• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NBA 2015- 16 Regular Season IOTI - NBA GAF Is Pretty Dead Considering This Fact

Cheebo

Banned
Man, I realize that a lot of people have no sympathy for us...but jesus christ do we need it right now. Lakers of course don't need to be dominant, but for them to at least play solid BBall and get some wins....is that really a big fucking deal to the haters(especially since a lot of these haters are folks who lost to the Lakers like...ten years ago.)? Just because we get the 8th seed doesn't mean we're going to win a title, guys.

What makes the Lakers deserving of a 8th seed over the other teams that would otherwise be fighting for it such as the Utah Jazz? What makes them more deserving of sympathy of any other team who would fight for that spot?

The answer is, nothing. No team is deserving of a playoff spot or sympathy. It's all about talent. The 8 most talented teams deserve to make the playoffs in each conference.
 

commish

Jason Kidd murdered my dog in cold blood!
Even though I've loved Kobe for years, I am kind of enjoying his humbling this season so far. The guy just refuses to adapt his game to his current skills/team needs.
 
Yeah I understand it takes time, and he did look better in the end. But I can't help but be anxious over it, and he was looking pretty flat footed for a good while. Not against the greatest of opposition either. But yeah, his play in the fourth was reassuring.
Don't be, it's just a matter of time. Pretty confident come March this team will start figuring it out. If Kawhi keeps getting better on the offensive end without any injuries... Whoo boy.

Yeah dunno. Honestly more worried about parker. Looked done at the Euro, isn't looking all that much better now. Mills looked a lot better to me.
Parker is aging. Fast. Throwing his body on the court for so many years has taken its toll, and he isn't going to be quite the same as he was years ago. I've said for the past year that Parker has looked like he needs to retire before Duncan and even Manu some days.
 
I wouldn't worry about the Spurs. Pop treats the first quarter of the season like an extension of preseason anyways. You can't really judge the team until after the Allstar break
 

Pachimari

Member
I'm watching the Kings vs Lakers from Oct 30 now and I like what I see of Kings and Rondo.

That said, wow are we playing bad. Is it normal I should be frustrated at Kobe Bryant? Sometimes it seems like he doesn't care much.

I like Clarkson's shots.
 
I believed!!!


(Not really, that 1st half was just horrendous!! Still, an amazing 2nd half!)

I really hope they pay Whiteside when the time comes and let the pipe dream of KD to Miami go away. There is no math possible that would make KD+Whiteside+Wade possible, so I rather have them keep HW than try and strike out with KD and ALSO lose HW.

Yep, honestly looking forward, I think the priority should be to strengthen their rotation. The Second Unit shouldn't rely on just Gerald Green to be their offensive threat. Also with this likely being Birdman's last year, and I honestly don't see the Stoudemire experiment panning out, getting a new back-up center will be a must.
 

xHiryu

Member
Haven't written here in a while, so instead of studying, I'ma procrastinate on GAF.

Still think that the Russell pick for the Lakers wasn't the best choice, they should have gone with either Okafor mainly or a high upside pick like Hezonja. Idk why they would pick him when Clarkson seems to have the lead point guard duties, but then again Bryon Scott is a terribad player development coach. Hoping to see the young Laker nucleus develop together, especially Randle and Russell.

Also Sixers should've drafted Mudiay instead of another center, creating a logjam at center (although its a good problem to have, 3 good young centers). Some combination of Mudiay, Noel and maybe Ingram of this incoming draft class could have been something special. Sixers haven't been making any real progress it seems except for Noel. Embiid seems like he could be a two-way dominant force at center when hes actually healthy and on the court, but all this talk of his work ethic and his attitude really aren't a good look for his future. Speaking of future, Timberwolves and Magic are the two up-incoming teams for their respective conferences, although the Timberwolves seem like their gonna be sick in the future, considering if they get another lottery pick.

