I got the arrow of light and also the medal of honor. I think I was close to making either Star or Life but I really can't remember.
And now this is funny.
Nevada (a swing state) Stake Presidents passed around this Power Point.
I love it it's like Hito's whole "sustaining" thing. Sure you have a choice but you know the choice they want you to make.
"Vote however you want!"
"But we must stop Satan and speak with ONE voice <wink wink nudge nudge>. "
http://abcnews.go.com/images/Blotter/Mormon_register.pdf
And now this is funny.
Nevada (a swing state) Stake Presidents passed around this Power Point.
I love it it's like Hito's whole "sustaining" thing. Sure you have a choice but you know the choice they want you to make.
"Vote however you want!"
"But we must stop Satan and speak with ONE voice <wink wink nudge nudge>. "
http://abcnews.go.com/images/Blotter/Mormon_register.pdf
Maybe it's just because I'm in the Poli Sci dept. but here at BYUI I have professors who do the exact opposite and point out that one of the reasons people hated the Saints so much back in the day was voting in blocks(granted as I recall it was also because they voted in blocks against slavery, but I can't recall now). Likewise the Poli Sci honor society goes to great lengths to point out that they're a non-partisan organization.
Yeah, it's pretty much doubling down on the importance of the temple, but aside from some assurances you get here and there nothing is really about the actual act itself.Oh and about the temple prep stuff. I took the institute class.
It essentially comprised of them telling me how holy the temple was and reading the Pearl of Great Price. Really didn't prepare me at all for the temple.
Oh and about the temple prep stuff. I took the institute class.
It essentially comprised of them telling me how holy the temple was and reading the Pearl of Great Price. Really didn't prepare me at all for the temple.
I was seriously freaked when I went the first time. So much so that I didn't adhere to that whole "Just go until you're comfortable" advice that everyone gives. I was like "This is religion not anal sex."
I think that the fact that there's a lay leadership in the church really helps and hurts the church. When you see stuff like this, it's probably just a few Stake Presidents that are like "This is a great idea!" and push it forward. They have the authority to do so but not necessarily the visibility of how it might affect the church's overall image.
A missionary with an anal sex catch phrase? Wow.Bwahahaha, this reminds me of my mission so much. And I know that not elaborating on that sounds terrible, but I'm not sure how elaborating on it would help. Basically, I had a companion whose catch phrase was "Relaxa, se nao, nao encaixa." which means "Relax, if you don't, it won't fit." or "this" won't fit.
Bear in mind that I also served in Brazil, so anal sex popped up once or twice as a topic.
A missionary with an anal sex catch phrase? Wow.
Reddit thread getting interesting.
http://www.reddit.com/r/exmormon/comments/10ejn1/show_of_support_for_david_twede_92912/
Eh, the problem comes when they try to excommunicate you after you've already left, acting like they still have control over your life. Sure, they can waste their own time and wave that stick, but it's also within the person's rights to tell them to go pound sand.Man, exmos can be such a bunch of whiny drama queen bitches. And we wonder why mormons don't listen to us.
Look, the dude dun goofed. I personally think it's dumb for the church to try and discipline him (again you have two choices, have the person be on your side and try to tell your point or make them a martyr and an enemy. You're not gonna stop him from publishing it. But you can control the tone he takes.) But the church is totally in their rights to kick him out if they want to. You're a mormon you know what you're signing up for.
If the church were to come to me tomorrow and be like "We've seen your neogaf posts. We're excommunicating you." I'd be like "I think you're making the wrong decision but you have the right."
I dunno. I've met a few people that left in their teenage years that just totally left the church behind and didn't think twice about never doing anything more with the church on either side. I've met people in their 60s that left and were the most bitter of exmos I met.I think it has to do with timing and how much you personally have been affected by it.
