But as Sam Harris points out, there are two options in resolving differences of opinion. There is conversation and there is violence. As evidenced by Spencer's face punch and the fiasco at Berkeley, violence is being viewed more widely by the left as the correct approach.
Honestly I expect Maher and Milo to circle jerk each other about liberals censoring free speech on college, because Maher was dropped from colleges for his anti-Muslim comments. I don't expect any genuine debate or exchange of ideas.
Yep. Anyone who doesn't see this coming is an idiot. Bill never gets tired of slamming Muslims or whining about how liberal protestors somehow got Trump elected so I'm expecting a total shit show on Friday.
I am very torn on this. I do believe that you need to talk...even with Nazis. On the other hand, you give them a platform. Hm...
In the end, Maher had Ann Coulter. Trevor Noah had Tomi Lahren. Milo is a step further, but in the end its not like this is totally new.
The quote "thick as pig shit media jews" from one of his talks comes up right away with a google search. That's pretty damn anti-semetic.Okay, not "nothing but", however he's mainly a provocateur and the point is that he likes to provoke people at every turn.
I haven't seen his anti-semitic statements, but I'm sure you have them handy for me. And no, it's not a Nazi icon. It's still the logo of the luftwaffe for crying out loud.
Look, I don't like this guy one bit, but I think calling him a nazi is inane and counter productive.
I don't see why he should, he isn't responsible for that. That said he should primarily focus his ire on fundamentalist Christians. They're the real threat that America needs to deal with.
Last time a Milo supporter shot a student
Last time before Milo made a transgender student target of harassment
Alexandre Bissonnette was a Internet troll
He murdered 6 and injured 19 muslims 3 weeks ago
We are talking about terrorists. About murderers.
But sure, punching a Nazi is the issue.
Funny how the Bixxonette was a big fan of Dawkins and Sam Harris. Now the similar Maher is trying his best to rewrite history, that they have nothing to do with anti Arab and Muslim bigotry.
We need to reject Sam Harris' and Dawkins views on racism and genetics. Their words are actually frequently used as inllectual justification for racism by Milos.
When Sam Harris says we should race target Muslims at airport, well that opens the rationale for white supremacists like Milos to say, why can't we racially profile African Americans then?
Harris, Maher and Dawkins hold many conventional racist ideas, but since it's for a villainized group we all ignore it. Well the intellectual underpinnings, of justifying stereotyping people and being racist, is largely what has fed and empowered racists like Milos.
Milos is very similar to Harris, only he hates all non whites it seems, whereas Harris only seems to have a biggotry in his heart for Arabs, but the rationale and justification is very much the same, which is why Harris and Dawkins is so popular among the alt right and the right wing.
Are we really doing that thing where we draw a false equivalence between a sociopathic troll and scientists who are capable of rational debate, and actually bother to back up their positions and engage in serious dialogue?Funny how the Bixxonette was a big fan of Dawkins and Sam Harris. Now the similar Maher is trying his best to rewrite history, that they have nothing to do with anti Arab and Muslim bigotry.
We need to reject Sam Harris' and Dawkins views on racism and genetics. Their words are actually frequently used as inllectual justification for racism by Milos.
When Sam Harris says we should race target Muslims at airport, well that opens the rationale for white supremacists like Milos to say, why can't we racially profile African Americans then?
Harris, Maher and Dawkins hold many conventional racist ideas, but since it's for a villainized group we all ignore it. Well the intellectual underpinnings, of justifying stereotyping people and being racist, is largely what has fed and empowered racists like Milos.
Milos is very similar to Harris, only he hates all non whites it seems, whereas Harris only seems to have a biggotry in his heart for Arabs, but the rationale and justification is very much the same, which is why Harris and Dawkins is so popular among the alt right and the right wing.
Both of this things are just showing that he has not even a clue about what he is talking. The iron cross is not even a nazi symbol but a lot older and still used by the German army and Lemmy from Motörhead was also wearing one.
Wagner was just a huge opportunist (used people to finance his ideas), not even a really good Nazi or anything his family just used the Nazis for their own personal gain. So that would be pretty reviling. Of course he also wrote some propaganda crap, but the Wagners as a lot of other people saw the Nazis as a good way to gain importance.
Either that or he is clever enough to know that people would react to that and he could play them like an instrument and gain popularity by using that outrage. So either he is to dust mb to really know this or people are so dumb to fall for it. So whatever you like more I guess.