Thunder are looking like a problem and its only been the first few games of the season. I got Thunder and Warriors in the west conference finals while it'll be Bulls and Cavs in the east conference finals. Thunder and Cavs advance (unless Bulls somehow gain consistency and continuity within the roster), and Thunder win it all.
Durant then splits from OKC and goes to the NY Bricks.
 
Haven't written here in a while, so instead of studying, I'ma procrastinate on GAF.

Still think that the Russell pick for the Lakers wasn't the best choice, they should have gone with either Okafor mainly or a high upside pick like Hezonja. Idk why they would pick him when Clarkson seems to have the lead point guard duties, but then again Bryon Scott is a terribad player development coach. Hoping to see the young Laker nucleus develop together, especially Randle and Russell.

Also Sixers should've drafted Mudiay instead of another center, creating a logjam at center (although its a good problem to have, 3 good young centers). Some combination of Mudiay, Noel and maybe Ingram of this incoming draft class could have been something special. Sixers haven't been making any real progress it seems except for Noel. Embiid seems like he could be a two-way dominant force at center when hes actually healthy and on the court, but all this talk of his work ethic and his attitude really aren't a good look for his future. Speaking of future, Timberwolves and Magic are the two up-incoming teams for their respective conferences, although the Timberwolves seem like their gonna be sick in the future, considering if they get another lottery pick.

Thunder are looking like a problem and its only been the first few games of the season. I got Thunder and Warriors in the west conference finals while it'll be Bulls and Cavs in the east conference finals. Thunder and Cavs advance (unless Bulls somehow gain consistency and continuity within the roster), and Thunder win it all.
Durant then splits from OKC and goes to the NY Bricks.

I think this is one of those hindsight is 20/20 deals (Mudiay looks good now but I'm sure scouting was fairly limited given that he spent the year playing pro ball in China). Hinkie is all about value and the safer bet in this case is to draft a big man. The common rule of thumb for GM trades is that you almost never trade a decent 1 big man for 1 wing player. By having a logjam at the frontcourt, he can leverage that to get a talented wing + stuff down the line. I'm not saying Mudiay wouldn't have been better (I like his game thus far), but it's just the safer bet at that point in time.
 
Haven't written here in a while, so instead of studying, I'ma procrastinate on GAF.

Still think that the Russell pick for the Lakers wasn't the best choice, they should have gone with either Okafor mainly or a high upside pick like Hezonja. Idk why they would pick him when Clarkson seems to have the lead point guard duties, but then again Bryon Scott is a terribad player development coach. Hoping to see the young Laker nucleus develop together, especially Randle and Russell.

Also Sixers should've drafted Mudiay instead of another center, creating a logjam at center (although its a good problem to have, 3 good young centers). Some combination of Mudiay, Noel and maybe Ingram of this incoming draft class could have been something special. Sixers haven't been making any real progress it seems except for Noel. Embiid seems like he could be a two-way dominant force at center when hes actually healthy and on the court, but all this talk of his work ethic and his attitude really aren't a good look for his future. Speaking of future, Timberwolves and Magic are the two up-incoming teams for their respective conferences, although the Timberwolves seem like their gonna be sick in the future, considering if they get another lottery pick.

Thunder are looking like a problem and its only been the first few games of the season. I got Thunder and Warriors in the west conference finals while it'll be Bulls and Cavs in the east conference finals. Thunder and Cavs advance (unless Bulls somehow gain consistency and continuity within the roster), and Thunder win it all.
Durant then splits from OKC and goes to the NY Bricks.

I think it's way too early to make judgements on draft picks. I think everyone knew Mudiay (and Okafor, to some extent) were going to perform early in his NBA career because he has an NBA body. Similar to Tyreke Evans, who after his rookie year probably had some people thinking he should have gone before Blake Griffin or James Harden.
 

xHiryu

Member
I think this is one of those hindsight is 20/20 deals (Mudiay looks good now but I'm sure scouting was fairly limited given that he spent the year playing pro ball in China). Hinkie is all about value and the safer bet in this case is to draft a big man. The common rule of thumb for GM trades is that you almost never trade a decent 1 big man for 1 wing player. By having a logjam at the frontcourt, he can leverage that to get a talented wing + stuff down the line. I'm not saying Mudiay wouldn't have been better (I like his game thus far), but it's just the safer bet at that point in time.

