:lol Wow.wizword said:The review is great. It is funny, well written, and tells you what the game is about. Ignore the fanboy bullshit here right now.
This one's a fun read.Rad- said:
:lol Wow.wizword said:The review is great. It is funny, well written, and tells you what the game is about. Ignore the fanboy bullshit here right now.
This one's a fun read.Rad- said:
wizword said:The review is great. It is funny, well written, and tells you what the game is about. Ignore the fanboy bullshit here right now.
Shogun PaiN said:Who say's you aren't going to be? The game has so far received more 9's than anything else :/
Buckethead said:Good job BLR. Great stuff as always.
Eurogamer complaints weren't directed at the game pacing, music, ,atmosphere aspects, or those elements. It was directed towards the story contriving too much of its elements from pop culture references and her complaints about alan wake controls. She completely justifies why she didn't enjoy the game (with one overexaggeration about how this would be an excellent game 3 years ago which is superflous) however, her review was actually decent compared to some other reviews (nzgamer was well written too). I don't care about the score because I just trust 5 sources because they usually give the best reviews. Gamespot, Eurogamer, Edge, ArsTechnica, and Kotaku.Lunchbox said:no it doesnt bro
read it again, go
Alan Wake has some very definite faults, but this is still a superb experience that manages to outweigh all of its problems with some truly unique and special moments, tons of character and a story that manages to be convincingly inventive despite its tendency to veer into somewhat silly territory. Anything it could do to irritate the player is quickly made up for with a consistently striking character, intriguing cutscene, or thrilling stand-off against an encroaching force of possessed and gibbering mountain hicks. Alan Wake wears its own anomalous sense of style with pride and that alone earns enough credit to spend on inefficient dodging or unfair ambush attacks.
In short, it's a must-have Xbox 360 title that provides a freshness and dynamism that horror games have been achingly lacking for the past several years. And it's done all of this without an awkward, unwarranted, ill-fitting sex scene!
Score: 9.0 -- Superb (9s are a hallmark of excellence. There may be flaws, but they are negligible and won't cause massive damage to what is a supreme title.)
wizword said:I don't care about the score because I just trust 5 sources because they usually give the best reviews. Gamespot, Eurogamer, Edge, ArsTechnica, and Kotaku.
gamespot is a much better than site IGN, it's nothing like Jeff Gertsmann era but it's still better than IGN. The guy who fired Jeff got fired a few months after, the site is pretty good right now and reviews are quite fair to be honest.Lunchbox said:need to get better sources bro
gb quicklook >
Chittagong said:Polarized reviews. I'm guessing the "tough guys" are going to 7 it just to stir up some controversy. If they are Heavy Rain 7s, I'm fine.
So still super excited. I really hope they get to do DLC and sequels.
Yeah, they're 'polarized' at the one pole. :lolChittagong said:Polarized reviews. I'm guessing the "tough guys" are going to 7 it just to stir up some controversy. If they are Heavy Rain 7s, I'm fine.
So still super excited. I really hope they get to do DLC and sequels.
The ones on the OP haven't been taken bro.Broadbandito said:i missed avatars
BruceLeeRoy said:The ones on the OP haven't been taken bro.
Chittagong said:Polarized reviews. I'm guessing the "tough guys" are going to 7 it just to stir up some controversy. If they are Heavy Rain 7s, I'm fine.
So still super excited. I really hope they get to do DLC and sequels.
Polarized if the scale is from 7-10. Every review is positive. The game seems great.Chittagong said:Polarized reviews. I'm guessing the "tough guys" are going to 7 it just to stir up some controversy. If they are Heavy Rain 7s, I'm fine.
So still super excited. I really hope they get to do DLC and sequels.
miladesn said:low score from 1up, I'm surprised! Splinter Cell got A- from there :|.
Wiseblood said:Giantbomb Quicklook: http://www.giantbomb.com/quick-look-alan-wake/17-2431/
Lunchbox said:theres only 4 bro, make some more
btw, quick look > any review. im sold halfway through that
:lol :lol Seriously, what an assy comment to make.BruceLeeRoy said::lol Yes sir. Ill have more tomorrow so if none of those strike your fancy check back.
lybertyboy said:A B+ from Scooter is a good score. Also, he didn't review Splinter Cell.
The Good
* Strong story, good voice acting
* The characters and settings feel real and fleshed-out
* Genuine scares and surprises
* Reading the manuscript to get new insights into the game world and the people in it is a neat way to deliver exposition
* The ending is one of the creepier moments in gaming
* Even the lowliest enemies can pose a threat
* Wonderful use of licensed music
* Sense of humor that doesn't seem out of place
* The episodic nature of the story and gameplay keeps you interested in what's going to happen next
* The faux TV programs that play throughout the game are hilarious
The Bad
* The game is rather shortexpect around eight hours to beat it
* Some of the sections where you're simply walking or driving from one place to the next are tiresome and drag on way too long
* The product placement is seriously distracting and out of place
The Ugly
* People who enjoy their stories ending with a neat conclusion, all wrapped up in a bow... are going to scream when they finish this
Verdict: Rent
Lunchbox said:youre an M$ shill, why should i listen to you?
Lunchbox said:youre an M$ shill, why should i listen to you?
Ars:
The Bad
* The game is rather shortexpect around eight hours to beat it
watership said:That can't be right. Everyone is saying 12-14 hours, even without being completionists.
* People who enjoy their stories ending with a neat conclusion, all wrapped up in a bow... are going to scream when they finish this
watership said:That can't be right. Everyone is saying 12-14 hours, even without being completionists.
watership said:That can't be right. Everyone is saying 12-14 hours, even without being completionists.
Jtyettis said:It's been varying on average mostly 10-20 first run. Couple of sites run it at 8. Although I would still think with the unlocks the replay should be valued.
It's the same as Ars' Heavy Rain review... both games are considered great experiences, but much too short for a purchase recommendation.BruceLeeRoy said:Hmm I have to read the article because based on the bullet points I am not really understanding why this is only a rental.
Most reviewers play games on easy difficulty, rushing through them to write the review before the deadline .watership said:That can't be right. Everyone is saying 12-14 hours, even without being completionists.
I've been on blackout for some time so no in-game media for me.Iced_Eagle said:Must... Resist...
Well, when you ask so nicely...Lunchbox said:theres only 4 bro, make some moreBruceLeeRoy said:The ones on the OP haven't been taken bro.
Lunchbox said:newgame+ ?
For the collectors amongst us, there are 100 Coffee Thermoses to find, 13 TV Shows to watch, 12 Radio Shows to listen to, and a smattering of hidden caches and signs to find. There are over 100 manuscript pages to find, some of which only discoverable on the highest difficulty levels, which provide a great deal of the compelling storyline. Not since Batman Arkham Asylum have I felt this compelled to find every single thing in the game. All told, you can complete all 6 of the Episodes of Alan Wake in roughly 10 to 12 hours, but itll take you far longer to discover everything in the game. Every copy of the game will ship with a token for the first DLC Episode, so expect more Alan Wake after you complete the content on the disc.
Wiseblood said:Giantbomb Quicklook: http://www.giantbomb.com/quick-look-alan-wake/17-2431/