You mean the BioShock and Mass Effect that they took a chance on and published? Sony had been doing that since Crash Bandicoot. FYI, Microsoft Game Studios or whatever the fuck was the name back then came up whenever you booted those games. Mentioning Gears being "kept off" of PS shows you don't know much of what you're talking about, anyway.Yep. They also kept Bioshock and Mass Effect off PlayStation platforms. And while Epic probably can't quote much on it, they kept Gears of War off too.
They said no to cross platform play and later decided it was only okay if users had an XBOX Live or Microsoft account.
Microsoft were massive dicks.
Imagine trying to equate an unknown such as this to what's going on now, lmao.To this day, I don't know how Splinter Cell: Conviction isn't on PlayStation platforms. It's owned by Ubisoft for christ sakes.
Which they learned from Nintendo, albeit a much softer approach to their draconian NES days.Sony has been in the console industry longer than Microsoft and was doing it before the original Xbox ever released.
There is literally no context to make it not shitty.Only fools ignore context and believe only the headlines like some in this thread are doing.
Isn't that supposed to be cloud episodic game? If its true ain't happening. If that's the case how much yiu are willing to bet?
Sorry, had to remove the silly GIF.
I fixed that for you.
Perhaps you don't understand, but this money hatting business was started by Microsoft. Sony did it (and still are doing it) in response to Microsoft.
For first party fine. For third party it's bullcrap unless they helped with development.Both camps do it so its pretty simple either play on multiple platforms or miss out
But...
![]()
Yep, I can imagine that the game will still work without cloud, just at a reduced scope.It's a cloud enhanced game, meaning it will use elements of cloud to add to the game like Flight Sim 2020 already does. Which is also available on retail.
[/URL]
Probably similar to Death Stranding with the change of terrain by others setting up roads, ziplines, etc..Yep, I can imagine that the game will still work without cloud, just at a reduced scope.
lol Yeah. I never bought into the good guy act of these suits. Singing kumbaya while stabbing each other in the back with multi billion acquistions then saying hey we only spent billions to keep everything multiplatform. Nonsense.I find it so refreshing when they take direct shots at each other. Much better to debate what was said than what was implied / not-said.
Didn't they have a list that was redacted?
It doesn't matter to me in all honesty as I play on all platforms and don't pledge my undying allegiance to one plastic box or the other because those companies don't really give a crap about me anyhowFor first party fine. For third party it's bullcrap unless they helped with development.
Cod is much bigger then elder scrollsStarfield is planned as an Xbox/PC exclusive. That game would have been on Playstation if not for the Bethesda acquisition. Also judging by Spencer's comments (that have been hard to pin down) it sounds like Elder Scrolls 6 will also be Xbox/PC exclusive. These are massive games so I don't see how the logic changes for CoD or any of the other ActiBliz franchises. I would imagine the only reason Minecraft is still on everything is because that's what Microsoft's strategy was at the time and it would be weird now to remove Minecraft from Playstation in retrospect.
Is there a chance this goes through this month so we can just enjoy the cod announcements next month and stop with the acquisition talk.
Have you not said you prefer PlayStation? Maybe I am misremembering.It doesn't matter to me in all honesty as I play on all platforms and don't pledge my undying allegiance to one plastic box or the other because those companies don't really give a crap about me anyhow
Besides everything is up for sale even our favorite games
I do prefer Playstation but I play everywhereHave you not said you prefer PlayStation? Maybe I am misremembering.
I don't know if they do. Look at the PS Extra drop this month and it's a mostly a bunch of games that are currently on Gamepass. That wouldn't happen if they had those types of agreements.Sony being petty, Microsoft are probably petty in some way. I'm sure they will have an agreement to stop a game being on ps plus if it is on game pass? If they don't that pretty damn cool but I doubt that will be happening.
Again a misunderstand of the finances; you don't need to pay off the purchase cost. You need to make sure the value of the division doesn't drop and the ROI is better than the alternative one of which is keeping it in a bank or stock buybacks.This is a business. No one spends $70 billion to add the mere $2-3 billion profits to their portfolio. It would take 20-30 years to pay off this purchase. Nah, this deal was made to get Sony to fold or bring sony into gamepass. Plain and simple. It's console wars at its finest. Whether or not it is a monopoly or ethical is besides the point. I just dont care for the whole congratulating each other on twitter while going out there and fighting in court like a divorced couple. Be honest FFS.
It's almost as if it's a game by game basis. Almost.I don't know if they do. Look at the PS Extra drop this month and it's a mostly a bunch of games that are currently on Gamepass. That wouldn't happen if they had those types of agreements.