Of course its one of those hindsight situations but like most, you can't help but wonder what if? But then again, this is all merely just some thoughts at the very beginning of the season. Wonders whats gonna happen if Embiid actually plays an NBA game, who gets benched between Noel, Okafor, and Embiid?

I think it's way too early to make judgements on draft picks. I think everyone knew Mudiay (and Okafor, to some extent) were going to perform early in his NBA career because he has an NBA body. Similar to Tyreke Evans, who after his rookie year probably had some people thinking he should have gone before Blake Griffin or James Harden.

Well duh, its very early in the season. As a regular fan, I have no knowledge of the drafting process and etc., but as a fan, it seems more logical to draft for need (but Hinkie drafted the best possible player) in this situation, whom is an athletic PG who can playmake with a proven track record of professional league play, especially when they just traded their mediocre starting PG for a pick. But we'll see how this Sixers experiment is gonna play out, to me its one of the more interesting storylines in the NBA.
 
Of course its one of those hindsight situations but like most, you can't help but wonder what if? But then again, this is all merely just some thoughts at the very beginning of the season. Wonders whats gonna happen if Embiid actually plays an NBA game, who gets benched between Noel, Okafor, and Embiid? .

Whoever underperforms. I don't think the 3rd big would stick around past his rookie contract anyways as Hinkie will just flip him for a talented wing player + pick(s).
 
Of course its one of those hindsight situations but like most, you can't help but wonder what if? But then again, this is all merely just some thoughts at the very beginning of the season. Wonders whats gonna happen if Embiid actually plays an NBA game, who gets benched between Noel, Okafor, and Embiid?



Well duh, its very early in the season. As a regular fan, I have no knowledge of the drafting process and etc., but as a fan, it seems more logical to draft for need (but Hinkie drafted the best possible player) in this situation, whom is an athletic PG who can playmake with a proven track record of professional league play, especially when they just traded their mediocre starting PG for a pick. But we'll see how this Sixers experiment is gonna play out, to me its one of the more interesting storylines in the NBA.


Hinkie is just trying to draft assets, so he probably put higher value on a 7 footer who can score at will vs. a big athletic combo guard. His plan is to just collect higher value assets that he can turn into a franchise player one way or another. Personally I was not a fan of Okafor and was glad the Lakers passed on him, but I knew he'd be good right away. Russell is far from a sure thing, but he has a higher ceiling (and higher floor) and a game that is more in line with where the game is trending if he pans out. It always said a lot to me that Okafor's biggest comp going into the draft was Al Jefferson, who is a consistent 20 ppg big man, but who also has been passed around like a groupie throughout his NBA career from team to team. The league in it's current state just doesn't seem to value his skill set.
 
I'm watching the Kings vs Lakers from Oct 30 now and I like what I see of Kings and Rondo.

That said, wow are we playing bad. Is it normal I should be frustrated at Kobe Bryant? Sometimes it seems like he doesn't care much.

I like Clarkson's shots.

Yeah it's pretty normal to be frustrated with Kobe right now. He's basically trying to get his numbers at the expense of his team (being doing this since last year really). It's really sad seeing how detrimental it is to his team.

On a separate note....I have this silly criteria on determining which players I like which is "if I were playing in the NBA, would I enjoy playing with them?" It's totally a personal preference thing but players that fall favorably here are essentially players like Steve Nash, Ricky Rubio, Tim Duncan, Shaq, the current Warriors squad, etc... whereas the ones I'd absolutely be miserable playing with would be Kobe/AI/Melo/Corey Maggette/Al Jefferson/Chris Kaman/Steve Francis/Stephon Marbury/Russell Westbrook..
 

Kave_Man

come in my shame circle
Yeah it's pretty normal to be frustrated with Kobe right now. He's basically trying to get his numbers at the expense of his team (being doing this since last year really). It's really sad seeing how detrimental it is to his team.

