Monmouth, A+ Rated Pollster on 538 - Hillary 50% Trump 37%

Status
Not open for further replies.
Polls don't mean anything. Remember in 2012 when the polls were showing Obama winning and the conservative elites said they were misleading and Romney was winning?

How did that turn out?
 
Meanwhile, at Republican Party Headquarters:

jj7Gqbk.gif
 
I think you are jumping the gun there. 2024 or 2028 more likely. I'd say 28/32.
Trump is imploding to such a degree, much earlier than I expected.

Texas is going swing state this election cycle, just nobody knows it yet. it will swing back slightly in 2020, before going blue in 2024.

And from there Republicans are screwed.

Though in a near historic wave election of 13%, Texas could go blue this cycle by a tiny amount, swing back in 2020 before trending blue in 2024. Similar to what happened in North Carolina.
 
People in this thread are getting ahead of themselves. Let's see how poll numbers are next month and October before we consider Georgia and Texas as possible pick ups.
 
People in this thread are getting ahead of themselves. Let's see how poll numbers are next month and October before we consider Georgia and Texas as possible pick ups.
She's going to need to build that infastructure now if she wants to have solid GOTV opperations in AZ and GA. She's already started in AZ.
 
She's going to need to build that infastructure now if she wants to have solid GOTV opperations in AZ and GA. She's already started in AZ.
I'm sure the campaign knows what it's doing.
Texas sure, but Georgia has been close all year.
Georgia is definitely the most viable state to take from Republicans alongside Arizona. Whether or not it's worth putting resources toward it is something else.

Georgia would be a victory lap, not necessary toward winning.
 
I'm sure the campaign knows what it's doing.

Georgia is definitely the most viable state to take from Republicans alongside Arizona. Whether or not it's worth putting resources toward it is something else.

Georgia would be a victory lap, not necessary toward winning.

Sure, but putting in the work in Georgia helps to build what the future Democrat coalition will look like. Not hard to imagine Dems being strong in heavily-black southern states again one day while Republicans eventually take states like PA.

I think Georgia is worth putting resources into this election, but more ambitious states than that, probably not. Would rather see them play it at least a little safe. I just think GA is close enough to swing state territory to be worth going for it and accelerating that process, like NC in '08.
 
Seems like Johnson's eating into trump's numbers. And I can only imagine it'll continue to happen as more people realize there's a choice.

EDIT: imagine if trump refuses to debate? Master stroke would be inviting johnson to debate. Would be more likely to harm trump than Clinton. The ideologies of their politics are so vastly different I doubt there'd be many he'd be able to take from Clinton.
 
IF thing continue as they have been the past 2 weeks, I see HRC winning Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, North Carolina Georgia, and Arizona. BUT, I don't foresee Trump making it to November, I can't imagine it.

Am I just experiencing denial?
 
IF thing continue as they have been the past 2 weeks, I see HRC winning Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, North Carolina Georgia, and Arizona. BUT, I don't foresee Trump making it to November, I can't imagine it.

Am I just experiencing denial?

Where is Trump going to go? It'd be too late to replace him on the ballot.
 
Sure, but putting in the work in Georgia helps to build what the future Democrat coalition will look like. Not hard to imagine Dems being strong in heavily-black southern states again one day while Republicans eventually take states like PA.

PA is about as red as it's going to get on the presidential level unless the GOP manages to swing educated college voters, minorities, and the suburbs back in their direction. Maximizing the angry white vote isn't going to work the same way it used to in the South because the GOP has already reached saturation point with that constituency and still has to contend with the large urban centers of the state.

Could a Republican along the lines of Charlie Dent win a state like PA? Absolutely, but someone like him would have to run the gauntlet of a national primary, and I can't see that happening unless we see what happened in Kansas last week replay itself across the country.

Republicans haven't had the spectre of having a big fat loser at the end of the election for a long time. Romney and McCain were at least competitive for long stretches of their presidential campaign.
 
I just hope Trump gets eviscerated and it minimizes as much republican down ticket voting as possible. News like this makes me hopeful.
 
Polls don't mean anything. Remember in 2012 when the polls were showing Obama winning and the conservative elites said they were misleading and Romney was winning?

How did that turn out?

I get what you're saying, but it's a different situation. The polls between Obama and Romeny were very close at the time, and there were several times when national polls had them neck and neck.

But

Keep this in mind: there has only been a single time when Trump has been ahead of Clinton, and that was only by about 3-4% in a single round of national polls after the RNC. But if you looked at electorate polling, Trump has never been ahead of Clinton, even though it's gotten close (in a similar way that Romney was never consistently ahead of Obama in the electorate). And the discrepancy between Clinton and Trump now is much larger than it ever was during the 2012 election, even as it ended. Even the national polls, which are generally easier to manipulate, show Clinton in a really demanding lead. Sorry, but that's not "meaningless." For a candidate to be this far behind this early in the election is pretty uncommon. Add that to the continued fracturing of the GOP away from Trump, and you have a candidate whose chances seem slimmer and slimmer. There's still 3 solid months away, so it's not impossible to see a turnaround, but Trump and the GOP blew the chance for a total turnaround. If Trump wins, it's going to be by the skin of his sagging balls scrapping on the ground over the finish line. Barring some crazy incident like...I dunno, Hilary executing Billy Graham on national TV.
 
IF thing continue as they have been the past 2 weeks, I see HRC winning Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, North Carolina Georgia, and Arizona. BUT, I don't foresee Trump making it to November, I can't imagine it.

Am I just experiencing denial?

