Much bigger, yes, but shrinking fast.
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Ubis...g-Games-for-PS3-Xbox-360-in-2015-381495.shtml
Just because Ubisoft is the only one that has announced their intentions so far doesn't mean they are the only ones. Many developers are going to be putting a lot of muscle into making their next yearly games as big and pretty as possible, and then the "last gen" editions may go on to different developers and or other teams, they may end up being completely different games. That's how it was for us at Sega anyway, as we moved onto PS360.
EA and Activision will more than likely continue on via making minor updates to their current games up until 2016 or so. -- There's just too much potential money to be made to completely ignore current gen. Especially when the PS3 is still getting such awesome support which will further lead into more sales (many are getting a PS3 this year just for Last of Us and/or GT6 alone).
I think that cutting support and focusing on the future is good business sense. If you don't actively support the next console, it will fail.
Many companies usually do both at the same time.
I'm looking at you Wii U. No one makes Wii games any more. In fact the only one I know of that has come out this year is Disney Infinity. But the Wii U hasn't even been out for one year yet, and people don't support it, or its predecessor.
Because the Wii U is doing terrible in sales, has an outdated/low user-count online system, and is under-powered in comparison to the upcoming new consoles.
So respectfully, I think your argument is moot. Supporting next gen is critical for everyone. Everyone's already made their money off of current gen, anything they make now is just icing on the cake. Time to move on.
Heh, again -- you can still do both. Supporting next gen only when next gen consoles sales probably won't match current gen userbases for 5 years+ just doesn't make sense. As I (and others) have said, there's still many that recently got current gen systems.
Higher userbase + low dev cost from a simple sequel that's a basic update from the predecessor = easy money
I think you are still missing the point here. It doesn't matter how many games are being made at the end of the generation, it matters how many are being sold.
???
Eh, of course -- and they are being made because they are selling -- selling to a user base that's larger than the new console userbases (during the respective time). This added with the low cost of the games themselves (since they are usually simple games and/or basic updates) means easy money.
How many copies did Frogger sell? I bet that blew everything out of the water. Madden may have done decently on name alone, but the fact of the matter is: Games are VERY expensive to make now, a hell of a lot more expensive than Frogger or Madden PS1 was to make, that's why so many studios closed this generation. Making a current gen game and then sending it out to die in a market that is on life support doesn't make any sense. THAT is bad business.
You are talking about how games are expensive to make... therefore why wouldn't it make sense to release games for multiple systems?
If some are in trouble now at this late point of a gen when the userbases are high then how do you think that they will do better via only releasing on new consoles that wouldn't even have half of the userbase?
I mean, we aren't talking about a "AAA" game that will get a lot of attention on its nature alone and a lot of advertising. We are talking about a "retro style" game.
The game is going to be cheap in price and therefore people who aren't into having the "latest and greatest" will more than likely be interested in it on top of the countless number of people who aren't going to get a next gen console until 2016 or later.
_________________________________________________________________
Yeah, consoles are supported long term, but I still find the 360/PS3 stretch goal odd. I'm guessing most of the people who want this game will have moved onto PS4/XB1 by 2015. Seems like a worthless stretch goal to me. I'd rather see the money go towards improving the game.
The people who really want it shouldn't mind playing on the 360/PS3. I mean, we are talking about a game that will be a throwback to NES/SNES. A decent number who are supporting this game probably still have those "old school" systems hooked up.