There's a lot of stuff I like about the church, and my faith crisis didn't happen during rebellion or frustration. I took moroni's promise and all my belief was based on it. Which also meant that I didn't worry about the historical oddities of church history (I knew all of them, I had every tanner book as well as basically the entire infobase library which I read most of. I even have a copy of the original article in the Improvement Era with Nibley's response to criticism of the book of Abraham). If God said it was true, then it was true regardless of the information out there. I felt the spirit and could make others feel it. I was a powerful missionary and speaker because of it. I really wish there was one true way that held all the answers but unfortunately life isn't that simple and ideas even good ones come from flawed men who also have some bad ideas.
People who leave as teenagers (ie the height of self loathing when they can't meet the church's standards) are usually much more angry. That is probably most of /r/exmormon
Well that's the problem. If you've already left it will only incite more spite and it really doesn't mean anything.Eh, the problem comes when they try to excommunicate you after you've already left, acting like they still have control over your life. Sure, they can waste their own time and wave that stick, but it's also within the person's rights to tell them to go pound sand.
Still clinging to the "they sinned/were weak/were offended" mantra?People who leave as teenagers (ie the height of self loathing when they can't meet the church's standards) are usually much more angry. That is probably most of /r/exmormon
Still clinging to the "they sinned/were weak/were offended" mantra?
Actually, from my time on the RfM boards, some of the most pure vitriol I've seen were from people who left as adults. They felt robbed of decades of time, and as I've gotten older I've come to understand this feeling pretty well. Life is too short to waste on bullshit.
I will say though that if you get me on the subject of the church and sex I do turn into a as slathering exmo as you've seen. In that respect I do think it's corrosive and toxic. I think we all have triggers.
When you realize you were angry and bitter in order to meet the standards that originated from a man who abused his power to sleep with other men's wives... yeah I get pretty damned salty too.
It also probably has something to do with whether you feel that the church fooled you or that you fooled yourself. I fooled myself. The unfortunate side effect is that I'm now decidedly atheist in my thought processes. As teenagers it's basically guaranteed that almost everyone is in the category of the church fooling them.
Oh Harry, you're in your own bubble.Mitt Romney is not the face of Mormonism, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says, adding the former Massachusetts governor has sullied his faith.
Hes coming to a state where there are a lot of members of the LDS Church, Reid said in advance of Romneys visit later this week to Nevada, according to the Salt Lake Tribune on Monday, based on a Friday conference call Reid did with reporters. They understand that he is not the face of Mormonism.
Reid, a Mormon, said he agreed with Gregory A. Prince, a Mormon historian who wrote a blog post criticizing Romney in the wake of the Republicans remarks disparaging the 47 percent.
He said that Romney has sullied the religion that he, Prince and Romney share, Reid said on the conference call. And hes so disappointed that in his words, Its a good religion and hes hiding from it.
Republicans took issue with Reids theological dabbling.
Shame on them, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) told the Tribune. Harry Reid seems to be making this way too personal and consequently throwing the religion under the bus for his own personal gain. Thats not where anyone should be going with this. Hes taking this two steps too far.
Earlier this year, Reid alleged Romney hadnt paid any taxes for at least one year. According to a summary of Romneys tax rates released by the nominees accountant, his lowest-ever tax rate was 13.66 percent.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/81632.html
Oh Harry, you're in your own bubble.
In many ways Romney is the mormon church incarnate much more than Harry ever would be.
There's a reason everyone knows that Romney is mormon but when they hear that Reid's a mormon the typical reaction is "Really?"
Not really. I think the main thing is that they haven't stuck around long enough to see any benefit whatsoever. There is 0 upside to being a mormon teenager. Being shit on and judged constantly and made to feel worthless hardly has a good effect on people.
Yoritomo: If you're leaving out of teenage rebellion then you're probably about as likely to become a jack mormon. You say you don't experience any upside, but saying "whatever" to it all doesn't really engender resentment either.
I've seen this myself too.
This isn't about hating mormons. It's about hating the church, in which the faith and the organization itself are bound together because without the hierarchy the entire belief system loses meaning.It also comes down to understanding how an intelligent person can believe. If someone has never experienced actual belief it's hard to imagine that any sane person could possibly believe what mormons believe. When you can no longer view an adherent as a rational human it's easy to hate.
This isn't about hating mormons. It's about hating the church, in which the faith and the organization itself are bound together because without the hierarchy the entire belief system loses meaning.
And your implication that they haven't experienced true belief is insulting.
*sigh*Anyone who thinks facts or infographics will somehow bring down the faith of anyone who has has had a "spiritual" witness is sorely deluded. The assumption is easy to make when those are the loudest angriest arguments in /r/exmormon . Attributing that to teens who leave is relatively easy and solidified even more by the number of posts by teenagers living in a mormon family trying to bide their time before they're out.
Man I don't want to think about what category I'm in. Cause I think I know.Weighing on the debate that's going on, I will only say this: In my life I've seen a fair number of people go inactive. There were radically different circumstances in every case for me. The temptation to judge some has been massive for me because of the closeness of the situation. As I grow older, I express only sadness that it happens. That said, it would be uncharacteristic for me as a Saint to begrudge them the choice. The Book of Mormon teaches that among the Nephites there was no law against people believing contrary to the Church, and while I don't think Nephite civilization was the pinnacle of humanity, I find that to be a good rule.
I separate, and I beg forgiveness of the many ExMos in this thread, ExMos into two categories: The nice ones and the mean ones. Nice ones have their reasons for leaving but are still nice to active members and serve as an excellent resource in analyzing where the Church needs to work on improving itself. Mean ones are the ones whose complaints about the Church, however legitimate, are wasted by the, how shall I say, anger with which they manifest their opinions. Most of ex or less active members I've met have been nice. On my mission they would make it clear they didn't want anything, but would still give me a cup of water. I reserve further comment on the mean ones because I have just about as much nice to say about them as they do me.
I was always a Maxwell guy. But then I really found the bluster did more damage than good. So I ended up being a Hinckley/Hunter guy.Turning away from these subjects, I'm pretty stoked right now because General Conference is coming. I'm trying to convince a friend of mine to go down to Provo so we can take part in our Mission's Reunion that Saturday, so I'm super hyped for that (even as I dread it) and also because GC has been an amazing experience for me since my Mission. I know some of you don't like Elder Holland, but he's kinda my personal fave because he's all about the whole "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" take on the Gospel and even though I will swear up and down in this thread that I am as progressive as it gets inside the Church, I love me a good ol' fashioned call to repentance and nobody does them quite as well as Elder Holland. Not to me.
Why do I get the feeling this is the setup for a Mormon romantic comedy?In the continuing saga of me being FHE dad, I keep trying to convince my roommates that there is nothing going on between me and the FHE mom, and her telling her parents I'm her "FHE hubby" didn't help my case. She's a great person, but I'm not really that into her that way. FHE was pretty cool though. Porter park was FULL of FHE groups and we elected to play us some good ol' fashioned soccer and sardines, so it worked out. Oh, and Book of Mormon class online whomps. In class it's cool because we can sit and talk and stuff, but taking a religion course online is, I dunno, it's so mechanical. It takes out all the emotion, all the life and just makes it this cold study thing and that's not fun. I prefer to get myself all caught up in the Scriptures as I study them. I like to talk about what Abraham was getting at with all that stuff about stars and whether or not you can make a case for certain doctrines being in the BoM and whether or not Jesus was a super badass who ninja dodged Pharisee attempts at stoning him and walked around with his cool Apostle bros and his totally not a harem or not.
But online it's just: Read Alma 32. Talk about faith and seeds. Post on discussion board. Done.
(which is a shame, because there's so much more in Alma 32 than that ONE VERSE.)
Man I don't want to think about what category I'm in. Cause I think I know.