And both would mean he is just a troll and not really a Nazi. Because I meet some Nazis and skinheads and believe me, usually the skinheads are not the problem, but the nice guy in the suit not saying something stupid when everybody is watching, but still nobody would fuck with him or her.
Funny how the Bixxonette was a big fan of Dawkins and Sam Harris. Now the similar Maher is trying his best to rewrite history, that they have nothing to do with anti Arab and Muslim bigotry.
We need to reject Sam Harris' and Dawkins views on racism and genetics. Their words are actually frequently used as inllectual justification for racism by Milos.
When Sam Harris says we should profile Muslims and stereotype them as dangerous, well that opens the rationale for white supremacists like Milos to say, why can't we racially profile African Americans, and stereotype them as dangerous?
Harris, Maher and Dawkins hold many conventional racist ideas, but since it's for a villainized group we all ignore it. Well the intellectual underpinnings, of justifying stereotyping people and being racist, is largely what has fed and empowered racists like Milos.
Milos is very similar to Harris, only he hates all non whites it seems, whereas Harris only seems to have a biggotry in his heart for Arabs, but the rationale and justification is very much the same, which is why Harris and Dawkins is so popular among the alt right and the right wing.
Yeah, I want to see why people feel that she deserved to get singled out, individually targeted, and harassed. That is what they are justifying, exactly to your point.But, to stay on topic. Did anyone ever give an answer as to why a trans student should face harassment at her own school? I sincerely want a reason as to why that's justified.
I do. I'm surprised you missed it being linked in this thread a few times. Again, no-to-little people are calling him a Nazi, but certainly suspect.I haven't seen his anti-semitic statements, but I'm sure you have them handy for me. And no, it's not a Nazi icon. It's still the logo of the luftwaffe for crying out loud.
Look, I don't like this guy one bit, but I think calling him a nazi is inane and counter productive.
The quote "thick as pig shit media jews" from one of his talks comes up right away with a google search. That's pretty damn anti-semetic.
Yeah, I want to see why people feel that she deserved to get singled out, individually targeted, and harassed. That is what they are justifying, exactly to your point.
They should have to defend their position.
This is a really important post.
Trokil started in this thread by espousing liberal democratic views on the importance of debate and free speech. When they were confronted with the fact that Milo uses his speech to incite harassment, they dismissed it. Now, when presented with evidence of Milo, an already avowed racist, using Nazi iconography, Trokil presents us with absurd apologetics.
Be careful. Some of the people preaching tolerance and free speech are actually just fascist sympathizers whose only interest is to deflect and distract. That's why they ignore what happened to the trans student, or Bobbys posts explaining that no one is advocating that we ignore the problem. It's like arguing with Kellyanne Conway.
I do have to mention that Maher did say, directly to Harris that Islamaphobia is certainly real, but Harris shut him down immediately to say that the word detracts from vetting extremism, which is absurd.
And for other posters, Dawkins is well noted for making similar statements as Harris and being tone-deaf to systemic racism. I think he had to take a break from twitter because he got into an argument about it with users a few year(s) ago.
----
But, to stay on topic. Did anyone ever give an answer as to why a trans student should face harassment at her own school? I sincerely want a reason as to why that's justified.
Surprisingly, both people can be considered abhorrent.So they use one student as an argument how Milo is way more evil, while there is Rolling Stine article how people like Michele Bachmann created a climate which lead to the suicide of several teenagers and a climate of large scale bullying.
That was funny. I also have something funny.
This is the iron cross from 1813, 120 years before the Nazis used it.
This is the one from WWI
This is the one the Nazis used
and this is the one the German Luftwaffe uses right now
Now this is the one Milo wore
So you don't see it very well, but do you see the white part on the top, the one of the Nazis did not have that. That is the white crown, so that is either the one of WW1 or 1813 so he picked the wrong one to make a Nazi statement. So this either makes him a huge troll and everybody falls for it or just a huge dumb ass.
So they use one student as an argument how Milo is way more evil, while there is Rolling Stone article how people like Michele Bachmann created a climate which lead to the suicide of several teenagers and a climate of large scale bullying.
I'm hoping you are aware that non-Berkeley students were the ones that escalated that situation, right?
Do we even know the ideology of the people that invaded that peaceful protest?
hah yea probably. Not sure why Maher is even bothering with this.
Hey everybody, apparently Golden Dawn aren't nazis because this isn't techinaclly a swaztika.
Trolling works best when you have racist apologists spewing intellectually dishonest arguments to muddy the water and give you cover.
Hey everybody, apparently Golden Dawn aren't nazis because this isn't techinaclly a swaztika.
So Angela Merkel is a Nazi because she has the iron cross of the Luftwaffe on her plane?
Why is it so sacrosanct to call people Nazis when the ideology has clearly returned to the mainstream?
We have a white nationalist president. But, please, continue with the semantics.
You really do seem intent on labeling everybody a Nazi don't you? Have you got any proof of the things you are saying or is it just word vomit coming from your mouth again?
What Nazi's does he hang out with?
What online handle are we talking about here?
An iron cross is not "Nazi memorabilia" by the way but what was the context of him wearing it?
Was he doing it to try and have a jab at people calling him a nazi so thought it would be "funny" to troll them?
Did he study history at any point in time and could this be related to that?
When was it taken?
Learn a little about history before you call the iron cross "Nazi memorabilia" please.
He used to call himself Milo Wagner.
Harris seems dangerous and angry? Point me to one example of Harris acting anything like the people foaming at the mouth to call him an islamaphobe. The left are becoming as intolerant as the far right. Dialogue and nuance doesn't matter. Fucking gross.Yeah, Harris did say that. Which I mean, is just so offensive, when you read and see what is happening right now. It's really just cruel and dangerous.
Yeah, Maher made such a small mea culpa, but he has repeated many ugly stereotypes about Arabs throughout the years, and is a big booster of Harris and Dawkins, and also believes in racial profiling. They were just usually small comments met with silence from the audience and not ever written about or any think pieces. But those comments normalize racism against a minority, which is what Maher has done. The intellectual justification of racial profiling these guys trumpet has been appropriated by the alt right to normalize racism against more than just Arabs and Muslims.
Dawkins did take a break, but I think he is more than just tone deaf. He really seems to delight in mocking and attacking Muslims, and so much dog whistling racism. Whereas Harris just seems dangerous and angry, imo. You can just see how the rising tide of white supremacy and populism in America and Europe loves both Dawkins and Harris, and uses and quotes them frequently.
Like I said, Alexader Bissonette was a big fan of both Dawkins and Harris.
Milo and Maher are probably more alike than not.
Enlighten all of us on the context for why Milo has an iron cross (beloved by neo-Nazis) and why he used to call himself Milo Andreas Wagner (Richard Wagner beloved by Nazis and himself a big antisemite), likes to use Holocause memes, is misogynist + racist + homophobic + transphobic, and likes to carry books about Hitler.
Not calling him a Nazi, though
What does milo even have to say
Yeah, Harris did say that. Which I mean, is just so offensive, when you read and see what is happening right now. It's really just cruel and dangerous.
Yeah, Maher made such a small mea culpa, but he has repeated many ugly stereotypes about Arabs throughout the years, and is a big booster of Harris and Dawkins, and also believes in racial profiling. They were just usually small comments met with silence from the audience and not ever written about or any think pieces. But those comments normalize racism against a minority, which is what Maher has done. The intellectual justification of racial profiling these guys trumpet has been appropriated by the alt right to normalize racism against more than just Arabs and Muslims.
Dawkins did take a break, but I think he is more than just tone deaf. He really seems to delight in mocking and attacking Muslims, and so much dog whistling racism. Whereas Harris just seems dangerous and angry, imo. You can just see how the rising tide of white supremacy and populism in America and Europe loves both Dawkins and Harris, and uses and quotes them frequently.
Like I said, Alexader Bissonette was a big fan of both Dawkins and Harris.
So the argument is, he is a troll and you should not feed trolls, so no platform for him. But also you should not ignore him, but he is a Nazi, but you can't argue with them but you can't ignore them and you can not give them a platform to expose them, because that would make everybody fall for them. So you should demonstrate him, when he shows up, but not too much, because that would also give him attention and that would help him again. Also not violence, which would also help him.
So the solution is?
Show clips of him saying stupid shit and pick apart his statements without giving him the chance to worm his way out of it. It meets all of your criteria.
They always worm out of it through deflection, mental gymnastics, etc.
I'm pretty sure the iron cross is still in use today by the germans.... not a nazi symbol.