TiredofWinning
Member
I had a minor chuckle
is this what horseshoe theory is????
No. From the entire episode and knowing Maher's rhetoric you would.
Ah ok.I would absolutely whip someone' ass who's political belief is the genocide and subjugation of non-whites
It's interesting watching the left try to figure out how to deal with a person like Milo.
I watch Maher every week, so I know you're right. But the point is almost none of Maher's views were brought to bear against Milo. He spent almost the entire episode fluffing him. So it doesn't matter what he really believes.
I dont understand how anyone can just think he is a troll.wow I never realized this guy was just a straight up troll. He's not even close to being the real problem.
I say it all the time; look to black people.
Because we've been dealing with contradictory Uncle Toms like Milo almost since slavery.
We could look to black people for a lot of things, but won't. So round and round they go.
?Ah ok.
I said it a couple times already but it was really telling that it was only the two black men who took Milo to task while the two white men just chuckled and remained quiet.
You know, there's nothing nicer than seeing two people who appear to be on different ends of the political spectrum bond over how much they dislike Islam, right? And no question: Maher and Yiannopoulos do indeed appear to be in lockstep when it comes to Muslims. Yiannopoulos, writing that "America has a Muslim problem" has conflated all Muslims with ISIS and has even defended loathing of Muslims with the comment, "fear of Islam is entirely rational."
Maher has echoed that very sentiment with his own comment about Islam that, "The more you know, the more you would be afraid." And Maher was even praised by the alt-right Breitbart, where Yiannopoulos works as editor, for his remark in 2015, "I think that Islam is a problem."
It's especially curious that Maher didn't stand up to Yiannopoulos, given that he had been roundly criticized for even booking him on the show. In fact, Jeremy Scahill, a frequent guest on Maher's show, canceled his appearance for that night because he vehemently disagreed with Maher presenting Yiannopoulos with a national TV platform from which to "legitimize his hateful agenda."
Thankfully, former Comedy Central host Larry Wilmore was on the panel and showed us how you confront hate. In the "Overtime" segment of the show, which can be seen online, Wilmore confronted Yiannopoulos's past racially-tinged attack on African-American SNL cast member Leslie Jones and his hatemongering about transgender Americans.
Thank fuck for Larry Wilmore. Seriously. There was someone competent to push back against Milo's garbage.In fact, when Yiannopoulos asserted that transgender people are "disproportionately involved" in committing acts of sexual assault -- a lie that has been debunked by experts -- Maher remained quiet. It was Wilmore who stepped up to challenge his "statistics."
And when Yiannopoulos went on to say that being transgender was a "psychiatric disorder," Maher kept his silence, while it was Wilmore who continued to press Yiannopoulos. The discussion between Wilmore and Yiannopoulos escalated until Wilmore told him "you can go f*** yourself," drawing a round of applause from the studio audience -- which had no doubt hoped Maher would've summoned half that much passionate pushback.
If Maher has made a strategic decision to court Yiannopoulos' legion of white-supremacist followers, that's his despicable choice.
But if he truly wants to regain progressive fans and the respect of his peers, then when he invites guests like Yiannopoulos, Maher should passionately press them on their hate, not mainstream it.
Bill Maher's shameful mainstreaming of Yiannopoulos' hate
Thank fuck for Larry Wilmore. Seriously. There was someone competent to push back against Milo's garbage.
Did we watch the same show because Bill called him out about being blatantly wrong several times and Milo was the one brushing it off?
Ah ok.
Did we watch the same show because Bill called him out about being blatantly wrong several times and Milo was the one brushing it off?
Did we watch the same show because Bill called him out about being blatantly wrong several times and Milo was the one brushing it off?
MILO Confronts the Panel | Overtime with Bill Maher
LOL what the fuck did you watch.
Bill Maher even praised Milo by saying that he reminded him of young Christopher Hitchens.
I dont understand how anyone can just think he is a troll.
Hate speech is not trolling.
As usual, black folks do the work that "allies" aren't willing to.
"Donald Trump could be like Christopher Hitchens if he weren't Donald Trump."How he talks and the delivery of the word is what he was referring to, I thought that was obvious... He said at the end of that comparison that you have to stop saying shit like that.