The only person with the power to stop Trump from being the nominee in three months is Donald Trump.

You honestly think he's going to walk away?
 
South Carolina blue in the 538 now-cast, crazy. Clinton has a higher chance of winning Texas than Trump has of winning North Carolina on there.
 
I could see Trump showing up at the White House the day after Election Day regardless of the results, expecting to be let in, and having no idea the president elect isn't supposed to be sworn in yet.
 
I hope for the biggest loss in history. It's the only thing that has the chance to convince the Republican Party it's going to have to evolve.

Naw you'll see these two excuses after he loses.

Trump's base/Trump: "We didn't win because the establishment sabotaged him."

Establishment: "We lost because we didn't pick a real conservative."
 
I hope for the biggest loss in history. It's the only thing that has the chance to convince the Republican Party it's going to have to evolve.

What factions would need to go on the chopping block for that to happen? Or more succinctly, which of the odious factions could they keep and get away with keeping, all the while not alienating themselves from the rest of the population? For example, as much as I've never been a fan of smoking, I wouldn't be troubled with the GOP maintaining ties with the tobacco industry in the same way that I'm troubled whenever they rule in lockstep with the NRA. I may be in the minority by saying that some of their economic positions in the early 1990's were somewhat reasonable, at least from my perspective, but then I was more of a centrist back in the 1990's, and figured that the Pat Buchanan faction of the republican party was a passing fad that would eventually correct itself. But having said that, I feel the only salvation for them over the long term is to jettison the tea party faction from within
 
I'm sure as fuck energized. Every time I read about Hillary killing it in the latest poll I get more excited to vote for her. She's inheriting Obama's ground force and being the potential first woman POTUS I have no doubt the GOTY effort will be legendary. She needs to crush him and everything he stand for.

As a person that supported Bernie and thinks that Hilary is a very smiley, damn near sociopathic person who will champion some things that the country doesn't need more of (more hawkishness, cozening up to special interests while passing largely token regulations for show, support of Israel): I still agree completely.

What factions would need to go on the chopping block for that to happen? Or more succinctly, which of the odious factions could they keep and get away with keeping, all the while not alienating themselves from the rest of the population? For example, as much as I've never been a fan of smoking, I wouldn't be troubled with the GOP maintaining ties with the tobacco industry in the same way that I'm troubled whenever they rule in lockstep with the NRA. I may be in the minority by saying that some of their economic positions in the early 1990's were somewhat reasonable, at least from my perspective, but then I was more of a centrist back in the 1990's, and figured that the Pat Buchanan faction of the republican party was a passing fad that would eventually correct itself. But having said that, I feel the only salvation for them over the long term is to jettison the tea party faction from within

This might be true, but they were off the deep end on economic and social policy prior to the tea party.
 
Originally Posted by Brian Griffin

I'm sure as fuck energized. Every time I read about Hillary killing it in the latest poll I get more excited to vote for her. She's inheriting Obama's ground force and being the potential first woman POTUS I have no doubt the GOTY effort will be legendary. She needs to crush him and everything he stand for.


My big concern is how American voters tend to be apathetic during elections. I hope everyone is keeping aware of how the Brexit vote played out in the U,K. and that a Donald Trump presidency is a very real possibility. And if for no other reason, I'm hoping that they have the inevitable Supreme Court vacancies in mind this November.
 
NO JOY ALLOWED

until Clinton get 270

preach it!

I will not relax until she hits 270 and nor should anyone else. This isn't over by a long shot.

I get it, but it's August, and your posting this on a video games forum. Nothing said on this website will influence the election. So unless Hillary completely implodes, I'll relax until November.

My big concern is how American voters tend to be apathetic during elections. I hope everyone is keeping aware of how the Brexit vote played out in the U,K. and that a Donald Trump presidency is a very real possibility. And if for no other reason, I'm hoping that they have the inevitable Supreme Court vacancies in mind this November.


Brexit was a lot closer than this. And was a simple majority not the EC used in our election. Not really the same thing.
 
I get it, but it's August, and your posting this on a video games forum. Nothing said on this website will influence the election. So unless Hillary completely implodes, I'll relax until November.

Seriously. Some people act like if you say "HILLARY WILL WIN" three times in front of the bathroom mirror Trump will appear or something. Relax.
 
I get it, but it's August, and your posting this on a video games forum. Nothing said on this website will influence the election. So unless Hillary completely implodes, I'll relax until November.

Brexit was a lot closer than this. And was a simple majority not the EC used in our election. Not really the same thing.

Seriously. Some people act like if you say "HILLARY WILL WIN" three times in front of the bathroom mirror Trump will appear or something. Relax.

Bullshit, this attitude breeds complacency. The more people who put their feet up and consider it a done deal hamper HRC's chances, as we see in the midterms every four fucking years.
 
Bullshit, this attitude breeds complacency. The more people who put their feet up and consider it a done deal hamper HRC's chances, as we see in the midterms every four fucking years.

People need to stop equating predicting a HIllary win with complacency. Until people start saying "Man Hillary is going to win so I'm not going to vote!", the fear mongering is unnecessary.
 
Bullshit, this attitude breeds complacency. The more people who put their feet up and consider it a done deal hamper HRC's chances, as we see in the midterms every four fucking years.
This isn't the midterms. How exactly does this breed complacency? Fear mongering is annoying

People need to stop equating predicting a HIllary win with complacency. Until people start saying "Man Hillary is going to win so I'm not going to vote!", the fear mongering is unnecessary.

Exactly. No one is telling people to stay home.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom