infinityBCRT said:
I'm amazed by how many people forget how the previous games actually were received...
Metascores:
Mortal Kombat - 86
Mortal Kombat vs DC - 76
Mortal Kombat Armageddon - 71
Mortal Kombat Shaolin Monks - 77
Mortal Kombat Deception - 81
Mortal Kombat Deadly Alliance - 79
So yeah, the previous games weren't complete ass. So people on podcasts, please stop pulling it outta your ass that they sucked when you probably didn't play those games.
I played them all except MKvsDC, and in my opinion they were awful when compared to the original 2D games and most other 3D fighters. MK is a popular franchise that has always been popular. It's as iconic to the world of videogames as Mario. Long as it's an MK fighting game and there are fatalities (or DC characters I guess) people will buy it, and many of them will love it. It's legendary.
But none of the 3D games delivered the goods. There's a lot of love for Deception, but as a fighting game, it pales in comparison to anything outside the franchise. It's only notable for not being as weak as Deadly Alliance, or as stripped down as Armageddon. Compared to other fighting games, it's only notable for having awesome fatalities.
This is coming from someone who loved MK4. I love MK as a concept, and I wanted every one of those games to be good. I felt disappointed by the combat engine every time. It took the MK9 demo to convince me that things had truly changed - I was extremely skeptical of the game before I got to try it myself, despite all the great preview press and the trailers.
These are just my opinions, but I think they're shared by a large number of MK fans, regardless of metacritic.
Edit: Obviously I'm only talking about the MK games in the fighting genre. Shaolin Monks is amazing, but I don't ever hear anyone bashing that game. It doesn't really need defending.