There are so many unknown aspects how the hole communication setup was.
Maybe the questions were prerecorded and send to the ISS. Maybe everything was live. How was the communication between NASA and the person who was asking? Maybe everything was prerecorded so that TV show viewers can enjoy a nice show without any delays.
The ISS is moving with 17500 mph. Lets say The ISS is directly above the US so NASA can send the signal straight up --> no delay. 10 Minutes later the ISS is now on the other side of the globe. So NASA is sending the signal to a relay station in space then to another station then maybe back to a station on earth and then back to space to catch up with the moving ISS. Every jump from one relay to another causes a delay.
So many unanswered questions but of course the easiest explanation NASA is faking all this because this is the only explanation that fits your beliefs.
Have you stated your position on why they would fake the footage yet? ...
I think it could be something as easy to explain as space is more dangerous for humans than we like to tell people or too expensive so, to keep the money for research and the dream of space travel alive in the hearts of the public, they would fake a few videos if need be.
I don't say the only explanation is that, but it is a possible explanation. But even at times , in videos, when they are showing 11 second delays to respond they are reacting instantly within the same video. Another gaf user commented that even at the nearest point there is a half second delay.
Why would they do that? Well rockets have 1-2% failure rate, even the space station itself ain't exactly safe. Manned launches have significantly less failure rate than multimillion dollar satellite launches.
- % Manned Failures in Manned, Entire Data Set = 1.64%
- % Manned Failures in Manned, Last 20 Years = 0.79%
- % Unmanned Failures in Unmanned, Entire Data Set = 8.08%
- % Unmanned Failures in Unmanned, Last 20 Years = 6.68%
There are thousands of satellites orbitting our planet and everyone of them got there from a rocket launch. I know that when a launch fails it is practically always a catastrophic failure, otherwis...
space.stackexchange.com
Could be extra care, or could be they fake them to avoid the loss of funding and bad press that would happen from a deadly accident killing astronauts.
Keep in mind that even with best most optimistic lowest odds of failure it is still about 1 in 200 chance of rocket failure. Doing 100s of trips, and sooner or later astronauts are going to die for no reason. Improving robotics to do the experiments is a much more ethical course of action. Putting people's lives at risk should be avoided unless absolutely necessary.
Dude on the left is clearly trying to cross his arms, then decides it's a bad idea in zero gravity.
What he's doing could be debated, but looks more like he's moving an object from one hand to another and putting it on the side, but only grabbing thin air. I've heard the official explanation is that he has a nervous tick and does random hand movements, though.
Lag is minimal if the space station is directly above Houston (about half a second or so depending on how the signal is relayed through the TDRSS), but becomes considerably longer if the ISS reaches the far side of the planet because the signal has a much longer travel distance.
The ISS is in constant movement though, doing about 16 orbits per day.
And some of those reactions are instant, not half a second delay, or so it seems.