Too many people are still confusing "debating ideas" with "spreading propaganda."
https://mobile.twitter.com/ezlusztig/status/803288929357041664?lang=en
And
https://mobile.twitter.com/ezlusztig/status/803288929357041664?lang=en
"Hannah Arendt in her book The Origin of Totalitarianism provides a helpful guide for interpreting the language of fascist.
She noted how decent liberals of the 1930s Germany would "fact check" the Nazis' bizarre claims about Jews like they were meant to be factual.
What they failed to understand, Arendt suggests, is that the Nazi Jew hating was not a statement of fact but a declaration of intent.
So when someone would blame the Jews for Germany's defeat in WWI, naive people would counter by saying there's no evidence of that.
What the Nazis were doing was not describing what was true, but what would have to be true to justify what they planned to do next.
Did 3 millions illegals cast votes in this election? Clearly not. But fact checking is just a way of playing along with their game.
What Trump is saying is not that 3 million illegals voted. What he's saying is: I'm going to steal the voting rights of millions of Americans."
And
"Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play.
They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert."