I don't share this positive view of him.
Yeah he does these charity stunts, but the whole course of his channel has always been this extremely exploitative "watch me (maybe) give this person a huge wad of cash because I'm rich" and it's the most depressing shit to feed to millions of kids every day, who latch onto this wealth obsession hard
Honestly, he made the world a worse place by a mile. He led this style of content and its dominance to young viewers. It's cynical and gross no matter how much he does the charity video here and there to try and offset it.
Tbh, I don't think the videos you've highlighted there are playing much of a role in dismantling society.
I think the whole rich people giving poor people stuff for likes is a particularly grim genre of YouTube video - I've seen enough videos that pair "emotional" music with first person footage of someone giving a homeless person a big mac meal (always junkfood, why is it never something good?) and waiting to be told "bless your heart" in the comments section a few hundred times. That is indeed exploitative and yucky imo.
I think Mr Beast's model is essentially to make money from merchandising and other business while he invests everything his videos make into making the next video, and this is how his stunts have become ever more extravagant. So, I think that when you see him being rich and (maybe) giving things to people, that he is actually just giving people things that his videos have earnt. I think he really is giving people things. So, in that sense I think he's a self made man. He's not really flaunting his wealth, he's got a video making business that uses all it's money to make more videos.
For whatever reason, people do seem to like seeing pizza delivery guys arrive at a house and be told that the house is theirs if they would like it. And how terrible that is, I guess, is through the eye of the beholder. The "last to take your hand off" videos are a bit of a sitcom trope, afaik, I don't know how often it happens in American Malls, but I've seen the setup in a number of different TV shows, so I assume it's not a whole new level of exploitation dreamt up by Mr Beast.
And in defense of his charitable causes, firstly he absolutely didn't need to do it. He would have been massive just giving cars and houses to people, or staging Squid Game recreations, or playing hide and seek in deserted stadiums. In a sense, he's making and presenting the ultimate gameshow, over and over again. For as long as anyone can remember, people have been appearing on TV to try and win money, cars and holidays. It's no different really. I think current Mr Beast videos are actually amongst the best gameshows on TV - the aforementioned Squid Game video, the recent one which pit one person of every age in a battle of wits to steal the prize, the real time escape video he did recently etc. Etc. I'm not really sure he's doing anything really new in a lot of his videos but he is doing it with a modern spin and crucially is doing it really very well, maybe better than anyone else.
But where this is different is that if you were the head of a TV channel you absolutely would not sign off on Steve Harvey leaving the TV studio to go plant some trees instead of presenting Family Feud. The ratings would crater. Or at least they would once you'd done that a few times.
That might be why Mr Beast has spun those things off to his philanthropy channel now, but A) he has a philanthropy channel, unlike the other YouTubers, and B) he absolutely has manage to spotlight some big problems and deliver some real benefit to the world. When was the last time someone got Jimmy Kimmel to talk about cleaning up the ocean?
When was the last time a YouTuber got 20m trees planted?
When was the last time it was explained to you that some people are blind because they can't afford a relatively simple operation?
How often do YouTubers dig drinking water wells in Africa?
Etc. Etc.
As said above, he didn't need to do these things, he was already wildly popular just making videos giving people 1 minute to buy whatever they wanted in Walmart.
And so, while there are things about YouTube that absolutely are exploitative, I'm not really of the opinion that Mr Beast is in the same category, I think he's mostly making gameshows now. And nobody has a problem with them elsewhere. I also think he's doing it better - it's just good entertainment, he's doing it better than the TV channels (and arguably no less professionally at this point). And if Steve Harvey makes a video where he funds a homeless shelter for a year, the question is would you hold up that he's made some fairly cruel jokes about some stupid people's answers on his TV show, which I might add people have only appeared on to try and win money, or would you congratulate him for doing something good?
And he's 26.
I think you could probably put Mr Beast on the unblock list if you were worried that YouTube was going to lead to moral decline.