The Faceless Master
Member
unless there's some weird bottleneck or secret sauce or intentional borking, it should go PC > PS4 > XB1 for everymultiplatform release, well, as far as graphics are concerned.
The PS4 will have the definitive version of any game because you can sell it if it sucks.
will be PC >>>> PS4 > XbOne
Of course, you mean a PC with a 1.000 bucks graphic card inside. Don't you?
Yeah, by the time either console has a library considering its purchase, you'll be able to buy a more beefy PC at a reasonable price. 770GTX costs $400 and murders PS4 performance-wise (though it has much less RAM), a year from now it's going to be even more lopesided. Chances are if you have a desktop PC you already have a much much more powerful CPU than the Jaguar found in consoles.That's if you buy one now. In a year, you'll probably only need to spend half that, in 2 years a quarter, etc...
will be PC >>>> PS4 > XbOne
That's if you buy one now. In a year, you'll probably only need to spend half that, in 2 years a quarter, etc...
ps4 is known to be more powerful but pc is always definitive
This.No, the technology gulf is larger, if anything, it'll be more of that.
PC gaming GAF won't need to build a brand new PC, just replacing the graphics card will be good enough. And $400 GPU will give you much better graphics than PS4 indeed.I really doubt you will be able to spend 500 dollars and get a PC that outputs much better graphics than PS4 in a year. Also this thread was about consoles, can we leave the smug PC bragging for other threads?
This.
Even if the games are coded with parity in mind, surely the faster RAM on PS4 will simply cope better under strain? Or am I being naive?
Well, as a European, I usually have a 3 day buffer period due to the shitty release delay
Also, I remember buying L.A Noire on PS3 based on one of those comparisons, so that must have been in that skewed release period.
No, but my point is, where the XBone version would maybe struggle with a building crumbling in BF4 (random unsubstantiated example), surely DICE couldn't tell the PS4's RAM to hold back so as not to upstage XBone? If the processor cycles are there, they'll get used right?Well, if the game looks and runs the same on the Xbox One you will know that the developer has a deal with Microsoft.
Apparently DF's LA Noire comparison was put up a few days after the EU release date (23rd versus the 20th). Lens of Truth's comparison was put up on the 19th, though; you might be thinking of that?
Going back to GTAV for a moment, I'd be surprised if the PS3 version came out on top, given the history of RAGE games on the two consoles. I'd say the exception of LA Noire could be chalked down to it beginning life as a PS3 exclusive and I don't think it was ever clarified just how much RAGE tech the game uses.
They've been demoing it to media on PS3, I think it'll at least be about equal this time around.Apparently DF's LA Noire comparison was put up a few days after the EU release date (23rd versus the 20th). Lens of Truth's comparison was put up on the 19th, though; you might be thinking of that?
Going back to GTAV for a moment, I'd be surprised if the PS3 version came out on top, given the history of RAGE games on the two consoles. I'd say the exception of LA Noire could be chalked down to it beginning life as a PS3 exclusive and I don't think it was ever clarified just how much RAGE tech the game uses.
Yeah, by the time either console has a library considering its purchase, you'll be able to buy a more beefy PC at a reasonable price. 770GTX costs $400 and murders PS4 performance-wise (though it has much less RAM), a year from now it's going to be even more lopesided. Chances are if you have a desktop PC you already have a much much more powerful CPU than the Jaguar found in consoles.
And yes, RAGE is usually better on the 360 and that's where I got all my Rockstar games, however as many has pointed out, they have consistently shown off GTA V on a PS3. Now that could indicate lead platform due to more recent compiled builds which could leave that as the 'definitive' version. So it's still up in the air. Still, it annoys me that you have to go through all this.
They've been demoing it to media on PS3, I think it'll at least be about equal this time around.
I would think performance would be the differentiating factor in that instance. IQ is usually pre determined by the dev, performance improvements will simply come about due to the raw horsepower on tap.The architecture and devloping environment seem so similar that it sounds like all devs have to do is copy and paste their code from X1 to PS4 and it'll run better.
Of course it's not that simple but that's the impression you get.
I think the real differences now will be voice commands + cloud vs better iq + no drm.
PS4 might be more powerful but it's up to the devs. If they can't use its "theoretical" power correctly or don't have time/budget etc to exploit it I doubt we'll see much difference. Even I think some Xb1 version might be running better.
But all of that is speculation. Let's wait to see the actual games running on final h/w and people doing pixel/frame count.
The PS4 will have the definitive version of any game because you can sell it if it sucks.
I would think performance would be the differentiating factor in that instance. IQ is usually pre determined by the dev, performance improvements will simply come about due to the raw horsepower on tap.
Well if specs are to be believed the difference is even larger, and in favor of the PS4. But due to politics we haven't gotten our hands on any multiplatform comparison, and most likely won't for quite some time. I for one can't wait for the comparisons because a cynical part of me think it's being exaggerated, either people have overestimated or overlooked something or because 3rd parties will to achieve parity for one reason or the other.
I really hope I get proven wrong, with PS4 SKU's looking noticeably better "by default."
You fill me with hope and optimism, Matt.
PC gaming GAF won't need to build a brand new PC, just replacing the graphics card will be good enough. And $400 GPU will give you much better graphics than PS4 indeed.
No, the technology gulf is larger, if anything, it'll be more of that.
Why do people bring up pc when the topic at hand is about PS4vsXbox1? Why does it still need to be discussed that when you pay for a gpu that cost as much as your console will obviously give you better graphics?
Considering how much more powerful some of the PC cards are, if anything we should see a drop off of people needing to upgrade. Although, I expect optimization to mean PC will need to brute force a some of the stuff optimized on consoles.
Richard Leadbetter had better go and find himself another job!
ps4 is known to be more powerful but pc is always definitive
Well as I said, whatever CPU is there in your desktop CPU is leaps and bounds better than the Jaguar in PS4/Xbone. So you pretty much only need to upgrade GPU and a $400 graphics card is going to be a lot more powerful than PS4.That's a lot of assumptions there. What about MANY people who don't have gaming PCs or their gaming PCs are getting old?
PC gaming GAF won't need to build a brand new PC, just replacing the graphics card will be good enough. And $400 GPU will give you much better graphics than PS4 indeed.
Higher rendering resolutions, higher resolution of stuff like shader effects and shadows, higher framerates, optional stuff like Oculus Rift support etc.How will you get "much" better graphics? Does it magically add polygons and character models that weren't present in the other versions?
ps4 is known to be more powerful but pc is always definitive
Not at all. I want to play everything that looks good, any genre. Right now there's 8 for PS4 on my upcoming games .txt, 13 for Xbone, and 14 for Wii U.Being only PC will mean you will not be able to play most of bigger games.
If you are gamer then PC+console is must.
Well as I said, whatever CPU is there in your desktop CPU is leaps and bounds better than the Jaguar in PS4/Xbone. So you pretty much only need to upgrade GPU and a $400 graphics card is going to be a lot more powerful than PS4.
If you don't have a PC, then buying a new one certainly requires a bigger investment, but then again its functionality is greater than just games, so you might find some use in it.
Then they'll upgrade their GPU and will have definitive versions of multiplatform games.I know a crapload of people who have 3-4 year old PCs and are perfectly content with them since their programs work fine. Again, you're assuming that everyone is a PC gamer that updates their PC frequently.
IF you thought this gen had a "definitive version" with the microsopic differences you see this gen...
Then they'll upgrade their GPU and will have definitive versions of multiplatform games.