Little Green Yoda
Member
Are you implying that if over a certain period of time where little/no positive results came back, that the MLB would voluntarily stop testing to cut back on expenses? Or that MLB "needs" positive results to generate press and would switch labs if they didn't get the results they wanted?I didn't say that. You said there it's no incentive for them which I think is false. Any drug testing facility associated with mlb is now making a ton of money versus 30 years ago. Are you staying that is not an incentive?
I really don't see any reason the lab(s) would lose out financially to the point where tampering with specimens is the best way out. At this point, drug testing is the MLB's PR insurance against roiding players - we already know the media scrutinizes baseball more than other sports regarding this issue. If anything, tampering is more likely to get the lab's contract with MLB terminated than provide financial security.