Still waiting for you to prove even 1 of them.It's almost as if it's a game by game basis. Almost.
You are not new to gaming, so stop pretending to still be purposely obtuse.Still waiting for you to prove even 1 of them.
I don't know if they do. Look at the PS Extra drop this month and it's a mostly a bunch of games that are currently on Gamepass. That wouldn't happen if they had those types of agreements.
Still waiting for you to prove even 1 of them.
That's twice you've called me obtuse and 0 times you've replied with anything substantial.You are not new to gaming, so stop pretending to still be purposely obtuse.
Bro, it's called gaming history and how marketing and other closed door deals work. I also did not call you obtuse, I said you are pretending to be. You know the game, but carry on.That's twice you've called me obtuse and 0 times you've replied with anything substantial.
It's right in the court filing in the OP. (Names of games seem to be redacted)And when are you going to prove that Sony paid devs to keep games off of Gamepass (without there being some marketing or exclusive deal being the reason)?
Fears Gamepass?Sony clearly fears Game Pass and what putting CoD day and date will mean for them. But not wanting to compete with the Game Pass model is not the same as can't compete. They basically are crying and have no real argument.
And when are you going to prove that Sony paid devs to keep games off of Gamepass (without there being some marketing or exclusive deal being the reason?
And when are you going to prove that Sony paid devs to keep games off of Gamepass (without there being some marketing or exclusive deal being the reason)?
He knows that, he's pretending it's not real because the names aren't listedIt's right in the court filing in the OP. (Names of games seem to be redacted)
That's not what he is saying.He knows that, he's pretending it's not real because the names aren't listed
I'm confused.. how is the bold statement not Sony paying to keep games off of Gamepass?
They do it via those marketing deals.
It's right in the court filing in the OP. (Names of games seem to be redacted)
I'm confused.. how is the bold statement not Sony paying to keep games off of Gamepass?
They do it via those marketing deals.
We've seen the capcom contracts stopping re village and also Microsoft can't say this stuff without it being true. That's literally breaking the law so Sony has to do it.
not just marketing deals, this new info implies they get into deals for the main purpose of keeping games off of game pass.
If they pay to keep them off, that becomes a marketing deal. So I guess your answer will always be 0 based on your dumb set of parameters.No, I'm talking about paying to keep them off WITHOUT a marketing deal. People are in here acting stupid. As if it makes sense for Sony to have a marketing deal for a 3rd party game, while allowing it on GamePass. That's stupid!
Sony literally deployed Monopoly tactics for PS+ this month. Uno too.Those sound like monopoly tactics.![]()
If they pay to keep them off, that becomes a marketing deal. So I guess your answer will always be 0 based on your dumb set of parameters.
Doesn't change anything though.
Well, one of the main reasons Sony even entered into a marketing deal might be that they wanted to prevent the game to come to Gamepass.Sony paid money to a developer for a marketing deal, and then it can't be on GamePass.
nah only COD and OW2, they can make games like Diablo 4 exclusive, most of this game IP audience on PC anyways. pretty much any games outside COD and OW2 can become exclusive because they can take loss for these other IP to grow platform and GP. also you have a game like WOW not even on consoles so they can make it exclusive if they decided to make new big game from WOW IPIf these statements are true, then it pretty much confirms that COD and other major Activision franchises will continue releasing on PlayStation for the foreseeable future...or at least until the money MS is wiling to sacrifice by not releasing on PlayStation is offset by some other area such as substantial GamePass revenue/adoption (which may very well happen if all future COD games became GamePass accessible from Day-1 going forward).
No, I'm talking about paying to keep them off WITHOUT a marketing deal. People are in here acting stupid. As if it makes sense for Sony to have a marketing deal for a 3rd party game, while allowing it on GamePass. That's stupid!
That language has been in there for their deals before Gamepass was ever conceived. But we get it, new ammo for the console war. Gafs favorite game.Well, one of the main reasons Sony even entered into a marketing deal might be that they wanted to prevent the game to come to Gamepass.
Do we know this? Gimme receipts.That language has been in there for their deals before Gamepass was ever conceived. But we get it, new ammo for the console war. Gafs favorite game.
No, I'm talking about paying to keep them off WITHOUT a marketing deal. People are in here acting stupid. As if it makes sense for Sony to have a marketing deal for a 3rd party game, while allowing it on GamePass. That's stupid!
Sony pays for "blocking rights" to prevent developers from adding content to Game Pass and other competing subscription services (then there is a bunch of redacted content).