On a separate note....I have this silly criteria on determining which players I like which is "if I were playing in the NBA, would I enjoy playing with them?" It's totally a personal preference thing but players that fall favorably here are essentially players like Steve Nash, Ricky Rubio, Tim Duncan, Shaq, the current Warriors squad, etc... whereas the ones I'd absolutely be miserable playing with would be Kobe/AI/Melo/Corey Maggette/Al Jefferson/Chris Kaman/Steve Francis/Stephon Marbury/Russell Westbrook..

I'm curious why Westbrook on that list?

Looking it over it's a pretty solid list tho on both sides. Only exceptions for me would be Kobe and Russ. I'd love being a part of them doing their thing.
 
I'm curious why Westbrook on that list?

Looking it over it's a pretty solid list tho on both sides. Only exceptions for me would be Kobe and Russ. I'd love being a part of them doing their thing.

If I were playing, the last thing I'd want to do is go stand in a corner while players like Kobe and Russ pound away the possession and play hero ball. At least Westbrook is making better decisions thus far this season...so my opinion of him in this case might change.
 
Even though I've loved Kobe for years, I am kind of enjoying his humbling this season so far. The guy just refuses to adapt his game to his current skills/team needs.

Personally I love it. For better or worse Kobe is who he is because he was stubborn as fuck and did everything his way. What better way to go out? What's the point of "adapting" his game when he's old, broken and playing on a garbage team? Keep shootin', Kob.
 

DMczaf

Member
Personally I love it. For better or worse Kobe is who he is because he was stubborn as fuck and did everything his way. What better way to go out? What's the point of "adapting" his game when he's old, broken and playing on a garbage team? Keep shootin', Kob.

Last game of the season is either gonna look like the ending of Unforgiven or Training Day
 
Last game of the season is either gonna look like the ending of Unforgiven or Training Day

I was thinking more like
tumblr_npaw5arAZw1sh95fzo1_500.gif

Mitch gonna send in the goons like Sosa
 
What makes the Lakers deserving of a 8th seed over the other teams that would otherwise be fighting for it such as the Utah Jazz? What makes them more deserving of sympathy of any other team who would fight for that spot?

The answer is, nothing. No team is deserving of a playoff spot or sympathy. It's all about talent. The 8 most talented teams deserve to make the playoffs in each conference.

I agree with this. It's just that the amount of sadistic pleasure people get over the Lakers suffering is way different than how people feel about some team like the Jazz or the Phoenix Suns. I don't have to take this type of shit and neither does my team. Fuck that.
 
I agree with this. It's just that the amount of sadistic pleasure people get over the Lakers suffering is way different than how people feel about some team like the Jazz or the Phoenix Suns. I don't have to take this type of shit and neither does my team. Fuck that.

I think you're taking this stuff too seriously man. The Lakers being trash is fun for everyone, let us hope that it lasts forever.
 

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
I agree with this. It's just that the amount of sadistic pleasure people get over the Lakers suffering is way different than how people feel about some team like the Jazz or the Phoenix Suns. I don't have to take this type of shit and neither does my team. Fuck that.

I'm getting "you don't know what it's like being a Yankees fan in California" vibes here.
 
I think you're taking this stuff too seriously man. The Lakers being trash is fun for everyone, let us hope that it lasts forever.

Ya See? Everyone enjoys it!

Oh well, I seriously just ignore it and just focus on the team getting better, and ignore all the attempts at feeling the suffering. I refuse to validate your schadenfreude with negative self-thinking, like Epictetus!


I'm getting "you don't know what it's like being a Yankees fan in California" vibes here.

?

On another note, I played basketball for almost two and a half hours today. I was on fire, or at least that's what some guy told me (dude hit like 8 three pointers in a row at one point, too.)
 