This reminds me of a recent event with an Elder's Quorum president. I recently moved and we got a visit from the primary president. She came and hung out for a while and asked why my 9 year old wasn't baptized I replied that while our names were still on the records we really didn't have any interest in being active. We appreciate the company and she could always come and hang but if she was hoping to reactivate us or see if we left because of sinning/offense or not understanding the teachings she'd be sorely disappointed. She was totally cool with it. She said she'd still stop by and invite my wife to enrichment.
About two weeks later I get a call from the Elder's Quorum President hearing that we had moved to the ward and the primary president told him about us and he was really anxious to meet us and see if we could talk about the church and all that. I told him the same thing, I was always up for company but he'd be disappointed if the thought this would be a reactivation campaign. He asked if he could send Home Teachers "If you know what that is." I replied that they were always welcome to visit but I knew they most likely wouldn't come. At which point he said, "Oh so you're familiar with the home teaching program." I noted that I was member for more than three decades so yeah I knew. So we talked a bit more he asked the typical stuff. Then he said, "So maybe I'll come and visit." I said he was always welcome to. He tried to share a few scriptures but after he saw that I knew them he quickly excused himself and said, "You know I'll probably not visit you."
And that was it. We never saw the Primary President or heard from Elder's Quorum President again. It's was sorta funny/sad they went from being really interested in knowing me and my family to suddenly no interest at all. Wish I could say it was abnormal.
I was always a Maxwell guy. But then I really found the bluster did more damage than good. So I ended up being a Hinckley/Hunter guy.
Why do I get the feeling this is the setup for a Mormon romantic comedy?
Hi all, I had not see this posted anywhere and thought this might be a relevant place to put it.
http://www.vice.com/en_uk/vice-news/the-mexican-mormon-war-part-1
Vice have done a story about the Mormon colonies in Mexico where Mitt Romneys father was born and where some of his family still live and how they are under attack from the cartels as well as their opinion on Mitt Romneys election promises on immigration and drugs.
I found it very interesting.
This was fascinating. However, they never really touched much on the mormonism part. Are they mormons as in LDS mormons? Or are they still polygamists? They never really tell you. Also they don't go into blood atonement for speaking so much about it. That's fine for people like us that actually know what it means but for people not in the know it would just be confusing.
I used to think that too, then I realized it was just my guilt. They're probably like "I've seen what you posted to the fanart thread Corvo. How could you?"They all have the same piercing gaze, though. My Mission President, too. Finally understand the meaning of being on the horns because there's just no lying to people who can stare you down like that.
Because if it weren't so unbearably tragic, my life would be a long string of Mormon romantic comedies. I've more or less made my peace with the fact that while I want the great love story of my life to play out like, some cosmic drama of the most beautiful and moving degree, it is doomed forever to be instead a comedy of errors.
Also, and I don't mean to preach in this thread, I always find it odd that Science classes are the ones that build up my faith the most. We had an interesting discussion about confirmation biases, the means by which people incorporate information contradictory or new to their world view into themselves and about the level of confidence vs experience/skill in something. So what I'm saying is that in a class about Issues in Global Climate Change, I was able to feel okay with the fact that some days I am not so confident in my testimony.
Which is not to say I feel my faith is shaken, but there are some days where I don't feel as sure I could move mountains as others. Except not as pompous as that.
I used to think that too, then I realized it was just my guilt. They're probably like "I've seen what you posted to the fanart thread Corvo. How could you?"
Cause you know, the brethren are totally GAFers.
I think it comes down to what you're willing to allow. For example my wife when she was going through her science core in college talked to her mom about how she (my wife) thought evolution was a cool thing and my MIL replied with "Well that's not what they teach in the temple so it's wrong."
And I can totally see her point. If you profess to believe everything in the temple unwaveringly then I can see why people are like "You can't believe in both." Further I also get the whole argument that some make about "It's just an analogy." But then I also understand the whole argument of "If you can make what you don't agree with 'just analogy' that's not religion."