He didn't say, "Wow, you're the next Christopher Hitchens, go you!" He was saying Milo could be like him if he'd stop being a fucking asshole.
I said it a couple times already but it was really telling that it was only the two black men who took Milo to task while the two white men just chuckled and remained quiet.
Grug wants to be friends with Nazi's, lol
Really? Because that normalizes Milo, and encourages more people to be like him in public because there are no real consequences to the hateful shit they spew.The correct response to Milo is...
... and nothing more.
Don't be childish.
Really? Because that normalizes Milo, and encourages more people to be like him in public because there are no real consequences to the hateful shit they spew.
I rabidly dislike Milo but I applaud Bill Maher for having him on.
We don't make these idiots go away by giving them the oxygen and notoriety they crave by blacklisting them.
Maher is totally right, us Liberals need to harden the fuck up and stop getting so fucking triggered by everything. You don't win friends with salad.
I thought Maher disarmed Milo brilliantly and exposed him for what he is... a silly troll. A reasonably articulate silly troll, but a silly troll nonetheless. He has supporters on the Alt-Right because they aren't used to hearing their ideology spouted by someone with a modicum of charima and the ability to string a sentence together. That's their problem, but the left allowing themselves to take what he says seriously is what gives his words a degree of agency they don't deserve and expands his platform.
The correct response to Milo is...
... and nothing more.
it's okay he just wants to make friends with the funny little nazi's, gosh darn oh you
that seems to be a pretty lazy and self serving response
There is nothing in my post, or my greater post history that comes even close to suggesting that. You're being imbecilic. Maybe read things twice before hitting reply.
lazy "liberals" are the worst. tone policing is all they're good at.
classy
I rabidly dislike Milo but I applaud Bill Maher for having him on.
We don't make these idiots go away by giving them the oxygen and notoriety they crave by blacklisting them.
Maher is totally right, us Liberals need to harden the fuck up and stop getting so fucking triggered by everything. You don't win friends with salad.
I thought Maher disarmed Milo brilliantly and exposed him for what he is... a silly troll. A reasonably articulate silly troll, but a silly troll nonetheless. He has supporters on the Alt-Right because they aren't used to hearing their ideology spouted by someone with a modicum of charima and the ability to string a sentence together. That's their problem, but the left allowing themselves to take what he says seriously is what gives his words a degree of agency they don't deserve and expands his platform.
The correct response to Milo is...
... and nothing more.
As opposed to calling me a "friend of nazis"" because I had the temerity to suggest that you publicly expose idiots like Milo for the frauds they are rather than pretend they aren't there?
You're seemingly providing a counterpoint to arguments I didn't make. it's really quite baffling.
As opposed to calling me a "friend of nazis"" because I had the temerity to suggest that you should publicly expose idiots like Milo for the frauds they are rather than cover your eyes and pretend they aren't there?
You're seemingly providing a counterpoint to arguments I didn't make. it's really quite baffling.
As I said I fast forwarded the Milo part. That was a great episode. I laugh at liberals dissing Maher because he has a different thought about Islam.
the left allowing themselves to take what he says seriously is what gives his words a degree of agency they don't deserve and expands his platform.
Really? Because that normalizes Milo, and encourages more people to be like him in public because there are no real consequences to the hateful shit they spew.
I disagree. Like i said, the guy is a self-promoting clown. He will eventually tie his own noose, that will be the consequence.
Kellyanne Conway is a walking joke now. Giving her airtime didn't "normalise" her, it just exposed her for the charlatan with shallow playbook that she is.
Liberals need to stop cowering in the corner and safe spaces and (non-violently) but aggressively call conservatives and the alt-right out for what they are. Easily frightened, manipulated, anachronistic and seemingly wilfully ignorant stooges who don't realise how hard they are getting played by the powerbrokers and puppetmasters of the party they support.
It's a contest of ideas, let them put their spokespeople forward, and we put ours forward. I think our ideas are better, don't you?
In case I haven't made myself clear enough (I have been misrepresented enough already) I'll defer to Bruno Gianelli who said it way better 15+ years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCSMyFWTjRc
Safe spaces are places for minorities to meet and focus on their unique issues without having to give time and voice to folks like Milo.... they are beneficial and conducive to a successful civil rights fight, please stop talking about safe spaces like you have literally any clue what they are for.