I'm enjoying the Lakers slide into mediocrity as well. But I also know that the last time the franchise missed consecutive playoffs prior to this last season was in the mid 70's (so chances are the Lakers will be good again shortly). I mean shit..most of the time in franchise history, your team is competing for championships (Good franchises historically are happy being in the playoffs more often than not). No other franchise can say that.
 
I thoroughly enjoy the idea of a Lakers fan not appreciating that other people like to see his team fail. It's as if you haven't realized that this happens to every big market team.
 

Cheebo

Banned
What fans of ANY awful team be it the Lakers or anyone else needs to remember the that the entire point of the lottery system is to ensure that the bad teams have the opportunity to become great.

The Bulls sucked then drafted Jordan.

More recently Golden State sucked then they drafted Steph, Klay, & Draymond.

As Philly fans love to say "trust the process". Because it's true. Just hope your GM is smart enough to draft well.
 
What fans of ANY awful team be it the Lakers or anyone else needs to remember the that the entire point of the lottery system is to ensure that the bad teams have the opportunity to become great.

The Bulls sucked then drafted Jordan.

More recently Golden State sucked then they drafted Steph, Klay, & Draymond.

As Philly fans love to say "trust the process". Because it's true. Just hope your GM is smart enough to draft well.

Yup, and most of those teams suck for multiple years. The Warriors were trash for 3-4 more years after getting Curry, which is why they were able to add more pieces like Klay and Harrison Barnes. The Thunder are a model franchise now, but they had to be terrible for 3 years to get KD, Westbrook and Harden.
 

Pachimari

Member
Is there anywhere were I can read about the drafting system?
I know 0% of how transfers work.

Can't players refuse, and negotiate with other teams? And what is this lottery, will teams get random players?

I really would like to read up on this.
 

Fjordson

Member
Draft is a bit of a crap shoot, though. The list of top 10 picks that never amounted to much in the league is a pretty long one. And obviously good scouting helps avoid that, but even players that look like sure things can end up busts.

Is there anywhere were I can read about the drafting system?
I know 0% of how transfers work.

Can't players refuse, and negotiate with other teams? And what is this lottery, will teams get random players?

I really would like to read up on this.
I don't believe players can refuse, but I could be wrong. And the lottery is for the draft order, not the players selected. Once the order is set, teams draft who they want.

Basically the worse you do, the more ping pong balls for your team get thrown into this machine. So the worst team in the league will have the highest chance of getting the number one pick. Then every year there's literally a machine they fire up that mixes all the balls up and one by one they determine who gets the top picks.
 
Is there anywhere were I can read about the drafting system?
I know 0% of how transfers work.

Can't players refuse, and negotiate with other teams? And what is this lottery, will teams get random players?

I really would like to read up on this.

Here's a decent article on how the lottery works. http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2015/5/19/8598525/nba-draft-lottery-odds-teams-players

Essentially the worse you do in the previous season the better chance you have at the top pick in the draft. Players can't negotiate with other teams, so assuming they want to play in the NBA they have to sign with the team that drafted them.
 
Draft is a bit of a crap shoot, though. And you need decent scouting. The list of top 10 picks that never amounted to much in the league is a pretty long.

This true too. I mean, everyone praises Daryl Morey (and with reason) for nailing the precursor to the Sixers' "trust the process" blueprint, but where would he and the Rockets be if OKC doesn't panic and trade James Harden for 50 cents on the dollar? A little luck and a break here and there are necessary.
 

Cheebo

Banned
Is there anywhere were I can read about the drafting system?
I know 0% of how transfers work.

Can't players refuse, and negotiate with other teams? And what is this lottery, will teams get random players?

I really would like to read up on this.

This is how the lottery works. Only the teams that do not make the playoffs are eligible for the lottery (so 14 teams, since 16 teams make the playoffs):
• Fourteen ping pong balls numbered 1-14 are placed in a standard
lottery machine.
• Four balls are drawn at random to determine the winner of each
of the top three picks in the Draft. The order of the numbers drawn
are not important, 1-2-3-4 is considered to be the same as 3-4-2-1.
• Each team in the lottery is assigned a certain amount of fournumber
combinations.
• The team with the worst record will get 250 out of 1,000 number combinations available. The team with the best record in the lottery has only five combinations.
• Only the top three picks are drawn via the lottery. The remaining
picks are decided by reverse order of finish.

