 the men of Gondor set up a garrison there to keep the evil of mordor or that side of the wall (with Sauron believed to be defeated) So basically from SA 3434 until Talion and his family are killed is your time table.
2. Christopher Tolkien describes "Uruks" as an anglicization of "Uruk-hai" and his father used the two terms interchangeably a number of times. While "Uruk-hai" means simply "Orc-folk", the term was reserved for the soldier orcs of Mordor and Isengard. The larger orcs called the smaller breeds snaga ("slave").
Edmond Dantès;131675546 said:In terms of the Black Gate, two towers (Narchost and Carchost) were built by Gondorians after the War of the Last Alliance at the end of the Second Age. The towers were built and maintained from that point on to watch for the return of Sauron. This watch persisted well into the Third Age, but finally declined and ended approximately 1000 years before the events of The Hobbit. Sauron returned to Mordor during that time period. As far as Rangers are concerned, Tolkien didn't really expound upon what took place during the 1000 year desertion of the area. One of the facets of the mythos that Tolkien left open to elaboration. The Gate essentially provides protection for a gap in a range of mountains that surround Mordor.
As far as Uruks and Uruk-hai are concerned; Tolkien used the terms interchangeably. In terms of meaning, hai translates to 'folk', Uruk-hai translates to 'Orc-folk'.
It isn't one tho. It's about as deep as Arkham and Assassin's Creed.Praying for this game tbh. I desperately want an RPG on PS4.
Second Son feels better than most unlocked games because it's relatively steady at maintaining a consistent pace, it's not varying wildly. First Light is even better about it.If this is like Second Son "Unlocked 60fps" then it will be amazing IMO.
I never needed the 30fps lock in that game, felt perfect, maybe is because Im not that used to 60fps? who knows!