I think it's a struggle. Certainly the church leadership hasn't pushed this struggle on people they tend to keep their mouth shut on the matter (as they should). But the culture does make it a struggle.
Talking about sexual repression I had a job at BYU taking old computers and refurbishing them for student use. There was not one, not one single computer that didn't have porn on it. And I'm not just talking like playboy stuff. I don't kid when I say I learned nearly every fetish I know about from BYU.
Man and there were like 3 times I walked into the BYU bathroom only to hear someone jacking off in the stall.
I don't think that's normal american stuff at all.
Which is sorta opportune that this came up because the mormon expositor just released a new podcast (I listen to podcasts when I'm coding at work) that deals with the church's stance on sex. They have a guy and his wife who left the church, a guy who is still very much in the church and a mormon therapist who is studying to be a sex therapist. It's a pretty interesting discussion and is very frank. I personally find it very interesting, for a while I was seriously considering becoming a sex therapist so this queues up my interest on several fronts.
Here's the link if you wanna listen : http://mormonexpositor.com/
To sum up:
Pros:
- The church doesn't believe that sex was the original sin. Yay!
- The church is one of the only churches that still emphasize sexual purity
Cons:
- Just about everything else is toxic to its membership (sexual impurity =almost as bad as murder, modesty, etc) and borderlines on inappropriate (grown men asking teenaged kids about their masturbation habits).
This is just the first part of a series that they're doing. I'll be interested to hear the rest.
The cycle of shame wasn't fun.
I got busted at BYU for having porn on my computer. I had to go into the Honor Code office and talk to some guy. My "punishment" was that I had my university login revoked for a semester (no big deal b/c I used my friends' login info) and had to read a mormon book and write a report on it. I delayed doing the repot till near the end of the semester, which consisted of me quickly skimming the book and throwing together a report professing my sorrow and repentance. Ah, good times.
Honor code voyeurism.my first experience with porn at BYU was actually before I took the computer job. I had a different job in the school and one day I got bored and decided to look through the history on the computer. Found some foot fetish sites. I didn't want the honor code office to think it was me so I went to the honor code office and told them what had happened.
Then they said that they couldn't do anything without proof and essentially asked me to spy to see who it was and make sure I knew for sure so they could "help" them.
I left right away. Spying on other people seemed worse than looking at pics of women's feet on penises.
Talking about sexual repression I had a job at BYU taking old computers and refurbishing them for student use. There was not one, not one single computer that didn't have porn on it. And I'm not just talking like playboy stuff. I don't kid when I say I learned nearly every fetish I know about from BYU.
Man and there were like 3 times I walked into the BYU bathroom only to hear someone jacking off in the stall.
I don't think that's normal american stuff at all.
Which is sorta opportune that this came up because the mormon expositor just released a new podcast (I listen to podcasts when I'm coding at work) that deals with the church's stance on sex. They have a guy and his wife who left the church, a guy who is still very much in the church and a mormon therapist who is studying to be a sex therapist. It's a pretty interesting discussion and is very frank. I personally find it very interesting, for a while I was seriously considering becoming a sex therapist so this queues up my interest on several fronts.
Here's the link if you wanna listen : http://mormonexpositor.com/
To sum up:
Pros:
- The church doesn't believe that sex was the original sin. Yay!
- The church is one of the only churches that still emphasize sexual purity
Cons:
- Just about everything else is toxic to its membership (sexual impurity =almost as bad as murder, modesty, etc) and borderlines on inappropriate (grown men asking teenaged kids about their masturbation habits).
This is just the first part of a series that they're doing. I'll be interested to hear the rest.
As a Mormon who's lived in Utah for the past 20 years, you guys have the weirdest stories. I've never experience stuff like this. Most of my childhood was in AZ though, completely different culture.
Yeah, growing up in Utah and having a very, very diverse group of friends, I still never say 99% of the stuff people in this thread say that they commonly faced. Ah well, some of us are put through different courses in life and it's up to us to decide how we want to respond to external influences on our attitudes.