After this method is used to pick 1-3 the rest of the picks are in order of worst regular season record to best (including the teams that made the playoffs).

There are 2 rounds. The same order from the first round is used in the second round. So 60 players get chosen (since there are 30 teams so 30 picks per a round).

Players do not get a say in where they end up if they sign up to be eligible for the draft (which all prospective NBA players do). It's sort of like a military draft in that way. When a team drafts you that is your team. Doesn't matter if you hate the team or didn't want to end up there. If players had a say they would refuse the bad teams and hope the good teams pick them up instead, so once a team picks you then your fate is up to that team.

Teams however can trade their draft picks to other teams.
 
More recently Golden State sucked then they drafted Steph, Klay, & Draymond.

I feel like drafting Steph was just half the battle with him. I truly believe that had we not changed ownership, there's a good chance, Steph would've been out of the league as a tragic what if player. It's almost downright criminal how the FO and coaching staff under previous owner, Chris Cohan bungled Curry development. They had him play with Monta in the backcourt, totally mishandled his ankle issues by rushing him back (he played 74 games that season despite going in and out because of the injury) and Coach Keith Smart even at one point benched him in favor of Acie Law. Contrast that with Lacob and Guber..shutting down Curry to let him properly rehab, bringing in proper coaching, consistently hiring the best player development staff and investing in technology to monitor player fatigue (Warriors maybe lucky with health last season but they certainly did their due diligence to prevent injury). I think lost in the shuffle of drafting the next star or paying top dollar for the big ticket free agent, we consistently downplay the importance the team plays by actually investing in star player development.

When I think about this, I can't help but wonder about the NBA prospects that just landed in the wrong situation to facilitate their proper growth and ended being busts largely because of it.
 

Fjordson

Member
This true too. I mean, everyone praises Daryl Morey (and with reason) for nailing the precursor to the Sixers' "trust the process" blueprint, but where would he and the Rockets be if OKC doesn't panic and trade James Harden for 50 cents on the dollar? A little luck and a break here and there are necessary.
Yep. As a Warriors fan I think back to the Warriors drafting Curry. It's crazy seeing a few of the picks before him (Johnny Flynn lol) but who knew Curry would become so great.

You can say that about a lot of sports.
Oh definitely. Unless you're like the Yankees or Real Madrid and can brute force it financially, success in a sport requires a decent amount of luck.
 
I'm enjoying the Lakers slide into mediocrity as well. But I also know that the last time the franchise missed consecutive playoffs prior to this last season was in the mid 70's (so chances are the Lakers will be good again shortly). I mean shit..most of the time in franchise history, your team is competing for championships (Good franchises historically are happy being in the playoffs more often than not). No other franchise can say that.

Yeah, that's a good point. It's why I try to be supportive of all other franchises, honestly.

Oh well, I'm an Arizona Cardinals fan...do you know they've been around for almost 120 years and have only won SIX play off games? I mean, wow that's bad.
 

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
Oh definitely. Unless you're like the Yankees or Real Madrid and can brute force it financially, success in a sport requires a decent amount of luck.

And even then hugh financial backing doesn't necessarily guarantee a title.

See the Yankees and Dodgers for the last several years.
 

AcridMeat

Banned
Love the start the Warrirors are on. Barnes stuffing Howard was sweet. Gully is absolutely right that the new owners are the key to the franchise's success. Thinking about all of the bust picks we had over the years, my god. You're probably right that one or two could have been something more if they had the staff the team has now.

Did I read that right that Kobe shot 16 of 51? I can't wait for his retirement, to the elation of his teammates, only for the announcement of his immediate hiring as head coach. Oldbe will tank the team to oblivion the likes of which haven't been seen since Isiah Thomas with the Knicks.
 
Top Bottom